Audit 316211

FY End
2023-12-31
Total Expended
$881,570
Findings
4
Programs
2
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-07-30
Auditor: Denman CPA LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
479620 2023-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
479621 2023-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
1056062 2023-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P
1056063 2023-002 Significant Deficiency Yes P

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $750,081 Yes 1
10.760 Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities $131,489 - 1

Contacts

Name Title Type
W7DKDJ5AVHQ4 Matt Mahler Auditee
6417927011 David Peirce Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Note A Basis of presentation Accounting Policies: NOTE B SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Expenditures reported in the schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following, as applicable, either the cost principles in OMB Circular A-87, Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian Tribal Governments, or the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. The Association is not eligible to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Association is not eligible to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (schedule) includes the federal award activity of the Association under programs of the federal government for the year ended December 31, 2023. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Association, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, change in net assets, or cash flows of the Association.

Finding Details

Segregation of duties Prior year finding number: 2022-001 Criteria: Segregation of duties should be in place to ensure appropriate checks and balances and to mitigate incompatible duties being performed by one individual over key financial and compliance functions. Condition: The Association does not maintain sufficient segregation of duties to prevent one individual from having control over the disbursements process, as one individual performs posting of disbursements, preparation of checks, and general ledger reconciliation. Cause: The Association does not have sufficient staffing to ensure multiple individuals are involved in all significant accounting controls and transaction cycles. Effect: One individual may have complete control over certain transactions without adequate checks and balances or reviews being implemented. Recommendation: Resolving the deficiency may require the Association to hire additional personnel necessary to adequately separate accounting responsibilities. This solution may result in a substantial increase in operating costs. The other action would be to accept that by definition there is a significant deficiency in internal control and the cost of eliminating that deficiency may exceed the benefit. Management should continue to provide adequate oversight of these functions if unable to cost effectively segregate duties further. Management’s response: The Association has implemented controls to help mitigate the segregation of duties issue noted. The CEO reviews and approves all invoices prior to payment. The Association provides a list of disbursements to the Board of Directors monthly as well as a completed set of financial statements. Management, including the Board of Directors, continues to have discussions regarding cost effective methods to obtain additional controls, including potential new staff and realignment of duties, however, at this time, the Association has determined that the cost of eliminating this deficiency would exceed its benefit. Conclusion: Response accepted.
Segregation of duties Prior year finding number: 2022-001 Criteria: Segregation of duties should be in place to ensure appropriate checks and balances and to mitigate incompatible duties being performed by one individual over key financial and compliance functions. Condition: The Association does not maintain sufficient segregation of duties to prevent one individual from having control over the disbursements process, as one individual performs posting of disbursements, preparation of checks, and general ledger reconciliation. Cause: The Association does not have sufficient staffing to ensure multiple individuals are involved in all significant accounting controls and transaction cycles. Effect: One individual may have complete control over certain transactions without adequate checks and balances or reviews being implemented. Recommendation: Resolving the deficiency may require the Association to hire additional personnel necessary to adequately separate accounting responsibilities. This solution may result in a substantial increase in operating costs. The other action would be to accept that by definition there is a significant deficiency in internal control and the cost of eliminating that deficiency may exceed the benefit. Management should continue to provide adequate oversight of these functions if unable to cost effectively segregate duties further. Management’s response: The Association has implemented controls to help mitigate the segregation of duties issue noted. The CEO reviews and approves all invoices prior to payment. The Association provides a list of disbursements to the Board of Directors monthly as well as a completed set of financial statements. Management, including the Board of Directors, continues to have discussions regarding cost effective methods to obtain additional controls, including potential new staff and realignment of duties, however, at this time, the Association has determined that the cost of eliminating this deficiency would exceed its benefit. Conclusion: Response accepted.
Segregation of duties Prior year finding number: 2022-001 Criteria: Segregation of duties should be in place to ensure appropriate checks and balances and to mitigate incompatible duties being performed by one individual over key financial and compliance functions. Condition: The Association does not maintain sufficient segregation of duties to prevent one individual from having control over the disbursements process, as one individual performs posting of disbursements, preparation of checks, and general ledger reconciliation. Cause: The Association does not have sufficient staffing to ensure multiple individuals are involved in all significant accounting controls and transaction cycles. Effect: One individual may have complete control over certain transactions without adequate checks and balances or reviews being implemented. Recommendation: Resolving the deficiency may require the Association to hire additional personnel necessary to adequately separate accounting responsibilities. This solution may result in a substantial increase in operating costs. The other action would be to accept that by definition there is a significant deficiency in internal control and the cost of eliminating that deficiency may exceed the benefit. Management should continue to provide adequate oversight of these functions if unable to cost effectively segregate duties further. Management’s response: The Association has implemented controls to help mitigate the segregation of duties issue noted. The CEO reviews and approves all invoices prior to payment. The Association provides a list of disbursements to the Board of Directors monthly as well as a completed set of financial statements. Management, including the Board of Directors, continues to have discussions regarding cost effective methods to obtain additional controls, including potential new staff and realignment of duties, however, at this time, the Association has determined that the cost of eliminating this deficiency would exceed its benefit. Conclusion: Response accepted.
Segregation of duties Prior year finding number: 2022-001 Criteria: Segregation of duties should be in place to ensure appropriate checks and balances and to mitigate incompatible duties being performed by one individual over key financial and compliance functions. Condition: The Association does not maintain sufficient segregation of duties to prevent one individual from having control over the disbursements process, as one individual performs posting of disbursements, preparation of checks, and general ledger reconciliation. Cause: The Association does not have sufficient staffing to ensure multiple individuals are involved in all significant accounting controls and transaction cycles. Effect: One individual may have complete control over certain transactions without adequate checks and balances or reviews being implemented. Recommendation: Resolving the deficiency may require the Association to hire additional personnel necessary to adequately separate accounting responsibilities. This solution may result in a substantial increase in operating costs. The other action would be to accept that by definition there is a significant deficiency in internal control and the cost of eliminating that deficiency may exceed the benefit. Management should continue to provide adequate oversight of these functions if unable to cost effectively segregate duties further. Management’s response: The Association has implemented controls to help mitigate the segregation of duties issue noted. The CEO reviews and approves all invoices prior to payment. The Association provides a list of disbursements to the Board of Directors monthly as well as a completed set of financial statements. Management, including the Board of Directors, continues to have discussions regarding cost effective methods to obtain additional controls, including potential new staff and realignment of duties, however, at this time, the Association has determined that the cost of eliminating this deficiency would exceed its benefit. Conclusion: Response accepted.