Audit 315804

FY End
2023-12-31
Total Expended
$1.98M
Findings
4
Programs
5
Organization: Borough of East Rutherford (NJ)
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-07-24

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
479245 2023-001 - Yes I
479246 2023-002 - - I
1055687 2023-001 - Yes I
1055688 2023-002 - - I

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $1.01M Yes 1
16.922 Equitable Sharing Program $775,250 Yes 1
20.205 Highway Planning and Construction $91,907 - 0
14.218 Community Development Block Grants/entitlement Grants $90,245 - 0
20.616 National Priority Safety Programs $15,750 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
G4HGF3842J21 Anthony Bianchi Auditee
2019333444 Robert Van Sweden Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: The financial statements of the Borough of East Rutherford are prepared and presented by the Borough on the basis of the financial accounting and reporting principles and practices that demonstrate compliance with the regulatory basis of accounting and budget laws prescribed by the Division of Local Government Service, Department of Community Affairs, State of New Jersey, which is a basis of accounting other than accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), to meet the requirements of the State of New Jersey for municipal government entities. The effect on financial statements of the variances between the regulatory accounting practices and GAAP, although not reasonably determinable, are presumed to be material. The basis of the financial reporting provisions of the Division are described in Note 1 of the financial statements. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: N/A

Finding Details

2023-001 Procurement Grantor: U.S. Department of Treasury/U.S. Department of Justice Award Name: Equitable Sharing Program (“ESP”) Award Year: 01/01/23 – 12/31/23 CFDA Numbers: 21.016 / 16.922 Criteria OMB Uniform Guidance §200.318 – 200.319, states that the non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procedures confirm to applicable Federal law and standards and that all procurement transactions be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition. Condition During our procurement testing procedures, we selected 33 items purchased with ESP funds and reviewed the vendor activity report along with the purchase orders to ensure proper procurement procedures were followed. Through our testing, we identified one vendor being used for police vehicle equipment, which, in aggregate, exceeded the bid threshold. The purchases were made without the use of public bidding or through a State contract purchasing program. Cause The Borough utilized a vendor which stated its pricing was competitive and/or less than that of the State contract agency. The Borough did not request supporting documents to support the competitive pricing claims made by the vendor. Effect The Borough made purchases in excess of the bid threshold without the use of competitive bidding or through a State contract purchasing program. Questioned Costs The purchases made from the vendor totaled $65,418.17. Recommendation That expenditures be monitored for compliance with the Local Public Contracts Law. Management’s View and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included under separate cover and filed with the State of New Jersey.
2023-002 Procurement Grantor: U.S. Department of Treasury Award Name: Coronavirus State and local Fiscal Recovery Funds (“SLFRF”) Award Year: 01/01/23 – 12/31/23 CFDA Numbers: 21.027 Criteria OMB Uniform Guidance §200.318 – 200.319, states that the non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procedures confirm to applicable Federal law and standards and that all procurement transactions be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition. Condition During our procurement testing procedures, we selected 3 items purchased with SLFRF funds and reviewed the vendor activity report along with the purchase orders to ensure proper procurement procedures were followed. Through our testing, we identified one vendor being used for fire department equipment, which, in aggregate, exceeded the bid threshold. The purchases were made without the use of public bidding or through a State contract purchasing program. Cause The Borough utilized a vendor without competitive bidding and/or through a State contract agency. Effect The Borough made purchases in excess of the bid threshold without the use of competitive bidding or through a State contract purchasing program. Questioned Costs The purchases made from the vendor totaled $52,308.15. Recommendation That expenditures be monitored for compliance with the Local Public Contracts Law. Management’s View and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included under separate cover and filed with the State of New Jersey.
2023-001 Procurement Grantor: U.S. Department of Treasury/U.S. Department of Justice Award Name: Equitable Sharing Program (“ESP”) Award Year: 01/01/23 – 12/31/23 CFDA Numbers: 21.016 / 16.922 Criteria OMB Uniform Guidance §200.318 – 200.319, states that the non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procedures confirm to applicable Federal law and standards and that all procurement transactions be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition. Condition During our procurement testing procedures, we selected 33 items purchased with ESP funds and reviewed the vendor activity report along with the purchase orders to ensure proper procurement procedures were followed. Through our testing, we identified one vendor being used for police vehicle equipment, which, in aggregate, exceeded the bid threshold. The purchases were made without the use of public bidding or through a State contract purchasing program. Cause The Borough utilized a vendor which stated its pricing was competitive and/or less than that of the State contract agency. The Borough did not request supporting documents to support the competitive pricing claims made by the vendor. Effect The Borough made purchases in excess of the bid threshold without the use of competitive bidding or through a State contract purchasing program. Questioned Costs The purchases made from the vendor totaled $65,418.17. Recommendation That expenditures be monitored for compliance with the Local Public Contracts Law. Management’s View and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included under separate cover and filed with the State of New Jersey.
2023-002 Procurement Grantor: U.S. Department of Treasury Award Name: Coronavirus State and local Fiscal Recovery Funds (“SLFRF”) Award Year: 01/01/23 – 12/31/23 CFDA Numbers: 21.027 Criteria OMB Uniform Guidance §200.318 – 200.319, states that the non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State, local and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procedures confirm to applicable Federal law and standards and that all procurement transactions be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition. Condition During our procurement testing procedures, we selected 3 items purchased with SLFRF funds and reviewed the vendor activity report along with the purchase orders to ensure proper procurement procedures were followed. Through our testing, we identified one vendor being used for fire department equipment, which, in aggregate, exceeded the bid threshold. The purchases were made without the use of public bidding or through a State contract purchasing program. Cause The Borough utilized a vendor without competitive bidding and/or through a State contract agency. Effect The Borough made purchases in excess of the bid threshold without the use of competitive bidding or through a State contract purchasing program. Questioned Costs The purchases made from the vendor totaled $52,308.15. Recommendation That expenditures be monitored for compliance with the Local Public Contracts Law. Management’s View and Corrective Action Plan Management’s views and corrective action plan is included under separate cover and filed with the State of New Jersey.