Audit 315577

FY End
2023-12-31
Total Expended
$827,888
Findings
2
Programs
1
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-07-22

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
479057 2023-001 Material Weakness - I
1055499 2023-001 Material Weakness - I

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $827,888 Yes 1

Contacts

Name Title Type
XQ4NJMLTMS41 Emily Johnson Auditee
8012257263 Matthew Geddes Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: NOTE A - BASIS FOR PRESENTATION Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting as described in Note 1 to the District’s basic financial statements. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The District has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of North Fork Special Service District (the District) under programs of the federal government for the year ended December 31, 2023. The information in the Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the District, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in financial position, or cash flows of the District.
Title: NOTE B - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting as described in Note 1 to the District’s basic financial statements. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The District has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting as described in Note 1 to the District’s basic financial statements. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement.
Title: NOTE C - SUBRECIPIENTS OF FEDERAL AWARDS Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting as described in Note 1 to the District’s basic financial statements. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The District has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The District did not provide federal award funding to any subrecipients during the year ended December 31, 2023.

Finding Details

U.S. Department of Treasury passed through Utah Governor’s Office of Economic Opportunity 2023-001 - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Program Name of Federal Program (ALN Number): Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recover Funds (21.027) Criteria: Recipients of federal awards must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR section 200.317 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State laws and regulations, provided that the procedures conform to applicable Federal law and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Recipients “must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price” 2 CFR section 200.318(i). The District’s procurement procedures include the requirement to maintain sufficient documentation of the history of procurement. The District also has procedures to identify procurement transactions requiring competitive bids or proposals. Context and Condition: We selected two contracts to test for compliance with procurementstandards. Records for one contract lacked documentation sufficient to detail procurement history. Cause: The District did not follow its documentation policy for obtaining contracts or bids. Effect: A potential failure to conduct procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition exists. Questioned Costs: No costs were questionable Repeat finding: No Statistically valid: Yes Recommendation: We recommend the District ensure it 1) maintains documentation of the history of procurement and 2) monitors compliance with documentation requirements. Views of responsible officials: The District will review its procurement policies and internal controls and ensure timely action is taken when noncompliance is identified.
U.S. Department of Treasury passed through Utah Governor’s Office of Economic Opportunity 2023-001 - Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Program Name of Federal Program (ALN Number): Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recover Funds (21.027) Criteria: Recipients of federal awards must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR section 200.317 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable State laws and regulations, provided that the procedures conform to applicable Federal law and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Recipients “must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price” 2 CFR section 200.318(i). The District’s procurement procedures include the requirement to maintain sufficient documentation of the history of procurement. The District also has procedures to identify procurement transactions requiring competitive bids or proposals. Context and Condition: We selected two contracts to test for compliance with procurementstandards. Records for one contract lacked documentation sufficient to detail procurement history. Cause: The District did not follow its documentation policy for obtaining contracts or bids. Effect: A potential failure to conduct procurement transactions in a manner providing full and open competition exists. Questioned Costs: No costs were questionable Repeat finding: No Statistically valid: Yes Recommendation: We recommend the District ensure it 1) maintains documentation of the history of procurement and 2) monitors compliance with documentation requirements. Views of responsible officials: The District will review its procurement policies and internal controls and ensure timely action is taken when noncompliance is identified.