Audit 315495

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$961,853
Findings
4
Programs
2
Organization: Harvest Against Hunger (WA)
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-07-19

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
478873 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - AB
478874 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - AB
1055315 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - AB
1055316 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - AB

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
94.013 Volunteers in Service to America $44,882 - 0
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $37,446 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
ZGMKMF1Q71Y9 David Bobanick Auditee
2062360408 Bryce Rassilyer Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: BASIS OF PRESENTATION Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance for all awards. Under these principles, certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Organization did not use the 10% de-minimus indirect cost rate. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of the organization under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2023. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the organization, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the organization.

Finding Details

Type of Finding: "• Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance" Criteria or specific requirement: Per §200.303, non-Federal entities must "establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards." Additionally, non-Federal entities must charge salaries and wages "based on records that accurately reflect the work performed" (§200.430(i)). Condition: Harvest Against Hunger allocates costs to the program based on the available funding and number of employees working on the project. They do not use the timesheet to record the operating hours for the program, but rather management makes a judgmental decision based on their understanding of program operations during the payroll period. Questioned costs: None Cause: The Organization lacks documentation supporting the allocation determination used to determine payroll amounts charged to the major program. Effect: Without proper documentation of the payroll allocation used, the Organization could charge time to a federal program that does not reflect true expenditures incurred by that program. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeated finding. Recommendation: The Organization should implement policies for consistently determining time allocation to the federal program, and ensure internal controls help to ensure this allocation is correct and consistently documented. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.
Type of Finding: "• Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance" Criteria or specific requirement: Per §200.303, non-Federal entities must "establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards." Additionally, non-Federal entities must charge salaries and wages "based on records that accurately reflect the work performed" (§200.430(i)). Condition: Harvest Against Hunger allocates costs to the program based on the available funding and number of employees working on the project. They do not use the timesheet to record the operating hours for the program, but rather management makes a judgmental decision based on their understanding of program operations during the payroll period. Questioned costs: None Cause: The Organization lacks documentation supporting the allocation determination used to determine payroll amounts charged to the major program. Effect: Without proper documentation of the payroll allocation used, the Organization could charge time to a federal program that does not reflect true expenditures incurred by that program. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeated finding. Recommendation: The Organization should implement policies for consistently determining time allocation to the federal program, and ensure internal controls help to ensure this allocation is correct and consistently documented. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.
Type of Finding: "• Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance" Criteria or specific requirement: Per §200.303, non-Federal entities must "establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards." Additionally, non-Federal entities must charge salaries and wages "based on records that accurately reflect the work performed" (§200.430(i)). Condition: Harvest Against Hunger allocates costs to the program based on the available funding and number of employees working on the project. They do not use the timesheet to record the operating hours for the program, but rather management makes a judgmental decision based on their understanding of program operations during the payroll period. Questioned costs: None Cause: The Organization lacks documentation supporting the allocation determination used to determine payroll amounts charged to the major program. Effect: Without proper documentation of the payroll allocation used, the Organization could charge time to a federal program that does not reflect true expenditures incurred by that program. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeated finding. Recommendation: The Organization should implement policies for consistently determining time allocation to the federal program, and ensure internal controls help to ensure this allocation is correct and consistently documented. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.
Type of Finding: "• Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance" Criteria or specific requirement: Per §200.303, non-Federal entities must "establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statues, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards." Additionally, non-Federal entities must charge salaries and wages "based on records that accurately reflect the work performed" (§200.430(i)). Condition: Harvest Against Hunger allocates costs to the program based on the available funding and number of employees working on the project. They do not use the timesheet to record the operating hours for the program, but rather management makes a judgmental decision based on their understanding of program operations during the payroll period. Questioned costs: None Cause: The Organization lacks documentation supporting the allocation determination used to determine payroll amounts charged to the major program. Effect: Without proper documentation of the payroll allocation used, the Organization could charge time to a federal program that does not reflect true expenditures incurred by that program. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeated finding. Recommendation: The Organization should implement policies for consistently determining time allocation to the federal program, and ensure internal controls help to ensure this allocation is correct and consistently documented. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.