Audit 314556

FY End
2023-12-31
Total Expended
$4.04M
Findings
2
Programs
3
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-07-08
Auditor: Uhy LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
477905 2023-001 - Yes E
1054347 2023-001 - Yes E

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
93.558 Temporary Assistance for Needy Families $3.34M Yes 1
93.575 Child Care and Development Block Grant $571,119 - 0
10.558 Child and Adult Care Food Program $129,974 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
MJLMUEG9UZW6 Jeff Cook Auditee
3147875100 Jody Lurk Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: NOTE 1 — BASIS OF PRESENTATION Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. No federal awards were expended in the form of noncash assistance. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The auditee used the de minimis cost rate. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal grant activity of Lutheran Family and Children’s Services of Missouri (the Agency) for the year ended December 31, 2023. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because this Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Agency, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets or cash flows of the Agency. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available.
Title: NOTE 2 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICES Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. No federal awards were expended in the form of noncash assistance. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The auditee used the de minimis cost rate. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. No federal awards were expended in the form of noncash assistance.
Title: NOTE 3 — INDIRECT COST RATE Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. No federal awards were expended in the form of noncash assistance. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The auditee used the de minimis cost rate. The Agency has elected to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance on the Alternatives to Abortion Program.

Finding Details

Finding No. 2023-001 – Alternative to Abortion Program – CFDA No. 93.558; Grant No. 1701MOTA Criteria and Condition: The Alternatives to Abortion program requires eligibility criteria including the client to be at or below 185 percent of federal poverty level based on the client or family income, must be a resident in a covered county, lack of involvement with other Alternative to Abortions providers, and the woman must be carrying an unborn child or children and chooses to carry the unborn child(ren) to term instead of having an abortion. Context: A test of 60 files revealed inadequate documentation surrounding the retention and verification of pregnancy, residency, lack of involvement with other Alternative to Abortions providers, and income level. The clients program eligibility must be determined upon entry into the program and documentation of eligibility must be retained. 2 of the 60 case files reviewed did not have proper documentation to support eligibility upon the entry into the program or retention of documentation after eligibility was determined. Cause: The case workers are required to verify the pregnancy, residency, lack of involvement with other Alternative to Abortions providers, and income level; however, they did not always maintain adequate documentation in the file at determination or retention after verification. Questioned Cost: $-0- Effect: The lack of documentation could lead to ineligible participants entering into or remaining in the program. Recommendation: We recommend management ensures all documentation is received and retained through strict following of the tracking checklist for newly eligible participants that documents the proof of pregnancy, income, residency, and lack of involvement with other Alternative to Abortions providers. Classification: Compliance finding and control deficiency in internal controls View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and the recommended procedures have been implemented. Supervisors will ensure that all client files have proof of eligibility during quarterly file reviews.
Finding No. 2023-001 – Alternative to Abortion Program – CFDA No. 93.558; Grant No. 1701MOTA Criteria and Condition: The Alternatives to Abortion program requires eligibility criteria including the client to be at or below 185 percent of federal poverty level based on the client or family income, must be a resident in a covered county, lack of involvement with other Alternative to Abortions providers, and the woman must be carrying an unborn child or children and chooses to carry the unborn child(ren) to term instead of having an abortion. Context: A test of 60 files revealed inadequate documentation surrounding the retention and verification of pregnancy, residency, lack of involvement with other Alternative to Abortions providers, and income level. The clients program eligibility must be determined upon entry into the program and documentation of eligibility must be retained. 2 of the 60 case files reviewed did not have proper documentation to support eligibility upon the entry into the program or retention of documentation after eligibility was determined. Cause: The case workers are required to verify the pregnancy, residency, lack of involvement with other Alternative to Abortions providers, and income level; however, they did not always maintain adequate documentation in the file at determination or retention after verification. Questioned Cost: $-0- Effect: The lack of documentation could lead to ineligible participants entering into or remaining in the program. Recommendation: We recommend management ensures all documentation is received and retained through strict following of the tracking checklist for newly eligible participants that documents the proof of pregnancy, income, residency, and lack of involvement with other Alternative to Abortions providers. Classification: Compliance finding and control deficiency in internal controls View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and the recommended procedures have been implemented. Supervisors will ensure that all client files have proof of eligibility during quarterly file reviews.