Audit 31392

FY End
2022-12-31
Total Expended
$1.36M
Findings
6
Programs
1
Organization: San Antonio Community Hospital (CA)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-09-27

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
28251 2022-001 Material Weakness Yes L
28252 2022-002 Material Weakness - A
28253 2022-003 Material Weakness - L
604693 2022-001 Material Weakness Yes L
604694 2022-002 Material Weakness - A
604695 2022-003 Material Weakness - L

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
93.498 Provider Relief Fund and American Rescue Plan Rural Distributions $1.36M Yes 3

Contacts

Name Title Type
XZ7NF2FHUM48 Teresa Vega Auditee
9099204887 Ey - Debbie Kohnle Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: 3. Nature of Activities Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of San Antonio Regional Hospital and Subsidiaries under programs of the federal government for the year ended December 31, 2022. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of San Antonio Regional Hospital and Subsidiaries, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, results of operations, changes in net assets, or cash flows of San Antonio Regional Hospital and Subsidiaries. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following, as applicable, the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, 45 CFR, PART 75 APPENDIX IX, Principles for Determining Costs Applicable to Research and Development Under Grants and Contracts With Hospitals, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Therefore, some amounts presented in the Schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the consolidated financial statements. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. San Antonio Regional Hospital and Subsidiaries receives various grants to cover costs of specified programs. Final determination of eligibility of costs will be made by the grantors. Should any costs be found ineligible, San Antonio Regional Hospital will be responsible for reimbursing the grantors for these amounts. Additionally, expenditures incurred for various programs may exceed the amounts awarded from the respective pass-through entity or agency. The amounts reported on the Schedule are limited to the award amounts. Amounts in excess of this amount are paid out of non-federal sources.

Finding Details

Identification of the federal program: Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Assistance Listing No.: 93.498 COVID-19 Provider Relief Fund (PRF) and American Rescue Plan (ARP) Rural Distribution Award Period of Performance: January 1, 2020 ? December 31, 2022 Criteria or Specific Requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: ?The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).? Condition: Per discussion with management, San Antonio Regional Hospital (the Hospital) has processes and internal controls in place to ensure lost revenues submitted in the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Portal were allowable under the terms and conditions of the award. These internal controls include ensuring the completeness and accuracy of the lost revenue calculation. However, management did not consistently retain documentation to evidence the performance of these controls. Cause: Management did not retain documentation evidencing the performance of this control. Effect or potential effect: The Hospital did not consistently retain documentation to evidence the performance of internal controls over the lost revenue calculation submitted to HRSA, which could lead to noncompliance. Questioned Costs: None. Context: During our testing over the PRF program, we observed that management did not retain evidence of controls surrounding the lost revenue calculation during January 1, 2020 ? December 31, 2022. Total federal expenditures for Assistance Listing No. 93.498 totaled $1,360,603 for the year ended December 31, 2022. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: The finding is a repeat finding of 2021-001. Recommendation: The Hospital should refine its process and retain documentation to evidence management?s review of the lost revenue calculation submitted to HRSA. View of Responsible Officials: The Hospital agrees with the finding and will implement procedures to ensure control documentation is retained.
Identification of the federal program: Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Assistance Listing No.: 93.498 COVID-19 Provider Relief Fund (PRF) and American Rescue Plan (ARP) Rural Distribution Award Period of Performance: January 1, 2020 ? December 31, 2022 Criteria or Specific Requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: ?The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).? The terms and conditions of the award requires the following: ? The recipient certified that the payment will only be used to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus, and that the payment shall reimburse the recipient only for health care related expenses or lost revenues that are attributable to coronavirus. ? The recipient certifies that it will not use the payment to reimburse expenses or losses that have been reimbursed from other sources or that other sources are obligated to reimburse. ? The recipient shall submit reports as the secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) determines are needed to ensure compliance with conditions that are imposed on the payment, and such reports shall be in such form, with such content, as specified by the secretary of HHS in future program instructions directed to all recipients. Condition: Per discussion with management, the Company has processes and internal controls over compliance with the terms and conditions of the award; however, management did not retain documentation evidencing the performance of these controls. Cause: Due to turnover, management did not retain documentation evidencing the performance of controls. Effect or potential effect: The Hospital did not consistently retain documentation to evidence the performance of internal controls over compliance with the terms and conditions of the award. Questioned Costs: None. Context: During our testing over the PRF program, we observed that management did not retain evidence of controls surrounding compliance with terms and conditions of the award. Total federal expenditures for Assistance Listing No. 93.498 totaled $1,360,603 for the year ended December 31, 2022. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: The finding is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: Management should refine its process and retain documentation evidencing that management reviewed compliance with the terms and conditions of the award. View of Responsible Officials: The Hospital agrees with the finding and will implement procedures to ensure control documentation is retained.
Identification of the federal program: Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Assistance Listing No.: 93.498 COVID-19 Provider Relief Fund (PRF) and American Rescue Plan (ARP) Rural Distribution Award Period of Performance: January 1, 2020 ? December 31, 2022 Criteria or specific requirement (Including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Section 200.303 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) states the following regarding internal control: ?The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).? Providers who received one or more PRF or ARP payments greater than $10,000 in the aggregate were required to report on the use of the funds to the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) Reporting Portal. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) requires the nonfederal entity to report lost revenues in order to support that funding received has been appropriately earned. HHS provided specific guidance in the June 11, 2021 Post-Payment Notice on how to complete the required reporting of lost revenues in the HRSA Reporting Portal. Under this guidance, recipients may choose to apply PRF and ARP payments towards lost revenues using one of the following options: ? Option i ? Up to the amount of the difference between actual patient care revenue ? Option ii ? Up to the amount of the difference between budgeted and actual patient care revenue, if the budget was established and approved prior to March 27, 2020 ? Option iii ? Up to the amount calculated by any reasonable method of estimating revenue Condition: The Hospital?s reporting submissions did not follow the published HRSA guidance related to the reporting of lost revenues. Cause: Internal controls over the review of the method used to report lost revenues in the HRSA reports were not designed with the level of precision necessary to identify submissions that were not compliant with HRSA reporting guidance. Effect or potential effect: Noncompliance with HRSA reporting guidance could result in the submission of incorrect lost revenues to the HRSA Reporting Portal. Questioned costs: None. Context: We inspected lost revenues reported for the Phase 4 PRF submission to HHS using Option ii, whereby the lost revenues reported should be up to the amount of the difference between budgeted and actual patient care revenue, if the budget was established and approved prior to March 27, 2020. However, we determined that the calculation used to report lost revenues was based on the 2022 budget, which was not approved prior to March 27, 2020. Total federal expenditures for Assistance Listing No. 93.498 totaled $1,360,603 for the year ended December 31, 2022. Identification as a repeat finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: HRSA does not allow reporting entities to amend a previously submitted report after the reporting period has passed. If any future PRF submissions are required, the Hospital should select Option iii for the calculation of lost revenues if a budget approved prior to March 27, 2020 does not exist. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees that the 2022 budget was not approved prior to March 27, 2020, but concluded that the method used is supportable under Option iii. Furthermore, management asserts the amount of lost revenues submitted would not change regardless of the Option selected to calculate lost revenues.
Identification of the federal program: Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Assistance Listing No.: 93.498 COVID-19 Provider Relief Fund (PRF) and American Rescue Plan (ARP) Rural Distribution Award Period of Performance: January 1, 2020 ? December 31, 2022 Criteria or Specific Requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: ?The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).? Condition: Per discussion with management, San Antonio Regional Hospital (the Hospital) has processes and internal controls in place to ensure lost revenues submitted in the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Portal were allowable under the terms and conditions of the award. These internal controls include ensuring the completeness and accuracy of the lost revenue calculation. However, management did not consistently retain documentation to evidence the performance of these controls. Cause: Management did not retain documentation evidencing the performance of this control. Effect or potential effect: The Hospital did not consistently retain documentation to evidence the performance of internal controls over the lost revenue calculation submitted to HRSA, which could lead to noncompliance. Questioned Costs: None. Context: During our testing over the PRF program, we observed that management did not retain evidence of controls surrounding the lost revenue calculation during January 1, 2020 ? December 31, 2022. Total federal expenditures for Assistance Listing No. 93.498 totaled $1,360,603 for the year ended December 31, 2022. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: The finding is a repeat finding of 2021-001. Recommendation: The Hospital should refine its process and retain documentation to evidence management?s review of the lost revenue calculation submitted to HRSA. View of Responsible Officials: The Hospital agrees with the finding and will implement procedures to ensure control documentation is retained.
Identification of the federal program: Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Assistance Listing No.: 93.498 COVID-19 Provider Relief Fund (PRF) and American Rescue Plan (ARP) Rural Distribution Award Period of Performance: January 1, 2020 ? December 31, 2022 Criteria or Specific Requirement (including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance states the following regarding internal control: ?The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).? The terms and conditions of the award requires the following: ? The recipient certified that the payment will only be used to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus, and that the payment shall reimburse the recipient only for health care related expenses or lost revenues that are attributable to coronavirus. ? The recipient certifies that it will not use the payment to reimburse expenses or losses that have been reimbursed from other sources or that other sources are obligated to reimburse. ? The recipient shall submit reports as the secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) determines are needed to ensure compliance with conditions that are imposed on the payment, and such reports shall be in such form, with such content, as specified by the secretary of HHS in future program instructions directed to all recipients. Condition: Per discussion with management, the Company has processes and internal controls over compliance with the terms and conditions of the award; however, management did not retain documentation evidencing the performance of these controls. Cause: Due to turnover, management did not retain documentation evidencing the performance of controls. Effect or potential effect: The Hospital did not consistently retain documentation to evidence the performance of internal controls over compliance with the terms and conditions of the award. Questioned Costs: None. Context: During our testing over the PRF program, we observed that management did not retain evidence of controls surrounding compliance with terms and conditions of the award. Total federal expenditures for Assistance Listing No. 93.498 totaled $1,360,603 for the year ended December 31, 2022. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: The finding is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: Management should refine its process and retain documentation evidencing that management reviewed compliance with the terms and conditions of the award. View of Responsible Officials: The Hospital agrees with the finding and will implement procedures to ensure control documentation is retained.
Identification of the federal program: Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Assistance Listing No.: 93.498 COVID-19 Provider Relief Fund (PRF) and American Rescue Plan (ARP) Rural Distribution Award Period of Performance: January 1, 2020 ? December 31, 2022 Criteria or specific requirement (Including statutory, regulatory or other citation): Section 200.303 of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) states the following regarding internal control: ?The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).? Providers who received one or more PRF or ARP payments greater than $10,000 in the aggregate were required to report on the use of the funds to the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) Reporting Portal. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) requires the nonfederal entity to report lost revenues in order to support that funding received has been appropriately earned. HHS provided specific guidance in the June 11, 2021 Post-Payment Notice on how to complete the required reporting of lost revenues in the HRSA Reporting Portal. Under this guidance, recipients may choose to apply PRF and ARP payments towards lost revenues using one of the following options: ? Option i ? Up to the amount of the difference between actual patient care revenue ? Option ii ? Up to the amount of the difference between budgeted and actual patient care revenue, if the budget was established and approved prior to March 27, 2020 ? Option iii ? Up to the amount calculated by any reasonable method of estimating revenue Condition: The Hospital?s reporting submissions did not follow the published HRSA guidance related to the reporting of lost revenues. Cause: Internal controls over the review of the method used to report lost revenues in the HRSA reports were not designed with the level of precision necessary to identify submissions that were not compliant with HRSA reporting guidance. Effect or potential effect: Noncompliance with HRSA reporting guidance could result in the submission of incorrect lost revenues to the HRSA Reporting Portal. Questioned costs: None. Context: We inspected lost revenues reported for the Phase 4 PRF submission to HHS using Option ii, whereby the lost revenues reported should be up to the amount of the difference between budgeted and actual patient care revenue, if the budget was established and approved prior to March 27, 2020. However, we determined that the calculation used to report lost revenues was based on the 2022 budget, which was not approved prior to March 27, 2020. Total federal expenditures for Assistance Listing No. 93.498 totaled $1,360,603 for the year ended December 31, 2022. Identification as a repeat finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: HRSA does not allow reporting entities to amend a previously submitted report after the reporting period has passed. If any future PRF submissions are required, the Hospital should select Option iii for the calculation of lost revenues if a budget approved prior to March 27, 2020 does not exist. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees that the 2022 budget was not approved prior to March 27, 2020, but concluded that the method used is supportable under Option iii. Furthermore, management asserts the amount of lost revenues submitted would not change regardless of the Option selected to calculate lost revenues.