Audit 313326

FY End
2022-09-30
Total Expended
$490.14M
Findings
2
Programs
69
Organization: City of Long Beach (CA)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-06-29
Auditor: Kpmg LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
449756 2022-001 Material Weakness - E
1026198 2022-001 Material Weakness - E

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $109.73M - 0
20.106 Covid-19 Airport Improvement Program $13.63M Yes 0
93.323 Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (elc) $10.86M - 0
14.231 Covid-19 Emergency Solutions Grant Program $5.89M - 0
10.557 Wic Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children $4.35M - 0
21.GSA_MIGRATION Covid-19 Emergency Rental Assistance Program $3.30M Yes 0
14.218 Community Development Block Grants/entitlement Grants $2.83M - 0
14.267 Continuum of Care Program $2.31M - 0
14.GSA_MIGRATION Covid-19 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $1.87M - 0
20.205 Highway Planning and Construction (federal-Aid Highway Program) $1.73M - 0
93.391 Activities to Support State, Tribal, Local and Territorial (stlt) Health Department Response to Public Health Or Healthcare Crises $1.67M - 0
21.GSA_MIGRATION Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $1.57M Yes 0
66.GSA_MIGRATION Diesel Emission Reduction Act (dera) National Grants $1.50M - 0
21.GSA_MIGRATION Covid-19 Coronavirus Relief Fund $1.37M - 0
11.307 Economic Adjustment Assistance $1.18M - 0
14.900 Lead-Based Pain Hazard Control in Privately-Owned Housing $1.12M - 0
93.917 Hiv Care Formula Grants $1.00M - 0
93.GSA_MIGRATION Public Health Emergency Preparedness $933,089 - 0
93.GSA_MIGRATION Healthy Marriage Promotion and Responsible Fatherhood Grants $904,354 - 0
14.218 Covid-19 Community Development Block Grants/entitlement Grants $901,313 - 0
14.241 Housing Opportunities for Persons with Aids (hopwa) $890,133 - 0
97.GSA_MIGRATION Port Security Grant Program $867,408 - 0
93.354 Public Health Emergency Response: Cooperative Agreement for Emergency Response: Public Health Crisis Response $748,023 - 0
10.561 State Administrative Matching Grants for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program $674,841 - 0
11.307 Covid-19 Economic Adjustment Assistance $467,503 - 0
20.106 Airport Improvement Program $431,950 Yes 0
93.268 Immunization Cooperative Agreements $410,672 Yes 0
15.514 Reclamation States Emergency Drought Relief El Dorado Duck Pond $389,024 - 0
93.197 Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Projects_state and Local Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention and Surveillance of Blood Lead Levels in Children $374,661 - 0
16.320 Services for Trafficking Victims $260,309 - 0
14.896 Family Self-Sufficiency Program $220,510 - 0
14.239 Home Investment Partnerships Program $218,720 Yes 0
93.914 Hiv Emergency Relief Project Grants $208,485 - 0
10.559 Summer Food Service Program for Children $207,264 - 0
16.GSA_MIGRATION Covid-19 Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding Program $194,920 - 0
16.738 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program $189,542 - 0
17.278 Covid-19 Wioa Dislocated Worker Formula Grants $188,891 Yes 0
93.994 Maternal and Child Health Services Block Grant to the States $188,385 - 0
14.231 Emergency Solutions Grant Program $174,601 - 0
20.616 National Priority Safety Programs $158,925 - 0
17.258 Wioa Adult Program $154,911 Yes 0
16.560 National Institute of Justice Research, Evaluation, and Development Project Grants $139,882 - 0
21.GSA_MIGRATION Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $138,910 Yes 0
20.600 State and Community Highway Safety $131,774 - 0
93.977 Sexually Transmitted Diseases (std) Prevention and Control Grants $125,647 - 0
15.506 Water Desalination Research and Development Program $98,854 - 0
93.GSA_MIGRATION Environmental Public Health and Emergency Response $94,740 - 0
93.558 Temporary Assistance for Needy Families $88,272 - 0
15.530 Water Conservation Field Services (wcfs) $85,931 - 0
17.259 Wioa Youth Activities $78,630 Yes 0
97.GSA_MIGRATION Emergency Management Performance Grants $77,817 - 0
93.354 Covid-19 Public Health Emergency Response: Cooperative Agreement for Emergency Response: Public Health Crisis Response $76,708 - 0
14.905 Lead Hazard Reduction Demonstration Grant Program $73,702 - 0
17.277 Covid-19 Wioa National Dislocated Worker Grants / Wia National Emergency Grants $64,512 - 0
15.504 Title Xvi Water Reclamation and Reuse Alamitos Tank 19 & 20 Conversion $60,045 - 0
16.825 Smart Prosecution Initiative $47,961 - 0
93.116 Project Grants and Cooperative Agreements for Tuberculosis Control Programs $45,180 - 0
15.514 Reclamation States Emergency Drought Relief Alamitos 9a & 14 $41,571 - 0
93.778 Medical Assistance Program (medicaid, Title Xix) $39,186 - 0
97.106 Securing the Cities Program $35,778 - 0
17.278 Wioa Dislocated Worker Formula Grants $28,578 Yes 0
66.472 Beach Monitoring and Notification Program Implementation Grants $21,406 - 0
97.GSA_MIGRATION Homeland Security Grant Program $16,275 - 0
93.940 Hiv Prevention Activities_health Department Based $8,253 - 0
16.742 Paul Coverdell Forensic Sciences Improvement Grant Program $3,773 - 0
15.504 Title Xvi Water Reclamation and Reuse El Dorado Duck Pond $3,418 - 0
97.GSA_MIGRATION Covid-19 Emergency Management Performance Grants $2,480 - 0
16.838 Comprehensive Opioid, Stimulant, and Substance Abuse Program $2,391 - 0
16.753 Congressionally Recommended Awards $1,303 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
RXK8HCFVLS49 Stefannie Kodrat Auditee
5625707172 Brianne Wiese Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Community-Based Loan Programs with Continuing Compliance Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. These items are reported as negative amounts within the Schedule and represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reports as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The City did not elect to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate as discussed in the Uniform Guidance Section 200.414. For the sponsored programs where the City claims indirect costs, the City's internal indirect cost rate is used. The City considers loans advanced to eligible participants for the Community Development Block/Grant Entitlement Grants (CDBG) and the Home Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) to have continuing compliance requirements. As such, the amounts reported in the accompanying Schedule for the CDBG and HOME programs include current years disbursements as well as the balance of the beginning of the year of loans with continuing compliance requirements. As of September 30, 2022, the balance of loans with continuing compliance requirements for the HOME program was $78,124,634.As of September 30, 2022, the balance of the outstanding loans with continuing compliance requirements for the CDBG programs was $6,446,540.
Title: General Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. These items are reported as negative amounts within the Schedule and represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reports as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The City did not elect to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate as discussed in the Uniform Guidance Section 200.414. For the sponsored programs where the City claims indirect costs, the City's internal indirect cost rate is used. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) presents the activity of all federal financial assistance programs of the City of Long Beach, California (the City). All federal financial assistance received directly from federal agencies, as well as federal financial assistance passed through to the City by other government agencies, has been included in the accompanying Schedule. The Schedule did not include federal expenditures of $35,195,575 for the year ended June 30, 2022 of the Long Beach Transportation Company (the Company), a discretely presented component unit of the City, as the Company engaged other auditors to perform audits in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. The Citys reporting entity is defined in note 1 to the Citys basic financial statements.
Title: Food Instruments/Vouchers Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. These items are reported as negative amounts within the Schedule and represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reports as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The City did not elect to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate as discussed in the Uniform Guidance Section 200.414. For the sponsored programs where the City claims indirect costs, the City's internal indirect cost rate is used. Food instruments/vouchers expenditures represent the estimate value of the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children food instruments distributed during the year as communicated by the State of California Department of Health Services. The food instruments/vouchers totaled $12,460,602 but do not represent cash expenditures in the Citys basic financial statements for the year ended September 30, 2022.
Title: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. These items are reported as negative amounts within the Schedule and represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reports as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The City did not elect to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate as discussed in the Uniform Guidance Section 200.414. For the sponsored programs where the City claims indirect costs, the City's internal indirect cost rate is used. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years.

Finding Details

Finding 2022-001 ? EligibilityFederal Program: Home Investment Partnership Program (HOME)ALN Number: 14.239Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentFederal Award Year: 2018Grant number: M-18-MC-06-0518Pass-Through Entity: NoneCriteria24 CFR92.252 Qualification as affordable housing: Rental housing.(e) Periods of affordability. The HOME-assisted units must meet the affordability requirements for not lessthan the applicable period specified in the following table, beginning after project completion.(1) The affordability requirements:(i) Apply without regard to the term of any loan or mortgage, repayment of the HOME investment,or the transfer of ownership;(ii) Must be imposed by a deed restriction, a covenant running with the land, an agreementrestricting the use of the property, or other mechanisms approved by HUD and must give theparticipating jurisdiction the right to require specific performance (except that the participatingjurisdiction may provide that the affordability restrictions may terminate upon foreclosure ortransfer in lieu of foreclosure); and(iii) Must be recorded in accordance with State recordation laws.(2) The participating jurisdiction may use purchase options, rights of first refusal or other preemptiverights to purchase the housing before foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure in order to preserveaffordability.(3) The affordability restrictions shall be revived according to the original terms if, during the originalaffordability period, the owner of record before the foreclosure, or deed in lieu of foreclosure, or anyentity that includes the former owner or those with whom the former owner has or had family orbusiness ties, obtains an ownership interest in the project or property.(4) The termination of the restrictions on the project does not terminate the participating jurisdiction?srepayment obligation under ? 92.503(b).Minimum periodof affordabilityRental housing activity in yearsRehabilitation or acquisition of existing housing per unit amount ofHOME funds: Under $15,000 515,000 to $40,000 10Over $40,000 or rehabilitation involving refinancing 15New construction or acquisition of newly constructed housing 20(h) Tenant income. The income of each tenant must be determined initially in accordance with ?92.203(a)(1)(i). In addition, each year during the period of affordability the project owner mustre-examine each tenant?s annual income in accordance with one of the options in ? 92.203 selected bythe participating jurisdiction.24 CFR92.203 Income determinations.(a) The HOME program has income targeting requirements for the HOME program and for HOMEprojects. Therefore, the participating jurisdiction must determine each family is income eligible bydetermining the family?s annual income.(1) For families who are tenants in HOME-assisted housing and not receiving HOME tenant-basedrental assistance, the participating jurisdiction must initially determine annual income using themethod in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section. For subsequent income determinations during theperiod of affordability, the participating jurisdiction may use any one of the following methods inaccordance with ? 92.252(h):(ii) Obtain from the family a written statement of the amount of the family?s annual income andfamily size, along with a certification that the information is complete and accurate. Thecertification must state that the family will provide source documents upon request.Title 45 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 75 (45 CFR part 75), Uniform Administrative Requirements,Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for HHS Awards, section 75.303 also states that nonfederalentities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that providesreasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federalstatutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the federal award.Condition and ContextDuring our testwork over continuing eligibility requirements for loan recipients of the program, we noted thatthe City did not have sufficient controls in place for the program, nor were adequate records maintained toverify that the tenant income was verified during the period of affordability.Cause and EffectDuring the period under audit, the City experienced turnover with the staff members responsible forcontinuing compliance requirement monitoring. As a result of this turnover, the City was unable to providethe necessary documentation. City management was aware that documentation was not available prior tothe audit, however, management was not able to recreate all documentation necessary for the audit. As aresult, the City was unable to verify that the loans continued to meet the eligibility requirements during theperiod of affordability.Questioned CostsFifteen loans totaling $9,380,325 were identified as noncompliant. Our sample consisted of 25 loanbalances which represents 26% of the total loan balance. Ten loans in our sample totaling $9,056,580 weredetermined to be compliant.Isolated or SystemicSystematicWhether the sampling was a statistically valid sampleThis sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample.Repeat FindingNoRecommendationWe recommend that the City further refine the design of the internal controls that will ensure thatdocumentation is maintained in a location accessible to multiple employees and that all relevantdocumentation is retained when there is employee turnover.Management?s ResponseThe Development Services Department?s storage options for data changed rapidly during the quick shift toremote work during the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, there was a gap in understanding andcomprehension of data storage and capabilities, which resulted in the loss of documentation during staffturnover. The eligibility requirements and monitoring for HOME loan recipients were met and managementis working on securing all documentation that was lost. As of this writing, 13 of the 15 non-compliantsamples have been secured and communication has been sent to retrieve the remaining two from thedevelopers. Internal controls for documentation will be strengthened by filling two vacancies. Until thosevacancies are filled, a staff member has been reassigned to review monitoring files for the loan portfolio toensure that the monitoring files are saved locally in the Housing and Neighborhood Services Bureau?spermanent files, and maintained on computer servers as well as in the cloud. When the two vacancies arefilled, it will be the procedure to save backups of documents to local servers. Additionally, access to thesefiles will be granted to the Bureau?s management team and multiple monitoring staff to prevent the futureloss of data.
Finding 2022-001 ? EligibilityFederal Program: Home Investment Partnership Program (HOME)ALN Number: 14.239Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentFederal Award Year: 2018Grant number: M-18-MC-06-0518Pass-Through Entity: NoneCriteria24 CFR92.252 Qualification as affordable housing: Rental housing.(e) Periods of affordability. The HOME-assisted units must meet the affordability requirements for not lessthan the applicable period specified in the following table, beginning after project completion.(1) The affordability requirements:(i) Apply without regard to the term of any loan or mortgage, repayment of the HOME investment,or the transfer of ownership;(ii) Must be imposed by a deed restriction, a covenant running with the land, an agreementrestricting the use of the property, or other mechanisms approved by HUD and must give theparticipating jurisdiction the right to require specific performance (except that the participatingjurisdiction may provide that the affordability restrictions may terminate upon foreclosure ortransfer in lieu of foreclosure); and(iii) Must be recorded in accordance with State recordation laws.(2) The participating jurisdiction may use purchase options, rights of first refusal or other preemptiverights to purchase the housing before foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure in order to preserveaffordability.(3) The affordability restrictions shall be revived according to the original terms if, during the originalaffordability period, the owner of record before the foreclosure, or deed in lieu of foreclosure, or anyentity that includes the former owner or those with whom the former owner has or had family orbusiness ties, obtains an ownership interest in the project or property.(4) The termination of the restrictions on the project does not terminate the participating jurisdiction?srepayment obligation under ? 92.503(b).Minimum periodof affordabilityRental housing activity in yearsRehabilitation or acquisition of existing housing per unit amount ofHOME funds: Under $15,000 515,000 to $40,000 10Over $40,000 or rehabilitation involving refinancing 15New construction or acquisition of newly constructed housing 20(h) Tenant income. The income of each tenant must be determined initially in accordance with ?92.203(a)(1)(i). In addition, each year during the period of affordability the project owner mustre-examine each tenant?s annual income in accordance with one of the options in ? 92.203 selected bythe participating jurisdiction.24 CFR92.203 Income determinations.(a) The HOME program has income targeting requirements for the HOME program and for HOMEprojects. Therefore, the participating jurisdiction must determine each family is income eligible bydetermining the family?s annual income.(1) For families who are tenants in HOME-assisted housing and not receiving HOME tenant-basedrental assistance, the participating jurisdiction must initially determine annual income using themethod in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section. For subsequent income determinations during theperiod of affordability, the participating jurisdiction may use any one of the following methods inaccordance with ? 92.252(h):(ii) Obtain from the family a written statement of the amount of the family?s annual income andfamily size, along with a certification that the information is complete and accurate. Thecertification must state that the family will provide source documents upon request.Title 45 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 75 (45 CFR part 75), Uniform Administrative Requirements,Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for HHS Awards, section 75.303 also states that nonfederalentities must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that providesreasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federalstatutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the federal award.Condition and ContextDuring our testwork over continuing eligibility requirements for loan recipients of the program, we noted thatthe City did not have sufficient controls in place for the program, nor were adequate records maintained toverify that the tenant income was verified during the period of affordability.Cause and EffectDuring the period under audit, the City experienced turnover with the staff members responsible forcontinuing compliance requirement monitoring. As a result of this turnover, the City was unable to providethe necessary documentation. City management was aware that documentation was not available prior tothe audit, however, management was not able to recreate all documentation necessary for the audit. As aresult, the City was unable to verify that the loans continued to meet the eligibility requirements during theperiod of affordability.Questioned CostsFifteen loans totaling $9,380,325 were identified as noncompliant. Our sample consisted of 25 loanbalances which represents 26% of the total loan balance. Ten loans in our sample totaling $9,056,580 weredetermined to be compliant.Isolated or SystemicSystematicWhether the sampling was a statistically valid sampleThis sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample.Repeat FindingNoRecommendationWe recommend that the City further refine the design of the internal controls that will ensure thatdocumentation is maintained in a location accessible to multiple employees and that all relevantdocumentation is retained when there is employee turnover.Management?s ResponseThe Development Services Department?s storage options for data changed rapidly during the quick shift toremote work during the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, there was a gap in understanding andcomprehension of data storage and capabilities, which resulted in the loss of documentation during staffturnover. The eligibility requirements and monitoring for HOME loan recipients were met and managementis working on securing all documentation that was lost. As of this writing, 13 of the 15 non-compliantsamples have been secured and communication has been sent to retrieve the remaining two from thedevelopers. Internal controls for documentation will be strengthened by filling two vacancies. Until thosevacancies are filled, a staff member has been reassigned to review monitoring files for the loan portfolio toensure that the monitoring files are saved locally in the Housing and Neighborhood Services Bureau?spermanent files, and maintained on computer servers as well as in the cloud. When the two vacancies arefilled, it will be the procedure to save backups of documents to local servers. Additionally, access to thesefiles will be granted to the Bureau?s management team and multiple monitoring staff to prevent the futureloss of data.