Audit 312734

FY End
2022-12-31
Total Expended
$1.14M
Findings
2
Programs
4
Organization: Town of Argos (IN)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-09-20

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
443057 2022-003 Material Weakness - L
1019499 2022-003 Material Weakness - L

Contacts

Name Title Type
ENSKN2TJB3F9 Lisa Mullaney Auditee
5748925717 Beth Kelley, Cpa, Cfe Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting PoliciesA. Basis of PresentationThe accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) includes the federalgrant activity of the Town under programs of the federal government for the year endedDecember 31, 2022. The information in the SEFA is presented in accordance with therequirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform AdministrativeRequirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (UniformGuidance). Because the SEFA presents only a select portion of the operations of the Town,it is not intended to and does not present the financial position of the Town.B. Other Significant Accounting PoliciesExpenditures reported on the SEFA are reported on the cash basis of accounting. Suchexpenditures are recognized following, as applicable, either the cost principles in OMBCircular A-87, Cost Principles for State, Local, and Indian Tribal Governments, or the costprinciples contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are notallowed or are limited as to reimbursement. When federal grants are received on a reimbursementbasis, the federal awards are considered expended when the reimbursement isreceived. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate.

Finding Details

FINDING 2022-003Subject: Community Development Block Grants/State's programand Non-Entitlement Grants in Hawaii - ReportingFederal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentFederal Program: Community Development Block Grants/State's programand Non-Entitlement Grants in HawaiiAssistance Listings Number: 14.228Federal Award Number or Year (or Other Identifying Number): B20DC1180001Compliance Requirement: ReportingAudit Finding: Material WeaknessCondition and ContextThe Town had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls that would likelybe effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. Recipients are required to submitannually a report related to hiring opportunities and labor hours. This report is referred to as the Section 3Housing Report.The Town contracted with an outside company to oversee the administration of its CDBG grant.Although, the company compiled and submitted the required Section 3 Housing Report and the companyreviewed the reports with a Town employee prior to submission, the Town's review was not documentedand could not be verified.The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period.Criteria2 CFR 200.303 states in part:"The non-Federal entity must:(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that providesreasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliancewith Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federalaward. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards forInternal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of theUnited States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee ofSponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."CauseA proper system of internal controls over the semiannual reporting was not designed by managementof the Town to ensure complete and accurate reporting of information related to the CommunityDevelopment Block Grants/State's program and Non-Entitlement Grants in Hawaii award. Embeddedwithin a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consistingof policies and procedures. Policies reflect the Town's management statements of what should be done toeffect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies.EffectWithout the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internalcontrol system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance.Questioned CostsThere were no questioned costs identified.RecommendationWe recommended that management of the Town design and implement a proper system of internalcontrols, including strengthening its policies and procedures to ensure appropriate reviews, approvals, andoversight are taking place.Views of Responsible OfficialsFor the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.
FINDING 2022-003Subject: Community Development Block Grants/State's programand Non-Entitlement Grants in Hawaii - ReportingFederal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentFederal Program: Community Development Block Grants/State's programand Non-Entitlement Grants in HawaiiAssistance Listings Number: 14.228Federal Award Number or Year (or Other Identifying Number): B20DC1180001Compliance Requirement: ReportingAudit Finding: Material WeaknessCondition and ContextThe Town had not properly designed or implemented a system of internal controls that would likelybe effective in preventing, or detecting and correcting, noncompliance. Recipients are required to submitannually a report related to hiring opportunities and labor hours. This report is referred to as the Section 3Housing Report.The Town contracted with an outside company to oversee the administration of its CDBG grant.Although, the company compiled and submitted the required Section 3 Housing Report and the companyreviewed the reports with a Town employee prior to submission, the Town's review was not documentedand could not be verified.The lack of internal controls was a systemic issue throughout the audit period.Criteria2 CFR 200.303 states in part:"The non-Federal entity must:(a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that providesreasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliancewith Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federalaward. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in 'Standards forInternal Control in the Federal Government' issued by the Comptroller General of theUnited States or the 'Internal Control Integrated Framework', issued by the Committee ofSponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). . . ."CauseA proper system of internal controls over the semiannual reporting was not designed by managementof the Town to ensure complete and accurate reporting of information related to the CommunityDevelopment Block Grants/State's program and Non-Entitlement Grants in Hawaii award. Embeddedwithin a properly designed and implemented internal control system should be internal controls consistingof policies and procedures. Policies reflect the Town's management statements of what should be done toeffect internal controls, and procedures should consist of actions that would implement these policies.EffectWithout the proper implementation of an effectively designed system of internal controls, the internalcontrol system cannot be capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material noncompliance.Questioned CostsThere were no questioned costs identified.RecommendationWe recommended that management of the Town design and implement a proper system of internalcontrols, including strengthening its policies and procedures to ensure appropriate reviews, approvals, andoversight are taking place.Views of Responsible OfficialsFor the views of responsible officials, refer to the Corrective Action Plan that is part of this report.