Audit 312508

FY End
2022-09-30
Total Expended
$1.60M
Findings
4
Programs
2
Organization: Copa Health, Inc. (AZ)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-09-28
Auditor: Eide Bailly LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
442878 2022-002 Material Weakness - AB
442879 2022-003 Material Weakness - L
1019320 2022-002 Material Weakness - AB
1019321 2022-003 Material Weakness - L

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
93.498 Provider Relief Fund $1.50M Yes 2
14.218 Community Development Block Grants/entitlement Grants $101,811 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
R7YFQJMV9KZ9 Gladys Lopez Auditee
4809693800 Pamela Eggert Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. When applicable, such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. No federal financial assistance has been provided to a subrecipient. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. The accompanying consolidated schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the schedule) includes the federal award activity of Copa Health, Inc. and Affiliates (the Organization) under programs of the federal government for the year ended September 30, 2022. The information is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Organization, it is not intended to and does not present the consolidated financial position, consolidated changes in net assets, or consolidated cash flows of the Organization.
Title: Provider Relief Funds Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. When applicable, such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. No federal financial assistance has been provided to a subrecipient. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. The Organization received amounts from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) through the Provider Relief Fund (PRF) and American Rescue Plan (ARP) Rural Distribution program (Federal Financial Assistance Listing #93.498) in the amount of $1,972,879 the year ended September 30, 2022. The PRF expenditures are not recognized on the schedule until the expenditures are included in the reporting to HHS as required under the PRF program. The following summarizes the Provider Relief Funds and the timing of when the amounts were recognized in the consolidated financial statements.

Finding Details

Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the Organization is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award.Condition: The Organization?s final expenditure listing identified as eligible and claimed under the Provider Relief Fund program lacked documentation of its review by a separate individual outside of the preparer. The support for two out of 60 expenditures tested differed in amounts from the amount on the tracking spreadsheet. Three of the 60 invoices did not include evidence of approval for payment.Cause: The Organization did not have an internal control process in place to ensure the review and approval of eligible expenditures that were summarized from the underlying supporting spreadsheets to the final expenditure listing was documented or that amounts reported were correct. The summary spreadsheet was used to claim allowable costs under the federal program.Effect: There is a possibility that ineligible expenditures may be claimed under the program.Questioned Costs: None reported.Context: Summary level testing was performed over certain payroll related expenditures. In addition, a nonstatistical sample of 60 transactions totaling $511,234 out of $1,115,520 were detail tested. Net amounts differed from the support by $10.Repeat Finding from Prior Years: NoRecommendation: We recommend the Organization implement a control process which includes maintaining documentation of the review and approval of the summarized final expenditure listing used to claim the allowable costs under the federal program.Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the Organization is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award.Condition: The Organization?s special reports submitted to the Department of Health and Human Services were not reviewed and approved by a separate individual outside of the preparer.Cause: The Organization did not have an internal control process in place to ensure review and approval of the reports being submitted to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).Effect: There is a possibility that the reports may not be accurately completed.Questioned Costs: None reported.Context: Key line items were tested on the Period 2 and Period 3 special reports submitted to the Department of Health and Human Services. A total of 3 reports were tested, which the 3 reports all lacked appropriate approval.Repeat Finding from Prior Years: NoRecommendation: We recommend the Organization implement a control process which includes approval of required reports to be submitted to the federal agency.Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the Organization is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award.Condition: The Organization?s final expenditure listing identified as eligible and claimed under the Provider Relief Fund program lacked documentation of its review by a separate individual outside of the preparer. The support for two out of 60 expenditures tested differed in amounts from the amount on the tracking spreadsheet. Three of the 60 invoices did not include evidence of approval for payment.Cause: The Organization did not have an internal control process in place to ensure the review and approval of eligible expenditures that were summarized from the underlying supporting spreadsheets to the final expenditure listing was documented or that amounts reported were correct. The summary spreadsheet was used to claim allowable costs under the federal program.Effect: There is a possibility that ineligible expenditures may be claimed under the program.Questioned Costs: None reported.Context: Summary level testing was performed over certain payroll related expenditures. In addition, a nonstatistical sample of 60 transactions totaling $511,234 out of $1,115,520 were detail tested. Net amounts differed from the support by $10.Repeat Finding from Prior Years: NoRecommendation: We recommend the Organization implement a control process which includes maintaining documentation of the review and approval of the summarized final expenditure listing used to claim the allowable costs under the federal program.Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the Organization is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and conditions of the federal award.Condition: The Organization?s special reports submitted to the Department of Health and Human Services were not reviewed and approved by a separate individual outside of the preparer.Cause: The Organization did not have an internal control process in place to ensure review and approval of the reports being submitted to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).Effect: There is a possibility that the reports may not be accurately completed.Questioned Costs: None reported.Context: Key line items were tested on the Period 2 and Period 3 special reports submitted to the Department of Health and Human Services. A total of 3 reports were tested, which the 3 reports all lacked appropriate approval.Repeat Finding from Prior Years: NoRecommendation: We recommend the Organization implement a control process which includes approval of required reports to be submitted to the federal agency.Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.