Audit 31230

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$30.06M
Findings
0
Programs
59
Organization: City of Redding (CA)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-02-12
Auditor: The Pun Group

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

No findings recorded

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.871 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $9.77M - 0
20.205 Girvan Road Railroad Crossing Project $3.95M Yes 0
21.027 State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund $1.76M Yes 0
20.507 Federal Transitformula Grants $1.65M - 0
20.205 Churn Creek/maraglia Safety Improvements $1.37M Yes 0
20.507 Covid-19 - Federal Transitformula Grants (cares Act) $1.33M - 0
21.027 California Arrearage Payment Program $1.14M Yes 0
20.106 Reconstruct Terminal / Airport Loop Access Road (woodrum Circle) - Phase 2 $1.09M - 0
14.218 Covid-19 - Community Development Block Grant $608,457 - 0
20.106 Preliminary Design Concept Study for Rw 16-34, Rw 12-30, Taxiway Connectors, Magvar Imp. $475,124 - 0
20.106 Covid-19 - Cares Act Muni $465,279 - 0
20.106 Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations $422,713 - 0
20.505 Owp We 702.04 Sustainable Development Incentive Program $393,490 - 0
20.526 Bus and Bus Facilities Formula Program $393,477 - 0
14.239 Covid-19 - Emergency Solutions Grant Program $340,290 - 0
97.036 Disaster Grants - Public Assistance $331,048 - 0
14.228 Community Development Block Grant - States $323,087 - 0
14.879 Mainstream Vouchers $298,575 - 0
14.871 Emergency Housing Vouchers (ehv) $243,199 - 0
21.027 California Water and Wastewater Arrearage Payment Program $229,477 Yes 0
14.218 Community Development Block Grant $220,044 - 0
20.106 Airport Layout Plan Drawing Set Update $216,613 - 0
14.871 Covid-19 - Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers $137,709 - 0
14.239 Home Investment Partnership $120,106 - 0
20.205 Pedestrian Improvements on Bidwell and North Bonnyview Road $96,820 Yes 0
20.205 Enhanced Pedestrian Crossings $78,066 Yes 0
20.205 Fhbp Study 5068-39 Girvan / Olney $75,137 Yes 0
20.205 Hartnell Avenue Ped Improvements $72,702 Yes 0
20.106 Runway Pavement Preservation / Magvar (slurry Seal) Phase 1 $70,382 - 0
20.106 Airport Rescue Grant - American Rescue Plan Act (arp) $68,641 - 0
20.205 Downtown to Turtle Bay Non-Motorized Improvements $62,822 Yes 0
97.039 Hazard Mitigation Grant Program $60,805 - 0
16.922 Asset Seizure Program $58,267 - 0
20.205 Fhbp Study 5068-45 Old Alturas / Churn Creek $54,832 Yes 0
20.205 Victor/cypress Active Transportation Program $54,784 Yes 0
20.205 Shoulder Widening on Old Oregon Trail for Recovery Area and Bike Lanes $51,656 Yes 0
20.205 Fhbp Study 5068-35 Eastside / Canyon $49,278 Yes 0
20.205 Shasta Street Railroad Crossing Project $49,144 Yes 0
20.106 Airport Drainage Study $43,157 - 0
14.896 Fss Coordinator $39,240 - 0
20.205 Diestelhorst Bridge to Downtown Via Benton $38,996 Yes 0
97.067 Homeland Security Grant Program (hsgp) $31,500 - 0
20.205 Fhbp Study 5068-34 Sacramento / Olney $31,297 Yes 0
97.012 Small Water Craft Safety Program $30,619 - 0
16.034 Covid-19 - Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding Program $25,128 - 0
16.738 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant $24,968 - 0
20.205 Fhbp Study 5068-38 Westside / Canyon $17,746 Yes 0
20.608 Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (step) $14,990 - 0
20.205 Fhbp Study 5068-37 Canyon / Acid $14,225 Yes 0
20.106 Runway 16 Blast Pad Design/taxi $13,611 - 0
16.607 Bulletproof Vest Partnership Program 2019 $13,231 - 0
20.600 Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (step) $10,984 - 0
20.106 Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations - Benton $10,900 - 0
20.205 Intersection Old Oregon/oasis $9,487 Yes 0
16.607 Bulletproof Vest Partnership Program 2020 $8,400 - 0
20.205 Fhbp Study 5068-36 Eastside Olney $8,220 Yes 0
20.106 Terminal Loop Design $6,256 - 0
20.106 Covid-19 - Cares Act Benton $4,175 - 0
14.239 Covid-19 - Home Investment Partnership $1,856 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
XL3JUNNVFLL9 Tammy Mann Auditee
5302254311 Andrew Roth Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Note 4 Indirect Cost Rate Accounting Policies: Note 1 Reporting EntityThe financial reporting entity, as defined by the Governmental Accounting Standard Board (GASB), consists of the primary government, which is the City of Redding, California (the City), organizations for which the primary government is financially accountable, and other organizations for which the nature and significance of their relationship with the primary government are such that exclusion would cause the reporting entitys financial statements to be misleading or incomplete.Note 2 Basis of AccountingFunds received under the various grant programs have been recorded within the general fund, enterprise funds and special revenue funds of the City. The City utilizes the modified accrual method of accounting for the general fund and special revenue funds. The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (Schedule) is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Therefore, some amounts presented in the schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in, the preparation of the Citys basic financial statements. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years.Note 3 Schedule of Expenditures of Federal AwardsThe accompanying Schedule presents the activity of all federal financial assistance programs of the City. Federal financial assistance received directly from federal agencies as well as federal financial assistance passed through the State of California, County of Shasta, and Shasta Regional Transportation Agency is included in the Schedule. The Schedule was prepared from only the accounts of various grant programs and, therefore, does not present the financial position, change in fund balance, or results of operations of the City. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. The City has not elected to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance.