Audit 311212

FY End
2023-09-30
Total Expended
$1.37M
Findings
2
Programs
2
Organization: City of Satsuma (AL)
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-07-01

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
404822 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - I
981264 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - I

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
15.435 Gomesa $1.02M Yes 1
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $342,244 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
QB5XLM585EJ5 Jessica Jones Auditee
2516751440 Erin Jones Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the SEFA are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: N/A The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA) includes the federal award activity of the City of Satsuma, Alabama (the City) under programs of the federal government for the year ended September 30, 2023. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the SEFA presents only a selected portion of the operations of the City, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position, or cash flows of the City. Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in or used in the preparation of the basic financial statements.

Finding Details

Criteria: According to 2 CFR section 200.318(c) and 48 CFR sections 52.203-13 and 52.303-16, an entity should have written standards of conduct to cover conflicts of interest and govern the performance of its employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts. According to 2 CFR section 200.214, an entity is subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations. Condition: During our testing of federal award expenditures, it was noted that there were no formal written policies in place for standards of conducts covering conflict of interests for employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts nor to determine if a vendor is suspended or disbarred. Recommendation: The City should create policies and procedures for applicable requirements in order to comply with Federal regulations including procedures that cover conflicts of interest and govern the performance of its employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts and for procedures to determine whether vendors have been suspended or debarred prior to entering into contracts or purchase orders for all transactions and maintain documentation supporting this verification View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: 1. Develop Comprehensive Policies and Procedures:  Policy Development: Create policies that align with federal, state, and municipal regulations governing conflicts of interest and employee conduct in contract selection, award, and administration.  Conflicts of Interest Policy: Define clear guidelines and procedures for identifying, disclosing, managing, and mitigating conflicts of interest among employees involved in contracting activities.  Contract Administration Procedures: Establish detailed procedures that encompass the entire contract lifecycle, ensuring compliance with federal, state, and municipal requirements at every stage.  Training and Awareness: Conduct training sessions for employees involved in contracting to ensure understanding and adherence to the newly developed policies, procedures and current bid law regulations set forth by the State of Alabama. 2. Implement Procedures for Vendor Evaluation and Debarment Checks:  Vendor Evaluation Process: Develop standardized procedures for evaluating vendors before entering into contracts, including criteria for assessing qualifications, capabilities, and compliance with regulatory requirements.  Debarment Check Procedure: Establish a systematic procedure to verify whether potential vendors have been suspended or debarred by federal, state, or municipal authorities prior to initiating contract negotiations.  Documentation Requirements: Specify the documentation that must be collected and maintained to demonstrate compliance with vendor evaluation and debarment check procedures. 3. Maintain Comprehensive Documentation:  Document Retention Policy: Create a policy outlining requirements for retaining all documentation related to contracts, including vendor evaluations, debarment checks, contract awards, modifications, and performance records.  Centralized Documentation Management: Implement a centralized system or repository for storing and managing contract-related documentation, ensuring accessibility, security, and compliance with retention policies.  Audit Trail: Maintain a clear audit trail for all contract-related activities, documenting decisionmaking processes and actions taken to ensure accountability and compliance. 4. Monitoring and Compliance Oversight:  Monitoring Mechanisms: Establish mechanisms for ongoing monitoring of compliance with federal, state, and municipal regulations, as well as internal policies related to conflicts of interest, contract administration, and vendor debarment checks.  Regular Audits: Conduct regular audits of contract management practices and documentation to identify any deviations from established procedures and regulatory requirements.  Reporting and Accountability: Implement a reporting structure that provides regular updates to management and stakeholders on compliance status, audit findings, and corrective actions taken to address deficiencies. 5. Continuous Improvement and Adaptation:  Feedback and Review: Encourage feedback from employees involved in contract management to identify opportunities for improving policies, procedures, and compliance practices.  Benchmarking: Benchmark contract management practices against industry standards, best practices, and regulatory changes to continuously enhance processes and ensure alignment with evolving requirements.  Adaptation to Changes: Stay informed about updates and changes in federal, state, and municipal regulations impacting conflicts of interest, contract administration, and vendor management, and update policies and procedures accordingly.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR section 200.318(c) and 48 CFR sections 52.203-13 and 52.303-16, an entity should have written standards of conduct to cover conflicts of interest and govern the performance of its employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts. According to 2 CFR section 200.214, an entity is subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations. Condition: During our testing of federal award expenditures, it was noted that there were no formal written policies in place for standards of conducts covering conflict of interests for employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts nor to determine if a vendor is suspended or disbarred. Recommendation: The City should create policies and procedures for applicable requirements in order to comply with Federal regulations including procedures that cover conflicts of interest and govern the performance of its employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts and for procedures to determine whether vendors have been suspended or debarred prior to entering into contracts or purchase orders for all transactions and maintain documentation supporting this verification View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: 1. Develop Comprehensive Policies and Procedures:  Policy Development: Create policies that align with federal, state, and municipal regulations governing conflicts of interest and employee conduct in contract selection, award, and administration.  Conflicts of Interest Policy: Define clear guidelines and procedures for identifying, disclosing, managing, and mitigating conflicts of interest among employees involved in contracting activities.  Contract Administration Procedures: Establish detailed procedures that encompass the entire contract lifecycle, ensuring compliance with federal, state, and municipal requirements at every stage.  Training and Awareness: Conduct training sessions for employees involved in contracting to ensure understanding and adherence to the newly developed policies, procedures and current bid law regulations set forth by the State of Alabama. 2. Implement Procedures for Vendor Evaluation and Debarment Checks:  Vendor Evaluation Process: Develop standardized procedures for evaluating vendors before entering into contracts, including criteria for assessing qualifications, capabilities, and compliance with regulatory requirements.  Debarment Check Procedure: Establish a systematic procedure to verify whether potential vendors have been suspended or debarred by federal, state, or municipal authorities prior to initiating contract negotiations.  Documentation Requirements: Specify the documentation that must be collected and maintained to demonstrate compliance with vendor evaluation and debarment check procedures. 3. Maintain Comprehensive Documentation:  Document Retention Policy: Create a policy outlining requirements for retaining all documentation related to contracts, including vendor evaluations, debarment checks, contract awards, modifications, and performance records.  Centralized Documentation Management: Implement a centralized system or repository for storing and managing contract-related documentation, ensuring accessibility, security, and compliance with retention policies.  Audit Trail: Maintain a clear audit trail for all contract-related activities, documenting decisionmaking processes and actions taken to ensure accountability and compliance. 4. Monitoring and Compliance Oversight:  Monitoring Mechanisms: Establish mechanisms for ongoing monitoring of compliance with federal, state, and municipal regulations, as well as internal policies related to conflicts of interest, contract administration, and vendor debarment checks.  Regular Audits: Conduct regular audits of contract management practices and documentation to identify any deviations from established procedures and regulatory requirements.  Reporting and Accountability: Implement a reporting structure that provides regular updates to management and stakeholders on compliance status, audit findings, and corrective actions taken to address deficiencies. 5. Continuous Improvement and Adaptation:  Feedback and Review: Encourage feedback from employees involved in contract management to identify opportunities for improving policies, procedures, and compliance practices.  Benchmarking: Benchmark contract management practices against industry standards, best practices, and regulatory changes to continuously enhance processes and ensure alignment with evolving requirements.  Adaptation to Changes: Stay informed about updates and changes in federal, state, and municipal regulations impacting conflicts of interest, contract administration, and vendor management, and update policies and procedures accordingly.