Audit 311173

FY End
2023-09-30
Total Expended
$27.39M
Findings
4
Programs
6
Organization: American Soybean Association (MO)
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-07-01
Auditor: Uhy LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
404771 2023-001 - - G
404772 2023-002 - - F
981213 2023-001 - - G
981214 2023-002 - - F

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
10.600 Foreign Market Development Cooperator Program $9.67M Yes 2
10.601 Market Access Program $8.80M - 0
10.618 Agricultural Trade Promotion Program $5.24M Yes 0
10.606 Food for Progress $3.14M - 0
10.603 Emerging Markets Program $213,553 - 0
10.960 Technical Agricultural Assistance $67,530 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
ZP21VWG6FLL8 Brian Vaught Auditee
3149744701 Susan Maher Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: none Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. No federal awards were expended in the form of noncash assistance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: ASA has a NICRA agreement. The United States Department of the Interior has approved a maximum provisional indirect cost rate of 20.05%. The Association recovers indirect costs at the maximum rate of 20.05% under federal programs that allow full indirect cost reimbursement, and recovers indirect costs at varying rates below 20.05% on other federal programs that do not allow full indirect cost recovery. Total indirect costs recovered under all federal programs were $111,201 for the year ended September 30, 2023. none

Finding Details

Criteria and Condition: The Foreign Market Development Cooperator Program requires matching contributions equal to 185% of project expenditures. These contributions must include expenditures that have been incurred and are allowable under 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E (CostPrinciples). Context: A test of the 2023 project contribution amounts for program year 2022 revealed that the contribution amount was being calculated by USSEC through an allocation rate of all program expenditures funded with non-federal revenue sources. These expenditures include unallowable costs under 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E that are required to be excluded from the calculation of the total project contribution amount. Cause: Expenditures used to meet the matching requirement were not reviewed to determine if costs were allowable under 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E. Questioned Cost: $-0- No questioned costs are reported as the Association has demonstrated allowable matching costs were incurred in excess of the requirement. Effect: Project expenditures that are unallowable are included within the matching contribution rate. Recommendation: We recommend that USSEC management reviews each expense included within the matching contribution total to verify that they have been incurred and are allowable under 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E. Classification: Compliance finding and control deficiency in internal controls. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: USSEC will review expenses included in the Contribution Report more closely to ensure they are allowable under 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E. For the report being submitted in June 2024 for program year 2023, all expenses related to meals, travel-related meals, and group meals at events will be removed. Food and beverages, including alcoholic beverages will not be included in the 2023 EOY Report.
Criteria and Condition: The Foreign Market Development Cooperator Program requires equipment records shall be maintained, a physical inventory of equipment shall be taken at least once every two years and reconciled to the equipment records, an appropriate control system shall be used to safeguard equipment, and equipment shall be adequately maintained. Context: A nonstatistical test of the 7 equipment and real property selections revealed that the 3 were not properly reconciled to the equipment records during the semiannual inventory counts at a USSEC international office location. These 3 selections were recorded twice on the equipment listing. The errors in the listing was an error in maintaining proper records and did not include duplicate funds being received for the equipment purchase. Cause: The physical inventory of equipment properly occurred twice during 2023, but the individual performing the physical inventory did not do so with diligence, resulting in the equipment records not being properly reconciled with the results of the physical inventory. Questioned Cost: $-0- Effect: The effectiveness of the physical inventory of equipment relies on the individual performing the count. The lack of a diligent and accurate reconciliation of equipment during a physical inventory can result in inaccurate equipment records. Recommendation: We recommend that USSEC management provides stronger oversite of the physical inventories and equipment reconciliations that occur at remote office locations to ensure individuals performing the counts are doing so with diligence. Classification: Compliance finding and control deficiency in internal controls. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: USSEC will ensure stronger oversight of fixed asset inventories and reconciliation processes.
Criteria and Condition: The Foreign Market Development Cooperator Program requires matching contributions equal to 185% of project expenditures. These contributions must include expenditures that have been incurred and are allowable under 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E (CostPrinciples). Context: A test of the 2023 project contribution amounts for program year 2022 revealed that the contribution amount was being calculated by USSEC through an allocation rate of all program expenditures funded with non-federal revenue sources. These expenditures include unallowable costs under 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E that are required to be excluded from the calculation of the total project contribution amount. Cause: Expenditures used to meet the matching requirement were not reviewed to determine if costs were allowable under 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E. Questioned Cost: $-0- No questioned costs are reported as the Association has demonstrated allowable matching costs were incurred in excess of the requirement. Effect: Project expenditures that are unallowable are included within the matching contribution rate. Recommendation: We recommend that USSEC management reviews each expense included within the matching contribution total to verify that they have been incurred and are allowable under 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E. Classification: Compliance finding and control deficiency in internal controls. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: USSEC will review expenses included in the Contribution Report more closely to ensure they are allowable under 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E. For the report being submitted in June 2024 for program year 2023, all expenses related to meals, travel-related meals, and group meals at events will be removed. Food and beverages, including alcoholic beverages will not be included in the 2023 EOY Report.
Criteria and Condition: The Foreign Market Development Cooperator Program requires equipment records shall be maintained, a physical inventory of equipment shall be taken at least once every two years and reconciled to the equipment records, an appropriate control system shall be used to safeguard equipment, and equipment shall be adequately maintained. Context: A nonstatistical test of the 7 equipment and real property selections revealed that the 3 were not properly reconciled to the equipment records during the semiannual inventory counts at a USSEC international office location. These 3 selections were recorded twice on the equipment listing. The errors in the listing was an error in maintaining proper records and did not include duplicate funds being received for the equipment purchase. Cause: The physical inventory of equipment properly occurred twice during 2023, but the individual performing the physical inventory did not do so with diligence, resulting in the equipment records not being properly reconciled with the results of the physical inventory. Questioned Cost: $-0- Effect: The effectiveness of the physical inventory of equipment relies on the individual performing the count. The lack of a diligent and accurate reconciliation of equipment during a physical inventory can result in inaccurate equipment records. Recommendation: We recommend that USSEC management provides stronger oversite of the physical inventories and equipment reconciliations that occur at remote office locations to ensure individuals performing the counts are doing so with diligence. Classification: Compliance finding and control deficiency in internal controls. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: USSEC will ensure stronger oversight of fixed asset inventories and reconciliation processes.