Audit 310764

FY End
2022-09-30
Total Expended
$825,051
Findings
2
Programs
12
Organization: Lauderdale County, Mississippi (MS)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2024-06-28

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Contacts

Name Title Type
UFLDFD6QHUB3 Cheryl Polk Auditee
6014864938 Joe McKnight Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Note A - Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credit made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: Lauderdale County has elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the "Schedule") includes the federal award activity of Lauderdale County under programs of the federal government for the year ended September 30, 2022. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S.Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Lauderdale County, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position, or cash flows of Lauderdale County.
Title: Note D - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credit made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: Lauderdale County has elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Of the federal expenditures presented in the Schedule, the County provided federal awards totaling $143,807 to subrecipients during the year ended September 30, 2022.

Finding Details

Compliance Requirement Subrecipient monitoring Material Weakness Material Noncompliance 2022-003. The County should establish controls to ensure subrecipients are sufficiently monitored. Assistance Listing Number 21.027 Federal Award Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Agency U.S. Department of the Treasury Pass-through N/A – Direct Award Questioned Costs None Context There was one transaction passed-through to a subrecipient. Repeat Finding No Criteria The Federal Compliance Supplement and 2 CFR Section 200.332 requires pass-through entities to communicate and clearly identify to the subrecipient: 1) the award as a subaward at the time of the subaward by providing the information described in 2 CFR section 200.332(a)(1); 2) all requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the federal award is used in accordance with federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the award; and 3) any additional requirements the pass-through entity imposes on the subrecipient in order for the pass-through entity to meet its own responsibility for the federal award. It also requires the pass-through entity to verify that every subrecipient is audited under the Uniform Guidance when required. Condition The County did not have an effective process in place to ensure required communications occurred with subrecipients of federal awards. There was no agreement with the subrecipient that explicitly included certain information required under 2 CFR 200.332(a)(1). During our audit of the County’s federal expenditures, we noted that the only procedure in place to monitor the subrecipient’s use of federal awards was a visual inspection of the work completed. Cause Management was not aware of the additional communication requirements imposed on pass-through entities. Effect Failure to monitor subrecipient’s use of federal awards could result in the erroneous or fraudulent spending of federal awards, as well as a risk the subrecipient may not be audited in accordance with the Uniform Guidance when required. Recommendation We recommend the County update its communications with the subrecipient to include the required communications of the subrecipient’s responsibilities under the federal requirements, grant agreements and award requirements including, but not limited to its audit obligations under the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Official(s) This payment was a one-time payment for a single project completed by the City of Meridian. Moving forward, Lauderdale County will document the completion of the project.
Compliance Requirement Subrecipient monitoring Material Weakness Material Noncompliance 2022-003. The County should establish controls to ensure subrecipients are sufficiently monitored. Assistance Listing Number 21.027 Federal Award Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Federal Agency U.S. Department of the Treasury Pass-through N/A – Direct Award Questioned Costs None Context There was one transaction passed-through to a subrecipient. Repeat Finding No Criteria The Federal Compliance Supplement and 2 CFR Section 200.332 requires pass-through entities to communicate and clearly identify to the subrecipient: 1) the award as a subaward at the time of the subaward by providing the information described in 2 CFR section 200.332(a)(1); 2) all requirements imposed by the pass-through entity on the subrecipient so that the federal award is used in accordance with federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the award; and 3) any additional requirements the pass-through entity imposes on the subrecipient in order for the pass-through entity to meet its own responsibility for the federal award. It also requires the pass-through entity to verify that every subrecipient is audited under the Uniform Guidance when required. Condition The County did not have an effective process in place to ensure required communications occurred with subrecipients of federal awards. There was no agreement with the subrecipient that explicitly included certain information required under 2 CFR 200.332(a)(1). During our audit of the County’s federal expenditures, we noted that the only procedure in place to monitor the subrecipient’s use of federal awards was a visual inspection of the work completed. Cause Management was not aware of the additional communication requirements imposed on pass-through entities. Effect Failure to monitor subrecipient’s use of federal awards could result in the erroneous or fraudulent spending of federal awards, as well as a risk the subrecipient may not be audited in accordance with the Uniform Guidance when required. Recommendation We recommend the County update its communications with the subrecipient to include the required communications of the subrecipient’s responsibilities under the federal requirements, grant agreements and award requirements including, but not limited to its audit obligations under the Uniform Guidance. Views of Responsible Official(s) This payment was a one-time payment for a single project completed by the City of Meridian. Moving forward, Lauderdale County will document the completion of the project.