Audit 310471

FY End
2023-12-31
Total Expended
$12.38M
Findings
2
Programs
7
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-06-27
Auditor: Moss Adams LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
403355 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - I
979797 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - I

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.231 Project Homekey City - Woodman $11.54M Yes 1
10.561 Calfresh Health Living Program $352,286 - 0
97.024 United Way Emergency Food and Shelter $253,113 - 0
14.267 Making Space for People with Lived Expertise $106,627 - 0
10.651 Calfresh Outreach Program $50,473 - 0
93.297 Youth Engagement Network $48,000 - 0
10.649 Covid-19 Pandemic Electonic Benefits Transfer $31,306 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
QQ4APDCGS691 Kristina Tran Auditee
2135380762 Keith Pew Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Note 1 – Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowed or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Note 3 – Indirect Cost Rate NHF has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (Schedule) includes the federal award activity of National Health Foundation and its subsidiary (NHF) under programs of the federal government for the year ended December 31, 2023. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because it presents only a selected portion of the operations of NHF, it is not intended to, and does not, present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of NHF.
Title: Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Policies: Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowed or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Note 3 – Indirect Cost Rate NHF has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under Uniform Guidance. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowed or are limited as to reimbursement.
Title: Note 3 – Indirect Cost Rate Accounting Policies: Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowed or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Note 3 – Indirect Cost Rate NHF has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under Uniform Guidance. NHF has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

FINDING 2023-001 – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment-Significant Deficiency over Internal Controls over Compliance Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Program: Emergency Solutions Grant Assistance Listing Number: 14.231 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment (I) Pass-Through Agency: Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority Award Number: GT-BH-PHKCO-016 Criteria: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 200.303 states that federal award recipients must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Federal award recipients are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 180.220. Per 2 CFR §180.300 when a federal award recipient enters into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, it must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Per 2 CFR §200.318 (c )(1) Ethics and conflict of interest, the entity must maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts. The policy should ensure that no one with a conflict of interest participates in the selection, award, or administration of a federal contract. Condition/Context: We selected two out of a universe of three vendors that had covered transactions over the covered transactions threshold. National Health Foundation was unable to provide supporting evidence documenting that it had verified either entity was not excluded or disqualified before National Health Foundation went under contract with those vendors. However, a subsequent review did show both vendors were not on the excluded or disqualified listing. The written policies at National Health Foundation include the requirement to attach evidence of the debarment verification when submitting an invoice for payment. The procurement policy effective during the audit period did not include the required written ethics and conflicts of interest standard to avoid actual or apparent conflict of interest involving expenditures of federal grant awards. National Health Foundation has a conflict-of-interest policy for employees to adhere to; however, the specific consideration for anyone who participates in the selection, awarding, or administration of a contract with federal funding was not included. Effect: Vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 may not be verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in accidental engagement with excluded vendors. Cause: The system of internal controls as established by management of National Health Foundation was not properly implemented to ensure that the policies and procedures in place related to procurement and suspension and debarment were appropriately documented. Repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommended that management of National Health Foundation establish a proper system of internal controls, including strengthening its policies and procedures to ensure its compliance with requirements related to procurement and suspension and debarment. The use of standard forms or templates could help document verification that parties are not suspended or debarred before National Health Foundation goes under contract with such an entity. Additionally, we recommend the conflict-of-interest policy be amended to properly include all required verbiage for federal procurement contracts. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the recommendation.
FINDING 2023-001 – Procurement and Suspension and Debarment-Significant Deficiency over Internal Controls over Compliance Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Program: Emergency Solutions Grant Assistance Listing Number: 14.231 Compliance Requirement: Procurement and Suspension and Debarment (I) Pass-Through Agency: Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority Award Number: GT-BH-PHKCO-016 Criteria: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 200.303 states that federal award recipients must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that it is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. Federal award recipients are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 180.220. Per 2 CFR §180.300 when a federal award recipient enters into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, it must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: (a) Checking the EPLS; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person if allowed by this rule; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Per 2 CFR §200.318 (c )(1) Ethics and conflict of interest, the entity must maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts. The policy should ensure that no one with a conflict of interest participates in the selection, award, or administration of a federal contract. Condition/Context: We selected two out of a universe of three vendors that had covered transactions over the covered transactions threshold. National Health Foundation was unable to provide supporting evidence documenting that it had verified either entity was not excluded or disqualified before National Health Foundation went under contract with those vendors. However, a subsequent review did show both vendors were not on the excluded or disqualified listing. The written policies at National Health Foundation include the requirement to attach evidence of the debarment verification when submitting an invoice for payment. The procurement policy effective during the audit period did not include the required written ethics and conflicts of interest standard to avoid actual or apparent conflict of interest involving expenditures of federal grant awards. National Health Foundation has a conflict-of-interest policy for employees to adhere to; however, the specific consideration for anyone who participates in the selection, awarding, or administration of a contract with federal funding was not included. Effect: Vendors to whom payments equal to or in excess of $25,000 may not be verified to be not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded. Noncompliance with the provisions of federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award could result in accidental engagement with excluded vendors. Cause: The system of internal controls as established by management of National Health Foundation was not properly implemented to ensure that the policies and procedures in place related to procurement and suspension and debarment were appropriately documented. Repeat finding: No. Recommendation: We recommended that management of National Health Foundation establish a proper system of internal controls, including strengthening its policies and procedures to ensure its compliance with requirements related to procurement and suspension and debarment. The use of standard forms or templates could help document verification that parties are not suspended or debarred before National Health Foundation goes under contract with such an entity. Additionally, we recommend the conflict-of-interest policy be amended to properly include all required verbiage for federal procurement contracts. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the recommendation.