Audit 309904

FY End
2023-09-30
Total Expended
$1.11M
Findings
2
Programs
1
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-06-25

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
402340 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - L
978782 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - L

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
11.611 Manufacturing Extension Partnership $1.11M Yes 1

Contacts

Name Title Type
WN1KPMDFK8J7 Gene Russell Auditee
9258075111 Eric Zehntbauer Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: 1. Basis of Accounting The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards includes the federal grant activity of The Corporation for Manufacturing Excellence dba Manex and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with requirements of The Uniform Guidance, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations. Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the basic financial statements. 2. Assistance Listings Federal award program titles are reported as presented in SAM.gov Assistance Listings (AL). Federal Award program titles not presented in SAM.gov are identified by Federal Agency number followed by (.xxx). 3. Major and Nonmajor Federal Financial Assistance Programs Federal financial assistance programs with identical assistance listing (AL) numbers are combined in determining whether the programs are major or nonmajor. Type A federal assistance programs are those with combined expenditures of $750,000 or more during a fiscal year. Type B federal financial assistance programs are those with combined expenditures of less than $750,000 during a fiscal year. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Corporation for Manufacturing Excellence dba Manex has not used the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate.

Finding Details

Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance – Allowable Costs, Cash Management, and Reporting. Criteria: The Organization is required to exercise internal control oversight over significant reports, allowable costs, and cash management requests for reimbursements filed with a federal funder. Condition: The Organization prepared the required reports and requests for reimbursements, but did not have another individual review them before or after they were filed with the funder. There was no documentation in 2 of 10 payroll samples that the payroll time sheet reports were reviewed by the designated second individual prior to processing and paying. Context and Cause: The Organization was not made aware that federal reports and requests for reimbursement should have internal control oversight procedures, and did not exercise such oversight. Only one individual was responsible for preparing and filing these documents. The payroll time sheet review process was inconsistently followed, and there is not a process for the processed payroll reports to be reviewed by a second individual. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: Reporting and cash management requests for reimbursement requirements lacked oversight, resulting in a lack of awareness of what was being reported as program income in one case for example, and an opportunity for erroneous claims for reimbursement being filed with a funder. Payroll time allocated to grants was inconsistently approved and lacked sufficient oversight. Recommendation: We recommend management implement procedures to ensure the Uniform Grant Guidance and the Compliance Supplement requirements for controls over Reporting, Allowable Costs, and Cash Management are designed and performed. The month-end checklist currently being used is a good start, and this could be enhanced by adding sections for the above items, and having specific individuals initial and date on the checklist when the procedures are completed. A fiscal policy and procedure manual would also be a good tool. Views of responsible official: Management concurs with the audit finding and will implement corrective action.
Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance – Allowable Costs, Cash Management, and Reporting. Criteria: The Organization is required to exercise internal control oversight over significant reports, allowable costs, and cash management requests for reimbursements filed with a federal funder. Condition: The Organization prepared the required reports and requests for reimbursements, but did not have another individual review them before or after they were filed with the funder. There was no documentation in 2 of 10 payroll samples that the payroll time sheet reports were reviewed by the designated second individual prior to processing and paying. Context and Cause: The Organization was not made aware that federal reports and requests for reimbursement should have internal control oversight procedures, and did not exercise such oversight. Only one individual was responsible for preparing and filing these documents. The payroll time sheet review process was inconsistently followed, and there is not a process for the processed payroll reports to be reviewed by a second individual. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: Reporting and cash management requests for reimbursement requirements lacked oversight, resulting in a lack of awareness of what was being reported as program income in one case for example, and an opportunity for erroneous claims for reimbursement being filed with a funder. Payroll time allocated to grants was inconsistently approved and lacked sufficient oversight. Recommendation: We recommend management implement procedures to ensure the Uniform Grant Guidance and the Compliance Supplement requirements for controls over Reporting, Allowable Costs, and Cash Management are designed and performed. The month-end checklist currently being used is a good start, and this could be enhanced by adding sections for the above items, and having specific individuals initial and date on the checklist when the procedures are completed. A fiscal policy and procedure manual would also be a good tool. Views of responsible official: Management concurs with the audit finding and will implement corrective action.