Federal Program Name: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Assistance Listing Title and Number: Federal Direct Loan Program ? 84.268 Award Year: July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Special Tests & Provisions ? Lender Notification Condition: The University failed to update the NSLDS for certain students that withdrew during the school year ? Other Instance of Noncompliance and Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Context: During testing of compliance with the lender notification compliance requirement, 2 out of 25 selections resulted in errors. From a population of 561 transactions, 25 were selected for testing. Errors consisted of 2 students for which the effective date of their withdrawal was not updated in the NSLDS. Our sample was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid. Cause: The students in question were dismissed based on poor academic performance, but the University overlooked the changes in the status of these students when submitting their roster file to the Clearinghouse. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University report the correct student status change to the NSLDS within the required timeframe. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: See corrective action plan prepared by management.
Federal Program Name: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Funds ? American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Assistance Listing Title and Number: Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund ? Student Portion, 84.425E and Institutional Portion, 84.425F Award Year: July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Reporting Condition: The University failed to file certain reports required for the student portion of ARPA funds received and expended. In addition, the report for the institutional portion of ARPA funds was filed late ? Material Weakness and Material Noncompliance Questioned Costs: None Context: During testing of compliance with the reporting compliance requirement, the University did not file the required quarterly reports for the student portion of the Higher Education Emergency Relief Funds (HEERF) and instead only filed one annual report at year end. The information regarding the number of eligible students was also not included on the annual report filed. The quarterly report selected for the institutional portion of the HEERF grant was filed after the required due date. Effect: The required reports were not filed in a timely manner. Cause: While the University filed the required reports for the institutional portion of HEERF funds, it did not file the related reports for the student portion and did not meet the required deadlines. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University create a summary of the required reports and deadlines to ensure they are being filed within the required timeframe. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: See corrective action plan prepared by management.
Federal Program Name: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Funds ? American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Assistance Listing Title and Number: Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund ? Student Portion, 84.425E and Institutional Portion, 84.425F Award Year: July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Reporting Condition: The University failed to file certain reports required for the student portion of ARPA funds received and expended. In addition, the report for the institutional portion of ARPA funds was filed late ? Material Weakness and Material Noncompliance Questioned Costs: None Context: During testing of compliance with the reporting compliance requirement, the University did not file the required quarterly reports for the student portion of the Higher Education Emergency Relief Funds (HEERF) and instead only filed one annual report at year end. The information regarding the number of eligible students was also not included on the annual report filed. The quarterly report selected for the institutional portion of the HEERF grant was filed after the required due date. Effect: The required reports were not filed in a timely manner. Cause: While the University filed the required reports for the institutional portion of HEERF funds, it did not file the related reports for the student portion and did not meet the required deadlines. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University create a summary of the required reports and deadlines to ensure they are being filed within the required timeframe. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: See corrective action plan prepared by management.
Federal Program Name: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Funds ? American Rescue Plan Act Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Assistance Listing Title and Number: Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund ? Institutional Portion, 84.425F Award Year: July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Procurement, suspension and debarment Condition: The University did not comply with the federal procurement, suspension and debarment requirements ? Material Weakness and Material Noncompliance Questioned Costs: $633,205, calculated as costs identified in our sample that were not expended in accordance with the applicable procurement, suspension and debarment requirements. Context: During testing of compliance with the procurement, suspension and debarment compliance requirements, 11 of 14 selections resulted in errors. From a population of 69 expenditure transactions with a total dollar value of $1,996,507, a sample of 14 transactions valued at $638,171 were selected for testing. 11 of the items sampled did not apply the applicable procurement, suspension and debarment requirements in identifying and selecting a vendor. Our sample was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid. Effect: Goods and services were procured without applying the appropriate compliance guidelines. Cause: While the University has a draft procurement policy, it is not necessarily compliant with federal regulations and was not consistently applied to acquisitions funded with ARPA dollars. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University update the procurement policies to comply with federal requirements and ensure the updated policy is followed when acquiring goods and services using federal funds. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: See corrective action plan prepared by management.
Federal Program Name: Student Financial Assistance Cluster Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Assistance Listing Title and Number: Federal Direct Loan Program ? 84.268 Award Year: July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Special Tests & Provisions ? Lender Notification Condition: The University failed to update the NSLDS for certain students that withdrew during the school year ? Other Instance of Noncompliance and Significant Deficiency Questioned Costs: None Context: During testing of compliance with the lender notification compliance requirement, 2 out of 25 selections resulted in errors. From a population of 561 transactions, 25 were selected for testing. Errors consisted of 2 students for which the effective date of their withdrawal was not updated in the NSLDS. Our sample was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid. Cause: The students in question were dismissed based on poor academic performance, but the University overlooked the changes in the status of these students when submitting their roster file to the Clearinghouse. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University report the correct student status change to the NSLDS within the required timeframe. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: See corrective action plan prepared by management.
Federal Program Name: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Funds ? American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Assistance Listing Title and Number: Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund ? Student Portion, 84.425E and Institutional Portion, 84.425F Award Year: July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Reporting Condition: The University failed to file certain reports required for the student portion of ARPA funds received and expended. In addition, the report for the institutional portion of ARPA funds was filed late ? Material Weakness and Material Noncompliance Questioned Costs: None Context: During testing of compliance with the reporting compliance requirement, the University did not file the required quarterly reports for the student portion of the Higher Education Emergency Relief Funds (HEERF) and instead only filed one annual report at year end. The information regarding the number of eligible students was also not included on the annual report filed. The quarterly report selected for the institutional portion of the HEERF grant was filed after the required due date. Effect: The required reports were not filed in a timely manner. Cause: While the University filed the required reports for the institutional portion of HEERF funds, it did not file the related reports for the student portion and did not meet the required deadlines. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University create a summary of the required reports and deadlines to ensure they are being filed within the required timeframe. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: See corrective action plan prepared by management.
Federal Program Name: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Funds ? American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Assistance Listing Title and Number: Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund ? Student Portion, 84.425E and Institutional Portion, 84.425F Award Year: July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Reporting Condition: The University failed to file certain reports required for the student portion of ARPA funds received and expended. In addition, the report for the institutional portion of ARPA funds was filed late ? Material Weakness and Material Noncompliance Questioned Costs: None Context: During testing of compliance with the reporting compliance requirement, the University did not file the required quarterly reports for the student portion of the Higher Education Emergency Relief Funds (HEERF) and instead only filed one annual report at year end. The information regarding the number of eligible students was also not included on the annual report filed. The quarterly report selected for the institutional portion of the HEERF grant was filed after the required due date. Effect: The required reports were not filed in a timely manner. Cause: While the University filed the required reports for the institutional portion of HEERF funds, it did not file the related reports for the student portion and did not meet the required deadlines. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University create a summary of the required reports and deadlines to ensure they are being filed within the required timeframe. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: See corrective action plan prepared by management.
Federal Program Name: COVID-19 - Education Stabilization Funds ? American Rescue Plan Act Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Assistance Listing Title and Number: Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund ? Institutional Portion, 84.425F Award Year: July 1, 2021 ? June 30, 2022 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Procurement, suspension and debarment Condition: The University did not comply with the federal procurement, suspension and debarment requirements ? Material Weakness and Material Noncompliance Questioned Costs: $633,205, calculated as costs identified in our sample that were not expended in accordance with the applicable procurement, suspension and debarment requirements. Context: During testing of compliance with the procurement, suspension and debarment compliance requirements, 11 of 14 selections resulted in errors. From a population of 69 expenditure transactions with a total dollar value of $1,996,507, a sample of 14 transactions valued at $638,171 were selected for testing. 11 of the items sampled did not apply the applicable procurement, suspension and debarment requirements in identifying and selecting a vendor. Our sample was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid. Effect: Goods and services were procured without applying the appropriate compliance guidelines. Cause: While the University has a draft procurement policy, it is not necessarily compliant with federal regulations and was not consistently applied to acquisitions funded with ARPA dollars. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the University update the procurement policies to comply with federal requirements and ensure the updated policy is followed when acquiring goods and services using federal funds. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: See corrective action plan prepared by management.