Audit 309564

FY End
2023-09-30
Total Expended
$1.22M
Findings
2
Programs
4
Organization: Vita Nova, Inc. (FL)
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-06-21

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
401511 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - N
977953 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - N

Programs

Contacts

Name Title Type
HC1CYZNK6NQ3 Delferine Spooner, CPA Auditee
5616890035 Teri Hackwith, CPA Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: Vita Nova, Inc. has elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the “Schedule”) includes the federal award activity of Vita Nova, Inc. under programs of the federal government for the year ended September 30, 2023. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Vita Nova, Inc., it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of Vita Nova, Inc.

Finding Details

Finding No. 2023-001 Significant deficiency for Major Program - U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Continuum of Care Program, Youth Homeless Demonstration Program (YHDP) – Assistance Listing No. 14.267. Condition: Rent was not deemed reasonable for one vendor included in the compliance test. Criteria: Compliance attribute “N” Special Tests and Provisions requires reasonable rental rates for this program as per the Compliance Supplement. Cause: There is a procedure in place to complete rent reasonableness via a few different methods including accessing the Section 8 Housing website and including 3 comparable properties to determine that the rent charged to the tenant and paid by Vita Nova is reasonable. The worksheet for the subject property stated that the requested rent was not reasonable and suggested a reduced rent amount. However, the actual rent paid was not reduced and was paid at the requested rate. Effect: The cost of rental assistance was potentially too high and could be disallowed. Context: We selected client tenants from the 4 largest vendors by expense as coded to the client rental assistance account during the fiscal year 10/1/2022 to 9/30/2023. Of those vendors, one of them had two tenants placed at a 2 bedroom/2 bath location. The rent reasonableness worksheet concluded that the requested rent of $1,600 was not reasonable and suggested a reduced rent of $1,200 per tenant per month to bring the rent in the reasonable range. The rent was charged and paid at the higher rate from the inception of the lease to the end of the fiscal year, plus one month’s rent for security deposit, which is allowed, but also at the higher rate. In total the overage of $400 per month plus security deposit for each tenant for the months of the lease in the fiscal year amounted to a $4,800 overage that could be considered unreasonable. Subsequent to year end the overage was found and the Program Director explained the issue to the landlord and negotiated a reduced rent so over the remaining months rent would be reduced by the overage of $4,800. Therefore, the issue was resolved within the lease term for each tenant, but crossed fiscal years. Recommendation: We recommend that when the rent reasonableness worksheet reflects that the proposed rent is not reasonable, the lease contracts should not be approved, and negotiations should begin with the landlord to get the rent within the reasonable range. To ensure this step is taken, we recommend that the Program Director initial each rent reasonableness worksheet before the lease is signed for the client tenant. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Organization agrees with the finding and has already implemented the process to approve the rent reasonableness worksheet by the Program Director. See the corrective action plan for the above finding no. 2023-001 for the year ended September 30, 2023, with respect to federal awards on page 30 of this report.
Finding No. 2023-001 Significant deficiency for Major Program - U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Continuum of Care Program, Youth Homeless Demonstration Program (YHDP) – Assistance Listing No. 14.267. Condition: Rent was not deemed reasonable for one vendor included in the compliance test. Criteria: Compliance attribute “N” Special Tests and Provisions requires reasonable rental rates for this program as per the Compliance Supplement. Cause: There is a procedure in place to complete rent reasonableness via a few different methods including accessing the Section 8 Housing website and including 3 comparable properties to determine that the rent charged to the tenant and paid by Vita Nova is reasonable. The worksheet for the subject property stated that the requested rent was not reasonable and suggested a reduced rent amount. However, the actual rent paid was not reduced and was paid at the requested rate. Effect: The cost of rental assistance was potentially too high and could be disallowed. Context: We selected client tenants from the 4 largest vendors by expense as coded to the client rental assistance account during the fiscal year 10/1/2022 to 9/30/2023. Of those vendors, one of them had two tenants placed at a 2 bedroom/2 bath location. The rent reasonableness worksheet concluded that the requested rent of $1,600 was not reasonable and suggested a reduced rent of $1,200 per tenant per month to bring the rent in the reasonable range. The rent was charged and paid at the higher rate from the inception of the lease to the end of the fiscal year, plus one month’s rent for security deposit, which is allowed, but also at the higher rate. In total the overage of $400 per month plus security deposit for each tenant for the months of the lease in the fiscal year amounted to a $4,800 overage that could be considered unreasonable. Subsequent to year end the overage was found and the Program Director explained the issue to the landlord and negotiated a reduced rent so over the remaining months rent would be reduced by the overage of $4,800. Therefore, the issue was resolved within the lease term for each tenant, but crossed fiscal years. Recommendation: We recommend that when the rent reasonableness worksheet reflects that the proposed rent is not reasonable, the lease contracts should not be approved, and negotiations should begin with the landlord to get the rent within the reasonable range. To ensure this step is taken, we recommend that the Program Director initial each rent reasonableness worksheet before the lease is signed for the client tenant. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Organization agrees with the finding and has already implemented the process to approve the rent reasonableness worksheet by the Program Director. See the corrective action plan for the above finding no. 2023-001 for the year ended September 30, 2023, with respect to federal awards on page 30 of this report.