Audit 309490

FY End
2023-09-30
Total Expended
$1.86M
Findings
4
Programs
3
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-06-21
Auditor: Greenwalt CPAS

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
401390 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - B
401391 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - B
977832 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - B
977833 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - B

Programs

Contacts

Name Title Type
Q29GNV6KWAS4 Michael Warden Auditee
6573750502 Amanda Meko Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: CIBD has not elected to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal grant activity of The Center for Comprehensive Care and Diagnosis of Inherited Blood Disorders (CIBD) for the year ended September 30, 2023. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of CIBD, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of CIBD.

Finding Details

Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430(i) requires the auditee to establish and maintain effective internal control over the allocation of personnel expenses whereby charges to Federal awards for personnel-related expenditures are supported by official records of the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. Budget estimates alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards, but may be used for interim accounting purposes, provided that: The non-federal entity's system of internal controls includes processes to review after-the-fact interim charges made to a Federal award based on budget estimates. All necessary adjustment must be made such that the final amount charged to the Federal award is accurate, allowable and properly allocated. Condition: Personnel expenses were not reconciled to T&E reports during the fiscal year, which resulted in personnel expenses being under-claimed. Cause: Internal controls surrounding time and effort reporting were designed to perform allocation reconciliations based on the award period instead of the fiscal year. Questioned costs: none. Recommendation: We recommend that management implement a process whereby reporting is reconciled based on fiscal year. We recommend that all personnel expenditures allocated to grants are tracked, reviewed, and approved prior to recording in the general ledger. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: See attached corrective action plan.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430(i) requires the auditee to establish and maintain effective internal control over the allocation of personnel expenses whereby charges to Federal awards for personnel-related expenditures are supported by official records of the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. Budget estimates alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards, but may be used for interim accounting purposes, provided that: The non-federal entity's system of internal controls includes processes to review after-the-fact interim charges made to a Federal award based on budget estimates. All necessary adjustment must be made such that the final amount charged to the Federal award is accurate, allowable and properly allocated. Condition: Personnel expenses were not reconciled to T&E reports during the fiscal year, which resulted in personnel expenses being under-claimed. Cause: Internal controls surrounding time and effort reporting were designed to perform allocation reconciliations based on the award period instead of the fiscal year. Questioned costs: none. Recommendation: We recommend that management implement a process whereby reporting is reconciled based on fiscal year. We recommend that all personnel expenditures allocated to grants are tracked, reviewed, and approved prior to recording in the general ledger. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: See attached corrective action plan.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430(i) requires the auditee to establish and maintain effective internal control over the allocation of personnel expenses whereby charges to Federal awards for personnel-related expenditures are supported by official records of the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. Budget estimates alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards, but may be used for interim accounting purposes, provided that: The non-federal entity's system of internal controls includes processes to review after-the-fact interim charges made to a Federal award based on budget estimates. All necessary adjustment must be made such that the final amount charged to the Federal award is accurate, allowable and properly allocated. Condition: Personnel expenses were not reconciled to T&E reports during the fiscal year, which resulted in personnel expenses being under-claimed. Cause: Internal controls surrounding time and effort reporting were designed to perform allocation reconciliations based on the award period instead of the fiscal year. Questioned costs: none. Recommendation: We recommend that management implement a process whereby reporting is reconciled based on fiscal year. We recommend that all personnel expenditures allocated to grants are tracked, reviewed, and approved prior to recording in the general ledger. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: See attached corrective action plan.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.430(i) requires the auditee to establish and maintain effective internal control over the allocation of personnel expenses whereby charges to Federal awards for personnel-related expenditures are supported by official records of the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on more than one Federal award; a Federal award and non-Federal award; an indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; two or more indirect activities which are allocated using different allocation bases; or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity. Budget estimates alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards, but may be used for interim accounting purposes, provided that: The non-federal entity's system of internal controls includes processes to review after-the-fact interim charges made to a Federal award based on budget estimates. All necessary adjustment must be made such that the final amount charged to the Federal award is accurate, allowable and properly allocated. Condition: Personnel expenses were not reconciled to T&E reports during the fiscal year, which resulted in personnel expenses being under-claimed. Cause: Internal controls surrounding time and effort reporting were designed to perform allocation reconciliations based on the award period instead of the fiscal year. Questioned costs: none. Recommendation: We recommend that management implement a process whereby reporting is reconciled based on fiscal year. We recommend that all personnel expenditures allocated to grants are tracked, reviewed, and approved prior to recording in the general ledger. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: See attached corrective action plan.