Audit 309412

FY End
2022-12-31
Total Expended
$7.36M
Findings
4
Programs
28
Organization: McLeod County (MN)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2024-06-20

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
401319 2022-006 Significant Deficiency Yes I
401320 2022-006 Significant Deficiency Yes I
977761 2022-006 Significant Deficiency Yes I
977762 2022-006 Significant Deficiency Yes I

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
20.205 Highway Planning and Construction $2.64M Yes 1
21.027 Covid-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $2.05M Yes 1
10.561 State Administrative Matching Grants for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program $249,264 - 0
93.667 Social Services Block Grant $192,123 - 0
93.658 Foster Care_title IV-E $133,080 - 0
93.563 Child Support Enforcement $128,641 - 0
10.557 Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children $123,919 - 0
16.835 Body Worn Camera Policy and Implementation $55,362 - 0
97.042 Emergency Management Performance Grants $48,810 - 0
93.994 Maternal and Child Health Services Block Grant to the States $38,239 - 0
90.404 2018 Hava Election Security Grants $34,691 - 0
93.558 Temporary Assistance for Needy Families $34,617 - 0
93.959 Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse $30,562 - 0
93.778 Medical Assistance Program $20,944 - 0
93.354 Public Health Emergency Response: Cooperative Agreement for Emergency Response: Public Health Crisis Response $13,759 - 0
16.606 State Criminal Alien Assistance Program $10,388 - 0
93.669 Child Abuse and Neglect State Grants $8,243 - 0
93.556 Promoting Safe and Stable Families $7,365 - 0
93.575 Child Care and Development Block Grant $6,359 - 0
93.590 Community-Based Child Abuse Prevention Grants $5,539 - 0
20.600 State and Community Highway Safety $3,989 - 0
93.645 Stephanie Tubbs Jones Child Welfare Services Program $3,640 - 0
93.674 John H. Chafee Foster Care Program for Successful Transition to Adulthood $2,852 - 0
84.181 Special Education-Grants for Infants and Families $2,556 - 0
93.767 Children's Health Insurance Program $1,332 - 0
93.268 Covid-19 Immunization Cooperative Agreements $900 - 0
93.251 Early Hearing Detection and Intervention $900 - 0
93.566 Refugee and Entrant Assistance_state Administered Programs $413 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
LDADUDX2KWM5 Sheila Murphy Auditee
3208641320 Julie Blaha Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Reconciliation to Schedule of Intergovernmental Revenue Accounting Policies: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Reporting Entity The Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards presents the activities of federal award programs expended by McLeod County. The County’s reporting entity is defined in Note 1 to the financial statements. The schedule does not include $601,045 in federal awards expended by the McLeod County Housing and Redevelopment Authority component unit. The component unit is legally separate from the primary government and expended less than $750,000 of federal awards for the year ended June 30, 2022, and, therefore, was not subject to the audit requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Basis of Presentation The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards includes the federal grant activity of McLeod County under programs of the federal government for the year ended December 31, 2022. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of McLeod County, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position, or cash flows of McLeod County. Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: De Minimis Cost Rate McLeod County has elected not to use the ten percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. See Notes to the SEFA for Charts/Table

Finding Details

2022-006 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Prior Year Finding Number: 2021-006 Repeat Finding Since: 2020 Type of Finding: Internal Control Over Compliance and Compliance Severity of Deficiency: Significant Deficiency and Other Matter Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation and U.S. Department of the Treasury Program: 20.205 Highway Planning and Construction, 21.027 COVID-19 — Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Award Number and Year: Assistance Listing Number Award Number Year 20.205 1052136 2022 21.027 Federal Direct 2022 Pass-Through Agency: Assistance Listing Number Pass-Through Agency 20.205 Minnesota Department of Transportation 21.027 Not applicable Criteria: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 200.303 states that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the auditee is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. In addition, Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 200.318 states that the non-federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform with applicable federal law and the standards identified in this regulation. Lastly, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. Covered transactions include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 180.220. Condition: The County has written procurement policies; however, these policies do not include the required components in accordance with Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 200.318. In addition, in the sample of two covered transactions tested, the verification for suspension and debarment was not performed before entering into the covered transactions. Questioned Costs: None. Context: This issue was discovered during the audit of the major federal programs; however, it impacts federal programs county-wide. Written policies that reflect the specific components of federal regulations improve controls to help ensure compliance with federal award requirements. The vendors were determined in the audit to not be suspended or debarred for the two covered transactions sampled. The County has drafted updated procurement policies to include components of the federal procurement requirements; these are pending review and approval by the Board of County Commissioners. The sample size was based on guidance from chapter 11 of the AICPA Audit Guide, Government Auditing Standards and Single Audits. Effect: Written policies and procedures that are not updated to reflect the federal procurement requirements increase the risk of noncompliance with federal program requirements. Failure to verify vendors are not suspended or debarred may result in the County entering into a transaction with a vendor that is not authorized to provide goods and services. Cause: The County has not prioritized updating its Procurement Policy for changes arising from federal procurement requirements due to the County not entering into many procurement contracts in its federal programs outside of highway contracts. In addition, Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds were spent prior to the County determining they would be funded with federal funds and subject to suspension and debarment requirements. Recommendation: We recommend the County include the specific components of the federal procurement requirements in its written procurement policies and procedures. We also recommend the County establish policies and procedures to ensure it does not enter into covered transactions with parties that are suspended or debarred. View of Responsible Official: Acknowledge
2022-006 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Prior Year Finding Number: 2021-006 Repeat Finding Since: 2020 Type of Finding: Internal Control Over Compliance and Compliance Severity of Deficiency: Significant Deficiency and Other Matter Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation and U.S. Department of the Treasury Program: 20.205 Highway Planning and Construction, 21.027 COVID-19 — Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Award Number and Year: Assistance Listing Number Award Number Year 20.205 1052136 2022 21.027 Federal Direct 2022 Pass-Through Agency: Assistance Listing Number Pass-Through Agency 20.205 Minnesota Department of Transportation 21.027 Not applicable Criteria: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 200.303 states that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the auditee is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. In addition, Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 200.318 states that the non-federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform with applicable federal law and the standards identified in this regulation. Lastly, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. Covered transactions include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 180.220. Condition: The County has written procurement policies; however, these policies do not include the required components in accordance with Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 200.318. In addition, in the sample of two covered transactions tested, the verification for suspension and debarment was not performed before entering into the covered transactions. Questioned Costs: None. Context: This issue was discovered during the audit of the major federal programs; however, it impacts federal programs county-wide. Written policies that reflect the specific components of federal regulations improve controls to help ensure compliance with federal award requirements. The vendors were determined in the audit to not be suspended or debarred for the two covered transactions sampled. The County has drafted updated procurement policies to include components of the federal procurement requirements; these are pending review and approval by the Board of County Commissioners. The sample size was based on guidance from chapter 11 of the AICPA Audit Guide, Government Auditing Standards and Single Audits. Effect: Written policies and procedures that are not updated to reflect the federal procurement requirements increase the risk of noncompliance with federal program requirements. Failure to verify vendors are not suspended or debarred may result in the County entering into a transaction with a vendor that is not authorized to provide goods and services. Cause: The County has not prioritized updating its Procurement Policy for changes arising from federal procurement requirements due to the County not entering into many procurement contracts in its federal programs outside of highway contracts. In addition, Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds were spent prior to the County determining they would be funded with federal funds and subject to suspension and debarment requirements. Recommendation: We recommend the County include the specific components of the federal procurement requirements in its written procurement policies and procedures. We also recommend the County establish policies and procedures to ensure it does not enter into covered transactions with parties that are suspended or debarred. View of Responsible Official: Acknowledge
2022-006 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Prior Year Finding Number: 2021-006 Repeat Finding Since: 2020 Type of Finding: Internal Control Over Compliance and Compliance Severity of Deficiency: Significant Deficiency and Other Matter Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation and U.S. Department of the Treasury Program: 20.205 Highway Planning and Construction, 21.027 COVID-19 — Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Award Number and Year: Assistance Listing Number Award Number Year 20.205 1052136 2022 21.027 Federal Direct 2022 Pass-Through Agency: Assistance Listing Number Pass-Through Agency 20.205 Minnesota Department of Transportation 21.027 Not applicable Criteria: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 200.303 states that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the auditee is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. In addition, Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 200.318 states that the non-federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform with applicable federal law and the standards identified in this regulation. Lastly, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. Covered transactions include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 180.220. Condition: The County has written procurement policies; however, these policies do not include the required components in accordance with Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 200.318. In addition, in the sample of two covered transactions tested, the verification for suspension and debarment was not performed before entering into the covered transactions. Questioned Costs: None. Context: This issue was discovered during the audit of the major federal programs; however, it impacts federal programs county-wide. Written policies that reflect the specific components of federal regulations improve controls to help ensure compliance with federal award requirements. The vendors were determined in the audit to not be suspended or debarred for the two covered transactions sampled. The County has drafted updated procurement policies to include components of the federal procurement requirements; these are pending review and approval by the Board of County Commissioners. The sample size was based on guidance from chapter 11 of the AICPA Audit Guide, Government Auditing Standards and Single Audits. Effect: Written policies and procedures that are not updated to reflect the federal procurement requirements increase the risk of noncompliance with federal program requirements. Failure to verify vendors are not suspended or debarred may result in the County entering into a transaction with a vendor that is not authorized to provide goods and services. Cause: The County has not prioritized updating its Procurement Policy for changes arising from federal procurement requirements due to the County not entering into many procurement contracts in its federal programs outside of highway contracts. In addition, Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds were spent prior to the County determining they would be funded with federal funds and subject to suspension and debarment requirements. Recommendation: We recommend the County include the specific components of the federal procurement requirements in its written procurement policies and procedures. We also recommend the County establish policies and procedures to ensure it does not enter into covered transactions with parties that are suspended or debarred. View of Responsible Official: Acknowledge
2022-006 Procurement and Suspension and Debarment Prior Year Finding Number: 2021-006 Repeat Finding Since: 2020 Type of Finding: Internal Control Over Compliance and Compliance Severity of Deficiency: Significant Deficiency and Other Matter Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation and U.S. Department of the Treasury Program: 20.205 Highway Planning and Construction, 21.027 COVID-19 — Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Award Number and Year: Assistance Listing Number Award Number Year 20.205 1052136 2022 21.027 Federal Direct 2022 Pass-Through Agency: Assistance Listing Number Pass-Through Agency 20.205 Minnesota Department of Transportation 21.027 Not applicable Criteria: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 200.303 states that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the auditee is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. In addition, Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 200.318 states that the non-federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform with applicable federal law and the standards identified in this regulation. Lastly, non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. Covered transactions include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 180.220. Condition: The County has written procurement policies; however, these policies do not include the required components in accordance with Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 200.318. In addition, in the sample of two covered transactions tested, the verification for suspension and debarment was not performed before entering into the covered transactions. Questioned Costs: None. Context: This issue was discovered during the audit of the major federal programs; however, it impacts federal programs county-wide. Written policies that reflect the specific components of federal regulations improve controls to help ensure compliance with federal award requirements. The vendors were determined in the audit to not be suspended or debarred for the two covered transactions sampled. The County has drafted updated procurement policies to include components of the federal procurement requirements; these are pending review and approval by the Board of County Commissioners. The sample size was based on guidance from chapter 11 of the AICPA Audit Guide, Government Auditing Standards and Single Audits. Effect: Written policies and procedures that are not updated to reflect the federal procurement requirements increase the risk of noncompliance with federal program requirements. Failure to verify vendors are not suspended or debarred may result in the County entering into a transaction with a vendor that is not authorized to provide goods and services. Cause: The County has not prioritized updating its Procurement Policy for changes arising from federal procurement requirements due to the County not entering into many procurement contracts in its federal programs outside of highway contracts. In addition, Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds were spent prior to the County determining they would be funded with federal funds and subject to suspension and debarment requirements. Recommendation: We recommend the County include the specific components of the federal procurement requirements in its written procurement policies and procedures. We also recommend the County establish policies and procedures to ensure it does not enter into covered transactions with parties that are suspended or debarred. View of Responsible Official: Acknowledge