Audit 309174

FY End
2022-09-30
Total Expended
$9.13M
Findings
4
Programs
9
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2024-06-18

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
401139 2022-002 Significant Deficiency - A
401140 2022-002 Significant Deficiency - A
977581 2022-002 Significant Deficiency - A
977582 2022-002 Significant Deficiency - A

Contacts

Name Title Type
GGYJLSN9FHJ4 Jim Vitt Auditee
5207211887 Eric Maneval Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Federal Assistance Listing Numbers (ALN): Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. ICHD has elected not to use the ten percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Auditee did not use the deminimis cost rate. The program titles and ALN, or federal identification numbers, were obtained from the federal or pass-through grantor or the update to the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance.

Finding Details

Criteria: Employee approved pay rates are to be used when calculating wages allocated to the grant. Condition: In our sample of payroll transactions, instances of estimated pay rates were used. Cause and Effect: The Organization's choice of method on how they were billing the grant was in some cases not correct. Instead of billing the grant based on actual pay rates, the Organization billed on estimated pay rates. The variances are small because the estimate was determined based on expected monthly hours worked and typically employees work their full work schedule. Therefore, the pay rate is an estimate if the employee does not work their full shift. Context: A sample of 40 transactions, totaling $50,758 was selected. The test found two transactions did not have the correct amount billed totaling $49 over billed and $37 under billed to the grant. Questioned costs: No known or likely questioned costs over $25,000. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization implement procedures to improve the wages billed to the grant and ensure they are based on actual approved pay rates.
Criteria: Employee approved pay rates are to be used when calculating wages allocated to the grant. Condition: In our sample of payroll transactions, instances of estimated pay rates were used. Cause and Effect: The Organization's choice of method on how they were billing the grant was in some cases not correct. Instead of billing the grant based on actual pay rates, the Organization billed on estimated pay rates. The variances are small because the estimate was determined based on expected monthly hours worked and typically employees work their full work schedule. Therefore, the pay rate is an estimate if the employee does not work their full shift. Context: A sample of 40 transactions, totaling $50,758 was selected. The test found two transactions did not have the correct amount billed totaling $49 over billed and $37 under billed to the grant. Questioned costs: No known or likely questioned costs over $25,000. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization implement procedures to improve the wages billed to the grant and ensure they are based on actual approved pay rates.
Criteria: Employee approved pay rates are to be used when calculating wages allocated to the grant. Condition: In our sample of payroll transactions, instances of estimated pay rates were used. Cause and Effect: The Organization's choice of method on how they were billing the grant was in some cases not correct. Instead of billing the grant based on actual pay rates, the Organization billed on estimated pay rates. The variances are small because the estimate was determined based on expected monthly hours worked and typically employees work their full work schedule. Therefore, the pay rate is an estimate if the employee does not work their full shift. Context: A sample of 40 transactions, totaling $50,758 was selected. The test found two transactions did not have the correct amount billed totaling $49 over billed and $37 under billed to the grant. Questioned costs: No known or likely questioned costs over $25,000. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization implement procedures to improve the wages billed to the grant and ensure they are based on actual approved pay rates.
Criteria: Employee approved pay rates are to be used when calculating wages allocated to the grant. Condition: In our sample of payroll transactions, instances of estimated pay rates were used. Cause and Effect: The Organization's choice of method on how they were billing the grant was in some cases not correct. Instead of billing the grant based on actual pay rates, the Organization billed on estimated pay rates. The variances are small because the estimate was determined based on expected monthly hours worked and typically employees work their full work schedule. Therefore, the pay rate is an estimate if the employee does not work their full shift. Context: A sample of 40 transactions, totaling $50,758 was selected. The test found two transactions did not have the correct amount billed totaling $49 over billed and $37 under billed to the grant. Questioned costs: No known or likely questioned costs over $25,000. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization implement procedures to improve the wages billed to the grant and ensure they are based on actual approved pay rates.