Audit 308970

FY End
2023-08-31
Total Expended
$2.55M
Findings
2
Programs
6
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-06-17

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Contacts

Name Title Type
UNX8JXLPT735 Debra Pratt Auditee
5734385451 Joshua Wilks Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: NOTE 1 BASIS OF PRESENTATION Accounting Policies: No funds were identified as having been provided to subrecipients by the Hospital and accordingly, no funds identified in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards are attributable to subrecipient entities. There were no federal awards expended for noncash assistance or insurance. The Hospital has elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowable under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The Hospital has elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowable under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards includes the federal grant activity of Washington County Memorial Hospital’s (the Hospital) and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the applicable requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the schedule of expenditures of federal awards presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Hospital, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position, or cash flows of the Hospital.
Title: NOTE 3 RECONCILATION OF SEFA AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Accounting Policies: No funds were identified as having been provided to subrecipients by the Hospital and accordingly, no funds identified in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards are attributable to subrecipient entities. There were no federal awards expended for noncash assistance or insurance. The Hospital has elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowable under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The Hospital has elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowable under the Uniform Guidance. The financial statements reflect revenue recognized from the COVID-19 Provider Relief Fund and American Rescue Plan Rural Distribution as well as other COVID-19 related grants of approximately $-0- and $1,931,000 for the years ended August 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. The SEFA includes COVID-19 Provider Relief Fund and American Rescue Plan Rural Distribution of $1,231,377 that were received in Period 4 in accordance with the requirements of the compliance supplement for assistance listing number 93.498.

Finding Details

2023 – 001 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Other Programs Federal program title: COVID-19 Provider Relief Fund and American Rescue Plan Rural Distribution CFDA Number: 93.498 Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: Period 4 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control in and over Compliance Compliance Requirement: Reporting Criteria or specific requirement: Surrounding reporting activities, the Hospital’s internal controls should be designed to assure all reporting completed under program guidelines. Condition: During our testing, we identified the Hospital did not have internal controls in place to ensure reporting was completed in accordance with HHS guidelines. Questioned costs: None Context: During our testing, it was identified that the Hospital selected Option 2 for reporting of lost revenues, which compared actual net patient revenue for each quarter during the period of availability against budget for each quarter. In order to utilize this option, budgets must have been approved before March 27, 2020. However, the budget for periods beginning September 1, 2020, through the end of the period of availability were not approved prior to this date. As such, the Hospital utilized the budget amounts for the same month of the previous year, which is not in accordance with the guidelines under Option 2. Cause: The Hospital was amidst a pandemic and due to the reporting requirements constantly changing, the Hospital reported under their initial understanding of the lost revenue guidance. Effect: The auditor noted no instances of noncompliance with the provisions of lost revenues claimed, as the approved quarters lost revenues exceeded the amount claimed; however, the internal controls around compliance over reporting were not effective. Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend the Hospital design controls to ensure that reporting is completing in accordance with latest HHS guidelines. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2023 – 001 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Other Programs Federal program title: COVID-19 Provider Relief Fund and American Rescue Plan Rural Distribution CFDA Number: 93.498 Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: Period 4 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control in and over Compliance Compliance Requirement: Reporting Criteria or specific requirement: Surrounding reporting activities, the Hospital’s internal controls should be designed to assure all reporting completed under program guidelines. Condition: During our testing, we identified the Hospital did not have internal controls in place to ensure reporting was completed in accordance with HHS guidelines. Questioned costs: None Context: During our testing, it was identified that the Hospital selected Option 2 for reporting of lost revenues, which compared actual net patient revenue for each quarter during the period of availability against budget for each quarter. In order to utilize this option, budgets must have been approved before March 27, 2020. However, the budget for periods beginning September 1, 2020, through the end of the period of availability were not approved prior to this date. As such, the Hospital utilized the budget amounts for the same month of the previous year, which is not in accordance with the guidelines under Option 2. Cause: The Hospital was amidst a pandemic and due to the reporting requirements constantly changing, the Hospital reported under their initial understanding of the lost revenue guidance. Effect: The auditor noted no instances of noncompliance with the provisions of lost revenues claimed, as the approved quarters lost revenues exceeded the amount claimed; however, the internal controls around compliance over reporting were not effective. Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend the Hospital design controls to ensure that reporting is completing in accordance with latest HHS guidelines. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.