Audit 308915

FY End
2023-12-31
Total Expended
$2.81M
Findings
2
Programs
1
Organization: Golden State Finance Authority (CA)
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-06-14
Auditor: Moss Adams LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
400884 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - G
977326 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - G

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
11.307 Economic Adjustment Assistance $2.81M Yes 1

Contacts

Name Title Type
TJEVAMJNLNV9 Milena De Melo Auditee
9164474806 Arthur Ngo Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement as they are not consistent with underlying agreements, program objectives, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis rate offered by Uniform Guidance The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (“Schedule”) includes the Federal grant activity of the Golden State Finance Authority (GSFA) and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of GSFA, it is not intended to and does not present the net position, changes in net position, or cash flows of the GSFA.

Finding Details

Criteria: Pursuant to Uniform Guidance 200-430, charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards, but may be used for interim accounting purposes, provided that: The non-Federal entity's system of internal controls includes processes to review after-the-fact interim charges made to a Federal award based on budget estimates. All necessary adjustments must be made such that the final amount charged to the Federal award is accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition/Context: During the audit of matching, level of effort, and earmarking we noted that there are no timesheets or time certifications maintained to validate the time spent and matched to the federal grant. Effect: There are no controls in place regarding payroll costs allocated to the federal program to meet matching, level of effort, and earmarking compliance requirements. A reasonable possibility exists that noncompliance could occur and not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Cause: GSFA did not formally document the review and approval of salaries and wages used to meet the program's matching requirements. Questioned cost: None. Recommendation: Management should implement controls to ensure salaries and wages used for matching requirements are certified at the end of each reporting period. Views of responsible officials (unaudited) – Management agrees with the recommendation. Management has subsequently reviewed the salaries and wages used to meet the program's matching requirements for the reporting periods during 2023, and deemed them accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. The subsequent review did not result in any amendments to our filing.
Criteria: Pursuant to Uniform Guidance 200-430, charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards, but may be used for interim accounting purposes, provided that: The non-Federal entity's system of internal controls includes processes to review after-the-fact interim charges made to a Federal award based on budget estimates. All necessary adjustments must be made such that the final amount charged to the Federal award is accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition/Context: During the audit of matching, level of effort, and earmarking we noted that there are no timesheets or time certifications maintained to validate the time spent and matched to the federal grant. Effect: There are no controls in place regarding payroll costs allocated to the federal program to meet matching, level of effort, and earmarking compliance requirements. A reasonable possibility exists that noncompliance could occur and not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Cause: GSFA did not formally document the review and approval of salaries and wages used to meet the program's matching requirements. Questioned cost: None. Recommendation: Management should implement controls to ensure salaries and wages used for matching requirements are certified at the end of each reporting period. Views of responsible officials (unaudited) – Management agrees with the recommendation. Management has subsequently reviewed the salaries and wages used to meet the program's matching requirements for the reporting periods during 2023, and deemed them accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. The subsequent review did not result in any amendments to our filing.