Audit 308475

FY End
2022-12-31
Total Expended
$13.49M
Findings
2
Programs
25
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2024-06-10

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
400454 2022-005 Significant Deficiency - I
976896 2022-005 Significant Deficiency - I

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.231 Emergency Solutions Grant Program $425,677 - 0
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $350,408 Yes 0
16.585 Drug Court Discretionary Grant Program $169,757 - 0
16.575 Crime Victim Assistance $152,087 - 0
20.600 State and Community Highway Safety $146,634 - 0
16.540 Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention_allocation to States $104,510 - 0
16.588 Violence Against Women Formula Grants $71,079 - 0
16.606 State Criminal Alien Assistance Program $68,031 - 0
20.521 New Freedom Program $54,347 - 0
20.205 Highway Planning and Construction $48,192 - 0
93.667 Social Services Block Grant $40,990 - 0
97.042 Emergency Management Performance Grants $39,721 - 0
93.044 Special Programs for the Aging_title Iii, Part B_grants for Supportive Services and Senior Centers $36,911 - 0
16.745 Criminal and Juvenile Justice and Mental Health Collaboration Program $33,072 - 0
93.053 Nutrition Services Incentive Program $30,809 - 0
93.045 Special Programs for the Aging_title Iii, Part C_nutrition Services $30,511 - 0
16.738 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program $28,245 - 0
93.669 Child Abuse and Neglect State Grants $21,633 - 0
20.507 Federal Transit_formula Grants $17,735 Yes 0
97.067 Homeland Security Grant Program $15,645 - 0
14.228 Community Development Block Grants/state's Program and Non-Entitlement Grants in Hawaii $13,990 - 0
16.548 Title V_delinquency Prevention Program $11,970 - 0
16.922 Equitable Sharing Program $9,995 - 0
93.276 Drug-Free Communities Support Program Grants $9,549 - 0
93.470 Alzheimer's Disease Program Initiative (adpi) $3,575 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
VE3JDWVHBLZ7 Dominic Ochei Auditee
7709207473 Meredith Lipson Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation and Accounting Accounting Policies: The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is presented using the modifiedaccrual bases of accounting. Under the modified accrual basis of accounting, expenditures arerecognized when the related fund liability is incurred.Federal grant programs which are administered through State agencies (pass-through awards)have been included in this report.The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S.Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles,and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards and therefore, some amounts presented in thisschedule may differ from amounts presented or used in the preparation of the financial statements. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The County did not use the de minimus indirect cost rate The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is presented using the modifiedaccrual bases of accounting. Under the modified accrual basis of accounting, expenditures arerecognized when the related fund liability is incurred.Federal grant programs which are administered through State agencies (pass-through awards)have been included in this report.The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S.Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles,and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards and therefore, some amounts presented in thisschedule may differ from amounts presented or used in the preparation of the financialstatements.

Finding Details

U.S. Department of Treasury Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund Assistance Listing Number 21.027 Internal Control Over Procurement Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200.318, requires grant recipients to follow the procurement standards established by their state and their own policies as long as those standards meet federal requirements. The County’s procurement standards meet federal and state requirements. Condition: During our testing of the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (“ARPA”), it was discovered that the County did not adhere to its established Procurement Policy as multiple contractors were engaged without any formal quote or a bid. Possible Effects: The County could unintentionally enter into a contract that the County’s governance would deem unsuitable were the proper policy followed. Questioned Costs: $633,457. Context/Effect: We tested four contractors paid with ARPA funds who were engaged without a formal approval, quote or competitive bid. Cause: The County did not adhere to its established Procurement Policy, and did not adhere to the Uniform Guidance requirements to ensure free and open competition. Recommendation: We recommend the County review its process for awarding all contracts paid with federal funding to ensure free and open competition in accordance with federal guidelines. Management's Response: We agree and have taken proactive measures within the Purchasing Department to enhance training and awareness among our staff. Additionally, the Grant division has been reinforcing the importance of adhering to Federal grant guidelines regarding procurement. We will continue to monitor and improve our processes to ensure compliance with established guidelines.
U.S. Department of Treasury Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund Assistance Listing Number 21.027 Internal Control Over Procurement Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200.318, requires grant recipients to follow the procurement standards established by their state and their own policies as long as those standards meet federal requirements. The County’s procurement standards meet federal and state requirements. Condition: During our testing of the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (“ARPA”), it was discovered that the County did not adhere to its established Procurement Policy as multiple contractors were engaged without any formal quote or a bid. Possible Effects: The County could unintentionally enter into a contract that the County’s governance would deem unsuitable were the proper policy followed. Questioned Costs: $633,457. Context/Effect: We tested four contractors paid with ARPA funds who were engaged without a formal approval, quote or competitive bid. Cause: The County did not adhere to its established Procurement Policy, and did not adhere to the Uniform Guidance requirements to ensure free and open competition. Recommendation: We recommend the County review its process for awarding all contracts paid with federal funding to ensure free and open competition in accordance with federal guidelines. Management's Response: We agree and have taken proactive measures within the Purchasing Department to enhance training and awareness among our staff. Additionally, the Grant division has been reinforcing the importance of adhering to Federal grant guidelines regarding procurement. We will continue to monitor and improve our processes to ensure compliance with established guidelines.