Audit 308145

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$42.91M
Findings
4
Programs
19
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-06-05
Auditor: Nigro & Nigro PC

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
399978 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - N
399979 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - N
976420 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - N
976421 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - N

Contacts

Name Title Type
Y2ZUG3RZT1V5 Kristin Garrison Auditee
7609664075 Peter Glenn Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: The schedule of expenditures of Federal awards includes the Federal grant activity of the District and is presented on the modified accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of the financial statements. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The District did not elect to use the ten percent de minimis indirect cost rate.

Finding Details

Criteria: ESEA sections 1111(h)(1)(C)(iii)(II) and 8101(23), (25) (20 USC 6311(h)(1)(C)(iii)(II) and 7801(23), (25))) require a local educational agency to have official written documentation that a student enrolled in another school or in an educational program that culminates in the award of a regular high school diploma in order to remove a student from the graduation cohort. A student who is retained in grade, enrolled in a GED program, or leaves school for any other reason may not be counted has having transferred out for the purpose of calculating graduation rate and must remain in the adjusted cohort. Condition: During our testing of compliance and controls over the graduation cohort, we identified two instances in which the District was unable to provide supporting documentation to demonstrate that the students enrolled in another school or in a educational program that culminates in the award of a regular high school diploma. Context: Exceptions were identified in two of the sixteen students sampled. Questioned Costs: None. Cause: The District did not maintain adequate documentation to support the removal of a student from the regulatory adjusted cohort. Effect: School site’s graduation rate will be overstated on the school site’s annual report card. Recommendation: We recommend the District train school site staff on allowable documentation to remove students from a graduation cohort as well as other cohort codes. Subsequently the District should assist school sites in developing the record retention process to ensure documentation is available upon request. Views of Responsible Officials: The district will develop a process for properly accounting for and documenting when a student is taken from the regulatory-adjusted cohort. In addition, formal training will be provided to both Counselors and site Guidance Technicians on the manner in which to implement the developed process in order to ensure that documentation is available upon request. This will be provided prior to May of 2024.
Criteria: ESEA sections 1111(h)(1)(C)(iii)(II) and 8101(23), (25) (20 USC 6311(h)(1)(C)(iii)(II) and 7801(23), (25))) require a local educational agency to have official written documentation that a student enrolled in another school or in an educational program that culminates in the award of a regular high school diploma in order to remove a student from the graduation cohort. A student who is retained in grade, enrolled in a GED program, or leaves school for any other reason may not be counted has having transferred out for the purpose of calculating graduation rate and must remain in the adjusted cohort. Condition: During our testing of compliance and controls over the graduation cohort, we identified two instances in which the District was unable to provide supporting documentation to demonstrate that the students enrolled in another school or in a educational program that culminates in the award of a regular high school diploma. Context: Exceptions were identified in two of the sixteen students sampled. Questioned Costs: None. Cause: The District did not maintain adequate documentation to support the removal of a student from the regulatory adjusted cohort. Effect: School site’s graduation rate will be overstated on the school site’s annual report card. Recommendation: We recommend the District train school site staff on allowable documentation to remove students from a graduation cohort as well as other cohort codes. Subsequently the District should assist school sites in developing the record retention process to ensure documentation is available upon request. Views of Responsible Officials: The district will develop a process for properly accounting for and documenting when a student is taken from the regulatory-adjusted cohort. In addition, formal training will be provided to both Counselors and site Guidance Technicians on the manner in which to implement the developed process in order to ensure that documentation is available upon request. This will be provided prior to May of 2024.
Criteria: ESEA sections 1111(h)(1)(C)(iii)(II) and 8101(23), (25) (20 USC 6311(h)(1)(C)(iii)(II) and 7801(23), (25))) require a local educational agency to have official written documentation that a student enrolled in another school or in an educational program that culminates in the award of a regular high school diploma in order to remove a student from the graduation cohort. A student who is retained in grade, enrolled in a GED program, or leaves school for any other reason may not be counted has having transferred out for the purpose of calculating graduation rate and must remain in the adjusted cohort. Condition: During our testing of compliance and controls over the graduation cohort, we identified two instances in which the District was unable to provide supporting documentation to demonstrate that the students enrolled in another school or in a educational program that culminates in the award of a regular high school diploma. Context: Exceptions were identified in two of the sixteen students sampled. Questioned Costs: None. Cause: The District did not maintain adequate documentation to support the removal of a student from the regulatory adjusted cohort. Effect: School site’s graduation rate will be overstated on the school site’s annual report card. Recommendation: We recommend the District train school site staff on allowable documentation to remove students from a graduation cohort as well as other cohort codes. Subsequently the District should assist school sites in developing the record retention process to ensure documentation is available upon request. Views of Responsible Officials: The district will develop a process for properly accounting for and documenting when a student is taken from the regulatory-adjusted cohort. In addition, formal training will be provided to both Counselors and site Guidance Technicians on the manner in which to implement the developed process in order to ensure that documentation is available upon request. This will be provided prior to May of 2024.
Criteria: ESEA sections 1111(h)(1)(C)(iii)(II) and 8101(23), (25) (20 USC 6311(h)(1)(C)(iii)(II) and 7801(23), (25))) require a local educational agency to have official written documentation that a student enrolled in another school or in an educational program that culminates in the award of a regular high school diploma in order to remove a student from the graduation cohort. A student who is retained in grade, enrolled in a GED program, or leaves school for any other reason may not be counted has having transferred out for the purpose of calculating graduation rate and must remain in the adjusted cohort. Condition: During our testing of compliance and controls over the graduation cohort, we identified two instances in which the District was unable to provide supporting documentation to demonstrate that the students enrolled in another school or in a educational program that culminates in the award of a regular high school diploma. Context: Exceptions were identified in two of the sixteen students sampled. Questioned Costs: None. Cause: The District did not maintain adequate documentation to support the removal of a student from the regulatory adjusted cohort. Effect: School site’s graduation rate will be overstated on the school site’s annual report card. Recommendation: We recommend the District train school site staff on allowable documentation to remove students from a graduation cohort as well as other cohort codes. Subsequently the District should assist school sites in developing the record retention process to ensure documentation is available upon request. Views of Responsible Officials: The district will develop a process for properly accounting for and documenting when a student is taken from the regulatory-adjusted cohort. In addition, formal training will be provided to both Counselors and site Guidance Technicians on the manner in which to implement the developed process in order to ensure that documentation is available upon request. This will be provided prior to May of 2024.