Audit 307971

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$6.82M
Findings
4
Programs
38
Organization: Bladen County (NC)
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-06-04

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
399870 2023-001 Material Weakness Yes E
399871 2023-002 Significant Deficiency Yes E
976312 2023-001 Material Weakness Yes E
976313 2023-002 Significant Deficiency Yes E

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
93.778 Medical Assistance Program $1.35M Yes 2
10.561 State Administrative Matching Grants for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program $817,101 Yes 0
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $749,558 Yes 0
93.563 Child Support Enforcement $688,020 - 0
14.228 Community Development Block Grants/state's Program and Non-Entitlement Grants in Hawaii $446,200 - 0
93.667 Social Services Block Grant $393,760 - 0
93.912 Rural Health Care Services Outreach, Rural Health Network Development and Small Health Care Provider Quality Improvement $348,522 - 0
10.557 Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children $237,848 - 0
93.568 Low-Income Home Energy Assistance $217,441 - 0
93.268 Immunization Cooperative Agreements $186,133 - 0
93.658 Foster Care_title IV-E $127,545 - 0
93.323 Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (elc) $117,094 - 0
93.044 Special Programs for the Aging_title Iii, Part B_grants for Supportive Services and Senior Centers $99,651 - 0
93.045 Special Programs for the Aging_title Iii, Part C_nutrition Services $95,654 - 0
20.509 Formula Grants for Rural Areas and Tribal Transit Program $80,237 - 0
21.016 Equitable Sharing $78,618 - 0
93.596 Child Care Mandatory and Matching Funds of the Child Care and Development Fund $77,349 - 0
93.994 Maternal and Child Health Services Block Grant to the States $47,478 - 0
97.039 Hazard Mitigation Grant $46,733 - 0
97.042 Emergency Management Performance Grants $38,146 - 0
93.069 Public Health Emergency Preparedness $33,601 - 0
93.991 Preventive Health and Health Services Block Grant $30,607 - 0
93.767 Children's Health Insurance Program $26,066 - 0
21.032 Local Assistance & Tribal Consistency $24,000 - 0
16.738 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program $23,813 - 0
93.217 Family Planning_services $19,671 - 0
93.053 Nutrition Services Incentive Program $14,752 - 0
93.645 Stephanie Tubbs Jones Child Welfare Services Program $14,025 - 0
93.556 Promoting Safe and Stable Families $12,436 - 0
97.067 Homeland Security Grant Program $12,000 - 0
45.310 Grants to States $6,488 - 0
16.607 Bulletproof Vest Partnership Program $4,979 - 0
93.659 Adoption Assistance $4,174 - 0
93.674 John H. Chafee Foster Care Program for Successful Transition to Adulthood $4,042 - 0
93.116 Project Grants and Cooperative Agreements for Tuberculosis Control Programs $2,021 - 0
93.391 Activities to Support State, Tribal, Local and Territorial (stlt) Health Department Response to Public Health Or Healthcare Crises $343 - 0
93.558 Temporary Assistance for Needy Families $323 - 0
93.977 Preventive Health Services_sexually Transmitted Diseases Control Grants $100 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
TLCTJWDJH1H9 Lisa Coleman Auditee
9108626723 R Bryon Scott Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Note 1: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported in the SEFSA are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Bladen County has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State wards (SEFSA) includes the federal and State grant activity of Bladen County under the programs of the federal government and the State of North Carolina for the year ended June 30, 2023. The information in this SEFSA is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 US Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards and the State Single Audit Implementation Act. Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Bladen County, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position or cash flows of Bladen County.
Title: Note 2: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported in the SEFSA are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Bladen County has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Expenditures reported in the SEFSA are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement.
Title: Note 3: Indirect Cost Rate Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported in the SEFSA are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Bladen County has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Bladen County has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance.
Title: Note 4: Cluster of Programs Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported in the SEFSA are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Bladen County has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The following are clustered by the NC Department of Health and Human Services and are treated separately for state audit requirement purposes: Foster Care and Adoption.
Title: Note 5: Benefit Payments Issued by the State Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported in the SEFSA are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Bladen County has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The amounts listed below were paid directly to individual recipients by the State from federal and State moneys. County personnel are involved with certain functions, primarily eligibility determinations that cause benefit payments to be issued by the State. These amounts disclose this additional aid to County recipients that do not appear in the basic financial statements because they are not revenues and expenditures of the County.

Finding Details

Criteria: Medicaid for Aged, Blind and Disabled case records should contain documentation that verifications were done in preparation of the application and these items will agree to reports in the NC FAST system. In this process, the countable resources should be calculated correctly and agree back to the amounts in the NC FAST system. Any items discovered in the verification process should be considered countable or non-countable resources and explained within the documentation. Condition: These technical errors consisted of forty-eight instances of failure to comply with a policy requirement. Of these, eight (8) failed to run the work number for all individuals with the potential for income. Child support referral was not sent in one (1) case. Errors in social security numbers for household participants resulted in a lack of online verification in two (2) cases. Four (4) cases had improperly forced eligibility. One (1) case of an SSI ex parte review not having been completed. Six (6) cases of incomplete or missing living arrangement documentation. Fifteen (15) instances of inaccurate resource calculations in NC FAST. All errors were the result of evidence entered into NC FAST and used in the eligibility determination not matching the supporting documentation or lacking any supporting documentation. Ten (10) instances of inaccurate budget calculations in NC FAST. All errors were the result of evidence entered into NC FAST and used in the eligibility determination not matching the supporting documentation, a lack of any supporting documentation, or a manual calculation error. One (1) instance of evidence input error resulting in inaccurate needs unit in the eligibility determination. Questioned Costs: There was no affect to eligibility and there were no questioned costs related to those errors. Context: Of the 447,847 claims, we examined 138 Medicaid cases to re-determine eligibility. These findings were disclosed in a separately issued spreadsheet to the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services and are being reported with the financial statement audit as it relates to Medicaid administrative cost compliance audit. Effect: For those certifications/re-certifications there was a chance that information was not properly documented and reconciled to NC FAST which affect countable resource and a participant could have been approved for benefits that they were not eligible. Identification of a repeat finding: This is a repeat finding from the immediate previous audit, 2022-002. Cause: Ineffective record keeping and ineffective case review process, incomplete documentation, and incorrect application of rules for purposes of determining eligibility. Recommendation: Files should be reviewed internally to ensure proper documentation is in place for eligibility. Workers should be retrained on what files should contain and the importance of complete and accurate record keeping. We recommend that all files include online verifications, documented resources of income and those amounts agree to information in NC FAST. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The County agrees with the finding. Supervisors will complete Monthly Second Party reviews for application approvals/denials and recertifications. These reviews will assist individual workers with noted case errors. Individual counseling will be held with the worker to assure their understanding of the errors.
Criteria: Medicaid for Aged, Blind and Disabled case records should contain documentation that verifications were done in preparation of the application and these items will agree to reports in the NC FAST system. In this process, the countable resources should be calculated correctly and agree back to the amounts in the NC FAST system. Any items discovered in the verification process should be considered countable or non-countable resources and explained within the documentation. Condition: Three eligibility errors were found. One case contained incomplete and contradicting documentations and verifications for resources and income. Based on a reperformance of eligibility check at audit, the case would not have been eligible for benefits. One case contained incomplete and contradicting documentations and verifications for resources and income. Based on a reperformance of eligibility check at audit, the case would not have been eligible for benefits. One case was not properly terminated. The case was scheduled for closure as of April 2021, but closure was not completed. The case was not acted upon again until 2023, with benefits continuing through that period. Questioned Costs: These errors did affect eligibility, however the $115 in claims paid in error did not rise to the level of a questioned cost. Context: Of 447,847 claims, we examined 120 Medicaid cases to re-determine eligibility. These findings were disclosed in a separately issued spreadsheet to the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services and are being reported with the financial statement audit as it relates to Medicaid administrative cost compliance audit. Effect: For those certifications/re-certifications there was a chance that information was not properly documented and reconciled to NC FAST which affect countable resource and a participant could have been approved for benefits that they were not eligible. Identification of a repeat finding: This is a repeat finding from the immediate previous audit, 2022-002. Cause: Ineffective record keeping and ineffective case review process, incomplete documentation, and incorrect application of rules for purposes of determining eligibility. Recommendation: Files should be reviewed internally to ensure proper documentation is in place for eligibility. Workers should be retrained on what files should contain and the importance of complete and accurate record keeping. We recommend that all files include online verifications, documented resources of income and those amounts agree to information in NC FAST. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The County agrees with the finding. Supervisors will complete Monthly Second Party reviews for application approvals/denials and recertifications. These reviews will assist individual workers with noted case errors. Individual counseling will be held with the worker to assure their understanding of the errors.
Criteria: Medicaid for Aged, Blind and Disabled case records should contain documentation that verifications were done in preparation of the application and these items will agree to reports in the NC FAST system. In this process, the countable resources should be calculated correctly and agree back to the amounts in the NC FAST system. Any items discovered in the verification process should be considered countable or non-countable resources and explained within the documentation. Condition: These technical errors consisted of forty-eight instances of failure to comply with a policy requirement. Of these, eight (8) failed to run the work number for all individuals with the potential for income. Child support referral was not sent in one (1) case. Errors in social security numbers for household participants resulted in a lack of online verification in two (2) cases. Four (4) cases had improperly forced eligibility. One (1) case of an SSI ex parte review not having been completed. Six (6) cases of incomplete or missing living arrangement documentation. Fifteen (15) instances of inaccurate resource calculations in NC FAST. All errors were the result of evidence entered into NC FAST and used in the eligibility determination not matching the supporting documentation or lacking any supporting documentation. Ten (10) instances of inaccurate budget calculations in NC FAST. All errors were the result of evidence entered into NC FAST and used in the eligibility determination not matching the supporting documentation, a lack of any supporting documentation, or a manual calculation error. One (1) instance of evidence input error resulting in inaccurate needs unit in the eligibility determination. Questioned Costs: There was no affect to eligibility and there were no questioned costs related to those errors. Context: Of the 447,847 claims, we examined 138 Medicaid cases to re-determine eligibility. These findings were disclosed in a separately issued spreadsheet to the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services and are being reported with the financial statement audit as it relates to Medicaid administrative cost compliance audit. Effect: For those certifications/re-certifications there was a chance that information was not properly documented and reconciled to NC FAST which affect countable resource and a participant could have been approved for benefits that they were not eligible. Identification of a repeat finding: This is a repeat finding from the immediate previous audit, 2022-002. Cause: Ineffective record keeping and ineffective case review process, incomplete documentation, and incorrect application of rules for purposes of determining eligibility. Recommendation: Files should be reviewed internally to ensure proper documentation is in place for eligibility. Workers should be retrained on what files should contain and the importance of complete and accurate record keeping. We recommend that all files include online verifications, documented resources of income and those amounts agree to information in NC FAST. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The County agrees with the finding. Supervisors will complete Monthly Second Party reviews for application approvals/denials and recertifications. These reviews will assist individual workers with noted case errors. Individual counseling will be held with the worker to assure their understanding of the errors.
Criteria: Medicaid for Aged, Blind and Disabled case records should contain documentation that verifications were done in preparation of the application and these items will agree to reports in the NC FAST system. In this process, the countable resources should be calculated correctly and agree back to the amounts in the NC FAST system. Any items discovered in the verification process should be considered countable or non-countable resources and explained within the documentation. Condition: Three eligibility errors were found. One case contained incomplete and contradicting documentations and verifications for resources and income. Based on a reperformance of eligibility check at audit, the case would not have been eligible for benefits. One case contained incomplete and contradicting documentations and verifications for resources and income. Based on a reperformance of eligibility check at audit, the case would not have been eligible for benefits. One case was not properly terminated. The case was scheduled for closure as of April 2021, but closure was not completed. The case was not acted upon again until 2023, with benefits continuing through that period. Questioned Costs: These errors did affect eligibility, however the $115 in claims paid in error did not rise to the level of a questioned cost. Context: Of 447,847 claims, we examined 120 Medicaid cases to re-determine eligibility. These findings were disclosed in a separately issued spreadsheet to the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services and are being reported with the financial statement audit as it relates to Medicaid administrative cost compliance audit. Effect: For those certifications/re-certifications there was a chance that information was not properly documented and reconciled to NC FAST which affect countable resource and a participant could have been approved for benefits that they were not eligible. Identification of a repeat finding: This is a repeat finding from the immediate previous audit, 2022-002. Cause: Ineffective record keeping and ineffective case review process, incomplete documentation, and incorrect application of rules for purposes of determining eligibility. Recommendation: Files should be reviewed internally to ensure proper documentation is in place for eligibility. Workers should be retrained on what files should contain and the importance of complete and accurate record keeping. We recommend that all files include online verifications, documented resources of income and those amounts agree to information in NC FAST. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The County agrees with the finding. Supervisors will complete Monthly Second Party reviews for application approvals/denials and recertifications. These reviews will assist individual workers with noted case errors. Individual counseling will be held with the worker to assure their understanding of the errors.