Audit 307757

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$3.66M
Findings
4
Programs
19
Organization: Town of Watertown, Connecticut (CT)
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-05-31

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
399189 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - L
399190 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - L
975631 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - L
975632 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - L

Contacts

Name Title Type
K63NWK8HFZP5 Sue Zappone Auditee
8609455259 Sean O'Grady Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Town of Watertown has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate provided under Section 200.414 of the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Name: Education Stabilization Fund (ESSER) Assistance Listing Number: 84.425D/84.425U Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): 12060-SDE64370-29571 and 12060-SDE64370-29636 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Criteria Controls should be in place to ensure the accuracy of reporting submitted for federal awards programs. Condition The reporting submitted to the Connecticut State Department of Education was not reviewed by an individual independent of the preparation process. The report contained an error of more than $13 million, which may have been identified during a review process. Context When the reporting error was brought to the attention of the Board of Education, the Board of Education reached out to the Connecticut State Department of Education. The Connecticut State Department of Education did not want the report re-opened for corrections since the data was already sent to the U.S. Department of Education and published. Cause No controls in place regarding a second review of submitted grant reports. Effect Potential for misstatements to be made during grant reporting without the review process. Recommendation We recommend that a second individual, independent of the preparation process, review grant reports to be submitted. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The Board of Education will implement a policy for an independent review of all grant reports to be submitted.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Name: Education Stabilization Fund (ESSER) Assistance Listing Number: 84.425D/84.425U Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): 12060-SDE64370-29571 and 12060-SDE64370-29636 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Criteria Controls should be in place to ensure the accuracy of reporting submitted for federal awards programs. Condition The reporting submitted to the Connecticut State Department of Education was not reviewed by an individual independent of the preparation process. The report contained an error of more than $13 million, which may have been identified during a review process. Context When the reporting error was brought to the attention of the Board of Education, the Board of Education reached out to the Connecticut State Department of Education. The Connecticut State Department of Education did not want the report re-opened for corrections since the data was already sent to the U.S. Department of Education and published. Cause No controls in place regarding a second review of submitted grant reports. Effect Potential for misstatements to be made during grant reporting without the review process. Recommendation We recommend that a second individual, independent of the preparation process, review grant reports to be submitted. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The Board of Education will implement a policy for an independent review of all grant reports to be submitted.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Name: Education Stabilization Fund (ESSER) Assistance Listing Number: 84.425D/84.425U Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): 12060-SDE64370-29571 and 12060-SDE64370-29636 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Criteria Controls should be in place to ensure the accuracy of reporting submitted for federal awards programs. Condition The reporting submitted to the Connecticut State Department of Education was not reviewed by an individual independent of the preparation process. The report contained an error of more than $13 million, which may have been identified during a review process. Context When the reporting error was brought to the attention of the Board of Education, the Board of Education reached out to the Connecticut State Department of Education. The Connecticut State Department of Education did not want the report re-opened for corrections since the data was already sent to the U.S. Department of Education and published. Cause No controls in place regarding a second review of submitted grant reports. Effect Potential for misstatements to be made during grant reporting without the review process. Recommendation We recommend that a second individual, independent of the preparation process, review grant reports to be submitted. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The Board of Education will implement a policy for an independent review of all grant reports to be submitted.
Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Name: Education Stabilization Fund (ESSER) Assistance Listing Number: 84.425D/84.425U Pass-Through Agency: State of Connecticut Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): 12060-SDE64370-29571 and 12060-SDE64370-29636 Compliance Requirement: Reporting Criteria Controls should be in place to ensure the accuracy of reporting submitted for federal awards programs. Condition The reporting submitted to the Connecticut State Department of Education was not reviewed by an individual independent of the preparation process. The report contained an error of more than $13 million, which may have been identified during a review process. Context When the reporting error was brought to the attention of the Board of Education, the Board of Education reached out to the Connecticut State Department of Education. The Connecticut State Department of Education did not want the report re-opened for corrections since the data was already sent to the U.S. Department of Education and published. Cause No controls in place regarding a second review of submitted grant reports. Effect Potential for misstatements to be made during grant reporting without the review process. Recommendation We recommend that a second individual, independent of the preparation process, review grant reports to be submitted. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The Board of Education will implement a policy for an independent review of all grant reports to be submitted.