Audit 307377

FY End
2017-12-31
Total Expended
$2.77M
Findings
4
Programs
11
Organization: City of Mount Vernon (NY)
Year: 2017 Accepted: 2024-05-28

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
398616 2017-006 Material Weakness - AB
398617 2017-007 Significant Deficiency Yes L
975058 2017-006 Material Weakness - AB
975059 2017-007 Significant Deficiency Yes L

Contacts

Name Title Type
DGJ2SXDRPZ66 Darren Morton Auditee
9146652305 Robert Daniele Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The City has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the "Schedule") includes the federal award activity of the City of Mount Vernon, New York (“City”), except for the Mount Vernon Board of Water Supply and the Mount Vernon Industrial Development Agency, under programs of the federal government for the year ended December 31, 2017. Federal awards received directly from the Federal agencies as well as Federal awards passed through other government agencies are included in the Schedule. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (“Uniform Guidance”). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the City, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position or cash flows of the City.

Finding Details

Finding 2017-006 - Material Weakness - Maintenance of Financial Records -- Federal Awarding Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development -- CFDA Number and Title: CDBG Entitlement Grants Cluster; 14.218 Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants -- Applicable Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles -- CFDA Number and Title: 14.267 Continuum of Care Program -- Applicable Compliance Requirements: -- Activities Allowed or Unallowed; Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and Eligibility. -- Criteria: Title 24 of the United States Department of Housing Urban Development (“HUD”) of the Code of Federal Regulations (“CFR”) §570.506(a) specifies that the grantee must keep records which provide a full description of each activity that is selected for assistance, including its location, the amount of funds budgeted, obligated and expended for the activity, and the provision of the regulations under which the activity is eligible. -- Condition: Our audit revealed that certain documentation supporting drawdown amounts for certain expenditures were misplaced. -- Cause: Constant turnover in personnel responsible for administering these programs and lack of adequate training and cross training of personnel. -- Effect or Potential Effect: The funding agency could disallow the costs that do not have the appropriate supporting documentation and approvals. -- Known Questioned Costs: $173,143 -- Recommendation: We recommend that the Agency maintain the supporting documentation for expenditures as required by the federal guidelines. Further, documentation should be reviewed and approved prior to payment. -- Management’s Responses: See corrective action plan.
Finding 2017-007 - Significant Deficiency - Untimely Submissions; CFDA Number and Title: CDBG Entitlement Grants Cluster; 14.218 Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants; -- Applicable Compliance Requirements: Reporting -- Criteria: Per the Uniform Guidance, states, local governments, and nonprofit organizations (“the auditee”) that annually spend $750,000 or more in federal awards must perform a Single Audit and complete Form SF-SAC (“Data Collection Form”) and submit both to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (“FAC”). The auditee should submit the Data Collection Form and the reporting package to the FAC within the earlier of 30 days after the receipt of the auditors’ reports or nine months after the end of the audit period, unless a longer period is agreed to in advance by the cognizant or oversight agency for audit. -- Condition: The City did not submit the Data Collection Form and the reporting package for 2017 to the FAC by the due date in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. -- Cause: The year end closing of the general ledger and preparation for audit were not completed by management in a timely manner. - Context: During our audit we noted that significant reconciliations, analyses and information were not available on a timely basis to complete the audit. -- Effect: The City did not comply with the Uniform Guidance reporting requirements. - Recommendation: We recommend that the City submit the reports referred to above on a timely basis as required. - Management’s Responses: See corrective action plan
Finding 2017-006 - Material Weakness - Maintenance of Financial Records -- Federal Awarding Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development -- CFDA Number and Title: CDBG Entitlement Grants Cluster; 14.218 Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants -- Applicable Compliance Requirements: Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles -- CFDA Number and Title: 14.267 Continuum of Care Program -- Applicable Compliance Requirements: -- Activities Allowed or Unallowed; Allowable Costs/Cost Principles and Eligibility. -- Criteria: Title 24 of the United States Department of Housing Urban Development (“HUD”) of the Code of Federal Regulations (“CFR”) §570.506(a) specifies that the grantee must keep records which provide a full description of each activity that is selected for assistance, including its location, the amount of funds budgeted, obligated and expended for the activity, and the provision of the regulations under which the activity is eligible. -- Condition: Our audit revealed that certain documentation supporting drawdown amounts for certain expenditures were misplaced. -- Cause: Constant turnover in personnel responsible for administering these programs and lack of adequate training and cross training of personnel. -- Effect or Potential Effect: The funding agency could disallow the costs that do not have the appropriate supporting documentation and approvals. -- Known Questioned Costs: $173,143 -- Recommendation: We recommend that the Agency maintain the supporting documentation for expenditures as required by the federal guidelines. Further, documentation should be reviewed and approved prior to payment. -- Management’s Responses: See corrective action plan.
Finding 2017-007 - Significant Deficiency - Untimely Submissions; CFDA Number and Title: CDBG Entitlement Grants Cluster; 14.218 Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants; -- Applicable Compliance Requirements: Reporting -- Criteria: Per the Uniform Guidance, states, local governments, and nonprofit organizations (“the auditee”) that annually spend $750,000 or more in federal awards must perform a Single Audit and complete Form SF-SAC (“Data Collection Form”) and submit both to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (“FAC”). The auditee should submit the Data Collection Form and the reporting package to the FAC within the earlier of 30 days after the receipt of the auditors’ reports or nine months after the end of the audit period, unless a longer period is agreed to in advance by the cognizant or oversight agency for audit. -- Condition: The City did not submit the Data Collection Form and the reporting package for 2017 to the FAC by the due date in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. -- Cause: The year end closing of the general ledger and preparation for audit were not completed by management in a timely manner. - Context: During our audit we noted that significant reconciliations, analyses and information were not available on a timely basis to complete the audit. -- Effect: The City did not comply with the Uniform Guidance reporting requirements. - Recommendation: We recommend that the City submit the reports referred to above on a timely basis as required. - Management’s Responses: See corrective action plan