Audit 306345

FY End
2022-12-31
Total Expended
$1.02M
Findings
4
Programs
1
Organization: Point of Freedom (OH)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2024-05-15

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
396710 2022-003 Material Weakness - B
396711 2022-004 Material Weakness - L
973152 2022-003 Material Weakness - B
973153 2022-004 Material Weakness - L

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
93.788 Opioid Str $49,886 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
RYVTL7C4BNR4 Najah Muhammad Auditee
2162439653 John Wright Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), wherein certain types of expenditures may or may not be allowable or may be limited as to reimbursement. Passthrough entity identifying numbers are presented where available. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Organization has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance for any of its awards. The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the “Schedule”) includes the federal grant activity of Point of Freedom under programs of the federal government for the year ended December 31, 2022. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Point of Freedom, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets or cash flows of the Organization.

Finding Details

According to Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance, a nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Point of Freedom receiving Federal Awards must follow 2 CFR Part 200 subpart E, which outlines cost principles in the Uniform Guidance. Adequate documentation is crucial for costs to be allowable under Federal Awards, ensuring compliance, transparency, and accountability in fund utilization. We noted the following matters during testing: 1) Nineteen (19) contractor expenditures have no internal control evidence of timesheet reviewed and approved for the hours charged to the federal program. 2) Seven (7) disbursements have inadequate documentation. There is no formal monitoring over the contractors’ charged hours to the federal program and established policies over maintaining an adequate documentation. This suggests control deficiency over compliance. Incomplete documentation creates a challenge in promptly verifying the accuracy, thereby posing a risk of improper disbursements of federal funds. Of the 693 disbursements, we examined 68 of which seven (7) were identified with incomplete documentation, nineteen (19) contractor invoices without supporting timesheets. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.516(a)(3), auditors are required to report known questioned costs when likely questioned costs are greater than $25,000. Although the sample uncovered 26 transactions with incomplete documentation, resulting in $11,307 in questioned costs, extending the tests to the entire population projects questioned costs exceeding $25,000, specifically $27,462. We recommend that management should develop internal control procedures to address the compliance requirements of federal programs, especially over retaining adequate documentation of transactions.
According to Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance, a nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Point of Freedom needs to establish and document their policies and procedures to meet the control objectives outlined in 2 CFR section 200.1. One of the objectives focuses on ensuring that transactions are accurately recorded and accounted for, enabling the accurate preparation of dependable financial statements and federal reports. Based on our testing of reports, management was not able to provide accurate supporting documentation to corroborate reports submitted to the funding agency. The Organization's initial exposure to a Single Audit, along with limited time to develop policies and procedures for compliance, has resulted in the identified deficiencies. Inadequate controls in this compliance area could lead to a significant risk of the Organization not meeting federal award reporting requirements. We selected three months' worth of monthly reports for ADAMHS and one closeout report for OHMAS. We recommend management to seek professional advice in developing and implementing policies and procedures that address compliance requirements. We recommend further to provide comprehensive training to employees on these policies and procedures, along with consistent monitoring, to ensure accuracy and timeliness in federal reporting.
According to Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance, a nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Point of Freedom receiving Federal Awards must follow 2 CFR Part 200 subpart E, which outlines cost principles in the Uniform Guidance. Adequate documentation is crucial for costs to be allowable under Federal Awards, ensuring compliance, transparency, and accountability in fund utilization. We noted the following matters during testing: 1) Nineteen (19) contractor expenditures have no internal control evidence of timesheet reviewed and approved for the hours charged to the federal program. 2) Seven (7) disbursements have inadequate documentation. There is no formal monitoring over the contractors’ charged hours to the federal program and established policies over maintaining an adequate documentation. This suggests control deficiency over compliance. Incomplete documentation creates a challenge in promptly verifying the accuracy, thereby posing a risk of improper disbursements of federal funds. Of the 693 disbursements, we examined 68 of which seven (7) were identified with incomplete documentation, nineteen (19) contractor invoices without supporting timesheets. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.516(a)(3), auditors are required to report known questioned costs when likely questioned costs are greater than $25,000. Although the sample uncovered 26 transactions with incomplete documentation, resulting in $11,307 in questioned costs, extending the tests to the entire population projects questioned costs exceeding $25,000, specifically $27,462. We recommend that management should develop internal control procedures to address the compliance requirements of federal programs, especially over retaining adequate documentation of transactions.
According to Section 200.303 of the Uniform Guidance, a nonfederal entity must establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Point of Freedom needs to establish and document their policies and procedures to meet the control objectives outlined in 2 CFR section 200.1. One of the objectives focuses on ensuring that transactions are accurately recorded and accounted for, enabling the accurate preparation of dependable financial statements and federal reports. Based on our testing of reports, management was not able to provide accurate supporting documentation to corroborate reports submitted to the funding agency. The Organization's initial exposure to a Single Audit, along with limited time to develop policies and procedures for compliance, has resulted in the identified deficiencies. Inadequate controls in this compliance area could lead to a significant risk of the Organization not meeting federal award reporting requirements. We selected three months' worth of monthly reports for ADAMHS and one closeout report for OHMAS. We recommend management to seek professional advice in developing and implementing policies and procedures that address compliance requirements. We recommend further to provide comprehensive training to employees on these policies and procedures, along with consistent monitoring, to ensure accuracy and timeliness in federal reporting.