Audit 305679

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$4.28M
Findings
2
Programs
11
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-05-07

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
396118 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - B
972560 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - B

Contacts

Name Title Type
Q447DAJ4A4P3 David Broutman Auditee
7739130706 Enrique Lopez Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: 1 Accounting Policies: The Schedule was on the Accrual Basis of Accounting De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: Entity elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate. There were no federal non-cash awards, insurance or loan guarantees in the year under audit
Title: 2 Accounting Policies: The Schedule was on the Accrual Basis of Accounting De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: Entity elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate. There were no subrecipients for this organization
Title: 3 Accounting Policies: The Schedule was on the Accrual Basis of Accounting De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: Entity elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate. Program tested as major program was CFDA number 93.243
Title: 4 Accounting Policies: The Schedule was on the Accrual Basis of Accounting De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: Entity elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate. Entity elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate.

Finding Details

Finding 2023‐003 – [Questioned Costs] (Significant Deficiency) Criteria: Internal Control procedures should be designed to ensure that only allowable costs are charged to the program. Condition: Audit test revealed that an unallowable cost in the amount of $20,500 was allocated to the program Context: Expense transactions were selected for testing and it was determined that vouchers were submitted based on a predetermined amount from the budget and the amount was not adjusted to reflect actual supply costs. Effect: Unallowable costs were charged to the program. Cause: Internal control over expenditures failed to identify and prevent unallowable costs from being charged to the program. Recommendation: Internal control procedures over expenditures should be reviewed and modified as necessary to ensure that unallowable costs are not charged to the program. Views of Responsible Official: While PRCC believe this was a legitimate cost, there was an uncommon problem due to the fact that these were charged on the company credit card instead of our normal procurement process. In the future we will make sure to use our normal procurement process.
Finding 2023‐003 – [Questioned Costs] (Significant Deficiency) Criteria: Internal Control procedures should be designed to ensure that only allowable costs are charged to the program. Condition: Audit test revealed that an unallowable cost in the amount of $20,500 was allocated to the program Context: Expense transactions were selected for testing and it was determined that vouchers were submitted based on a predetermined amount from the budget and the amount was not adjusted to reflect actual supply costs. Effect: Unallowable costs were charged to the program. Cause: Internal control over expenditures failed to identify and prevent unallowable costs from being charged to the program. Recommendation: Internal control procedures over expenditures should be reviewed and modified as necessary to ensure that unallowable costs are not charged to the program. Views of Responsible Official: While PRCC believe this was a legitimate cost, there was an uncommon problem due to the fact that these were charged on the company credit card instead of our normal procurement process. In the future we will make sure to use our normal procurement process.