Audit 30559

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$1.59M
Findings
24
Programs
10
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-08-06

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
37168 2022-002 - Yes P
37169 2022-002 - Yes P
37170 2022-002 - Yes P
37171 2022-002 - Yes P
37172 2022-002 - Yes P
37173 2022-002 - Yes P
37174 2022-002 - Yes P
37175 2022-002 - Yes P
37176 2022-002 - Yes P
37177 2022-002 - Yes P
37178 2022-002 - Yes P
37179 2022-002 - Yes P
613610 2022-002 - Yes P
613611 2022-002 - Yes P
613612 2022-002 - Yes P
613613 2022-002 - Yes P
613614 2022-002 - Yes P
613615 2022-002 - Yes P
613616 2022-002 - Yes P
613617 2022-002 - Yes P
613618 2022-002 - Yes P
613619 2022-002 - Yes P
613620 2022-002 - Yes P
613621 2022-002 - Yes P

Contacts

Name Title Type
PBKZEDQB85K5 Alyssa Enderson Auditee
7128523201 Murray Stanley Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported in the Schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Emmetsburg Community School District made no subrecipient payments. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate.

Finding Details

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control. A good system of internal control provides for adequate segregation of duties so no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. In order to maintain proper internal control, duties should be segregated so the authorization, custody and recording of transactions are not under the control of the same employee. This segregation of duties helps prevent losses from employee error or dishonesty and maximizes the accuracy of the District?s financial statements. The District has primarily one employee who is involved in the custody, recording, reconciling and reporting of transactions, which are incompatible internal controls. The District has a limited number of employees and some procedures have been designed to adequately segregate duties or provide compensating controls through additional oversight of transactions and processes. However, adequate segregation of duties has not been achieved. Inadequate segregation of duties could adversely affect the District?s ability to prevent or detect and correct misstatements, errors or misappropriation on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We realize segregation of duties is difficult with a limited number of office employees. However, the District should review its procedures to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances utilizing currently available staff, including elected officials.
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control. A good system of internal control provides for adequate segregation of duties so no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. In order to maintain proper internal control, duties should be segregated so the authorization, custody and recording of transactions are not under the control of the same employee. This segregation of duties helps prevent losses from employee error or dishonesty and maximizes the accuracy of the District?s financial statements. The District has primarily one employee who is involved in the custody, recording, reconciling and reporting of transactions, which are incompatible internal controls. The District has a limited number of employees and some procedures have been designed to adequately segregate duties or provide compensating controls through additional oversight of transactions and processes. However, adequate segregation of duties has not been achieved. Inadequate segregation of duties could adversely affect the District?s ability to prevent or detect and correct misstatements, errors or misappropriation on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We realize segregation of duties is difficult with a limited number of office employees. However, the District should review its procedures to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances utilizing currently available staff, including elected officials.
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control. A good system of internal control provides for adequate segregation of duties so no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. In order to maintain proper internal control, duties should be segregated so the authorization, custody and recording of transactions are not under the control of the same employee. This segregation of duties helps prevent losses from employee error or dishonesty and maximizes the accuracy of the District?s financial statements. The District has primarily one employee who is involved in the custody, recording, reconciling and reporting of transactions, which are incompatible internal controls. The District has a limited number of employees and some procedures have been designed to adequately segregate duties or provide compensating controls through additional oversight of transactions and processes. However, adequate segregation of duties has not been achieved. Inadequate segregation of duties could adversely affect the District?s ability to prevent or detect and correct misstatements, errors or misappropriation on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We realize segregation of duties is difficult with a limited number of office employees. However, the District should review its procedures to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances utilizing currently available staff, including elected officials.
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control. A good system of internal control provides for adequate segregation of duties so no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. In order to maintain proper internal control, duties should be segregated so the authorization, custody and recording of transactions are not under the control of the same employee. This segregation of duties helps prevent losses from employee error or dishonesty and maximizes the accuracy of the District?s financial statements. The District has primarily one employee who is involved in the custody, recording, reconciling and reporting of transactions, which are incompatible internal controls. The District has a limited number of employees and some procedures have been designed to adequately segregate duties or provide compensating controls through additional oversight of transactions and processes. However, adequate segregation of duties has not been achieved. Inadequate segregation of duties could adversely affect the District?s ability to prevent or detect and correct misstatements, errors or misappropriation on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We realize segregation of duties is difficult with a limited number of office employees. However, the District should review its procedures to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances utilizing currently available staff, including elected officials.
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control. A good system of internal control provides for adequate segregation of duties so no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. In order to maintain proper internal control, duties should be segregated so the authorization, custody and recording of transactions are not under the control of the same employee. This segregation of duties helps prevent losses from employee error or dishonesty and maximizes the accuracy of the District?s financial statements. The District has primarily one employee who is involved in the custody, recording, reconciling and reporting of transactions, which are incompatible internal controls. The District has a limited number of employees and some procedures have been designed to adequately segregate duties or provide compensating controls through additional oversight of transactions and processes. However, adequate segregation of duties has not been achieved. Inadequate segregation of duties could adversely affect the District?s ability to prevent or detect and correct misstatements, errors or misappropriation on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We realize segregation of duties is difficult with a limited number of office employees. However, the District should review its procedures to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances utilizing currently available staff, including elected officials.
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control. A good system of internal control provides for adequate segregation of duties so no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. In order to maintain proper internal control, duties should be segregated so the authorization, custody and recording of transactions are not under the control of the same employee. This segregation of duties helps prevent losses from employee error or dishonesty and maximizes the accuracy of the District?s financial statements. The District has primarily one employee who is involved in the custody, recording, reconciling and reporting of transactions, which are incompatible internal controls. The District has a limited number of employees and some procedures have been designed to adequately segregate duties or provide compensating controls through additional oversight of transactions and processes. However, adequate segregation of duties has not been achieved. Inadequate segregation of duties could adversely affect the District?s ability to prevent or detect and correct misstatements, errors or misappropriation on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We realize segregation of duties is difficult with a limited number of office employees. However, the District should review its procedures to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances utilizing currently available staff, including elected officials.
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control. A good system of internal control provides for adequate segregation of duties so no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. In order to maintain proper internal control, duties should be segregated so the authorization, custody and recording of transactions are not under the control of the same employee. This segregation of duties helps prevent losses from employee error or dishonesty and maximizes the accuracy of the District?s financial statements. The District has primarily one employee who is involved in the custody, recording, reconciling and reporting of transactions, which are incompatible internal controls. The District has a limited number of employees and some procedures have been designed to adequately segregate duties or provide compensating controls through additional oversight of transactions and processes. However, adequate segregation of duties has not been achieved. Inadequate segregation of duties could adversely affect the District?s ability to prevent or detect and correct misstatements, errors or misappropriation on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We realize segregation of duties is difficult with a limited number of office employees. However, the District should review its procedures to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances utilizing currently available staff, including elected officials.
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control. A good system of internal control provides for adequate segregation of duties so no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. In order to maintain proper internal control, duties should be segregated so the authorization, custody and recording of transactions are not under the control of the same employee. This segregation of duties helps prevent losses from employee error or dishonesty and maximizes the accuracy of the District?s financial statements. The District has primarily one employee who is involved in the custody, recording, reconciling and reporting of transactions, which are incompatible internal controls. The District has a limited number of employees and some procedures have been designed to adequately segregate duties or provide compensating controls through additional oversight of transactions and processes. However, adequate segregation of duties has not been achieved. Inadequate segregation of duties could adversely affect the District?s ability to prevent or detect and correct misstatements, errors or misappropriation on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We realize segregation of duties is difficult with a limited number of office employees. However, the District should review its procedures to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances utilizing currently available staff, including elected officials.
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control. A good system of internal control provides for adequate segregation of duties so no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. In order to maintain proper internal control, duties should be segregated so the authorization, custody and recording of transactions are not under the control of the same employee. This segregation of duties helps prevent losses from employee error or dishonesty and maximizes the accuracy of the District?s financial statements. The District has primarily one employee who is involved in the custody, recording, reconciling and reporting of transactions, which are incompatible internal controls. The District has a limited number of employees and some procedures have been designed to adequately segregate duties or provide compensating controls through additional oversight of transactions and processes. However, adequate segregation of duties has not been achieved. Inadequate segregation of duties could adversely affect the District?s ability to prevent or detect and correct misstatements, errors or misappropriation on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We realize segregation of duties is difficult with a limited number of office employees. However, the District should review its procedures to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances utilizing currently available staff, including elected officials.
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control. A good system of internal control provides for adequate segregation of duties so no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. In order to maintain proper internal control, duties should be segregated so the authorization, custody and recording of transactions are not under the control of the same employee. This segregation of duties helps prevent losses from employee error or dishonesty and maximizes the accuracy of the District?s financial statements. The District has primarily one employee who is involved in the custody, recording, reconciling and reporting of transactions, which are incompatible internal controls. The District has a limited number of employees and some procedures have been designed to adequately segregate duties or provide compensating controls through additional oversight of transactions and processes. However, adequate segregation of duties has not been achieved. Inadequate segregation of duties could adversely affect the District?s ability to prevent or detect and correct misstatements, errors or misappropriation on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We realize segregation of duties is difficult with a limited number of office employees. However, the District should review its procedures to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances utilizing currently available staff, including elected officials.
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control. A good system of internal control provides for adequate segregation of duties so no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. In order to maintain proper internal control, duties should be segregated so the authorization, custody and recording of transactions are not under the control of the same employee. This segregation of duties helps prevent losses from employee error or dishonesty and maximizes the accuracy of the District?s financial statements. The District has primarily one employee who is involved in the custody, recording, reconciling and reporting of transactions, which are incompatible internal controls. The District has a limited number of employees and some procedures have been designed to adequately segregate duties or provide compensating controls through additional oversight of transactions and processes. However, adequate segregation of duties has not been achieved. Inadequate segregation of duties could adversely affect the District?s ability to prevent or detect and correct misstatements, errors or misappropriation on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We realize segregation of duties is difficult with a limited number of office employees. However, the District should review its procedures to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances utilizing currently available staff, including elected officials.
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control. A good system of internal control provides for adequate segregation of duties so no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. In order to maintain proper internal control, duties should be segregated so the authorization, custody and recording of transactions are not under the control of the same employee. This segregation of duties helps prevent losses from employee error or dishonesty and maximizes the accuracy of the District?s financial statements. The District has primarily one employee who is involved in the custody, recording, reconciling and reporting of transactions, which are incompatible internal controls. The District has a limited number of employees and some procedures have been designed to adequately segregate duties or provide compensating controls through additional oversight of transactions and processes. However, adequate segregation of duties has not been achieved. Inadequate segregation of duties could adversely affect the District?s ability to prevent or detect and correct misstatements, errors or misappropriation on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We realize segregation of duties is difficult with a limited number of office employees. However, the District should review its procedures to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances utilizing currently available staff, including elected officials.
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control. A good system of internal control provides for adequate segregation of duties so no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. In order to maintain proper internal control, duties should be segregated so the authorization, custody and recording of transactions are not under the control of the same employee. This segregation of duties helps prevent losses from employee error or dishonesty and maximizes the accuracy of the District?s financial statements. The District has primarily one employee who is involved in the custody, recording, reconciling and reporting of transactions, which are incompatible internal controls. The District has a limited number of employees and some procedures have been designed to adequately segregate duties or provide compensating controls through additional oversight of transactions and processes. However, adequate segregation of duties has not been achieved. Inadequate segregation of duties could adversely affect the District?s ability to prevent or detect and correct misstatements, errors or misappropriation on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We realize segregation of duties is difficult with a limited number of office employees. However, the District should review its procedures to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances utilizing currently available staff, including elected officials.
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control. A good system of internal control provides for adequate segregation of duties so no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. In order to maintain proper internal control, duties should be segregated so the authorization, custody and recording of transactions are not under the control of the same employee. This segregation of duties helps prevent losses from employee error or dishonesty and maximizes the accuracy of the District?s financial statements. The District has primarily one employee who is involved in the custody, recording, reconciling and reporting of transactions, which are incompatible internal controls. The District has a limited number of employees and some procedures have been designed to adequately segregate duties or provide compensating controls through additional oversight of transactions and processes. However, adequate segregation of duties has not been achieved. Inadequate segregation of duties could adversely affect the District?s ability to prevent or detect and correct misstatements, errors or misappropriation on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We realize segregation of duties is difficult with a limited number of office employees. However, the District should review its procedures to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances utilizing currently available staff, including elected officials.
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control. A good system of internal control provides for adequate segregation of duties so no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. In order to maintain proper internal control, duties should be segregated so the authorization, custody and recording of transactions are not under the control of the same employee. This segregation of duties helps prevent losses from employee error or dishonesty and maximizes the accuracy of the District?s financial statements. The District has primarily one employee who is involved in the custody, recording, reconciling and reporting of transactions, which are incompatible internal controls. The District has a limited number of employees and some procedures have been designed to adequately segregate duties or provide compensating controls through additional oversight of transactions and processes. However, adequate segregation of duties has not been achieved. Inadequate segregation of duties could adversely affect the District?s ability to prevent or detect and correct misstatements, errors or misappropriation on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We realize segregation of duties is difficult with a limited number of office employees. However, the District should review its procedures to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances utilizing currently available staff, including elected officials.
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control. A good system of internal control provides for adequate segregation of duties so no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. In order to maintain proper internal control, duties should be segregated so the authorization, custody and recording of transactions are not under the control of the same employee. This segregation of duties helps prevent losses from employee error or dishonesty and maximizes the accuracy of the District?s financial statements. The District has primarily one employee who is involved in the custody, recording, reconciling and reporting of transactions, which are incompatible internal controls. The District has a limited number of employees and some procedures have been designed to adequately segregate duties or provide compensating controls through additional oversight of transactions and processes. However, adequate segregation of duties has not been achieved. Inadequate segregation of duties could adversely affect the District?s ability to prevent or detect and correct misstatements, errors or misappropriation on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We realize segregation of duties is difficult with a limited number of office employees. However, the District should review its procedures to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances utilizing currently available staff, including elected officials.
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control. A good system of internal control provides for adequate segregation of duties so no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. In order to maintain proper internal control, duties should be segregated so the authorization, custody and recording of transactions are not under the control of the same employee. This segregation of duties helps prevent losses from employee error or dishonesty and maximizes the accuracy of the District?s financial statements. The District has primarily one employee who is involved in the custody, recording, reconciling and reporting of transactions, which are incompatible internal controls. The District has a limited number of employees and some procedures have been designed to adequately segregate duties or provide compensating controls through additional oversight of transactions and processes. However, adequate segregation of duties has not been achieved. Inadequate segregation of duties could adversely affect the District?s ability to prevent or detect and correct misstatements, errors or misappropriation on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We realize segregation of duties is difficult with a limited number of office employees. However, the District should review its procedures to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances utilizing currently available staff, including elected officials.
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control. A good system of internal control provides for adequate segregation of duties so no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. In order to maintain proper internal control, duties should be segregated so the authorization, custody and recording of transactions are not under the control of the same employee. This segregation of duties helps prevent losses from employee error or dishonesty and maximizes the accuracy of the District?s financial statements. The District has primarily one employee who is involved in the custody, recording, reconciling and reporting of transactions, which are incompatible internal controls. The District has a limited number of employees and some procedures have been designed to adequately segregate duties or provide compensating controls through additional oversight of transactions and processes. However, adequate segregation of duties has not been achieved. Inadequate segregation of duties could adversely affect the District?s ability to prevent or detect and correct misstatements, errors or misappropriation on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We realize segregation of duties is difficult with a limited number of office employees. However, the District should review its procedures to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances utilizing currently available staff, including elected officials.
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control. A good system of internal control provides for adequate segregation of duties so no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. In order to maintain proper internal control, duties should be segregated so the authorization, custody and recording of transactions are not under the control of the same employee. This segregation of duties helps prevent losses from employee error or dishonesty and maximizes the accuracy of the District?s financial statements. The District has primarily one employee who is involved in the custody, recording, reconciling and reporting of transactions, which are incompatible internal controls. The District has a limited number of employees and some procedures have been designed to adequately segregate duties or provide compensating controls through additional oversight of transactions and processes. However, adequate segregation of duties has not been achieved. Inadequate segregation of duties could adversely affect the District?s ability to prevent or detect and correct misstatements, errors or misappropriation on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We realize segregation of duties is difficult with a limited number of office employees. However, the District should review its procedures to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances utilizing currently available staff, including elected officials.
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control. A good system of internal control provides for adequate segregation of duties so no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. In order to maintain proper internal control, duties should be segregated so the authorization, custody and recording of transactions are not under the control of the same employee. This segregation of duties helps prevent losses from employee error or dishonesty and maximizes the accuracy of the District?s financial statements. The District has primarily one employee who is involved in the custody, recording, reconciling and reporting of transactions, which are incompatible internal controls. The District has a limited number of employees and some procedures have been designed to adequately segregate duties or provide compensating controls through additional oversight of transactions and processes. However, adequate segregation of duties has not been achieved. Inadequate segregation of duties could adversely affect the District?s ability to prevent or detect and correct misstatements, errors or misappropriation on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We realize segregation of duties is difficult with a limited number of office employees. However, the District should review its procedures to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances utilizing currently available staff, including elected officials.
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control. A good system of internal control provides for adequate segregation of duties so no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. In order to maintain proper internal control, duties should be segregated so the authorization, custody and recording of transactions are not under the control of the same employee. This segregation of duties helps prevent losses from employee error or dishonesty and maximizes the accuracy of the District?s financial statements. The District has primarily one employee who is involved in the custody, recording, reconciling and reporting of transactions, which are incompatible internal controls. The District has a limited number of employees and some procedures have been designed to adequately segregate duties or provide compensating controls through additional oversight of transactions and processes. However, adequate segregation of duties has not been achieved. Inadequate segregation of duties could adversely affect the District?s ability to prevent or detect and correct misstatements, errors or misappropriation on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We realize segregation of duties is difficult with a limited number of office employees. However, the District should review its procedures to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances utilizing currently available staff, including elected officials.
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control. A good system of internal control provides for adequate segregation of duties so no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. In order to maintain proper internal control, duties should be segregated so the authorization, custody and recording of transactions are not under the control of the same employee. This segregation of duties helps prevent losses from employee error or dishonesty and maximizes the accuracy of the District?s financial statements. The District has primarily one employee who is involved in the custody, recording, reconciling and reporting of transactions, which are incompatible internal controls. The District has a limited number of employees and some procedures have been designed to adequately segregate duties or provide compensating controls through additional oversight of transactions and processes. However, adequate segregation of duties has not been achieved. Inadequate segregation of duties could adversely affect the District?s ability to prevent or detect and correct misstatements, errors or misappropriation on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We realize segregation of duties is difficult with a limited number of office employees. However, the District should review its procedures to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances utilizing currently available staff, including elected officials.
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control. A good system of internal control provides for adequate segregation of duties so no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. In order to maintain proper internal control, duties should be segregated so the authorization, custody and recording of transactions are not under the control of the same employee. This segregation of duties helps prevent losses from employee error or dishonesty and maximizes the accuracy of the District?s financial statements. The District has primarily one employee who is involved in the custody, recording, reconciling and reporting of transactions, which are incompatible internal controls. The District has a limited number of employees and some procedures have been designed to adequately segregate duties or provide compensating controls through additional oversight of transactions and processes. However, adequate segregation of duties has not been achieved. Inadequate segregation of duties could adversely affect the District?s ability to prevent or detect and correct misstatements, errors or misappropriation on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We realize segregation of duties is difficult with a limited number of office employees. However, the District should review its procedures to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances utilizing currently available staff, including elected officials.
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control. A good system of internal control provides for adequate segregation of duties so no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. In order to maintain proper internal control, duties should be segregated so the authorization, custody and recording of transactions are not under the control of the same employee. This segregation of duties helps prevent losses from employee error or dishonesty and maximizes the accuracy of the District?s financial statements. The District has primarily one employee who is involved in the custody, recording, reconciling and reporting of transactions, which are incompatible internal controls. The District has a limited number of employees and some procedures have been designed to adequately segregate duties or provide compensating controls through additional oversight of transactions and processes. However, adequate segregation of duties has not been achieved. Inadequate segregation of duties could adversely affect the District?s ability to prevent or detect and correct misstatements, errors or misappropriation on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We realize segregation of duties is difficult with a limited number of office employees. However, the District should review its procedures to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances utilizing currently available staff, including elected officials.