Audit 305538

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$151.11M
Findings
18
Programs
7
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-05-06

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
395911 2023-001 Material Weakness - E
395912 2023-002 Material Weakness - N
395913 2023-003 Material Weakness - N
395914 2023-001 Material Weakness - E
395915 2023-002 Material Weakness - N
395916 2023-003 Material Weakness - N
395917 2023-001 Material Weakness - E
395918 2023-002 Material Weakness - N
395919 2023-003 Material Weakness - N
972353 2023-001 Material Weakness - E
972354 2023-002 Material Weakness - N
972355 2023-003 Material Weakness - N
972356 2023-001 Material Weakness - E
972357 2023-002 Material Weakness - N
972358 2023-003 Material Weakness - N
972359 2023-001 Material Weakness - E
972360 2023-002 Material Weakness - N
972361 2023-003 Material Weakness - N

Contacts

Name Title Type
M879BXWTHRR7 Aaron Dean Auditee
5025694471 Debbie Smith Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Note C – Reconciliation of Federal Expenditures to the Financial Statements Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the “Schedule) includes the federal grant activity of the Authority and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (“CFR”) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (“Uniform Guidance”). Therefore, some amounts presented in this schedule may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the basic financial statements. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Authority has not elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance See notes to SEFA for chart / table.

Finding Details

Finding: 2023-001 Program Name: Moving to Work (ALN #14.881) Federal Awarding Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Compliance Requirement: Eligibility Type of Finding: Material Weakness; Material Noncompliance Qualification Criteria: Per 24 CFR section 982.516, the Authority must reexamine family income and composition at least once every two years and adjust the tenant rent and housing assistance payment as necessary using the documentation from third party verification. Condition: Of the 25 Housing Choice Voucher tenant files tested, the annual recertification was not completed for five tenant files and the information from the prior year 50058 was rolled forward without verification of current income. For two additional tenant files, the 50058 was rolled forward without updating as required; however, the income was later recertified. Cause: During fiscal year 2023, the Authority had employee turnover resulting in a backlog of recertifications. Because payments to landlords on the annual HAP contracts were set to expire, the Authority rolled forward the tenant’s prior year form HUD-50058 Family Report without updating family income and composition. Effect: The Authority was not in compliance with the eligibility compliance requirements for the year ended June 30, 2023. Failure to perform income recertifications could result in improper housing assistance payments. Auditor Recommendation: We recommend the Authority perform a review of all tenant files to ensure income has been appropriately recertified and housing assistance payments are accurate. Questioned Costs: Undeterminable. Management’s Response: LMHA has implemented a comprehensive plan to resolve the backlog of recertifications that necessitated the roll forward of tenant’s prior year form HUD-50058 family report without updating family income and composition. First and foremost, representing the rolling forward of the tenant’s HUD-50058 as a biennial recertification has been discontinued. Compliance staff has implemented training of Housing Specialists and other staff to assure biennial recertification and use of HUD-50058 Type 2 (“Annual Recertification”) will now be compliant. LMHA has contracted with a vendor to assist with the recertification process. LMHA has also restructured workflows to provide efficiencies and accountability that will promote compliance. LMHA is also working with various HUD departments and personnel to assess noncompliance and how to move forward. In addition to resolving these issues with HUD, LMHA has engaged its Financial Auditor, Cherry Bekaert, to review the Housing Choice Voucher Program for process, compliance, and internal control.
Finding: 2023-002 Program Name: Moving to Work (ALN #14.881) Federal Awarding Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions Type of Finding: Material Weakness; Material Noncompliance Qualification Criteria: Per 24 CFR section 990.280(d), the Authority may only charge centralized maintenance services to Public Housing projects on a fee-for-service approach. Each project must be charged for the actual services received and only to the extent that such amounts are reasonable. Condition: During our testing of the reasonableness of centralized maintenance costs charged by the COCC, we noted work orders in which excessive hours were charged to public housing including multiple instances of more than 15 hours per day per employee charged as maintenance time. Cause: Work orders prepared by maintenance staff were not reviewed for reasonableness. Effect: The Authority was not in compliance with the special tests regarding fees charged for centralized services for the year ended June 30, 2023. After management’s review of all instances of excessive maintenance hours, management reduced fees charged by the COCC to the public housing program by $1.2 million. Auditor Recommendation: We recommend supervisors review all time charged by maintenance staff on a routine basis. We would also recommend an additional review by the finance department to ensure hours are reasonable prior to posting charges to the Public Housing projects. Questioned Costs: All costs were corrected and fees were reversed. Management’s Response: To verify that the hours charged by maintenance staff are reasonable, Central Maintenance supervisors/coordinators will verify the accuracy of the hours recorded to work orders completed. Questionable hours will be reviewed and corrected when appropriate. The report will then be submitted to Financeto be charged to Public Housing development. The Finance Department will perform an additional review for reasonableness prior to posting.
Finding: 2023-003 Program Name: Moving to Work (ALN #14.881) Federal Awarding Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions Type of Finding: Material Weakness; Material Noncompliance Qualification Criteria: The Authority is required to aggregate cost and consumption data from utility invoices for each Operating Fund project. This aggregated data is transferred to form HUD-52722 Calculation of Utilities Expense Level and used to determine the utility portion of the Operating Fund subsidy. Condition: We selected three projects to test the accuracy of Form HUD-52722 and verify utility invoices supporting utility costs and consumption. The Authority was unable to provide invoices supporting utility consumption and cost for two projects. In addition, water costs were overstated for one project resulting in overstatement of the UEL by $34,200. Cause: The Authority does not have controls in place to ensure supporting documents are maintained to support all HUD-52722 forms. Effect: The amounts reported on Form 52722 could not be verified resulting in a potential error in the operating subsidy. Auditor Recommendation: The Authority should maintain files with all supporting documentation for each HUD-52722. Questioned Costs: Undeterminable. Management’s Response: To ensure supporting documents are maintained to support all HUD-52722 forms, all privately managed Mixed-Finance developments will submit utility cost and consumption data to include copies of invoices to LMHA monthly. Utility cost and consumption data to include copies of invoices are already collected by LMHA managed sites.
Finding: 2023-001 Program Name: Moving to Work (ALN #14.881) Federal Awarding Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Compliance Requirement: Eligibility Type of Finding: Material Weakness; Material Noncompliance Qualification Criteria: Per 24 CFR section 982.516, the Authority must reexamine family income and composition at least once every two years and adjust the tenant rent and housing assistance payment as necessary using the documentation from third party verification. Condition: Of the 25 Housing Choice Voucher tenant files tested, the annual recertification was not completed for five tenant files and the information from the prior year 50058 was rolled forward without verification of current income. For two additional tenant files, the 50058 was rolled forward without updating as required; however, the income was later recertified. Cause: During fiscal year 2023, the Authority had employee turnover resulting in a backlog of recertifications. Because payments to landlords on the annual HAP contracts were set to expire, the Authority rolled forward the tenant’s prior year form HUD-50058 Family Report without updating family income and composition. Effect: The Authority was not in compliance with the eligibility compliance requirements for the year ended June 30, 2023. Failure to perform income recertifications could result in improper housing assistance payments. Auditor Recommendation: We recommend the Authority perform a review of all tenant files to ensure income has been appropriately recertified and housing assistance payments are accurate. Questioned Costs: Undeterminable. Management’s Response: LMHA has implemented a comprehensive plan to resolve the backlog of recertifications that necessitated the roll forward of tenant’s prior year form HUD-50058 family report without updating family income and composition. First and foremost, representing the rolling forward of the tenant’s HUD-50058 as a biennial recertification has been discontinued. Compliance staff has implemented training of Housing Specialists and other staff to assure biennial recertification and use of HUD-50058 Type 2 (“Annual Recertification”) will now be compliant. LMHA has contracted with a vendor to assist with the recertification process. LMHA has also restructured workflows to provide efficiencies and accountability that will promote compliance. LMHA is also working with various HUD departments and personnel to assess noncompliance and how to move forward. In addition to resolving these issues with HUD, LMHA has engaged its Financial Auditor, Cherry Bekaert, to review the Housing Choice Voucher Program for process, compliance, and internal control.
Finding: 2023-002 Program Name: Moving to Work (ALN #14.881) Federal Awarding Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions Type of Finding: Material Weakness; Material Noncompliance Qualification Criteria: Per 24 CFR section 990.280(d), the Authority may only charge centralized maintenance services to Public Housing projects on a fee-for-service approach. Each project must be charged for the actual services received and only to the extent that such amounts are reasonable. Condition: During our testing of the reasonableness of centralized maintenance costs charged by the COCC, we noted work orders in which excessive hours were charged to public housing including multiple instances of more than 15 hours per day per employee charged as maintenance time. Cause: Work orders prepared by maintenance staff were not reviewed for reasonableness. Effect: The Authority was not in compliance with the special tests regarding fees charged for centralized services for the year ended June 30, 2023. After management’s review of all instances of excessive maintenance hours, management reduced fees charged by the COCC to the public housing program by $1.2 million. Auditor Recommendation: We recommend supervisors review all time charged by maintenance staff on a routine basis. We would also recommend an additional review by the finance department to ensure hours are reasonable prior to posting charges to the Public Housing projects. Questioned Costs: All costs were corrected and fees were reversed. Management’s Response: To verify that the hours charged by maintenance staff are reasonable, Central Maintenance supervisors/coordinators will verify the accuracy of the hours recorded to work orders completed. Questionable hours will be reviewed and corrected when appropriate. The report will then be submitted to Financeto be charged to Public Housing development. The Finance Department will perform an additional review for reasonableness prior to posting.
Finding: 2023-003 Program Name: Moving to Work (ALN #14.881) Federal Awarding Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions Type of Finding: Material Weakness; Material Noncompliance Qualification Criteria: The Authority is required to aggregate cost and consumption data from utility invoices for each Operating Fund project. This aggregated data is transferred to form HUD-52722 Calculation of Utilities Expense Level and used to determine the utility portion of the Operating Fund subsidy. Condition: We selected three projects to test the accuracy of Form HUD-52722 and verify utility invoices supporting utility costs and consumption. The Authority was unable to provide invoices supporting utility consumption and cost for two projects. In addition, water costs were overstated for one project resulting in overstatement of the UEL by $34,200. Cause: The Authority does not have controls in place to ensure supporting documents are maintained to support all HUD-52722 forms. Effect: The amounts reported on Form 52722 could not be verified resulting in a potential error in the operating subsidy. Auditor Recommendation: The Authority should maintain files with all supporting documentation for each HUD-52722. Questioned Costs: Undeterminable. Management’s Response: To ensure supporting documents are maintained to support all HUD-52722 forms, all privately managed Mixed-Finance developments will submit utility cost and consumption data to include copies of invoices to LMHA monthly. Utility cost and consumption data to include copies of invoices are already collected by LMHA managed sites.
Finding: 2023-001 Program Name: Moving to Work (ALN #14.881) Federal Awarding Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Compliance Requirement: Eligibility Type of Finding: Material Weakness; Material Noncompliance Qualification Criteria: Per 24 CFR section 982.516, the Authority must reexamine family income and composition at least once every two years and adjust the tenant rent and housing assistance payment as necessary using the documentation from third party verification. Condition: Of the 25 Housing Choice Voucher tenant files tested, the annual recertification was not completed for five tenant files and the information from the prior year 50058 was rolled forward without verification of current income. For two additional tenant files, the 50058 was rolled forward without updating as required; however, the income was later recertified. Cause: During fiscal year 2023, the Authority had employee turnover resulting in a backlog of recertifications. Because payments to landlords on the annual HAP contracts were set to expire, the Authority rolled forward the tenant’s prior year form HUD-50058 Family Report without updating family income and composition. Effect: The Authority was not in compliance with the eligibility compliance requirements for the year ended June 30, 2023. Failure to perform income recertifications could result in improper housing assistance payments. Auditor Recommendation: We recommend the Authority perform a review of all tenant files to ensure income has been appropriately recertified and housing assistance payments are accurate. Questioned Costs: Undeterminable. Management’s Response: LMHA has implemented a comprehensive plan to resolve the backlog of recertifications that necessitated the roll forward of tenant’s prior year form HUD-50058 family report without updating family income and composition. First and foremost, representing the rolling forward of the tenant’s HUD-50058 as a biennial recertification has been discontinued. Compliance staff has implemented training of Housing Specialists and other staff to assure biennial recertification and use of HUD-50058 Type 2 (“Annual Recertification”) will now be compliant. LMHA has contracted with a vendor to assist with the recertification process. LMHA has also restructured workflows to provide efficiencies and accountability that will promote compliance. LMHA is also working with various HUD departments and personnel to assess noncompliance and how to move forward. In addition to resolving these issues with HUD, LMHA has engaged its Financial Auditor, Cherry Bekaert, to review the Housing Choice Voucher Program for process, compliance, and internal control.
Finding: 2023-002 Program Name: Moving to Work (ALN #14.881) Federal Awarding Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions Type of Finding: Material Weakness; Material Noncompliance Qualification Criteria: Per 24 CFR section 990.280(d), the Authority may only charge centralized maintenance services to Public Housing projects on a fee-for-service approach. Each project must be charged for the actual services received and only to the extent that such amounts are reasonable. Condition: During our testing of the reasonableness of centralized maintenance costs charged by the COCC, we noted work orders in which excessive hours were charged to public housing including multiple instances of more than 15 hours per day per employee charged as maintenance time. Cause: Work orders prepared by maintenance staff were not reviewed for reasonableness. Effect: The Authority was not in compliance with the special tests regarding fees charged for centralized services for the year ended June 30, 2023. After management’s review of all instances of excessive maintenance hours, management reduced fees charged by the COCC to the public housing program by $1.2 million. Auditor Recommendation: We recommend supervisors review all time charged by maintenance staff on a routine basis. We would also recommend an additional review by the finance department to ensure hours are reasonable prior to posting charges to the Public Housing projects. Questioned Costs: All costs were corrected and fees were reversed. Management’s Response: To verify that the hours charged by maintenance staff are reasonable, Central Maintenance supervisors/coordinators will verify the accuracy of the hours recorded to work orders completed. Questionable hours will be reviewed and corrected when appropriate. The report will then be submitted to Financeto be charged to Public Housing development. The Finance Department will perform an additional review for reasonableness prior to posting.
Finding: 2023-003 Program Name: Moving to Work (ALN #14.881) Federal Awarding Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions Type of Finding: Material Weakness; Material Noncompliance Qualification Criteria: The Authority is required to aggregate cost and consumption data from utility invoices for each Operating Fund project. This aggregated data is transferred to form HUD-52722 Calculation of Utilities Expense Level and used to determine the utility portion of the Operating Fund subsidy. Condition: We selected three projects to test the accuracy of Form HUD-52722 and verify utility invoices supporting utility costs and consumption. The Authority was unable to provide invoices supporting utility consumption and cost for two projects. In addition, water costs were overstated for one project resulting in overstatement of the UEL by $34,200. Cause: The Authority does not have controls in place to ensure supporting documents are maintained to support all HUD-52722 forms. Effect: The amounts reported on Form 52722 could not be verified resulting in a potential error in the operating subsidy. Auditor Recommendation: The Authority should maintain files with all supporting documentation for each HUD-52722. Questioned Costs: Undeterminable. Management’s Response: To ensure supporting documents are maintained to support all HUD-52722 forms, all privately managed Mixed-Finance developments will submit utility cost and consumption data to include copies of invoices to LMHA monthly. Utility cost and consumption data to include copies of invoices are already collected by LMHA managed sites.
Finding: 2023-001 Program Name: Moving to Work (ALN #14.881) Federal Awarding Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Compliance Requirement: Eligibility Type of Finding: Material Weakness; Material Noncompliance Qualification Criteria: Per 24 CFR section 982.516, the Authority must reexamine family income and composition at least once every two years and adjust the tenant rent and housing assistance payment as necessary using the documentation from third party verification. Condition: Of the 25 Housing Choice Voucher tenant files tested, the annual recertification was not completed for five tenant files and the information from the prior year 50058 was rolled forward without verification of current income. For two additional tenant files, the 50058 was rolled forward without updating as required; however, the income was later recertified. Cause: During fiscal year 2023, the Authority had employee turnover resulting in a backlog of recertifications. Because payments to landlords on the annual HAP contracts were set to expire, the Authority rolled forward the tenant’s prior year form HUD-50058 Family Report without updating family income and composition. Effect: The Authority was not in compliance with the eligibility compliance requirements for the year ended June 30, 2023. Failure to perform income recertifications could result in improper housing assistance payments. Auditor Recommendation: We recommend the Authority perform a review of all tenant files to ensure income has been appropriately recertified and housing assistance payments are accurate. Questioned Costs: Undeterminable. Management’s Response: LMHA has implemented a comprehensive plan to resolve the backlog of recertifications that necessitated the roll forward of tenant’s prior year form HUD-50058 family report without updating family income and composition. First and foremost, representing the rolling forward of the tenant’s HUD-50058 as a biennial recertification has been discontinued. Compliance staff has implemented training of Housing Specialists and other staff to assure biennial recertification and use of HUD-50058 Type 2 (“Annual Recertification”) will now be compliant. LMHA has contracted with a vendor to assist with the recertification process. LMHA has also restructured workflows to provide efficiencies and accountability that will promote compliance. LMHA is also working with various HUD departments and personnel to assess noncompliance and how to move forward. In addition to resolving these issues with HUD, LMHA has engaged its Financial Auditor, Cherry Bekaert, to review the Housing Choice Voucher Program for process, compliance, and internal control.
Finding: 2023-002 Program Name: Moving to Work (ALN #14.881) Federal Awarding Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions Type of Finding: Material Weakness; Material Noncompliance Qualification Criteria: Per 24 CFR section 990.280(d), the Authority may only charge centralized maintenance services to Public Housing projects on a fee-for-service approach. Each project must be charged for the actual services received and only to the extent that such amounts are reasonable. Condition: During our testing of the reasonableness of centralized maintenance costs charged by the COCC, we noted work orders in which excessive hours were charged to public housing including multiple instances of more than 15 hours per day per employee charged as maintenance time. Cause: Work orders prepared by maintenance staff were not reviewed for reasonableness. Effect: The Authority was not in compliance with the special tests regarding fees charged for centralized services for the year ended June 30, 2023. After management’s review of all instances of excessive maintenance hours, management reduced fees charged by the COCC to the public housing program by $1.2 million. Auditor Recommendation: We recommend supervisors review all time charged by maintenance staff on a routine basis. We would also recommend an additional review by the finance department to ensure hours are reasonable prior to posting charges to the Public Housing projects. Questioned Costs: All costs were corrected and fees were reversed. Management’s Response: To verify that the hours charged by maintenance staff are reasonable, Central Maintenance supervisors/coordinators will verify the accuracy of the hours recorded to work orders completed. Questionable hours will be reviewed and corrected when appropriate. The report will then be submitted to Financeto be charged to Public Housing development. The Finance Department will perform an additional review for reasonableness prior to posting.
Finding: 2023-003 Program Name: Moving to Work (ALN #14.881) Federal Awarding Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions Type of Finding: Material Weakness; Material Noncompliance Qualification Criteria: The Authority is required to aggregate cost and consumption data from utility invoices for each Operating Fund project. This aggregated data is transferred to form HUD-52722 Calculation of Utilities Expense Level and used to determine the utility portion of the Operating Fund subsidy. Condition: We selected three projects to test the accuracy of Form HUD-52722 and verify utility invoices supporting utility costs and consumption. The Authority was unable to provide invoices supporting utility consumption and cost for two projects. In addition, water costs were overstated for one project resulting in overstatement of the UEL by $34,200. Cause: The Authority does not have controls in place to ensure supporting documents are maintained to support all HUD-52722 forms. Effect: The amounts reported on Form 52722 could not be verified resulting in a potential error in the operating subsidy. Auditor Recommendation: The Authority should maintain files with all supporting documentation for each HUD-52722. Questioned Costs: Undeterminable. Management’s Response: To ensure supporting documents are maintained to support all HUD-52722 forms, all privately managed Mixed-Finance developments will submit utility cost and consumption data to include copies of invoices to LMHA monthly. Utility cost and consumption data to include copies of invoices are already collected by LMHA managed sites.
Finding: 2023-001 Program Name: Moving to Work (ALN #14.881) Federal Awarding Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Compliance Requirement: Eligibility Type of Finding: Material Weakness; Material Noncompliance Qualification Criteria: Per 24 CFR section 982.516, the Authority must reexamine family income and composition at least once every two years and adjust the tenant rent and housing assistance payment as necessary using the documentation from third party verification. Condition: Of the 25 Housing Choice Voucher tenant files tested, the annual recertification was not completed for five tenant files and the information from the prior year 50058 was rolled forward without verification of current income. For two additional tenant files, the 50058 was rolled forward without updating as required; however, the income was later recertified. Cause: During fiscal year 2023, the Authority had employee turnover resulting in a backlog of recertifications. Because payments to landlords on the annual HAP contracts were set to expire, the Authority rolled forward the tenant’s prior year form HUD-50058 Family Report without updating family income and composition. Effect: The Authority was not in compliance with the eligibility compliance requirements for the year ended June 30, 2023. Failure to perform income recertifications could result in improper housing assistance payments. Auditor Recommendation: We recommend the Authority perform a review of all tenant files to ensure income has been appropriately recertified and housing assistance payments are accurate. Questioned Costs: Undeterminable. Management’s Response: LMHA has implemented a comprehensive plan to resolve the backlog of recertifications that necessitated the roll forward of tenant’s prior year form HUD-50058 family report without updating family income and composition. First and foremost, representing the rolling forward of the tenant’s HUD-50058 as a biennial recertification has been discontinued. Compliance staff has implemented training of Housing Specialists and other staff to assure biennial recertification and use of HUD-50058 Type 2 (“Annual Recertification”) will now be compliant. LMHA has contracted with a vendor to assist with the recertification process. LMHA has also restructured workflows to provide efficiencies and accountability that will promote compliance. LMHA is also working with various HUD departments and personnel to assess noncompliance and how to move forward. In addition to resolving these issues with HUD, LMHA has engaged its Financial Auditor, Cherry Bekaert, to review the Housing Choice Voucher Program for process, compliance, and internal control.
Finding: 2023-002 Program Name: Moving to Work (ALN #14.881) Federal Awarding Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions Type of Finding: Material Weakness; Material Noncompliance Qualification Criteria: Per 24 CFR section 990.280(d), the Authority may only charge centralized maintenance services to Public Housing projects on a fee-for-service approach. Each project must be charged for the actual services received and only to the extent that such amounts are reasonable. Condition: During our testing of the reasonableness of centralized maintenance costs charged by the COCC, we noted work orders in which excessive hours were charged to public housing including multiple instances of more than 15 hours per day per employee charged as maintenance time. Cause: Work orders prepared by maintenance staff were not reviewed for reasonableness. Effect: The Authority was not in compliance with the special tests regarding fees charged for centralized services for the year ended June 30, 2023. After management’s review of all instances of excessive maintenance hours, management reduced fees charged by the COCC to the public housing program by $1.2 million. Auditor Recommendation: We recommend supervisors review all time charged by maintenance staff on a routine basis. We would also recommend an additional review by the finance department to ensure hours are reasonable prior to posting charges to the Public Housing projects. Questioned Costs: All costs were corrected and fees were reversed. Management’s Response: To verify that the hours charged by maintenance staff are reasonable, Central Maintenance supervisors/coordinators will verify the accuracy of the hours recorded to work orders completed. Questionable hours will be reviewed and corrected when appropriate. The report will then be submitted to Financeto be charged to Public Housing development. The Finance Department will perform an additional review for reasonableness prior to posting.
Finding: 2023-003 Program Name: Moving to Work (ALN #14.881) Federal Awarding Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions Type of Finding: Material Weakness; Material Noncompliance Qualification Criteria: The Authority is required to aggregate cost and consumption data from utility invoices for each Operating Fund project. This aggregated data is transferred to form HUD-52722 Calculation of Utilities Expense Level and used to determine the utility portion of the Operating Fund subsidy. Condition: We selected three projects to test the accuracy of Form HUD-52722 and verify utility invoices supporting utility costs and consumption. The Authority was unable to provide invoices supporting utility consumption and cost for two projects. In addition, water costs were overstated for one project resulting in overstatement of the UEL by $34,200. Cause: The Authority does not have controls in place to ensure supporting documents are maintained to support all HUD-52722 forms. Effect: The amounts reported on Form 52722 could not be verified resulting in a potential error in the operating subsidy. Auditor Recommendation: The Authority should maintain files with all supporting documentation for each HUD-52722. Questioned Costs: Undeterminable. Management’s Response: To ensure supporting documents are maintained to support all HUD-52722 forms, all privately managed Mixed-Finance developments will submit utility cost and consumption data to include copies of invoices to LMHA monthly. Utility cost and consumption data to include copies of invoices are already collected by LMHA managed sites.
Finding: 2023-001 Program Name: Moving to Work (ALN #14.881) Federal Awarding Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Compliance Requirement: Eligibility Type of Finding: Material Weakness; Material Noncompliance Qualification Criteria: Per 24 CFR section 982.516, the Authority must reexamine family income and composition at least once every two years and adjust the tenant rent and housing assistance payment as necessary using the documentation from third party verification. Condition: Of the 25 Housing Choice Voucher tenant files tested, the annual recertification was not completed for five tenant files and the information from the prior year 50058 was rolled forward without verification of current income. For two additional tenant files, the 50058 was rolled forward without updating as required; however, the income was later recertified. Cause: During fiscal year 2023, the Authority had employee turnover resulting in a backlog of recertifications. Because payments to landlords on the annual HAP contracts were set to expire, the Authority rolled forward the tenant’s prior year form HUD-50058 Family Report without updating family income and composition. Effect: The Authority was not in compliance with the eligibility compliance requirements for the year ended June 30, 2023. Failure to perform income recertifications could result in improper housing assistance payments. Auditor Recommendation: We recommend the Authority perform a review of all tenant files to ensure income has been appropriately recertified and housing assistance payments are accurate. Questioned Costs: Undeterminable. Management’s Response: LMHA has implemented a comprehensive plan to resolve the backlog of recertifications that necessitated the roll forward of tenant’s prior year form HUD-50058 family report without updating family income and composition. First and foremost, representing the rolling forward of the tenant’s HUD-50058 as a biennial recertification has been discontinued. Compliance staff has implemented training of Housing Specialists and other staff to assure biennial recertification and use of HUD-50058 Type 2 (“Annual Recertification”) will now be compliant. LMHA has contracted with a vendor to assist with the recertification process. LMHA has also restructured workflows to provide efficiencies and accountability that will promote compliance. LMHA is also working with various HUD departments and personnel to assess noncompliance and how to move forward. In addition to resolving these issues with HUD, LMHA has engaged its Financial Auditor, Cherry Bekaert, to review the Housing Choice Voucher Program for process, compliance, and internal control.
Finding: 2023-002 Program Name: Moving to Work (ALN #14.881) Federal Awarding Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions Type of Finding: Material Weakness; Material Noncompliance Qualification Criteria: Per 24 CFR section 990.280(d), the Authority may only charge centralized maintenance services to Public Housing projects on a fee-for-service approach. Each project must be charged for the actual services received and only to the extent that such amounts are reasonable. Condition: During our testing of the reasonableness of centralized maintenance costs charged by the COCC, we noted work orders in which excessive hours were charged to public housing including multiple instances of more than 15 hours per day per employee charged as maintenance time. Cause: Work orders prepared by maintenance staff were not reviewed for reasonableness. Effect: The Authority was not in compliance with the special tests regarding fees charged for centralized services for the year ended June 30, 2023. After management’s review of all instances of excessive maintenance hours, management reduced fees charged by the COCC to the public housing program by $1.2 million. Auditor Recommendation: We recommend supervisors review all time charged by maintenance staff on a routine basis. We would also recommend an additional review by the finance department to ensure hours are reasonable prior to posting charges to the Public Housing projects. Questioned Costs: All costs were corrected and fees were reversed. Management’s Response: To verify that the hours charged by maintenance staff are reasonable, Central Maintenance supervisors/coordinators will verify the accuracy of the hours recorded to work orders completed. Questionable hours will be reviewed and corrected when appropriate. The report will then be submitted to Financeto be charged to Public Housing development. The Finance Department will perform an additional review for reasonableness prior to posting.
Finding: 2023-003 Program Name: Moving to Work (ALN #14.881) Federal Awarding Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions Type of Finding: Material Weakness; Material Noncompliance Qualification Criteria: The Authority is required to aggregate cost and consumption data from utility invoices for each Operating Fund project. This aggregated data is transferred to form HUD-52722 Calculation of Utilities Expense Level and used to determine the utility portion of the Operating Fund subsidy. Condition: We selected three projects to test the accuracy of Form HUD-52722 and verify utility invoices supporting utility costs and consumption. The Authority was unable to provide invoices supporting utility consumption and cost for two projects. In addition, water costs were overstated for one project resulting in overstatement of the UEL by $34,200. Cause: The Authority does not have controls in place to ensure supporting documents are maintained to support all HUD-52722 forms. Effect: The amounts reported on Form 52722 could not be verified resulting in a potential error in the operating subsidy. Auditor Recommendation: The Authority should maintain files with all supporting documentation for each HUD-52722. Questioned Costs: Undeterminable. Management’s Response: To ensure supporting documents are maintained to support all HUD-52722 forms, all privately managed Mixed-Finance developments will submit utility cost and consumption data to include copies of invoices to LMHA monthly. Utility cost and consumption data to include copies of invoices are already collected by LMHA managed sites.