Audit 30476

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$1.04M
Findings
2
Programs
6
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-01-04

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
36768 2022-004 Material Weakness Yes BEN
613210 2022-004 Material Weakness Yes BEN

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
14.157 Supportive Housing for the Elderly $635,688 Yes 1
10.415 Rural Rental Housing Loans $199,299 - 0
10.447 The Rural Development (rd) Multi-Family Housing Revitalization Demonstration Program (mpr) $63,571 - 0
14.872 Public Housing Capital Fund $61,673 - 0
14.850 Public and Indian Housing $39,203 - 0
10.427 Rural Rental Assistance Payments $37,690 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
LSPHN5PGDJG3 Julie Gockley Auditee
3088825321 Jeff Wiens Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Loan/loan guarantee outstanding balances Accounting Policies: 1. The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards includes the federal grant activity of Housing Authority of the City of Imperial, Nebraska and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Costs Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. SUPPORTIVE HOUSING FOR THE ELDERLY (14.157) - Balances outstanding at the end of the audit period were 615700. THE RURAL DEVELOPMENT (RD) MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING REVITALIZATION DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM (MPR) (10.447) - Balances outstanding at the end of the audit period were 62365. RURAL RENTAL HOUSING LOANS (10.415) - Balances outstanding at the end of the audit period were 193772.

Finding Details

Finding 2022-004: Internal Control Structure Section 202 Capital Advance, 14.157 Material Weakness - Allowable Costs, Eligibility, Special Tests and Provisions Repeat Finding ? Finding 2021-002 Criteria: The Authority is responsible for establishing an effective internal control process to ensure the Authority complies with the requirements governing the Section 202 Capital Advance program. Condition: The Authority only had one employee which makes it difficult for the Authority to have controls beyond the Authority Manager?s knowledge. As a result, we noted the Authority had a lack of segregation of duties related to all applicable compliance requirements. Cause: The Authority has limited resources and one staff. Effect or Potential Effect: The control deficiencies are deficiencies that result in more than a reasonable possibility that material noncompliance with program requirements could occur and not be prevented or detected. Recommendation: As noted above, the Authority has limited resources and additional controls are not financially feasible in the hiring of additional staff. In addition, the Board of Commissioners is considered a governing Board and the Board performing management or day-to-day activities is not recommended based on our previous experience and is not intended to be a solution to this situation. The Authority is a small entity and the lack of segregation of duties is common among entities with minimal employees and should be recognized as such. However, it is not our intent to establish internal controls as the Authority?s Board should make the final determination in the cost versus benefit. View of the Responsible Officials of the Auditee: The auditee?s management agrees with the finding but can not reasonably adopt internal control procedures to correct the material weakness.
Finding 2022-004: Internal Control Structure Section 202 Capital Advance, 14.157 Material Weakness - Allowable Costs, Eligibility, Special Tests and Provisions Repeat Finding ? Finding 2021-002 Criteria: The Authority is responsible for establishing an effective internal control process to ensure the Authority complies with the requirements governing the Section 202 Capital Advance program. Condition: The Authority only had one employee which makes it difficult for the Authority to have controls beyond the Authority Manager?s knowledge. As a result, we noted the Authority had a lack of segregation of duties related to all applicable compliance requirements. Cause: The Authority has limited resources and one staff. Effect or Potential Effect: The control deficiencies are deficiencies that result in more than a reasonable possibility that material noncompliance with program requirements could occur and not be prevented or detected. Recommendation: As noted above, the Authority has limited resources and additional controls are not financially feasible in the hiring of additional staff. In addition, the Board of Commissioners is considered a governing Board and the Board performing management or day-to-day activities is not recommended based on our previous experience and is not intended to be a solution to this situation. The Authority is a small entity and the lack of segregation of duties is common among entities with minimal employees and should be recognized as such. However, it is not our intent to establish internal controls as the Authority?s Board should make the final determination in the cost versus benefit. View of the Responsible Officials of the Auditee: The auditee?s management agrees with the finding but can not reasonably adopt internal control procedures to correct the material weakness.