Audit 303823

FY End
2023-11-30
Total Expended
$28.35M
Findings
2
Programs
25
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-04-18

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
393687 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - B
970129 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - B

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
93.837 Cardiovascular Diseases Research $718,197 Yes 0
93.846 Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research $426,602 Yes 0
93.393 Cancer Cause and Prevention Research $385,849 Yes 0
93.859 Biomedical Research and Research Training $294,173 Yes 0
93.398 Cancer Research Manpower $260,575 Yes 0
93.395 Cancer Treatment Research $250,140 Yes 0
47.074 Biological Sciences $226,492 Yes 0
93.310 Trans-Nih Research Support $220,687 Yes 0
81.049 Office of Science Financial Assistance Program $217,218 Yes 0
93.172 Human Genome Research $149,295 Yes 0
93.397 Cancer Centers Support Grants $111,812 Yes 0
93.121 Oral Diseases and Disorders Research $107,385 Yes 0
93.839 Blood Diseases and Resources Research $100,537 Yes 0
93.866 Aging Research $98,276 Yes 0
93.855 Allergy, Immunology and Transplantation Research $94,828 Yes 0
93.865 Child Health and Human Development Extramural Research $65,820 Yes 0
93.394 Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research $54,157 Yes 0
93.847 Diabetes, Digestive, and Kidney Diseases Extramural Research $39,785 Yes 0
93.396 Cancer Biology Research $17,061 Yes 0
93.113 Environmental Health $15,455 Yes 0
47.076 Education and Human Resources $12,333 Yes 0
93.853 Extramural Research Programs in the Neurosciences and Neurological Disorders $5,811 Yes 0
47.083 Integrative Activities $4,689 Yes 0
93.242 Mental Health Research Grants $2,984 Yes 0
12.420 Military Medical Research and Development $1,986 Yes 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
QLRCUJ8JTN53 Jeff Richardson Auditee
6162345000 Christina Hardy Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the “Schedule”) includes the federal grant activity of Van Andel Institute and Affiliates (“VAIA”) under programs of the federal government for the year ended November 30, 2023. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the "Uniform Guidance"). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of VAIA, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of VAIA. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the same basis of accounting as the consolidated financial statements. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Pass through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. VAIA has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate to recover indirect costs, as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Organization has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate to recover indirect costs, as allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name – 93.866, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Aging Research – Role of Desumoylase SENP6 in Joint Aging and Osteoarthritis Development, Research and Development Center Federal Award Identification Number and Year – R01 AG061086 Pass through Entity – N/A – direct award Finding Type - Significant deficiency and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria – In accordance with 2 CFR 200.405, costs are allocable to a particular federal award if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received. Costs must be incurred specifically for a federal award and if costs benefit multiple grants, the costs can be allocated between federal and non-federal grants using a reasonable allocation method. Allocable costs can be requested for reimbursement by the federal agency. Condition – VAIA’s controls requiring investigators to monitor expenses, ensure that costs benefitting multiple projects are allocated using a reasonable methodology, as required by Uniform Guidance, and ensure that allocation errors are timely corrected were not supported by adequate training of investigators and their delegates. Questioned Costs – N/A Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Context - In December of 2023, VAIA identified it did not properly calculate an allocation of certain costs incurred that benefited both federal and institutionally funded projects. VAIA management performed a look back analysis of these costs and determined that only 50 percent of the costs benefited the federal grant activities instead of the 100 percent originally reported to and reimbursed by the federal agency, resulting in excess draws of approximately $248,000, including approximately $30,000 for the year ending November 30, 2023. The approximate $30,000 includes approximately $16,000 of direct costs and approximately $14,000 of indirect using VAIA’s negotiated rate. VAIA notified the funding agency of this error and reimbursed the federal agency in February 2024. The amount reported on the accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the year ended November 30, 2023 does not include any of these unallowable charges. Cause and Effect – VAIA’s training of investigators and their delegates regarding expense monitoring, allocation of costs benefitting multiple projects using reasonable methodologies, and the timely correction of allocation errors was inadequate and resulted in VAIA drawing down funds to which they were not entitled. Recommendation – We recommend that VAIA review its procedures and controls to ensure that principal investigators over grants funds are properly trained and knowledgeable regarding allocation of expenditures between programs. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - VAIA requires laboratory personnel to review and approve monthly Vivarium transactions by protocol, since investigators and their delegates are the only individuals at VAIA in a position to know with certainty how Vivarium costs proportionately benefit multiple funding sources. Following VAIA’s customary review and approval process, VAIA’s internal controls subsequently identified an improperly calculated allocation. Taking swift action, the allocation was corrected, and funds were returned to the Federal Government within 90 days of identifying improper allocation as required by NIH Grants Policy Statement section 7.5. VAIA management disclosed this correction to our external auditors and the award’s Grant Management Officer. VAI’s corrective action plan for Vivarium charges includes the following: - Deploying an automated front-end solution that requires a protocol review and approval by our IACUC office before a protocol is made available for use by individual sponsored projects. - Evaluating additional opportunities to utilize technology to enhance the control environment, particularly with respect to cost allocation of vivarium charges, - Ensuring proper allocation through three meetings per laboratory in 2024 to review Vivarium costs charged to federally sponsored projects. - Providing additional continuing education on cost allocation principles for those making allocation determinations
Assistance Listing, Federal Agency, and Program Name – 93.866, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Aging Research – Role of Desumoylase SENP6 in Joint Aging and Osteoarthritis Development, Research and Development Center Federal Award Identification Number and Year – R01 AG061086 Pass through Entity – N/A – direct award Finding Type - Significant deficiency and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding - No Criteria – In accordance with 2 CFR 200.405, costs are allocable to a particular federal award if the goods or services involved are chargeable or assignable to that federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received. Costs must be incurred specifically for a federal award and if costs benefit multiple grants, the costs can be allocated between federal and non-federal grants using a reasonable allocation method. Allocable costs can be requested for reimbursement by the federal agency. Condition – VAIA’s controls requiring investigators to monitor expenses, ensure that costs benefitting multiple projects are allocated using a reasonable methodology, as required by Uniform Guidance, and ensure that allocation errors are timely corrected were not supported by adequate training of investigators and their delegates. Questioned Costs – N/A Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed – N/A Context - In December of 2023, VAIA identified it did not properly calculate an allocation of certain costs incurred that benefited both federal and institutionally funded projects. VAIA management performed a look back analysis of these costs and determined that only 50 percent of the costs benefited the federal grant activities instead of the 100 percent originally reported to and reimbursed by the federal agency, resulting in excess draws of approximately $248,000, including approximately $30,000 for the year ending November 30, 2023. The approximate $30,000 includes approximately $16,000 of direct costs and approximately $14,000 of indirect using VAIA’s negotiated rate. VAIA notified the funding agency of this error and reimbursed the federal agency in February 2024. The amount reported on the accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for the year ended November 30, 2023 does not include any of these unallowable charges. Cause and Effect – VAIA’s training of investigators and their delegates regarding expense monitoring, allocation of costs benefitting multiple projects using reasonable methodologies, and the timely correction of allocation errors was inadequate and resulted in VAIA drawing down funds to which they were not entitled. Recommendation – We recommend that VAIA review its procedures and controls to ensure that principal investigators over grants funds are properly trained and knowledgeable regarding allocation of expenditures between programs. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - VAIA requires laboratory personnel to review and approve monthly Vivarium transactions by protocol, since investigators and their delegates are the only individuals at VAIA in a position to know with certainty how Vivarium costs proportionately benefit multiple funding sources. Following VAIA’s customary review and approval process, VAIA’s internal controls subsequently identified an improperly calculated allocation. Taking swift action, the allocation was corrected, and funds were returned to the Federal Government within 90 days of identifying improper allocation as required by NIH Grants Policy Statement section 7.5. VAIA management disclosed this correction to our external auditors and the award’s Grant Management Officer. VAI’s corrective action plan for Vivarium charges includes the following: - Deploying an automated front-end solution that requires a protocol review and approval by our IACUC office before a protocol is made available for use by individual sponsored projects. - Evaluating additional opportunities to utilize technology to enhance the control environment, particularly with respect to cost allocation of vivarium charges, - Ensuring proper allocation through three meetings per laboratory in 2024 to review Vivarium costs charged to federally sponsored projects. - Providing additional continuing education on cost allocation principles for those making allocation determinations