Audit 303750

FY End
2022-09-30
Total Expended
$972,076
Findings
10
Programs
5
Organization: Wilcox County, Georgia (GA)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2024-04-17
Auditor: Eckler CPA LLC

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
393573 2022-004 - - B
393574 2022-005 - - I
393575 2022-006 - - I
393576 2022-007 Material Weakness - B
393577 2022-008 Material Weakness - I
970015 2022-004 - - B
970016 2022-005 - - I
970017 2022-006 - - I
970018 2022-007 Material Weakness - B
970019 2022-008 Material Weakness - I

Programs

Contacts

Name Title Type
JKGTPDQBBVQ6 Michael Pomirko Auditee
2294672737 D. Anthony Eckler Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: This schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the "Schedule") includes the federal award activity of Wilcox County, Georgia under programs of the federal government for the year ended September 30, 2022. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because this Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Wilcox County, Georgia, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of Wilcox County, Georgia. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are presented on the modified accrual basis of accounting. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Wilcox County, Georgia has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

Information on the Federal Program: Assistance Listing Number 21.027-Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, U.S. Department of the Treasury. Compliance Requirements: Allowable Costs and Costs Principles. Type of Finding: Noncompliance. Criteria: 2 CFR § 200.302(b)(7) requires that each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with 2 CFR 200 Subpart E – Cost Principles and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: We noted that the County did not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs and the terms and conditions of the Federal award during fiscal year 2022. Cause: The County was not aware of the requirement to have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Effect: Failure to have written procedures for determining allowability of costs and the terms and conditions of the Federal award could result in costs charged to the program that are not allowable costs as defined by the appropriate cost principles circular and noncompliance with Uniform Guidance requirements and terms and conditions of the Federal award. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend that the County identify grants that are subject to Uniform Guidance on a timely basis to ensure all compliance requirements are met and develop written procedures where required. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The County has identified federal grants subject to the Uniform Guidance and will develop written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with 2 CFR 200, Subpart E—Cost Principles and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.
Information on the Federal Program: Assistance Listing Number 21.027-Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, U.S. Department of the Treasury. Compliance Requirements: Procurement. Type of Finding: Noncompliance. Criteria: 2 CFR § 200.318(c)(1) requires that the non-Federal entity must maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. Condition: We noted that the County did not have written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts in fiscal year 2022. Cause: The County was not aware of the requirement to have written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. Effect: Failure to have written standards of conduct could result in noncompliance with Uniform Guidance requirements. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend that the County develop written standards of conduct that include the requirements of 2 CFR § 200.318(c)(1). Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The County will develop written standards of conduct in that satisfy the requirements of 2 CFR § 200.318(c)(1).
Information on the Federal Program: Assistance Listing Number 21.027-Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, U.S. Department of the Treasury. Compliance Requirements: Procurement. Type of Finding: Noncompliance. Criteria: 2 CFR § 200.319(d) requires that the non-Federal entity must maintain written procedures for procurement transactions. Condition: We noted that the County did not have written procedures for procurement transactions that include the provisions required by the Procurement Standards 2 CFR § 200.318 through 2 CFR § 200.327 in fiscal year 2022. Cause: The County was not aware of the requirement to have written procedures for procurement transactions. Effect: Failure to have adequate written procedures for procurement transactions could result in the acquisition of goods or services in violation with administrative requirements, federal regulations, other procurement requirements, and Uniform Guidance requirements. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend that the County identify grants that are subject to Uniform Guidance on a timely basis to ensure all compliance requirements are met and develop adequate written policies and procedures for procurement transactions. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The County has identified federal grants subject to the Uniform Guidance and will develop written policies and procedures which include the relevant provisions required by 2 CFR § 200.318 through 2 CFR § 200.326 Contract provisions.
Information on the Federal Program: Assistance Listing Number 21.027-Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, U.S. Department of the Treasury. Compliance Requirements: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles. Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance. Criteria: Internal controls should be in place to provide reasonable assurance that the costs of goods and services charged to federal awards are allowable and in accordance with the applicable cost principles. Condition: The County lacks sufficient controls over allowable cost/cost principles to ensure that costs of goods and services charged to federal awards are allowable and in accordance with the applicable cost principles. Cause: The County did not design and implement controls over compliance with allowable cost/cost principles. Effect or Potential Effect: Failure to have adequate internal controls over compliance with allowable cost/cost principles could result in costs charged to the program that are not allowable costs as defined by the appropriate cost principles circular. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend that the County design and implement controls to ensure: Accountability for authorization is fixed in an individual who is knowledgeable of the requirements for determining allowable costs; and supporting documentation is compared to lists of allowable and unallowable expenditures. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management concurs with the audit finding. The County will design and implement controls to ensure that the costs of goods and services charged to federal awards are allowable and in accordance with the applicable cost principles.
Information on the Federal Program: Assistance Listing Number 21.027-Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, U.S. Department of the Treasury. Compliance Requirements: Procurement. Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance. Criteria: Internal controls should be in place to provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with federal regulations and other procurement requirements, as applicable. Condition: The County lacks sufficient controls over procurement to ensure compliance with federal regulations and other procurement requirements, as applicable. Cause: The County did not design and implement controls over compliance with procurement. Effect or Potential Effect: Failure to have adequate internal controls over compliance with procurement could result in the acquisition of goods or services in violation with administrative requirements, federal regulations, and other procurement requirements. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend that the County create and adopt an official written policy for procurement and contracts establishing contract files that document significant procurement history; methods of procurement authorized including selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis of contract price; verification that procurements provide full and open competition; requirements for cost or price analysis, including for contract modifications; obtaining and reacting to suspension and debarment certifications; and other applicable requirements for procurements under federal awards are followed. We also recommend that personnel with adequate knowledge and experience of responsibilities for procurements for federal awards review procurement and contracting decisions for compliance with federal procurement policies. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management concurs with the audit finding. The County will develop written policies and procedures for procurement, including the relevant provisions required by 2 CFR § 200.318 through 2 CFR § 200.326 Contract provisions. Management will evaluate the need to contract with local government consultants to perform control procedures where County personnel are not available or qualified to perform.
Information on the Federal Program: Assistance Listing Number 21.027-Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, U.S. Department of the Treasury. Compliance Requirements: Allowable Costs and Costs Principles. Type of Finding: Noncompliance. Criteria: 2 CFR § 200.302(b)(7) requires that each non-Federal entity must provide for written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with 2 CFR 200 Subpart E – Cost Principles and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Condition: We noted that the County did not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs and the terms and conditions of the Federal award during fiscal year 2022. Cause: The County was not aware of the requirement to have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Effect: Failure to have written procedures for determining allowability of costs and the terms and conditions of the Federal award could result in costs charged to the program that are not allowable costs as defined by the appropriate cost principles circular and noncompliance with Uniform Guidance requirements and terms and conditions of the Federal award. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend that the County identify grants that are subject to Uniform Guidance on a timely basis to ensure all compliance requirements are met and develop written procedures where required. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The County has identified federal grants subject to the Uniform Guidance and will develop written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with 2 CFR 200, Subpart E—Cost Principles and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.
Information on the Federal Program: Assistance Listing Number 21.027-Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, U.S. Department of the Treasury. Compliance Requirements: Procurement. Type of Finding: Noncompliance. Criteria: 2 CFR § 200.318(c)(1) requires that the non-Federal entity must maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. Condition: We noted that the County did not have written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts in fiscal year 2022. Cause: The County was not aware of the requirement to have written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. Effect: Failure to have written standards of conduct could result in noncompliance with Uniform Guidance requirements. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend that the County develop written standards of conduct that include the requirements of 2 CFR § 200.318(c)(1). Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The County will develop written standards of conduct in that satisfy the requirements of 2 CFR § 200.318(c)(1).
Information on the Federal Program: Assistance Listing Number 21.027-Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, U.S. Department of the Treasury. Compliance Requirements: Procurement. Type of Finding: Noncompliance. Criteria: 2 CFR § 200.319(d) requires that the non-Federal entity must maintain written procedures for procurement transactions. Condition: We noted that the County did not have written procedures for procurement transactions that include the provisions required by the Procurement Standards 2 CFR § 200.318 through 2 CFR § 200.327 in fiscal year 2022. Cause: The County was not aware of the requirement to have written procedures for procurement transactions. Effect: Failure to have adequate written procedures for procurement transactions could result in the acquisition of goods or services in violation with administrative requirements, federal regulations, other procurement requirements, and Uniform Guidance requirements. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend that the County identify grants that are subject to Uniform Guidance on a timely basis to ensure all compliance requirements are met and develop adequate written policies and procedures for procurement transactions. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The County has identified federal grants subject to the Uniform Guidance and will develop written policies and procedures which include the relevant provisions required by 2 CFR § 200.318 through 2 CFR § 200.326 Contract provisions.
Information on the Federal Program: Assistance Listing Number 21.027-Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, U.S. Department of the Treasury. Compliance Requirements: Allowable Costs/Cost Principles. Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance. Criteria: Internal controls should be in place to provide reasonable assurance that the costs of goods and services charged to federal awards are allowable and in accordance with the applicable cost principles. Condition: The County lacks sufficient controls over allowable cost/cost principles to ensure that costs of goods and services charged to federal awards are allowable and in accordance with the applicable cost principles. Cause: The County did not design and implement controls over compliance with allowable cost/cost principles. Effect or Potential Effect: Failure to have adequate internal controls over compliance with allowable cost/cost principles could result in costs charged to the program that are not allowable costs as defined by the appropriate cost principles circular. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend that the County design and implement controls to ensure: Accountability for authorization is fixed in an individual who is knowledgeable of the requirements for determining allowable costs; and supporting documentation is compared to lists of allowable and unallowable expenditures. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management concurs with the audit finding. The County will design and implement controls to ensure that the costs of goods and services charged to federal awards are allowable and in accordance with the applicable cost principles.
Information on the Federal Program: Assistance Listing Number 21.027-Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, U.S. Department of the Treasury. Compliance Requirements: Procurement. Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance. Criteria: Internal controls should be in place to provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with federal regulations and other procurement requirements, as applicable. Condition: The County lacks sufficient controls over procurement to ensure compliance with federal regulations and other procurement requirements, as applicable. Cause: The County did not design and implement controls over compliance with procurement. Effect or Potential Effect: Failure to have adequate internal controls over compliance with procurement could result in the acquisition of goods or services in violation with administrative requirements, federal regulations, and other procurement requirements. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend that the County create and adopt an official written policy for procurement and contracts establishing contract files that document significant procurement history; methods of procurement authorized including selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis of contract price; verification that procurements provide full and open competition; requirements for cost or price analysis, including for contract modifications; obtaining and reacting to suspension and debarment certifications; and other applicable requirements for procurements under federal awards are followed. We also recommend that personnel with adequate knowledge and experience of responsibilities for procurements for federal awards review procurement and contracting decisions for compliance with federal procurement policies. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management concurs with the audit finding. The County will develop written policies and procedures for procurement, including the relevant provisions required by 2 CFR § 200.318 through 2 CFR § 200.326 Contract provisions. Management will evaluate the need to contract with local government consultants to perform control procedures where County personnel are not available or qualified to perform.