Audit 303315

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$874,772
Findings
2
Programs
6
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2024-04-11

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
392990 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes B
969432 2022-001 Significant Deficiency Yes B

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
84.002 Adult Education - Basic Grants to States $424,686 Yes 1
17.258 Wia Adult Program $85,534 - 0
17.278 Wia Dislocated Worker Formula Grants $52,857 - 0
17.259 Wia Youth Activities $52,675 - 0
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $28,741 - 0
93.558 Temporary Assistance for Needy Families $22,000 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
PJ9FF6GKA4X9 Colleen Duran Auditee
6108764811 Linda Scafiro Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: NOTE 1: BASIS OF PRESENTATION Accounting Policies: NOTE 2: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES The Schedule is presented on the accrual basis of accounting, which is described in Note 2 of the Literacy Council’s basic financial statements. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles obtained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: NOTE 3: INDIRECT COST RATE The Literacy Council has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance, Section 414. The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (“the Schedule”) includes the federal grant activity of the Delaware County Literacy Council (“the Literacy Council”) under the programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2022. The information in the Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Literacy Council, it is not intended to, and does not, present the financial position, activities, changes in net assets, functional expenses or cash flows of the Literacy Council.
Title: NOTE 2: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Accounting Policies: NOTE 2: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES The Schedule is presented on the accrual basis of accounting, which is described in Note 2 of the Literacy Council’s basic financial statements. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles obtained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: NOTE 3: INDIRECT COST RATE The Literacy Council has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance, Section 414. The Schedule is presented on the accrual basis of accounting, which is described in Note 2 of the Literacy Council’s basic financial statements. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles obtained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available.
Title: NOTE 3: INDIRECT COST RATE Accounting Policies: NOTE 2: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES The Schedule is presented on the accrual basis of accounting, which is described in Note 2 of the Literacy Council’s basic financial statements. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles obtained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: NOTE 3: INDIRECT COST RATE The Literacy Council has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance, Section 414. The Literacy Council has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance, Section 414.

Finding Details

Finding 2022-001: Significant Deficiency – Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Repeat Finding: 2021-001 Organization did not implement an established and accurate cost allocation plan during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022. Therefore, not all costs were shared among different grants consistently and accurately. Criteria: Under the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 2: Grants and Agreements, PART 200 - Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, Subpart E - Cost Principles Sec. 200.405 Allocable Costs - the cost must be allocated to the grants/projects based on the proportional benefit. If a cost benefits two or more grants/projects or activities in proportions that cannot be determined because of the interrelationship of the work involved, then the costs may be allocated or transferred to benefitted projects on a reasonable documented basis. Condition: During our prior year audit as well as during a monitoring visit by PDE, it was discovered that certain expenses were allocated to grants on an unsupported basis. Based on testing of expenditures performed for current year an accurate cost allocation plan was not accurately developed or implemented during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. Questioned Costs: None Cause: The Organization did not create or implement an accurate cost allocation plan during the current or prior or fiscal year. Effect: DCLC is not in compliance with 2 CFR Sec. 200.405 - Allocable Costs. Recommendation: We recommend that DCLC work to develop and implement a written allocation plan including calculations for all direct and indirect costs that benefit two or more grants or programs. Specifically, DCLC should review actual expenses on an ongoing basis and make any necessary adjustments to the allocated expenses.
Finding 2022-001: Significant Deficiency – Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Repeat Finding: 2021-001 Organization did not implement an established and accurate cost allocation plan during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022. Therefore, not all costs were shared among different grants consistently and accurately. Criteria: Under the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 2: Grants and Agreements, PART 200 - Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, Subpart E - Cost Principles Sec. 200.405 Allocable Costs - the cost must be allocated to the grants/projects based on the proportional benefit. If a cost benefits two or more grants/projects or activities in proportions that cannot be determined because of the interrelationship of the work involved, then the costs may be allocated or transferred to benefitted projects on a reasonable documented basis. Condition: During our prior year audit as well as during a monitoring visit by PDE, it was discovered that certain expenses were allocated to grants on an unsupported basis. Based on testing of expenditures performed for current year an accurate cost allocation plan was not accurately developed or implemented during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. Questioned Costs: None Cause: The Organization did not create or implement an accurate cost allocation plan during the current or prior or fiscal year. Effect: DCLC is not in compliance with 2 CFR Sec. 200.405 - Allocable Costs. Recommendation: We recommend that DCLC work to develop and implement a written allocation plan including calculations for all direct and indirect costs that benefit two or more grants or programs. Specifically, DCLC should review actual expenses on an ongoing basis and make any necessary adjustments to the allocated expenses.