Audit 30286

FY End
2022-12-31
Total Expended
$2.81M
Findings
2
Programs
2
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-09-26

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
38253 2022-001 Material Weakness Yes L
614695 2022-001 Material Weakness Yes L

Contacts

Name Title Type
KYYKGFSN7859 Tom Auditee
9375924015 Jordan Pace Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal grant activity of Mary Rutan Health Association of Logan County and Subsidiaries (the Organization) under programs of the federal government for the year ended December 31, 2022. The information in the Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Organization, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the Organization.Expenditures reported in the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement, except for expenditures related to ALN 93.498, Provider Relief Fund (PRF). PRF does not apply the cost principles contained in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, but rather applies the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) guidance. For PRF program, HHS has indicated that the amounts on the schedule should be reported in correspondence with reporting requirements of the HHS PRF Portal. Payments from HHS for PRF are assigned to one of five payment received periods based upon the date each payment from PRF was received. Each period has a specified period of availability and timing of reporting requirements.The Organization has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate to recover indirect costs, as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate.

Finding Details

Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 93.498, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, COVID-19 - Provider Relief Fund and American Rescue Plan Rural Distribution Federal Award Identification Number and Year - N/A Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding ? Yes, 2021-001 Criteria - - The Organization must establish and maintain effective internal controls over federal awards that provide reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The reporting requirements for the Provider Relief Fund requires recipients that apply PRF payments toward lost revenue to use one of the following options for calculating lost revenue: Option i: The difference between actual patient care revenue Option ii: The difference between budgeted (prior to March 27, 2020) and actual patient care revenue Option iii: The amount calculated by any reasonable method of estimating revenue Condition - The Organization does not have a review process in place related to the required reporting submissions to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services for the PRF program. The Organization selected Option iii for reporting lost revenues, however the Organization had mathematical errors in the calculation of lost revenue for the second quarter of 2021 and second quarter of 2022 (the lost revenues by quarter did not sum in total by quarter appropriately).. Questioned Cost ? None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed ? N/A Context - There was no independent review completed on the reporting submission to evaluate the completeness and accuracy of the calculation of lost revenue. The lost revenue reported in the period four portal submission was understated by approximately $450,000 as a result of the mathematical error identified. Cause and Effect - The lack of an independent review of the reporting submission resulted in a reporting error and could also result in an increased risk of incomplete or inaccurate information reported to the granting agency. Recommendation - The Organization should implement a process to ensure an independent review of the reporting submission is completed prior to finalization. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - Management agrees with the finding and will implement a process to ensure an independent review of the reporting submission is completed. The lost revenue reported in the period four portal submission was understated by approximately $450,000 as a result of the mathematical error identified. The Organization also had excess lost revenue that did not have to be utilized to justify recognition of the funding received, therefore this error had no impact on meeting the conditions of the funding received.
Assistance Listing Number, Federal Agency, and Program Name - 93.498, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, COVID-19 - Provider Relief Fund and American Rescue Plan Rural Distribution Federal Award Identification Number and Year - N/A Pass-through Entity - N/A Finding Type - Material weakness and material noncompliance with laws and regulations Repeat Finding ? Yes, 2021-001 Criteria - - The Organization must establish and maintain effective internal controls over federal awards that provide reasonable assurance that the nonfederal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The reporting requirements for the Provider Relief Fund requires recipients that apply PRF payments toward lost revenue to use one of the following options for calculating lost revenue: Option i: The difference between actual patient care revenue Option ii: The difference between budgeted (prior to March 27, 2020) and actual patient care revenue Option iii: The amount calculated by any reasonable method of estimating revenue Condition - The Organization does not have a review process in place related to the required reporting submissions to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services for the PRF program. The Organization selected Option iii for reporting lost revenues, however the Organization had mathematical errors in the calculation of lost revenue for the second quarter of 2021 and second quarter of 2022 (the lost revenues by quarter did not sum in total by quarter appropriately).. Questioned Cost ? None Identification of How Questioned Costs Were Computed ? N/A Context - There was no independent review completed on the reporting submission to evaluate the completeness and accuracy of the calculation of lost revenue. The lost revenue reported in the period four portal submission was understated by approximately $450,000 as a result of the mathematical error identified. Cause and Effect - The lack of an independent review of the reporting submission resulted in a reporting error and could also result in an increased risk of incomplete or inaccurate information reported to the granting agency. Recommendation - The Organization should implement a process to ensure an independent review of the reporting submission is completed prior to finalization. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan - Management agrees with the finding and will implement a process to ensure an independent review of the reporting submission is completed. The lost revenue reported in the period four portal submission was understated by approximately $450,000 as a result of the mathematical error identified. The Organization also had excess lost revenue that did not have to be utilized to justify recognition of the funding received, therefore this error had no impact on meeting the conditions of the funding received.