Audit 302840

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$7.26M
Findings
12
Programs
24
Organization: Park County (MT)
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-04-08

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
392508 2023-012 Material Weakness - IP
392509 2023-013 Material Weakness - AB
392510 2023-013 Material Weakness - AB
392511 2023-011 Material Weakness Yes I
392512 2023-011 Material Weakness Yes I
392513 2023-011 Material Weakness Yes I
968950 2023-012 Material Weakness - IP
968951 2023-013 Material Weakness - AB
968952 2023-013 Material Weakness - AB
968953 2023-011 Material Weakness Yes I
968954 2023-011 Material Weakness Yes I
968955 2023-011 Material Weakness Yes I

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
21.032 Local Assistance and Tribal Consistency Fund $1.52M Yes 0
97.036 Disaster Grants - Public Assistance (presidentially Declared Disasters) $546,792 - 0
21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds $486,406 Yes 1
10.665 Schools and Roads - Grants to States $278,947 - 0
20.106 Airport Improvement Program $215,697 Yes 0
20.509 Formula Grants for Rural Areas and Tribal Transit Program $80,160 Yes 1
10.557 Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children $78,415 - 0
97.067 Homeland Security Grant Program $72,911 - 0
16.588 Violence Against Women Formula Grants $64,041 - 0
97.042 Emergency Management Performance Grants $45,000 - 0
16.710 Public Safety Partnership and Community Policing Grants $43,829 - 0
93.069 Public Health Emergency Preparedness $39,574 - 0
93.982 Mental Health Disaster Assistance and Emergency Mental Health $37,421 - 0
16.738 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program $34,625 - 0
93.323 Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (elc) $28,139 - 0
14.228 Community Development Block Grants/state's Program and Non-Entitlement Grants in Hawaii $21,599 - 0
93.268 Immunization Cooperative Agreements $17,145 - 0
93.391 Activities to Support State, Tribal, Local and Territorial (stlt) Health Department Response to Public Health Or Healthcare Crises $12,354 - 0
93.959 Block Grants for Prevention and Treatment of Substance Abuse $9,254 - 0
93.994 Maternal and Child Health Services Block Grant to the States $7,779 - 0
93.354 Public Health Emergency Response: Cooperative Agreement for Emergency Response: Public Health Crisis Response $6,863 - 0
10.578 Wic Grants to States (wgs) $3,489 - 0
93.052 National Family Caregiver Support, Title Iii, Part E $3,300 - 0
93.435 Innovative State and Local Public Health Strategies to Prevent and Manage Diabetes and Heart Disease and Stroke- $170 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
M31JSJMJWGE7 Erica Strickland Auditee
4062224135 Curt Wyss Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: NOTE 4 - DONATED PPE Accounting Policies: The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the schedule) includes the federal award activity of the government under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2023. The Information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of the Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the government, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position or changes in net position of the government. Expenditures reported on the schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: N/A The estimated Fair Market Value (FMV) of donated PPE for the year ended June 30, 2023 was $2,500 (unaudited).

Finding Details

NONCOMPLIANCE WITH GRANT TERMS AND CONDITIONS; FORMULA GRANTS FOR RURAL AREAS AND TRIBAL TRANSIT PROGRAM; AL No. 20.509, GRANT No 111604, YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023 Criteria: Per section 3.5 of the grant contract, the county is required to obtain from its third-party contractors certifications required by Department of Transportation regulations, “Government­wide Debarment and Suspension (Non-procurement)," 49 CFR Part 29, and otherwise comply with the requirements of those regulations. Condition 1: The county did not obtain the required certifications in order to verify that program recipients/participants were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in the program. Criteria: Section 2.8 of the grant contract requires the county to include contract Sections 2.9 to 3.17 in any advertisement or invitation to bid for any procurement under the contract. Condition 2: The county did not include the required contract sections in its bid advertisements. Criteria: Section 3.12 of the grant contract incorporates FTA Circular 4220.1F terms into the contract. Per FTA Circular 4220.1F, Federal Transit Authority’s (FTA) Buy America requirements prevent FTA from obligating an amount that may be appropriated to carry out its program for a project unless "the steel, iron, and manufactured goods used in the project are produced in the United States" (49 U.S.C. § 5323(j)(1)). FTA’s Buy America requirements apply to third-party procurements by FTA grant recipients. A grantee must include in its bid or request for proposal (RFP) specification for procurement of steel, iron or manufactured goods (including rolling stock) an appropriate notice of the Buy America provision and require, as a condition of responsiveness, that the bidder or offeror submit with the bid or offer a completed Buy America certificate in accordance with 49 CFR §§661.6 or 661.12. Condition 3: The county did not include in its bid or request for proposal (RFP) specification for procurement of steel, iron or manufactured goods nor did they require the bidders to submit completed Buy America certificates. Criteria: Section 3.1 of the grant contract incorporates the FTA Master Contract MA(26) by reference. Section 16 (9) of FTA Master Contract MA(26) restricts lobbying in accordance with 31 U.S.C. § 1352. Contractors that apply or bid for an award exceeding $100,000 must file the certification required by 49 C.F.R. part 20. Each tier certifies to the tier above that it will not and has not used federal appropriated funds to pay any person or organization for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a member of Congress, officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with obtaining any federal contract, grant or any other award covered by 31 U.S.C. § 1352. Each tier must also disclose any lobbying with non-federal funds that takes place in connection with obtaining any Federal award. Such disclosures are forwarded from tier to tier up to the non-federal award. Condition 4: The certifications required by 49 C.F.R. part 20 were not filed nor on hand for inspection. Cause: The county does not have a system in place that will allow full compliance with all program terms and conditions. Effect: Non-compliance with program terms and conditions. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should develop procedures that will provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with applicable federal regulations and other procurement requirements specific to a federal award or subaward, and that no subaward, contract, or agreement for purchase of goods or services is made with any suspended or debarred party. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES; FORMULA GRANTS FOR RURAL AREAS AND TRIBAL TRANSIT PROGRAM; AL No. 20.509, GRANT No’s 112761 AND 112626, YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023 Criteria: Because the federal reimbursement rates are different for Operations, Administration and Maintenance, the general ledger accounts are separated into the cost categories that are reported to the granting agencies. Condition: The expenditures reported on the reimbursement reports filed with the granting agency did not agree with the county’s general ledger. Questioned Costs: None Cause: The county does not have preparation and review procedures to reconcile the amounts reported on the reimbursement requests to the general ledger accounting records. Effect: Incorrect reimbursement amounts were received. Recommendation: The county should develop a process to verify that amounts reported to the granting agency agree to the general ledger accounting records. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES; FORMULA GRANTS FOR RURAL AREAS AND TRIBAL TRANSIT PROGRAM; AL No. 20.509, GRANT No’s 112761 AND 112626, YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023 Criteria: Because the federal reimbursement rates are different for Operations, Administration and Maintenance, the general ledger accounts are separated into the cost categories that are reported to the granting agencies. Condition: The expenditures reported on the reimbursement reports filed with the granting agency did not agree with the county’s general ledger. Questioned Costs: None Cause: The county does not have preparation and review procedures to reconcile the amounts reported on the reimbursement requests to the general ledger accounting records. Effect: Incorrect reimbursement amounts were received. Recommendation: The county should develop a process to verify that amounts reported to the granting agency agree to the general ledger accounting records. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION & DEBARMENT REQUIREMENTS, CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS; AL No. 21.027, YEAR ENDED JUNE 30 2023 Criteria: Per section 13 of Treasury’s Final Rule FAQs and 2 CFR 200.214, counties must comply with the procurement standards set forth in 2 CFR 200.318, through 2 CFR 200.327, when using their SLFRF award funds to procure goods and services to carry out the objectives of their SLFRF award. In addition, 2 CFR 200.214, prohibits recipients from using SLFRF funds to enter into subawards and contracts with parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs. Condition 1: The county did not verify that program recipients/participants were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in the program. Condition 2: The county did not formally bid a water and sewer line extension project at the fairgrounds as required by federal procurement standards established in 2 CFR 300.19. Cause: The county does not have procurement policies and procedures in place that allows it to comply with procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Non-compliance with program terms and conditions. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should develop procedures that will provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with applicable federal regulations and other procurement requirements specific to a federal award or subaward, and that no subaward, contract, or agreement for purchase of goods or services is made with any suspended or debarred party. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION & DEBARMENT REQUIREMENTS, CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS; AL No. 21.027, YEAR ENDED JUNE 30 2023 Criteria: Per section 13 of Treasury’s Final Rule FAQs and 2 CFR 200.214, counties must comply with the procurement standards set forth in 2 CFR 200.318, through 2 CFR 200.327, when using their SLFRF award funds to procure goods and services to carry out the objectives of their SLFRF award. In addition, 2 CFR 200.214, prohibits recipients from using SLFRF funds to enter into subawards and contracts with parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs. Condition 1: The county did not verify that program recipients/participants were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in the program. Condition 2: The county did not formally bid a water and sewer line extension project at the fairgrounds as required by federal procurement standards established in 2 CFR 300.19. Cause: The county does not have procurement policies and procedures in place that allows it to comply with procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Non-compliance with program terms and conditions. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should develop procedures that will provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with applicable federal regulations and other procurement requirements specific to a federal award or subaward, and that no subaward, contract, or agreement for purchase of goods or services is made with any suspended or debarred party. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION & DEBARMENT REQUIREMENTS, CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS; AL No. 21.027, YEAR ENDED JUNE 30 2023 Criteria: Per section 13 of Treasury’s Final Rule FAQs and 2 CFR 200.214, counties must comply with the procurement standards set forth in 2 CFR 200.318, through 2 CFR 200.327, when using their SLFRF award funds to procure goods and services to carry out the objectives of their SLFRF award. In addition, 2 CFR 200.214, prohibits recipients from using SLFRF funds to enter into subawards and contracts with parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs. Condition 1: The county did not verify that program recipients/participants were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in the program. Condition 2: The county did not formally bid a water and sewer line extension project at the fairgrounds as required by federal procurement standards established in 2 CFR 300.19. Cause: The county does not have procurement policies and procedures in place that allows it to comply with procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Non-compliance with program terms and conditions. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should develop procedures that will provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with applicable federal regulations and other procurement requirements specific to a federal award or subaward, and that no subaward, contract, or agreement for purchase of goods or services is made with any suspended or debarred party. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH GRANT TERMS AND CONDITIONS; FORMULA GRANTS FOR RURAL AREAS AND TRIBAL TRANSIT PROGRAM; AL No. 20.509, GRANT No 111604, YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023 Criteria: Per section 3.5 of the grant contract, the county is required to obtain from its third-party contractors certifications required by Department of Transportation regulations, “Government­wide Debarment and Suspension (Non-procurement)," 49 CFR Part 29, and otherwise comply with the requirements of those regulations. Condition 1: The county did not obtain the required certifications in order to verify that program recipients/participants were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in the program. Criteria: Section 2.8 of the grant contract requires the county to include contract Sections 2.9 to 3.17 in any advertisement or invitation to bid for any procurement under the contract. Condition 2: The county did not include the required contract sections in its bid advertisements. Criteria: Section 3.12 of the grant contract incorporates FTA Circular 4220.1F terms into the contract. Per FTA Circular 4220.1F, Federal Transit Authority’s (FTA) Buy America requirements prevent FTA from obligating an amount that may be appropriated to carry out its program for a project unless "the steel, iron, and manufactured goods used in the project are produced in the United States" (49 U.S.C. § 5323(j)(1)). FTA’s Buy America requirements apply to third-party procurements by FTA grant recipients. A grantee must include in its bid or request for proposal (RFP) specification for procurement of steel, iron or manufactured goods (including rolling stock) an appropriate notice of the Buy America provision and require, as a condition of responsiveness, that the bidder or offeror submit with the bid or offer a completed Buy America certificate in accordance with 49 CFR §§661.6 or 661.12. Condition 3: The county did not include in its bid or request for proposal (RFP) specification for procurement of steel, iron or manufactured goods nor did they require the bidders to submit completed Buy America certificates. Criteria: Section 3.1 of the grant contract incorporates the FTA Master Contract MA(26) by reference. Section 16 (9) of FTA Master Contract MA(26) restricts lobbying in accordance with 31 U.S.C. § 1352. Contractors that apply or bid for an award exceeding $100,000 must file the certification required by 49 C.F.R. part 20. Each tier certifies to the tier above that it will not and has not used federal appropriated funds to pay any person or organization for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a member of Congress, officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with obtaining any federal contract, grant or any other award covered by 31 U.S.C. § 1352. Each tier must also disclose any lobbying with non-federal funds that takes place in connection with obtaining any Federal award. Such disclosures are forwarded from tier to tier up to the non-federal award. Condition 4: The certifications required by 49 C.F.R. part 20 were not filed nor on hand for inspection. Cause: The county does not have a system in place that will allow full compliance with all program terms and conditions. Effect: Non-compliance with program terms and conditions. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should develop procedures that will provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with applicable federal regulations and other procurement requirements specific to a federal award or subaward, and that no subaward, contract, or agreement for purchase of goods or services is made with any suspended or debarred party. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES; FORMULA GRANTS FOR RURAL AREAS AND TRIBAL TRANSIT PROGRAM; AL No. 20.509, GRANT No’s 112761 AND 112626, YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023 Criteria: Because the federal reimbursement rates are different for Operations, Administration and Maintenance, the general ledger accounts are separated into the cost categories that are reported to the granting agencies. Condition: The expenditures reported on the reimbursement reports filed with the granting agency did not agree with the county’s general ledger. Questioned Costs: None Cause: The county does not have preparation and review procedures to reconcile the amounts reported on the reimbursement requests to the general ledger accounting records. Effect: Incorrect reimbursement amounts were received. Recommendation: The county should develop a process to verify that amounts reported to the granting agency agree to the general ledger accounting records. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLES; FORMULA GRANTS FOR RURAL AREAS AND TRIBAL TRANSIT PROGRAM; AL No. 20.509, GRANT No’s 112761 AND 112626, YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023 Criteria: Because the federal reimbursement rates are different for Operations, Administration and Maintenance, the general ledger accounts are separated into the cost categories that are reported to the granting agencies. Condition: The expenditures reported on the reimbursement reports filed with the granting agency did not agree with the county’s general ledger. Questioned Costs: None Cause: The county does not have preparation and review procedures to reconcile the amounts reported on the reimbursement requests to the general ledger accounting records. Effect: Incorrect reimbursement amounts were received. Recommendation: The county should develop a process to verify that amounts reported to the granting agency agree to the general ledger accounting records. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION & DEBARMENT REQUIREMENTS, CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS; AL No. 21.027, YEAR ENDED JUNE 30 2023 Criteria: Per section 13 of Treasury’s Final Rule FAQs and 2 CFR 200.214, counties must comply with the procurement standards set forth in 2 CFR 200.318, through 2 CFR 200.327, when using their SLFRF award funds to procure goods and services to carry out the objectives of their SLFRF award. In addition, 2 CFR 200.214, prohibits recipients from using SLFRF funds to enter into subawards and contracts with parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs. Condition 1: The county did not verify that program recipients/participants were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in the program. Condition 2: The county did not formally bid a water and sewer line extension project at the fairgrounds as required by federal procurement standards established in 2 CFR 300.19. Cause: The county does not have procurement policies and procedures in place that allows it to comply with procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Non-compliance with program terms and conditions. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should develop procedures that will provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with applicable federal regulations and other procurement requirements specific to a federal award or subaward, and that no subaward, contract, or agreement for purchase of goods or services is made with any suspended or debarred party. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION & DEBARMENT REQUIREMENTS, CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS; AL No. 21.027, YEAR ENDED JUNE 30 2023 Criteria: Per section 13 of Treasury’s Final Rule FAQs and 2 CFR 200.214, counties must comply with the procurement standards set forth in 2 CFR 200.318, through 2 CFR 200.327, when using their SLFRF award funds to procure goods and services to carry out the objectives of their SLFRF award. In addition, 2 CFR 200.214, prohibits recipients from using SLFRF funds to enter into subawards and contracts with parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs. Condition 1: The county did not verify that program recipients/participants were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in the program. Condition 2: The county did not formally bid a water and sewer line extension project at the fairgrounds as required by federal procurement standards established in 2 CFR 300.19. Cause: The county does not have procurement policies and procedures in place that allows it to comply with procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Non-compliance with program terms and conditions. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should develop procedures that will provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with applicable federal regulations and other procurement requirements specific to a federal award or subaward, and that no subaward, contract, or agreement for purchase of goods or services is made with any suspended or debarred party. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.
NONCOMPLIANCE WITH PROCUREMENT, SUSPENSION & DEBARMENT REQUIREMENTS, CORONAVIRUS STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUNDS; AL No. 21.027, YEAR ENDED JUNE 30 2023 Criteria: Per section 13 of Treasury’s Final Rule FAQs and 2 CFR 200.214, counties must comply with the procurement standards set forth in 2 CFR 200.318, through 2 CFR 200.327, when using their SLFRF award funds to procure goods and services to carry out the objectives of their SLFRF award. In addition, 2 CFR 200.214, prohibits recipients from using SLFRF funds to enter into subawards and contracts with parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs. Condition 1: The county did not verify that program recipients/participants were not suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from participation in the program. Condition 2: The county did not formally bid a water and sewer line extension project at the fairgrounds as required by federal procurement standards established in 2 CFR 300.19. Cause: The county does not have procurement policies and procedures in place that allows it to comply with procurement standards outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Effect: Non-compliance with program terms and conditions. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: Management should develop procedures that will provide reasonable assurance that procurement of goods and services are made in compliance with applicable federal regulations and other procurement requirements specific to a federal award or subaward, and that no subaward, contract, or agreement for purchase of goods or services is made with any suspended or debarred party. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The government agrees with this finding and will adhere to the attached corrective action plan.