Audit 302135

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$1.72M
Findings
4
Programs
2
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-04-01

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
391953 2023-002 Significant Deficiency Yes AEL
391954 2023-002 Significant Deficiency Yes AEL
968395 2023-002 Significant Deficiency Yes AEL
968396 2023-002 Significant Deficiency Yes AEL

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
84.268 Federal Direct Student Loans $1.71M Yes 1
84.033 Federal Work-Study Program $7,022 Yes 1

Contacts

Name Title Type
N0TAV1ALABLE Latasha Sewell Auditee
4045277725 Donald K. Murphy Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: The Center participates in several programs sponsored by various government agencies as listed in the accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. All programs are subject to audit by the various agencies and they have the authority to determine liabilities, limit or suspend the Center's participation in the federal programs. The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) is presented on an accrual basis of accounting consistent with the basis of accounting used by the Center in the preparation of its financial statements with the exception of government loans and guarantees. The information in the Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). The Schedule includes all known federal and pass-through federal funds expended by the Center for the year ended June 30, 2023. All grants/awards should be reviewed in detail to determine if they contain any special provisions (for example, some awards require they be treated as major programs, even though they might not otherwise qualify as such). If the grant/award contains federal funding, the organization will obtain the following: name of the federal agency, award period, Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number. The grant/award should also be researched to determine if it is part of a cluster (including research and development) or a federal loan program. If the grant/award is passed through to/from a sub-recipient, the organization will obtain the pass-through entity identifying number. Prior to the grant/award becoming operational, the organization should review the OMB Compliance Supplements Matrix of Compliance Requirements. For every federally funded grant/award, personnel should be assigned for each area of compliance. Expenditures must be tracked for each individual grant/award. The accounting system must be set up to capture this information, and individuals must be established to assign expenses to each grant/award. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The Center does not have a federally negotiated indirect cost rate agreement. The Center has elected to use the 10% de mini mis indirect cost rate allowedunder the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

Finding 2023-001 – U.S. Department of Education (USDE), Title IV Student Financial Aid Programs (Significant Deficiencies) Information on the federal program – Federal Direct Student Loans, CFDA No. 84.268, June 30, 2023; Federal Work-Study Program, CFDA No. 84.033, June 30, 2023. Criteria – Federal regulations governing Title IV programs. Condition – Instances of noncompliance were noted as more fully described in the context below. Questioned Costs – $54,230 Context – We observed the following conditions in connection with our testing of the various U.S. Department of Education, Title IV, Student Financial Assistance Programs: a. Two (2) out of 21 students did not complete exit counseling requirements upon graduating or dropping below half-time status. 34 CFR 685.304(b)(1) b. One (1) out of 21 students was awarded Federal Direct Loans at less than half-time status. 34 CFR 685.200 (a)(1)(i). Attributable questioned cost: $3,000 c. Documentation to support the Center’s reconciliation of the Federal Direct Loan program between Common Origination and Disbursement (COD) and the Office of Financial aid was not available. 34 CFR 685.300(b)(5) d. Documentation to support the Center’s reconciliation of the Federal Work-study program was not available. 34 CFR Part 668 Subpart L e. One (1) out of 21 students did not have timely or accurate enrollment reporting to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS). 34 CFR685.309(b) f. Documentation to conduct Federal Work Study compliance testing was not provided. 34 CFR Part 675 g. Documentation to support testing for withdrawals and the return of Title IV funds compliance was not provided. HEA Section 484B & 34 CFR 668.22 h. Documentation to support credit balance (student refund) testing was not provided. 34 CFR 668.164(h)(1) i. Two (2) students out of 21 students were paid federal Direct Loans and did not make satisfactory academic progress (SAP) for the academic year. Additionally, the school did not provide updated documents supporting successful appeals. 34 CFR 668.34. Attributable questioned cost: $30,730 j. One (1) out of 21 students did not have an undergraduate transcript to prove eligibility for the program they were enrolled within the institution. HEA Section 484(d) and 34 CFR 668.32. Attributable questioned cost: $20,500. Cause – Oversight by responsible employees of properly monitoring regulatory requirements. Effect – The Center’s participation in the Title IV programs could be subject to USDE sanctions as applicable. Auditor's Recommendation – The Center should implement corrective actions to ensure that the above findings are resolved and does not recur in future periods. Moreover, internal controls over compliance with federal program regulations should be revisited to ensure adequate supervisory controls, quality assurance reviews of compliance steps, technical training of staff, and adequate procedures are being followed for compliance purposes.
Finding 2023-001 – U.S. Department of Education (USDE), Title IV Student Financial Aid Programs (Significant Deficiencies) Information on the federal program – Federal Direct Student Loans, CFDA No. 84.268, June 30, 2023; Federal Work-Study Program, CFDA No. 84.033, June 30, 2023. Criteria – Federal regulations governing Title IV programs. Condition – Instances of noncompliance were noted as more fully described in the context below. Questioned Costs – $54,230 Context – We observed the following conditions in connection with our testing of the various U.S. Department of Education, Title IV, Student Financial Assistance Programs: a. Two (2) out of 21 students did not complete exit counseling requirements upon graduating or dropping below half-time status. 34 CFR 685.304(b)(1) b. One (1) out of 21 students was awarded Federal Direct Loans at less than half-time status. 34 CFR 685.200 (a)(1)(i). Attributable questioned cost: $3,000 c. Documentation to support the Center’s reconciliation of the Federal Direct Loan program between Common Origination and Disbursement (COD) and the Office of Financial aid was not available. 34 CFR 685.300(b)(5) d. Documentation to support the Center’s reconciliation of the Federal Work-study program was not available. 34 CFR Part 668 Subpart L e. One (1) out of 21 students did not have timely or accurate enrollment reporting to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS). 34 CFR685.309(b) f. Documentation to conduct Federal Work Study compliance testing was not provided. 34 CFR Part 675 g. Documentation to support testing for withdrawals and the return of Title IV funds compliance was not provided. HEA Section 484B & 34 CFR 668.22 h. Documentation to support credit balance (student refund) testing was not provided. 34 CFR 668.164(h)(1) i. Two (2) students out of 21 students were paid federal Direct Loans and did not make satisfactory academic progress (SAP) for the academic year. Additionally, the school did not provide updated documents supporting successful appeals. 34 CFR 668.34. Attributable questioned cost: $30,730 j. One (1) out of 21 students did not have an undergraduate transcript to prove eligibility for the program they were enrolled within the institution. HEA Section 484(d) and 34 CFR 668.32. Attributable questioned cost: $20,500. Cause – Oversight by responsible employees of properly monitoring regulatory requirements. Effect – The Center’s participation in the Title IV programs could be subject to USDE sanctions as applicable. Auditor's Recommendation – The Center should implement corrective actions to ensure that the above findings are resolved and does not recur in future periods. Moreover, internal controls over compliance with federal program regulations should be revisited to ensure adequate supervisory controls, quality assurance reviews of compliance steps, technical training of staff, and adequate procedures are being followed for compliance purposes.
Finding 2023-001 – U.S. Department of Education (USDE), Title IV Student Financial Aid Programs (Significant Deficiencies) Information on the federal program – Federal Direct Student Loans, CFDA No. 84.268, June 30, 2023; Federal Work-Study Program, CFDA No. 84.033, June 30, 2023. Criteria – Federal regulations governing Title IV programs. Condition – Instances of noncompliance were noted as more fully described in the context below. Questioned Costs – $54,230 Context – We observed the following conditions in connection with our testing of the various U.S. Department of Education, Title IV, Student Financial Assistance Programs: a. Two (2) out of 21 students did not complete exit counseling requirements upon graduating or dropping below half-time status. 34 CFR 685.304(b)(1) b. One (1) out of 21 students was awarded Federal Direct Loans at less than half-time status. 34 CFR 685.200 (a)(1)(i). Attributable questioned cost: $3,000 c. Documentation to support the Center’s reconciliation of the Federal Direct Loan program between Common Origination and Disbursement (COD) and the Office of Financial aid was not available. 34 CFR 685.300(b)(5) d. Documentation to support the Center’s reconciliation of the Federal Work-study program was not available. 34 CFR Part 668 Subpart L e. One (1) out of 21 students did not have timely or accurate enrollment reporting to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS). 34 CFR685.309(b) f. Documentation to conduct Federal Work Study compliance testing was not provided. 34 CFR Part 675 g. Documentation to support testing for withdrawals and the return of Title IV funds compliance was not provided. HEA Section 484B & 34 CFR 668.22 h. Documentation to support credit balance (student refund) testing was not provided. 34 CFR 668.164(h)(1) i. Two (2) students out of 21 students were paid federal Direct Loans and did not make satisfactory academic progress (SAP) for the academic year. Additionally, the school did not provide updated documents supporting successful appeals. 34 CFR 668.34. Attributable questioned cost: $30,730 j. One (1) out of 21 students did not have an undergraduate transcript to prove eligibility for the program they were enrolled within the institution. HEA Section 484(d) and 34 CFR 668.32. Attributable questioned cost: $20,500. Cause – Oversight by responsible employees of properly monitoring regulatory requirements. Effect – The Center’s participation in the Title IV programs could be subject to USDE sanctions as applicable. Auditor's Recommendation – The Center should implement corrective actions to ensure that the above findings are resolved and does not recur in future periods. Moreover, internal controls over compliance with federal program regulations should be revisited to ensure adequate supervisory controls, quality assurance reviews of compliance steps, technical training of staff, and adequate procedures are being followed for compliance purposes.
Finding 2023-001 – U.S. Department of Education (USDE), Title IV Student Financial Aid Programs (Significant Deficiencies) Information on the federal program – Federal Direct Student Loans, CFDA No. 84.268, June 30, 2023; Federal Work-Study Program, CFDA No. 84.033, June 30, 2023. Criteria – Federal regulations governing Title IV programs. Condition – Instances of noncompliance were noted as more fully described in the context below. Questioned Costs – $54,230 Context – We observed the following conditions in connection with our testing of the various U.S. Department of Education, Title IV, Student Financial Assistance Programs: a. Two (2) out of 21 students did not complete exit counseling requirements upon graduating or dropping below half-time status. 34 CFR 685.304(b)(1) b. One (1) out of 21 students was awarded Federal Direct Loans at less than half-time status. 34 CFR 685.200 (a)(1)(i). Attributable questioned cost: $3,000 c. Documentation to support the Center’s reconciliation of the Federal Direct Loan program between Common Origination and Disbursement (COD) and the Office of Financial aid was not available. 34 CFR 685.300(b)(5) d. Documentation to support the Center’s reconciliation of the Federal Work-study program was not available. 34 CFR Part 668 Subpart L e. One (1) out of 21 students did not have timely or accurate enrollment reporting to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS). 34 CFR685.309(b) f. Documentation to conduct Federal Work Study compliance testing was not provided. 34 CFR Part 675 g. Documentation to support testing for withdrawals and the return of Title IV funds compliance was not provided. HEA Section 484B & 34 CFR 668.22 h. Documentation to support credit balance (student refund) testing was not provided. 34 CFR 668.164(h)(1) i. Two (2) students out of 21 students were paid federal Direct Loans and did not make satisfactory academic progress (SAP) for the academic year. Additionally, the school did not provide updated documents supporting successful appeals. 34 CFR 668.34. Attributable questioned cost: $30,730 j. One (1) out of 21 students did not have an undergraduate transcript to prove eligibility for the program they were enrolled within the institution. HEA Section 484(d) and 34 CFR 668.32. Attributable questioned cost: $20,500. Cause – Oversight by responsible employees of properly monitoring regulatory requirements. Effect – The Center’s participation in the Title IV programs could be subject to USDE sanctions as applicable. Auditor's Recommendation – The Center should implement corrective actions to ensure that the above findings are resolved and does not recur in future periods. Moreover, internal controls over compliance with federal program regulations should be revisited to ensure adequate supervisory controls, quality assurance reviews of compliance steps, technical training of staff, and adequate procedures are being followed for compliance purposes.