Audit 30198

FY End
2022-05-31
Total Expended
$53.96M
Findings
12
Programs
26
Organization: California Lutheran University (CA)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2022-10-23
Auditor: Moss Adams LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
30973 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - N
30974 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - N
30975 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - N
30976 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - N
30977 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - N
30978 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - N
607415 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - N
607416 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - N
607417 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - N
607418 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - N
607419 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - N
607420 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - N

Programs

ALN Program Spent Major Findings
84.268 Federal Direct Student Loans $32.46M Yes 1
84.425 Covid-19 Education Stabalization Fund Heerf - Student Portion $4.71M Yes 0
84.425 Covid-19 Education Stabalization Fund Heerf - Institutional Portion $4.70M Yes 0
84.063 Federal Pell Grant Program $4.41M Yes 1
84.038 Federal Perkins Loan Program $1.13M Yes 1
84.033 Federal Work-Study Program $1.09M Yes 1
84.031 Title V, Developing Hispanic-Serving Institutions Program - Cal Lutheran & Moorpark College Cooperative for Hispanics in Higher Ed & Student Success - Chess $879,029 - 0
84.031 Hispanic-Serving Institutions - Science, Technology, Engineering, Or Mathematics (hsi Stem; Title Iii, Part F) - Allies in Stem $675,589 - 0
84.031 Title V, Developing Hispanic-Serving Institutions Program - Project Educal $607,647 - 0
84.425 Covid-19 Education Stabalization Fund Heerf - Minority Serving Institutions Strengthening Institutions Programs $603,170 Yes 0
84.007 Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants $382,198 Yes 1
84.047 Trio_upward Bound $355,471 - 0
84.044 Trio_talent Search $351,347 - 0
84.047 Trio_math & Science Upward Bound $339,353 - 0
84.042 Trio_student Support Services $271,059 - 0
84.047 Trio_upward Bound Centinela Valley $270,300 - 0
84.217 Trio_mcnair $233,338 - 0
84.206 Javits Gifted and Talented Students Education Grant Program $192,143 - 0
97.036 Disaster Grants - Public Assistance (presidentially Declared Disasters) $107,214 - 0
47.074 Rui: Structural & Functional Substrate Binding $41,788 - 0
94.006 Americorps Planning Grant (state Share) - Contracting Agency: California Volunteers $37,629 - 0
94.006 Americorps Planning Grant -Corporation for National and Community Service (cncs Share) $31,032 - 0
84.379 Teacher Education Assistance for College and Higher Education Grants $29,233 Yes 1
47.076 Developing Live Science Show & Outreach $23,662 - 0
47.075 Rui: Signals of Genetic Quality and Mate Choice (squirrel Monkeys) $13,122 - 0
47.083 Gcr: Growing A New Science of Landscape Terraformation $9,955 - 0

Contacts

Name Title Type
UTQ7GBV8BLL8 Thomas Marsh Auditee
8054933164 Matt Parsons Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Note 3 - Federal Student Loan Programs: Accounting Policies: Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowed or are limited as to reimbursement. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available.The University has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The University has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under Uniform Guidance. The federal student loan program listed subsequently is administered directly by the University and balances and transactions relating to these programs are included in the Universitys consolidated financial statements. The balance and activity of loans outstanding at May 31, 2022, consist of: (See Notes to SEFA - Note 3-Federal Student Loan Programs for chart)
Title: Note 1 - Basis of Presentation: Accounting Policies: Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowed or are limited as to reimbursement. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available.The University has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under Uniform Guidance. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The University has elected not to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of California Lutheran University and Affiliate (the University) under programs of the federal government for the year ended May 31, 2022. The information in this Schedule is presented inaccordance with the requirements of the Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the University, it is not intended to, and does not, present the consolidated statement of financial position, activities, or cash flows of the University.

Finding Details

FINDING 2022-001 - Special Tests and Provisions ? Enrollment Reporting ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance "See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table" Criteria: The National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) is the Department of Education?s (ED) centralized database for students? enrollment information. It is the University?s responsibility to update this information timely and accurately when the enrollment status or permanent address of a student that has received federal aid changes. The University is ultimately responsible for the timeliness and accuracy of this information even when a third-party servicer is used as an intermediary to report on the University?s behalf. The University currently contracts with a third-party servicer and has elected to receive an Enrollment Reporting roster file every 30 days from NSLDS. At a minimum, institutions must certify the enrollment status and permanent address changes of all students included on the roster file within 15 days of receiving the roster file. If errors are identified, the University has 10 days to resubmit a corrected response. Unless the school expects to complete its next roster within 60 days, the school must notify the lender or the guaranty agency within 30 days, if it discovers that a student who received federal aid either did not enroll or ceased to be enrolled on at least a half-time basis or their permeant address has changed (34 CFR section 685.309). Condition/Context: We selected a sample of students identified by the University as having received some Federal assistance and who either withdrew from the University, graduated from the University, or had a change to their permanent address during the year ended May 31, 2022. Our sample consisted of 15 students out of a population of 75 that were identified as withdrawn during the year; a sample of 19 students out of a population of approximately 172 that were identified as graduates; and a sample of 15 students out of a population of 145 that had permanent address changes. We then compared the enrollment information and withdrawal or graduation date per the University?s records to the information reported to NSLDS. We believe this to be a representative sample of the population. We noted an exception with one student who had a permanent address change that was not reported within the required time frame. Questioned costs: No questioned costs were identified as part of this finding. Effect: Permanent addresses are used by ED for ensuring that repayment information and other communications from ED are quickly accessible to a student. Therefore, this deficiency in reporting permanent address changes could result in delays in receiving this information. Cause: Management appropriately and timely captured the status changes within the University?s student account system; however, when extracting the changes to submit to the third-party processor the report showed an error which was not detected within the 60-day timeframe. Repeat finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the University develop additional procedures to monitor the accuracy of information provided by its third-party servicer on behalf of the University to NSLDS. One additional monitoring control could be to review a sample of students within NSLDS after each roster file response to ensure that the enrollment status is accurate and that permanent address changes were processed. Each institution has access to correct information directly within NSLDS at any time. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The University concurs with the exception of one student for whom a permanent address change was not reported within the required timeframe. After investigation, it was determined that the selection criteria for data extraction required adjustment to ensure all students were included in the data extraction and reporting process. Maria Kohnke, Associate Vice President of Academic Services & Registrar, modified the selection criteria for the data exaction process in the Colleague system to ensure all permanent address changes are extracted and submitted for all students as required. The Associate Registrar is responsible for reviewing and modifying the selection criteria for the data extraction process at the beginning of each year and at each change in criteria. The criterion will be reviewed and approved by the Associate Vice President of Academic Services & Registrar when changes are made.
FINDING 2022-001 - Special Tests and Provisions ? Enrollment Reporting ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance "See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table" Criteria: The National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) is the Department of Education?s (ED) centralized database for students? enrollment information. It is the University?s responsibility to update this information timely and accurately when the enrollment status or permanent address of a student that has received federal aid changes. The University is ultimately responsible for the timeliness and accuracy of this information even when a third-party servicer is used as an intermediary to report on the University?s behalf. The University currently contracts with a third-party servicer and has elected to receive an Enrollment Reporting roster file every 30 days from NSLDS. At a minimum, institutions must certify the enrollment status and permanent address changes of all students included on the roster file within 15 days of receiving the roster file. If errors are identified, the University has 10 days to resubmit a corrected response. Unless the school expects to complete its next roster within 60 days, the school must notify the lender or the guaranty agency within 30 days, if it discovers that a student who received federal aid either did not enroll or ceased to be enrolled on at least a half-time basis or their permeant address has changed (34 CFR section 685.309). Condition/Context: We selected a sample of students identified by the University as having received some Federal assistance and who either withdrew from the University, graduated from the University, or had a change to their permanent address during the year ended May 31, 2022. Our sample consisted of 15 students out of a population of 75 that were identified as withdrawn during the year; a sample of 19 students out of a population of approximately 172 that were identified as graduates; and a sample of 15 students out of a population of 145 that had permanent address changes. We then compared the enrollment information and withdrawal or graduation date per the University?s records to the information reported to NSLDS. We believe this to be a representative sample of the population. We noted an exception with one student who had a permanent address change that was not reported within the required time frame. Questioned costs: No questioned costs were identified as part of this finding. Effect: Permanent addresses are used by ED for ensuring that repayment information and other communications from ED are quickly accessible to a student. Therefore, this deficiency in reporting permanent address changes could result in delays in receiving this information. Cause: Management appropriately and timely captured the status changes within the University?s student account system; however, when extracting the changes to submit to the third-party processor the report showed an error which was not detected within the 60-day timeframe. Repeat finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the University develop additional procedures to monitor the accuracy of information provided by its third-party servicer on behalf of the University to NSLDS. One additional monitoring control could be to review a sample of students within NSLDS after each roster file response to ensure that the enrollment status is accurate and that permanent address changes were processed. Each institution has access to correct information directly within NSLDS at any time. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The University concurs with the exception of one student for whom a permanent address change was not reported within the required timeframe. After investigation, it was determined that the selection criteria for data extraction required adjustment to ensure all students were included in the data extraction and reporting process. Maria Kohnke, Associate Vice President of Academic Services & Registrar, modified the selection criteria for the data exaction process in the Colleague system to ensure all permanent address changes are extracted and submitted for all students as required. The Associate Registrar is responsible for reviewing and modifying the selection criteria for the data extraction process at the beginning of each year and at each change in criteria. The criterion will be reviewed and approved by the Associate Vice President of Academic Services & Registrar when changes are made.
FINDING 2022-001 - Special Tests and Provisions ? Enrollment Reporting ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance "See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table" Criteria: The National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) is the Department of Education?s (ED) centralized database for students? enrollment information. It is the University?s responsibility to update this information timely and accurately when the enrollment status or permanent address of a student that has received federal aid changes. The University is ultimately responsible for the timeliness and accuracy of this information even when a third-party servicer is used as an intermediary to report on the University?s behalf. The University currently contracts with a third-party servicer and has elected to receive an Enrollment Reporting roster file every 30 days from NSLDS. At a minimum, institutions must certify the enrollment status and permanent address changes of all students included on the roster file within 15 days of receiving the roster file. If errors are identified, the University has 10 days to resubmit a corrected response. Unless the school expects to complete its next roster within 60 days, the school must notify the lender or the guaranty agency within 30 days, if it discovers that a student who received federal aid either did not enroll or ceased to be enrolled on at least a half-time basis or their permeant address has changed (34 CFR section 685.309). Condition/Context: We selected a sample of students identified by the University as having received some Federal assistance and who either withdrew from the University, graduated from the University, or had a change to their permanent address during the year ended May 31, 2022. Our sample consisted of 15 students out of a population of 75 that were identified as withdrawn during the year; a sample of 19 students out of a population of approximately 172 that were identified as graduates; and a sample of 15 students out of a population of 145 that had permanent address changes. We then compared the enrollment information and withdrawal or graduation date per the University?s records to the information reported to NSLDS. We believe this to be a representative sample of the population. We noted an exception with one student who had a permanent address change that was not reported within the required time frame. Questioned costs: No questioned costs were identified as part of this finding. Effect: Permanent addresses are used by ED for ensuring that repayment information and other communications from ED are quickly accessible to a student. Therefore, this deficiency in reporting permanent address changes could result in delays in receiving this information. Cause: Management appropriately and timely captured the status changes within the University?s student account system; however, when extracting the changes to submit to the third-party processor the report showed an error which was not detected within the 60-day timeframe. Repeat finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the University develop additional procedures to monitor the accuracy of information provided by its third-party servicer on behalf of the University to NSLDS. One additional monitoring control could be to review a sample of students within NSLDS after each roster file response to ensure that the enrollment status is accurate and that permanent address changes were processed. Each institution has access to correct information directly within NSLDS at any time. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The University concurs with the exception of one student for whom a permanent address change was not reported within the required timeframe. After investigation, it was determined that the selection criteria for data extraction required adjustment to ensure all students were included in the data extraction and reporting process. Maria Kohnke, Associate Vice President of Academic Services & Registrar, modified the selection criteria for the data exaction process in the Colleague system to ensure all permanent address changes are extracted and submitted for all students as required. The Associate Registrar is responsible for reviewing and modifying the selection criteria for the data extraction process at the beginning of each year and at each change in criteria. The criterion will be reviewed and approved by the Associate Vice President of Academic Services & Registrar when changes are made.
FINDING 2022-001 - Special Tests and Provisions ? Enrollment Reporting ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance "See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table" Criteria: The National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) is the Department of Education?s (ED) centralized database for students? enrollment information. It is the University?s responsibility to update this information timely and accurately when the enrollment status or permanent address of a student that has received federal aid changes. The University is ultimately responsible for the timeliness and accuracy of this information even when a third-party servicer is used as an intermediary to report on the University?s behalf. The University currently contracts with a third-party servicer and has elected to receive an Enrollment Reporting roster file every 30 days from NSLDS. At a minimum, institutions must certify the enrollment status and permanent address changes of all students included on the roster file within 15 days of receiving the roster file. If errors are identified, the University has 10 days to resubmit a corrected response. Unless the school expects to complete its next roster within 60 days, the school must notify the lender or the guaranty agency within 30 days, if it discovers that a student who received federal aid either did not enroll or ceased to be enrolled on at least a half-time basis or their permeant address has changed (34 CFR section 685.309). Condition/Context: We selected a sample of students identified by the University as having received some Federal assistance and who either withdrew from the University, graduated from the University, or had a change to their permanent address during the year ended May 31, 2022. Our sample consisted of 15 students out of a population of 75 that were identified as withdrawn during the year; a sample of 19 students out of a population of approximately 172 that were identified as graduates; and a sample of 15 students out of a population of 145 that had permanent address changes. We then compared the enrollment information and withdrawal or graduation date per the University?s records to the information reported to NSLDS. We believe this to be a representative sample of the population. We noted an exception with one student who had a permanent address change that was not reported within the required time frame. Questioned costs: No questioned costs were identified as part of this finding. Effect: Permanent addresses are used by ED for ensuring that repayment information and other communications from ED are quickly accessible to a student. Therefore, this deficiency in reporting permanent address changes could result in delays in receiving this information. Cause: Management appropriately and timely captured the status changes within the University?s student account system; however, when extracting the changes to submit to the third-party processor the report showed an error which was not detected within the 60-day timeframe. Repeat finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the University develop additional procedures to monitor the accuracy of information provided by its third-party servicer on behalf of the University to NSLDS. One additional monitoring control could be to review a sample of students within NSLDS after each roster file response to ensure that the enrollment status is accurate and that permanent address changes were processed. Each institution has access to correct information directly within NSLDS at any time. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The University concurs with the exception of one student for whom a permanent address change was not reported within the required timeframe. After investigation, it was determined that the selection criteria for data extraction required adjustment to ensure all students were included in the data extraction and reporting process. Maria Kohnke, Associate Vice President of Academic Services & Registrar, modified the selection criteria for the data exaction process in the Colleague system to ensure all permanent address changes are extracted and submitted for all students as required. The Associate Registrar is responsible for reviewing and modifying the selection criteria for the data extraction process at the beginning of each year and at each change in criteria. The criterion will be reviewed and approved by the Associate Vice President of Academic Services & Registrar when changes are made.
FINDING 2022-001 - Special Tests and Provisions ? Enrollment Reporting ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance "See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table" Criteria: The National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) is the Department of Education?s (ED) centralized database for students? enrollment information. It is the University?s responsibility to update this information timely and accurately when the enrollment status or permanent address of a student that has received federal aid changes. The University is ultimately responsible for the timeliness and accuracy of this information even when a third-party servicer is used as an intermediary to report on the University?s behalf. The University currently contracts with a third-party servicer and has elected to receive an Enrollment Reporting roster file every 30 days from NSLDS. At a minimum, institutions must certify the enrollment status and permanent address changes of all students included on the roster file within 15 days of receiving the roster file. If errors are identified, the University has 10 days to resubmit a corrected response. Unless the school expects to complete its next roster within 60 days, the school must notify the lender or the guaranty agency within 30 days, if it discovers that a student who received federal aid either did not enroll or ceased to be enrolled on at least a half-time basis or their permeant address has changed (34 CFR section 685.309). Condition/Context: We selected a sample of students identified by the University as having received some Federal assistance and who either withdrew from the University, graduated from the University, or had a change to their permanent address during the year ended May 31, 2022. Our sample consisted of 15 students out of a population of 75 that were identified as withdrawn during the year; a sample of 19 students out of a population of approximately 172 that were identified as graduates; and a sample of 15 students out of a population of 145 that had permanent address changes. We then compared the enrollment information and withdrawal or graduation date per the University?s records to the information reported to NSLDS. We believe this to be a representative sample of the population. We noted an exception with one student who had a permanent address change that was not reported within the required time frame. Questioned costs: No questioned costs were identified as part of this finding. Effect: Permanent addresses are used by ED for ensuring that repayment information and other communications from ED are quickly accessible to a student. Therefore, this deficiency in reporting permanent address changes could result in delays in receiving this information. Cause: Management appropriately and timely captured the status changes within the University?s student account system; however, when extracting the changes to submit to the third-party processor the report showed an error which was not detected within the 60-day timeframe. Repeat finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the University develop additional procedures to monitor the accuracy of information provided by its third-party servicer on behalf of the University to NSLDS. One additional monitoring control could be to review a sample of students within NSLDS after each roster file response to ensure that the enrollment status is accurate and that permanent address changes were processed. Each institution has access to correct information directly within NSLDS at any time. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The University concurs with the exception of one student for whom a permanent address change was not reported within the required timeframe. After investigation, it was determined that the selection criteria for data extraction required adjustment to ensure all students were included in the data extraction and reporting process. Maria Kohnke, Associate Vice President of Academic Services & Registrar, modified the selection criteria for the data exaction process in the Colleague system to ensure all permanent address changes are extracted and submitted for all students as required. The Associate Registrar is responsible for reviewing and modifying the selection criteria for the data extraction process at the beginning of each year and at each change in criteria. The criterion will be reviewed and approved by the Associate Vice President of Academic Services & Registrar when changes are made.
FINDING 2022-001 - Special Tests and Provisions ? Enrollment Reporting ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance "See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table" Criteria: The National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) is the Department of Education?s (ED) centralized database for students? enrollment information. It is the University?s responsibility to update this information timely and accurately when the enrollment status or permanent address of a student that has received federal aid changes. The University is ultimately responsible for the timeliness and accuracy of this information even when a third-party servicer is used as an intermediary to report on the University?s behalf. The University currently contracts with a third-party servicer and has elected to receive an Enrollment Reporting roster file every 30 days from NSLDS. At a minimum, institutions must certify the enrollment status and permanent address changes of all students included on the roster file within 15 days of receiving the roster file. If errors are identified, the University has 10 days to resubmit a corrected response. Unless the school expects to complete its next roster within 60 days, the school must notify the lender or the guaranty agency within 30 days, if it discovers that a student who received federal aid either did not enroll or ceased to be enrolled on at least a half-time basis or their permeant address has changed (34 CFR section 685.309). Condition/Context: We selected a sample of students identified by the University as having received some Federal assistance and who either withdrew from the University, graduated from the University, or had a change to their permanent address during the year ended May 31, 2022. Our sample consisted of 15 students out of a population of 75 that were identified as withdrawn during the year; a sample of 19 students out of a population of approximately 172 that were identified as graduates; and a sample of 15 students out of a population of 145 that had permanent address changes. We then compared the enrollment information and withdrawal or graduation date per the University?s records to the information reported to NSLDS. We believe this to be a representative sample of the population. We noted an exception with one student who had a permanent address change that was not reported within the required time frame. Questioned costs: No questioned costs were identified as part of this finding. Effect: Permanent addresses are used by ED for ensuring that repayment information and other communications from ED are quickly accessible to a student. Therefore, this deficiency in reporting permanent address changes could result in delays in receiving this information. Cause: Management appropriately and timely captured the status changes within the University?s student account system; however, when extracting the changes to submit to the third-party processor the report showed an error which was not detected within the 60-day timeframe. Repeat finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the University develop additional procedures to monitor the accuracy of information provided by its third-party servicer on behalf of the University to NSLDS. One additional monitoring control could be to review a sample of students within NSLDS after each roster file response to ensure that the enrollment status is accurate and that permanent address changes were processed. Each institution has access to correct information directly within NSLDS at any time. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The University concurs with the exception of one student for whom a permanent address change was not reported within the required timeframe. After investigation, it was determined that the selection criteria for data extraction required adjustment to ensure all students were included in the data extraction and reporting process. Maria Kohnke, Associate Vice President of Academic Services & Registrar, modified the selection criteria for the data exaction process in the Colleague system to ensure all permanent address changes are extracted and submitted for all students as required. The Associate Registrar is responsible for reviewing and modifying the selection criteria for the data extraction process at the beginning of each year and at each change in criteria. The criterion will be reviewed and approved by the Associate Vice President of Academic Services & Registrar when changes are made.
FINDING 2022-001 - Special Tests and Provisions ? Enrollment Reporting ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance "See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table" Criteria: The National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) is the Department of Education?s (ED) centralized database for students? enrollment information. It is the University?s responsibility to update this information timely and accurately when the enrollment status or permanent address of a student that has received federal aid changes. The University is ultimately responsible for the timeliness and accuracy of this information even when a third-party servicer is used as an intermediary to report on the University?s behalf. The University currently contracts with a third-party servicer and has elected to receive an Enrollment Reporting roster file every 30 days from NSLDS. At a minimum, institutions must certify the enrollment status and permanent address changes of all students included on the roster file within 15 days of receiving the roster file. If errors are identified, the University has 10 days to resubmit a corrected response. Unless the school expects to complete its next roster within 60 days, the school must notify the lender or the guaranty agency within 30 days, if it discovers that a student who received federal aid either did not enroll or ceased to be enrolled on at least a half-time basis or their permeant address has changed (34 CFR section 685.309). Condition/Context: We selected a sample of students identified by the University as having received some Federal assistance and who either withdrew from the University, graduated from the University, or had a change to their permanent address during the year ended May 31, 2022. Our sample consisted of 15 students out of a population of 75 that were identified as withdrawn during the year; a sample of 19 students out of a population of approximately 172 that were identified as graduates; and a sample of 15 students out of a population of 145 that had permanent address changes. We then compared the enrollment information and withdrawal or graduation date per the University?s records to the information reported to NSLDS. We believe this to be a representative sample of the population. We noted an exception with one student who had a permanent address change that was not reported within the required time frame. Questioned costs: No questioned costs were identified as part of this finding. Effect: Permanent addresses are used by ED for ensuring that repayment information and other communications from ED are quickly accessible to a student. Therefore, this deficiency in reporting permanent address changes could result in delays in receiving this information. Cause: Management appropriately and timely captured the status changes within the University?s student account system; however, when extracting the changes to submit to the third-party processor the report showed an error which was not detected within the 60-day timeframe. Repeat finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the University develop additional procedures to monitor the accuracy of information provided by its third-party servicer on behalf of the University to NSLDS. One additional monitoring control could be to review a sample of students within NSLDS after each roster file response to ensure that the enrollment status is accurate and that permanent address changes were processed. Each institution has access to correct information directly within NSLDS at any time. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The University concurs with the exception of one student for whom a permanent address change was not reported within the required timeframe. After investigation, it was determined that the selection criteria for data extraction required adjustment to ensure all students were included in the data extraction and reporting process. Maria Kohnke, Associate Vice President of Academic Services & Registrar, modified the selection criteria for the data exaction process in the Colleague system to ensure all permanent address changes are extracted and submitted for all students as required. The Associate Registrar is responsible for reviewing and modifying the selection criteria for the data extraction process at the beginning of each year and at each change in criteria. The criterion will be reviewed and approved by the Associate Vice President of Academic Services & Registrar when changes are made.
FINDING 2022-001 - Special Tests and Provisions ? Enrollment Reporting ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance "See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table" Criteria: The National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) is the Department of Education?s (ED) centralized database for students? enrollment information. It is the University?s responsibility to update this information timely and accurately when the enrollment status or permanent address of a student that has received federal aid changes. The University is ultimately responsible for the timeliness and accuracy of this information even when a third-party servicer is used as an intermediary to report on the University?s behalf. The University currently contracts with a third-party servicer and has elected to receive an Enrollment Reporting roster file every 30 days from NSLDS. At a minimum, institutions must certify the enrollment status and permanent address changes of all students included on the roster file within 15 days of receiving the roster file. If errors are identified, the University has 10 days to resubmit a corrected response. Unless the school expects to complete its next roster within 60 days, the school must notify the lender or the guaranty agency within 30 days, if it discovers that a student who received federal aid either did not enroll or ceased to be enrolled on at least a half-time basis or their permeant address has changed (34 CFR section 685.309). Condition/Context: We selected a sample of students identified by the University as having received some Federal assistance and who either withdrew from the University, graduated from the University, or had a change to their permanent address during the year ended May 31, 2022. Our sample consisted of 15 students out of a population of 75 that were identified as withdrawn during the year; a sample of 19 students out of a population of approximately 172 that were identified as graduates; and a sample of 15 students out of a population of 145 that had permanent address changes. We then compared the enrollment information and withdrawal or graduation date per the University?s records to the information reported to NSLDS. We believe this to be a representative sample of the population. We noted an exception with one student who had a permanent address change that was not reported within the required time frame. Questioned costs: No questioned costs were identified as part of this finding. Effect: Permanent addresses are used by ED for ensuring that repayment information and other communications from ED are quickly accessible to a student. Therefore, this deficiency in reporting permanent address changes could result in delays in receiving this information. Cause: Management appropriately and timely captured the status changes within the University?s student account system; however, when extracting the changes to submit to the third-party processor the report showed an error which was not detected within the 60-day timeframe. Repeat finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the University develop additional procedures to monitor the accuracy of information provided by its third-party servicer on behalf of the University to NSLDS. One additional monitoring control could be to review a sample of students within NSLDS after each roster file response to ensure that the enrollment status is accurate and that permanent address changes were processed. Each institution has access to correct information directly within NSLDS at any time. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The University concurs with the exception of one student for whom a permanent address change was not reported within the required timeframe. After investigation, it was determined that the selection criteria for data extraction required adjustment to ensure all students were included in the data extraction and reporting process. Maria Kohnke, Associate Vice President of Academic Services & Registrar, modified the selection criteria for the data exaction process in the Colleague system to ensure all permanent address changes are extracted and submitted for all students as required. The Associate Registrar is responsible for reviewing and modifying the selection criteria for the data extraction process at the beginning of each year and at each change in criteria. The criterion will be reviewed and approved by the Associate Vice President of Academic Services & Registrar when changes are made.
FINDING 2022-001 - Special Tests and Provisions ? Enrollment Reporting ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance "See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table" Criteria: The National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) is the Department of Education?s (ED) centralized database for students? enrollment information. It is the University?s responsibility to update this information timely and accurately when the enrollment status or permanent address of a student that has received federal aid changes. The University is ultimately responsible for the timeliness and accuracy of this information even when a third-party servicer is used as an intermediary to report on the University?s behalf. The University currently contracts with a third-party servicer and has elected to receive an Enrollment Reporting roster file every 30 days from NSLDS. At a minimum, institutions must certify the enrollment status and permanent address changes of all students included on the roster file within 15 days of receiving the roster file. If errors are identified, the University has 10 days to resubmit a corrected response. Unless the school expects to complete its next roster within 60 days, the school must notify the lender or the guaranty agency within 30 days, if it discovers that a student who received federal aid either did not enroll or ceased to be enrolled on at least a half-time basis or their permeant address has changed (34 CFR section 685.309). Condition/Context: We selected a sample of students identified by the University as having received some Federal assistance and who either withdrew from the University, graduated from the University, or had a change to their permanent address during the year ended May 31, 2022. Our sample consisted of 15 students out of a population of 75 that were identified as withdrawn during the year; a sample of 19 students out of a population of approximately 172 that were identified as graduates; and a sample of 15 students out of a population of 145 that had permanent address changes. We then compared the enrollment information and withdrawal or graduation date per the University?s records to the information reported to NSLDS. We believe this to be a representative sample of the population. We noted an exception with one student who had a permanent address change that was not reported within the required time frame. Questioned costs: No questioned costs were identified as part of this finding. Effect: Permanent addresses are used by ED for ensuring that repayment information and other communications from ED are quickly accessible to a student. Therefore, this deficiency in reporting permanent address changes could result in delays in receiving this information. Cause: Management appropriately and timely captured the status changes within the University?s student account system; however, when extracting the changes to submit to the third-party processor the report showed an error which was not detected within the 60-day timeframe. Repeat finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the University develop additional procedures to monitor the accuracy of information provided by its third-party servicer on behalf of the University to NSLDS. One additional monitoring control could be to review a sample of students within NSLDS after each roster file response to ensure that the enrollment status is accurate and that permanent address changes were processed. Each institution has access to correct information directly within NSLDS at any time. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The University concurs with the exception of one student for whom a permanent address change was not reported within the required timeframe. After investigation, it was determined that the selection criteria for data extraction required adjustment to ensure all students were included in the data extraction and reporting process. Maria Kohnke, Associate Vice President of Academic Services & Registrar, modified the selection criteria for the data exaction process in the Colleague system to ensure all permanent address changes are extracted and submitted for all students as required. The Associate Registrar is responsible for reviewing and modifying the selection criteria for the data extraction process at the beginning of each year and at each change in criteria. The criterion will be reviewed and approved by the Associate Vice President of Academic Services & Registrar when changes are made.
FINDING 2022-001 - Special Tests and Provisions ? Enrollment Reporting ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance "See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table" Criteria: The National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) is the Department of Education?s (ED) centralized database for students? enrollment information. It is the University?s responsibility to update this information timely and accurately when the enrollment status or permanent address of a student that has received federal aid changes. The University is ultimately responsible for the timeliness and accuracy of this information even when a third-party servicer is used as an intermediary to report on the University?s behalf. The University currently contracts with a third-party servicer and has elected to receive an Enrollment Reporting roster file every 30 days from NSLDS. At a minimum, institutions must certify the enrollment status and permanent address changes of all students included on the roster file within 15 days of receiving the roster file. If errors are identified, the University has 10 days to resubmit a corrected response. Unless the school expects to complete its next roster within 60 days, the school must notify the lender or the guaranty agency within 30 days, if it discovers that a student who received federal aid either did not enroll or ceased to be enrolled on at least a half-time basis or their permeant address has changed (34 CFR section 685.309). Condition/Context: We selected a sample of students identified by the University as having received some Federal assistance and who either withdrew from the University, graduated from the University, or had a change to their permanent address during the year ended May 31, 2022. Our sample consisted of 15 students out of a population of 75 that were identified as withdrawn during the year; a sample of 19 students out of a population of approximately 172 that were identified as graduates; and a sample of 15 students out of a population of 145 that had permanent address changes. We then compared the enrollment information and withdrawal or graduation date per the University?s records to the information reported to NSLDS. We believe this to be a representative sample of the population. We noted an exception with one student who had a permanent address change that was not reported within the required time frame. Questioned costs: No questioned costs were identified as part of this finding. Effect: Permanent addresses are used by ED for ensuring that repayment information and other communications from ED are quickly accessible to a student. Therefore, this deficiency in reporting permanent address changes could result in delays in receiving this information. Cause: Management appropriately and timely captured the status changes within the University?s student account system; however, when extracting the changes to submit to the third-party processor the report showed an error which was not detected within the 60-day timeframe. Repeat finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the University develop additional procedures to monitor the accuracy of information provided by its third-party servicer on behalf of the University to NSLDS. One additional monitoring control could be to review a sample of students within NSLDS after each roster file response to ensure that the enrollment status is accurate and that permanent address changes were processed. Each institution has access to correct information directly within NSLDS at any time. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The University concurs with the exception of one student for whom a permanent address change was not reported within the required timeframe. After investigation, it was determined that the selection criteria for data extraction required adjustment to ensure all students were included in the data extraction and reporting process. Maria Kohnke, Associate Vice President of Academic Services & Registrar, modified the selection criteria for the data exaction process in the Colleague system to ensure all permanent address changes are extracted and submitted for all students as required. The Associate Registrar is responsible for reviewing and modifying the selection criteria for the data extraction process at the beginning of each year and at each change in criteria. The criterion will be reviewed and approved by the Associate Vice President of Academic Services & Registrar when changes are made.
FINDING 2022-001 - Special Tests and Provisions ? Enrollment Reporting ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance "See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table" Criteria: The National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) is the Department of Education?s (ED) centralized database for students? enrollment information. It is the University?s responsibility to update this information timely and accurately when the enrollment status or permanent address of a student that has received federal aid changes. The University is ultimately responsible for the timeliness and accuracy of this information even when a third-party servicer is used as an intermediary to report on the University?s behalf. The University currently contracts with a third-party servicer and has elected to receive an Enrollment Reporting roster file every 30 days from NSLDS. At a minimum, institutions must certify the enrollment status and permanent address changes of all students included on the roster file within 15 days of receiving the roster file. If errors are identified, the University has 10 days to resubmit a corrected response. Unless the school expects to complete its next roster within 60 days, the school must notify the lender or the guaranty agency within 30 days, if it discovers that a student who received federal aid either did not enroll or ceased to be enrolled on at least a half-time basis or their permeant address has changed (34 CFR section 685.309). Condition/Context: We selected a sample of students identified by the University as having received some Federal assistance and who either withdrew from the University, graduated from the University, or had a change to their permanent address during the year ended May 31, 2022. Our sample consisted of 15 students out of a population of 75 that were identified as withdrawn during the year; a sample of 19 students out of a population of approximately 172 that were identified as graduates; and a sample of 15 students out of a population of 145 that had permanent address changes. We then compared the enrollment information and withdrawal or graduation date per the University?s records to the information reported to NSLDS. We believe this to be a representative sample of the population. We noted an exception with one student who had a permanent address change that was not reported within the required time frame. Questioned costs: No questioned costs were identified as part of this finding. Effect: Permanent addresses are used by ED for ensuring that repayment information and other communications from ED are quickly accessible to a student. Therefore, this deficiency in reporting permanent address changes could result in delays in receiving this information. Cause: Management appropriately and timely captured the status changes within the University?s student account system; however, when extracting the changes to submit to the third-party processor the report showed an error which was not detected within the 60-day timeframe. Repeat finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the University develop additional procedures to monitor the accuracy of information provided by its third-party servicer on behalf of the University to NSLDS. One additional monitoring control could be to review a sample of students within NSLDS after each roster file response to ensure that the enrollment status is accurate and that permanent address changes were processed. Each institution has access to correct information directly within NSLDS at any time. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The University concurs with the exception of one student for whom a permanent address change was not reported within the required timeframe. After investigation, it was determined that the selection criteria for data extraction required adjustment to ensure all students were included in the data extraction and reporting process. Maria Kohnke, Associate Vice President of Academic Services & Registrar, modified the selection criteria for the data exaction process in the Colleague system to ensure all permanent address changes are extracted and submitted for all students as required. The Associate Registrar is responsible for reviewing and modifying the selection criteria for the data extraction process at the beginning of each year and at each change in criteria. The criterion will be reviewed and approved by the Associate Vice President of Academic Services & Registrar when changes are made.
FINDING 2022-001 - Special Tests and Provisions ? Enrollment Reporting ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance "See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table" Criteria: The National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) is the Department of Education?s (ED) centralized database for students? enrollment information. It is the University?s responsibility to update this information timely and accurately when the enrollment status or permanent address of a student that has received federal aid changes. The University is ultimately responsible for the timeliness and accuracy of this information even when a third-party servicer is used as an intermediary to report on the University?s behalf. The University currently contracts with a third-party servicer and has elected to receive an Enrollment Reporting roster file every 30 days from NSLDS. At a minimum, institutions must certify the enrollment status and permanent address changes of all students included on the roster file within 15 days of receiving the roster file. If errors are identified, the University has 10 days to resubmit a corrected response. Unless the school expects to complete its next roster within 60 days, the school must notify the lender or the guaranty agency within 30 days, if it discovers that a student who received federal aid either did not enroll or ceased to be enrolled on at least a half-time basis or their permeant address has changed (34 CFR section 685.309). Condition/Context: We selected a sample of students identified by the University as having received some Federal assistance and who either withdrew from the University, graduated from the University, or had a change to their permanent address during the year ended May 31, 2022. Our sample consisted of 15 students out of a population of 75 that were identified as withdrawn during the year; a sample of 19 students out of a population of approximately 172 that were identified as graduates; and a sample of 15 students out of a population of 145 that had permanent address changes. We then compared the enrollment information and withdrawal or graduation date per the University?s records to the information reported to NSLDS. We believe this to be a representative sample of the population. We noted an exception with one student who had a permanent address change that was not reported within the required time frame. Questioned costs: No questioned costs were identified as part of this finding. Effect: Permanent addresses are used by ED for ensuring that repayment information and other communications from ED are quickly accessible to a student. Therefore, this deficiency in reporting permanent address changes could result in delays in receiving this information. Cause: Management appropriately and timely captured the status changes within the University?s student account system; however, when extracting the changes to submit to the third-party processor the report showed an error which was not detected within the 60-day timeframe. Repeat finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend that the University develop additional procedures to monitor the accuracy of information provided by its third-party servicer on behalf of the University to NSLDS. One additional monitoring control could be to review a sample of students within NSLDS after each roster file response to ensure that the enrollment status is accurate and that permanent address changes were processed. Each institution has access to correct information directly within NSLDS at any time. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The University concurs with the exception of one student for whom a permanent address change was not reported within the required timeframe. After investigation, it was determined that the selection criteria for data extraction required adjustment to ensure all students were included in the data extraction and reporting process. Maria Kohnke, Associate Vice President of Academic Services & Registrar, modified the selection criteria for the data exaction process in the Colleague system to ensure all permanent address changes are extracted and submitted for all students as required. The Associate Registrar is responsible for reviewing and modifying the selection criteria for the data extraction process at the beginning of each year and at each change in criteria. The criterion will be reviewed and approved by the Associate Vice President of Academic Services & Registrar when changes are made.