Audit 301722

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$2.15M
Findings
2
Programs
4
Organization: Town of Easton (MD)
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-04-01

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
391133 2023-001 Significant Deficiency Yes I
967575 2023-001 Significant Deficiency Yes I

Contacts

Name Title Type
JZ1BQ5N9JL77 Donald Richardson Auditee
4108222525 Jake Lenell Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Note 1 - Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance for all awards. Under these principles, certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Town has not elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of the Town of Easton, Maryland (the Town) under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2023. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Town, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the Town.
Title: Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance for all awards. Under these principles, certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Town has not elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under Uniform Guidance. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance for all awards. Under these principles, certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years.
Title: Note 3 - Indirect Cost Rate Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance for all awards. Under these principles, certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Town has not elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under Uniform Guidance. The Town has not elected to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

2023 – 001 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal program title: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Compliance Requirement: Suspension and Debarment Federal Award Identification Number and Year: MD-0044 and 2021 Award Period: March 11, 2021 through December 31, 2024, liquidated by December 31, 2026 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Questioned Costs: None Condition/Context: Three of five vendors tested did not have proper documentation maintained to support suspension and debarment verification was performed prior to them being paid with federal funds. Per sam.gov, there was no history of the vendor being suspended or debarred. Cause: The Town’s policies and procedures did not require documentation be maintained to verify vendors are not suspended or debarred prior to paying with Federal grant funds. Effect: The Town could make a disbursement to a vendor that is suspended or debarred. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the Town review its policies and procedures to require documentation be maintained to verify vendors are not suspended or debarred prior to being paid with federal funds. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding.
2023 – 001 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal program title: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Compliance Requirement: Suspension and Debarment Federal Award Identification Number and Year: MD-0044 and 2021 Award Period: March 11, 2021 through December 31, 2024, liquidated by December 31, 2026 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Questioned Costs: None Condition/Context: Three of five vendors tested did not have proper documentation maintained to support suspension and debarment verification was performed prior to them being paid with federal funds. Per sam.gov, there was no history of the vendor being suspended or debarred. Cause: The Town’s policies and procedures did not require documentation be maintained to verify vendors are not suspended or debarred prior to paying with Federal grant funds. Effect: The Town could make a disbursement to a vendor that is suspended or debarred. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the Town review its policies and procedures to require documentation be maintained to verify vendors are not suspended or debarred prior to being paid with federal funds. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding.