Audit 301028

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$2.70M
Findings
2
Programs
2
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-03-29

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
390137 2023-001 Material Weakness - I
966579 2023-001 Material Weakness - I

Contacts

Name Title Type
NLPMYDRMF726 Michelle Orge Auditee
6082167232 Ryan Lay Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amount reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Organization has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of Second Harvest Foodbank of Southern Wisconsin, Inc. (the Organization) under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2023. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of the Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Organization, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets or cash flows of the Organization.
Title: Local Matching Expenditures Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amount reported as expenditures in prior years. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The Organization has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. During the administration of the federal program, the Organization incurred costs which were not reimbursed by the granting agency. The local matching expenditures incurred by the Organization during the year ended June 30, 2023, are as follows: Program title - State Administrative Matching Grants for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. Federal Expenditures $236,833. Local Matching Expenditures $236,833. Total Expenditures $473,666.

Finding Details

2023-001 Agency and Pass Through Entities: U.S. Department of Treasury passed through Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection and Feeding Wisconsin, Inc. Federal Program and Award Numbers: 21.027, COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (ARP). Award number 445404. Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires the Organization establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards over procurement by obtaining price quotations from an adequate number of sources when payments are expected to be greater than the simplified acquisition threshold ($10,000). Statement of Condition: The Organization did not retain documentation that supported that a review occurred over multiple bids that were obtained when purchases exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold ($10,000). During the course of the audit process, management reproduced and provided evidence that the Organization complied with the requirements. Questioned Costs: The amount of questioned costs could not be determined. Context: In four out of the eight selections tested, management obtained multiple price quotations but did not retain documentation that supported a review occurred for purchases that exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold ($10,000). Effect: Federal funds could be used with bias or inefficiently. Cause: Management did not have controls in place to ensure documentation was retained and documentation that the bids and quotes were reviewed when purchases exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold ($10,000). Recommendation: We recommend management implement procedures and controls in which the Organization retains documentation to support multiple quotes were obtained for purchases that exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold ($10,000). Management should designate an individual to perform a review of the procurement process and supporting documentation prior to purchases occurring. Management Response: Management acknowledges that while the Organization has the policies in place and obtained the required number of quotes/bids, the Organization did not have consistent adherence to documentation of all quotes/bids. Management agrees with the recommendation and have prepared a corrective action plan with the VP of Finance reviewing the procurement process and ensuring supporting documentation prior to these specific purchases occurring.
2023-001 Agency and Pass Through Entities: U.S. Department of Treasury passed through Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection and Feeding Wisconsin, Inc. Federal Program and Award Numbers: 21.027, COVID-19 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (ARP). Award number 445404. Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires the Organization establish and maintain effective internal control over federal awards over procurement by obtaining price quotations from an adequate number of sources when payments are expected to be greater than the simplified acquisition threshold ($10,000). Statement of Condition: The Organization did not retain documentation that supported that a review occurred over multiple bids that were obtained when purchases exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold ($10,000). During the course of the audit process, management reproduced and provided evidence that the Organization complied with the requirements. Questioned Costs: The amount of questioned costs could not be determined. Context: In four out of the eight selections tested, management obtained multiple price quotations but did not retain documentation that supported a review occurred for purchases that exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold ($10,000). Effect: Federal funds could be used with bias or inefficiently. Cause: Management did not have controls in place to ensure documentation was retained and documentation that the bids and quotes were reviewed when purchases exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold ($10,000). Recommendation: We recommend management implement procedures and controls in which the Organization retains documentation to support multiple quotes were obtained for purchases that exceeded the simplified acquisition threshold ($10,000). Management should designate an individual to perform a review of the procurement process and supporting documentation prior to purchases occurring. Management Response: Management acknowledges that while the Organization has the policies in place and obtained the required number of quotes/bids, the Organization did not have consistent adherence to documentation of all quotes/bids. Management agrees with the recommendation and have prepared a corrective action plan with the VP of Finance reviewing the procurement process and ensuring supporting documentation prior to these specific purchases occurring.