Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: Per OMB No. 1845-0039, an institution is required to submit Pell disbursement records to the Common Origination and Disbursement (COD). The disbursement record reports the actual disbursement date and the amount of the disbursement. In accordance with Volume 4, Chapter 2 of the Federal Student Aid Handbook, an institution must submit Direct Loan and Pell Grant disbursement records to the COD no later than 15 days after making the disbursement or becoming aware of the need to adjust a previously reported disbursement. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure Direct Loan and Pell Grant disbursement records are submitted to the COD no later than 15 days after making the disbursement. For one of fifty-six Direct Loan disbursement samples, the University did not submit the Direct Loan disbursement record to the COD. For one of four Pell Grant disbursement samples where the University submitted the Pell Grant disbursement record to the COD 27 days after the disbursement date which was not within the 15-day requirement. Management provided a report comparing all disbursements of Direct Loan and Pell during fiscal year 2023 compared to the reporting to the COD. This report shows noncompliance of 759 Pell Grant disbursements submitted late out of 5,708 (13% of population) total Pell Grant disbursements and 255 Direct Loan disbursements submitted late or not submitted as of August 14, 2023 out of 21,130 (1% of the population) total Direct Loan disbursements. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues to resolve reports that were not accepted based on the original submission resulted in reporting disbursement record reports to the COD later than the 15-day requirement. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year as finding number 2022-008. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure Direct Loan and Pell Grant disbursement records are submitted or records that were not accepted based on the original submission are resolved and resubmitted to COD no later than 15-days after making the disbursement. View of Responsible Official: We acknowledge the deficiencies identified in our internal control process, specifically regarding the submission of Direct Loan and Pell Grant disbursement records to COD within the prescribed 15-day timeframe. The instances highlighted in this report, particularly the delayed submission of records for one Direct Loan disbursement sample and one Pell Grant disbursement sample, are indicative of areas where improvement is necessary. We provided insights into the root cause, citing capacity issues in addressing reports that were initially rejected, leading to delays in resubmission. While this explanation sheds light on the challenges faced, it underscores the importance of fortifying our internal control mechanisms to mitigate such delays in the future. Based on the recommendations outlined in this report, we are committed to enhancing our internal control process to ensure timely submission of Direct Loan and Pell Grant disbursement records to COD. This includes allocating necessary resources, providing additional training, and implementing robust monitoring and oversight mechanisms to address capacity constraints effectively and prevent future instances of noncompliance.
Criteria: Per OMB No. 1845-0039, an institution is required to submit Pell disbursement records to the Common Origination and Disbursement (COD). The disbursement record reports the actual disbursement date and the amount of the disbursement. In accordance with Volume 4, Chapter 2 of the Federal Student Aid Handbook, an institution must submit Direct Loan and Pell Grant disbursement records to the COD no later than 15 days after making the disbursement or becoming aware of the need to adjust a previously reported disbursement. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure Direct Loan and Pell Grant disbursement records are submitted to the COD no later than 15 days after making the disbursement. For one of fifty-six Direct Loan disbursement samples, the University did not submit the Direct Loan disbursement record to the COD. For one of four Pell Grant disbursement samples where the University submitted the Pell Grant disbursement record to the COD 27 days after the disbursement date which was not within the 15-day requirement. Management provided a report comparing all disbursements of Direct Loan and Pell during fiscal year 2023 compared to the reporting to the COD. This report shows noncompliance of 759 Pell Grant disbursements submitted late out of 5,708 (13% of population) total Pell Grant disbursements and 255 Direct Loan disbursements submitted late or not submitted as of August 14, 2023 out of 21,130 (1% of the population) total Direct Loan disbursements. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues to resolve reports that were not accepted based on the original submission resulted in reporting disbursement record reports to the COD later than the 15-day requirement. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year as finding number 2022-008. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure Direct Loan and Pell Grant disbursement records are submitted or records that were not accepted based on the original submission are resolved and resubmitted to COD no later than 15-days after making the disbursement. View of Responsible Official: We acknowledge the deficiencies identified in our internal control process, specifically regarding the submission of Direct Loan and Pell Grant disbursement records to COD within the prescribed 15-day timeframe. The instances highlighted in this report, particularly the delayed submission of records for one Direct Loan disbursement sample and one Pell Grant disbursement sample, are indicative of areas where improvement is necessary. We provided insights into the root cause, citing capacity issues in addressing reports that were initially rejected, leading to delays in resubmission. While this explanation sheds light on the challenges faced, it underscores the importance of fortifying our internal control mechanisms to mitigate such delays in the future. Based on the recommendations outlined in this report, we are committed to enhancing our internal control process to ensure timely submission of Direct Loan and Pell Grant disbursement records to COD. This includes allocating necessary resources, providing additional training, and implementing robust monitoring and oversight mechanisms to address capacity constraints effectively and prevent future instances of noncompliance.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: 2 CFR 200.431 includes the standards for documentation of fringe benefits. According to
2 CFR 200.431(c), the cost of fringe benefits are allowable, provided such benefits are granted under established written policies. Such benefits should be charged as direct or indirect costs in accordance with the non-Federal entity’s accounting practices. Additionally, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants Policy Statement section 7.5, Cost Transfers, Overruns, Accelerated and Delayed Expenditures, states that cost transfers to NIH grants that represent corrections of clerical or bookkeeping errors should be accomplished within 90 days of when the error was discovered. The transfers must be supported by documentation that fully explains how the error occurred and a certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official.
Documentation must be maintained of cost transfers, pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.337 and
45 CFR Part 75.364. The recipient should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls. Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both. If such errors occur, recipients are encouraged to evaluate the need for improvements and to make whatever improvements are deemed necessary to prevent reoccurrence. Lastly, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: We noted several conditions that existed due to cost transfers that occurred during the fiscal year. While performing procedures related to cost transfers, we noted the University had not followed their ‘Cost Transfer Policy’ which states “Cost transfers for current transactions must occur on a timely basis”. The University’s cost transfer policy defines timely as “occurring no later than two accounting periods after the month end of the date of the original transaction (no later than 90 days total)”. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to timely discover errors and get them corrected as we noted seventy-five of our one hundred nineteen transactions sampled cost transfers (totaling $246,869 positive and $66,004 negative) where the cost transfer date was between 91 and 1,002 days past the date the original expenditure was incurred (30 were between 91 and 180 days past, 15 were between 181 and
270 days past, and 30 were greater than 271 days past). While testing cost transfers and adjustments, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that did not have supporting documentation resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: Additionally, we noted a transaction recorded to a grant that was recorded outside of the period of performance resulting in the costs being unallowable to the grant: During the fiscal year, positive cost transfers were approximately $2,815,865 and negative cost transfers were $1,792,678 during fiscal year 2023. While performing procedures related to fringe benefits, we noted one of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where transactions were originally recorded to an incorrect worktag. Management identified the error and a cost transfer was performed to move the fringe benefits to a federal research and development grant. However, the incorrect fringe rate was utilized as the University’s non-sponsored research fringe rate utilized in the original entry is a higher fringe rate than the federally approved fringe rate which resulted in an overcharge to the research and development grant during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for a total overstatement of $26 as noted below: Additionally, we noted fringe benefits were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of twenty-five sampled grants (totaling $461,382) where the labor transaction originated in previous fiscal years. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the fringe benefit charges for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total fringe benefits charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,134 as noted below: Total fringe benefits during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $2,673,231.While performing procedures related to indirect costs, we noted indirect costs were expensed during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 for two of forty sampled grants (totaling $1,817,264) where indirect costs were originally undercharged during the previous fiscal year. The University booked an adjustment within Workday to correct the indirect costs for the life of the grant. This resulted in the SEFA being overstated during the University’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We noted the total indirect costs charged for the life of the grants was allowable and within the period of performance. These overstatements to the SEFA for the University’s fiscal year 2023 was for a total of $3,677 as noted below: Total indirect costs during fiscal year 2023 totaled approximately $10,484,419. Questioned Cost: Known questioned costs of $26. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that during fiscal year 2023, they continued reconciliation procedures related to ‘grant level’ activity as a result of implementing the grants module of Workday during fiscal year 2021. Grant level activity allows them to track the specific budget provided by the individual grant as well as monitor other key compliance requirement aspects. The University continued to process an increased volume of cost transfers and experienced delays in posting necessary cost transfers for identified unallowable costs stemming from the reconciliation efforts. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-001. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University continue its corrective action plan and adjust internal controls as needed to prevent and detect noncompliance with and improve adherence to federal regulations.View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. As noted in our prior year response, the University continued to have cost transfers in fiscal year 2023 as it reconciled its grants. To limit cost transfers in the future, the following steps have been taken by the University: Additionally, the University is exploring additional functionality within our Workday grants management module to build in additional approvals, specifically for labor, on expense before the expenses are charged to the grant to reduce future cost transfers. In regards to the three transactions noted above (federal award number HHSN272201300021I; federal award number 5R21AG065526-02; and federal award number UH3HD096929), the erroneous charges have been refunded to the federal agency. As part of the University’s corrective action plan, during fiscal year 2023 the sponsored programs accounting team recalculated fringe and indirect costs on all federal grants to ensure the correct expense was recorded to each grant. During this reconciliation process cumulative award to date errors were identified and corrected in fiscal year 2023. The sponsored program accounting team continues to reconcile fringe and indirect costs on cost transfers at the grant level on a periodic basis to ensure accuracy.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: According to 2 CFR 200.419, a higher education entity that receives an aggregate total of $50 million or more in Federal awards must disclose their cost accounting practices by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS-2). An accurate DS-2 must be maintained and the higher education entity must comply with the cost accounting practices established within the DS-2. Amendments to the DS-2 must be filed with the
cognizant agency for indirect costs in advance of a disclosed practice being changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when a practice is changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS-2 may be submitted at any time. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University’s last submitted DS-2 to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services was March 27, 2007. The University implemented significant portions of Workday on July 1, 2020. We noted multiple items in the existing DS-2 that are no longer applicable/accurate and/or refers to previous practices and policies, including those related to the University’s salary and wage accumulation system. The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure compliance with the requirements for amending its DS-2. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues resulted in a revised DS-2 not being prepared and submitted. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year audit as finding number 2022-002. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure the University has effective internal controls in place to ensure requirements around the DS-2 are met. We recommend the University perform a thorough review of their existing DS-2 and determine what adjustments to the existing DS-2 are needed to reflect current policies and practices. Additionally, we recommend the University implement a process to routinely review the DS-2 so that any updates are submitted as required. Lastly, we recommend someone other than the preparer perform a review of the DS-2 prior to any amendments being submitted. View of Responsible Official: The University concurs with the finding. The University updated its DS-2 form and submitted it electronically to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on December 4, 2023. The Controller’s Office implemented an annual review of the DS-2 to identify factors that may require amendments to our next filing. In addition, prior to our submission of any DS-2 amendments, University staff other than the initial preparer will re-confirm the accuracy of changes to the DS-2.
Criteria: Per OMB No. 1845-0039, an institution is required to submit Pell disbursement records to the Common Origination and Disbursement (COD). The disbursement record reports the actual disbursement date and the amount of the disbursement. In accordance with Volume 4, Chapter 2 of the Federal Student Aid Handbook, an institution must submit Direct Loan and Pell Grant disbursement records to the COD no later than 15 days after making the disbursement or becoming aware of the need to adjust a previously reported disbursement. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure Direct Loan and Pell Grant disbursement records are submitted to the COD no later than 15 days after making the disbursement. For one of fifty-six Direct Loan disbursement samples, the University did not submit the Direct Loan disbursement record to the COD. For one of four Pell Grant disbursement samples where the University submitted the Pell Grant disbursement record to the COD 27 days after the disbursement date which was not within the 15-day requirement. Management provided a report comparing all disbursements of Direct Loan and Pell during fiscal year 2023 compared to the reporting to the COD. This report shows noncompliance of 759 Pell Grant disbursements submitted late out of 5,708 (13% of population) total Pell Grant disbursements and 255 Direct Loan disbursements submitted late or not submitted as of August 14, 2023 out of 21,130 (1% of the population) total Direct Loan disbursements. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues to resolve reports that were not accepted based on the original submission resulted in reporting disbursement record reports to the COD later than the 15-day requirement. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year as finding number 2022-008. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure Direct Loan and Pell Grant disbursement records are submitted or records that were not accepted based on the original submission are resolved and resubmitted to COD no later than 15-days after making the disbursement. View of Responsible Official: We acknowledge the deficiencies identified in our internal control process, specifically regarding the submission of Direct Loan and Pell Grant disbursement records to COD within the prescribed 15-day timeframe. The instances highlighted in this report, particularly the delayed submission of records for one Direct Loan disbursement sample and one Pell Grant disbursement sample, are indicative of areas where improvement is necessary. We provided insights into the root cause, citing capacity issues in addressing reports that were initially rejected, leading to delays in resubmission. While this explanation sheds light on the challenges faced, it underscores the importance of fortifying our internal control mechanisms to mitigate such delays in the future. Based on the recommendations outlined in this report, we are committed to enhancing our internal control process to ensure timely submission of Direct Loan and Pell Grant disbursement records to COD. This includes allocating necessary resources, providing additional training, and implementing robust monitoring and oversight mechanisms to address capacity constraints effectively and prevent future instances of noncompliance.
Criteria: Per OMB No. 1845-0039, an institution is required to submit Pell disbursement records to the Common Origination and Disbursement (COD). The disbursement record reports the actual disbursement date and the amount of the disbursement. In accordance with Volume 4, Chapter 2 of the Federal Student Aid Handbook, an institution must submit Direct Loan and Pell Grant disbursement records to the COD no later than 15 days after making the disbursement or becoming aware of the need to adjust a previously reported disbursement. Additionally, 2 CFR 200.303 requires nonfederal entities to, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Conditions Found: The University did not have an effective system of internal control in place to ensure Direct Loan and Pell Grant disbursement records are submitted to the COD no later than 15 days after making the disbursement. For one of fifty-six Direct Loan disbursement samples, the University did not submit the Direct Loan disbursement record to the COD. For one of four Pell Grant disbursement samples where the University submitted the Pell Grant disbursement record to the COD 27 days after the disbursement date which was not within the 15-day requirement. Management provided a report comparing all disbursements of Direct Loan and Pell during fiscal year 2023 compared to the reporting to the COD. This report shows noncompliance of 759 Pell Grant disbursements submitted late out of 5,708 (13% of population) total Pell Grant disbursements and 255 Direct Loan disbursements submitted late or not submitted as of August 14, 2023 out of 21,130 (1% of the population) total Direct Loan disbursements. Questioned Cost: There are no questioned costs. Cause and Effect: In discussing these conditions with University management, they stated that capacity issues to resolve reports that were not accepted based on the original submission resulted in reporting disbursement record reports to the COD later than the 15-day requirement. Repeat Finding: A similar finding was reported in prior year as finding number 2022-008. Statistical Sampling: The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Recommendations: We recommend the University enhance its internal control process to ensure Direct Loan and Pell Grant disbursement records are submitted or records that were not accepted based on the original submission are resolved and resubmitted to COD no later than 15-days after making the disbursement. View of Responsible Official: We acknowledge the deficiencies identified in our internal control process, specifically regarding the submission of Direct Loan and Pell Grant disbursement records to COD within the prescribed 15-day timeframe. The instances highlighted in this report, particularly the delayed submission of records for one Direct Loan disbursement sample and one Pell Grant disbursement sample, are indicative of areas where improvement is necessary. We provided insights into the root cause, citing capacity issues in addressing reports that were initially rejected, leading to delays in resubmission. While this explanation sheds light on the challenges faced, it underscores the importance of fortifying our internal control mechanisms to mitigate such delays in the future. Based on the recommendations outlined in this report, we are committed to enhancing our internal control process to ensure timely submission of Direct Loan and Pell Grant disbursement records to COD. This includes allocating necessary resources, providing additional training, and implementing robust monitoring and oversight mechanisms to address capacity constraints effectively and prevent future instances of noncompliance.