Audit 300275

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$1.43M
Findings
4
Programs
8
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-03-29
Auditor: Eide Bailly LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
388584 2023-003 Material Weakness - AB
388585 2023-004 Material Weakness - C
965026 2023-003 Material Weakness - AB
965027 2023-004 Material Weakness - C

Programs

Contacts

Name Title Type
NP5EYJQES3N7 Mindy Baylor Auditee
7123887301 Stacey Nelson Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported in the schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting, except for subrecipient expenditures, which are recorded on the cash basis. When applicable, such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: Y Rate Explanation: The Organization has elected to use the 10% de minimus cost rate or the rate approved by the granting agencies in the subaward for pass-through grants. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the schedule) includes the federal award activity of Siouxland Human Investment Partnership, Inc. (the Organization) under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2023. The information is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Organization, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets, or cash flows of the Organization.

Finding Details

Department of Education and Passed through State of Iowa Department of Education Federal Financial Assistance Listing #84.287, C14-SHIP, C15-SHIP, C16-SHIP, C17-SHIP, 7/1/2022 – 6/30/2023 Twenty-First Century Community Learning Centers Program Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria: The Organization is required to have procedures in place to ensure that federal awards are expended only for allowable costs in accordance with Subpart E – Cost Principles of the Uniform Guidance. Allowable costs are supported by appropriate documentation and correctly charged as to account, amount, and period. 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Iowa Department of Education Guide to Program Budgets and Accounting for the 21st Century Community Learning Centers program provides that an organization participating in the program may expend no more than 8 percent of annual funding on general administration and indirect costs. Further, indirect costs are to be recovered only to the extent of direct costs incurred. Condition: Through review of indirect costs charged to the federal awards, we noted the following: • The Organization charged an 8% administrative indirect cost rate to the federal awards, however, calculated the 8% on the budgeted grant award rather than on the actual direct costs incurred under the federal award, resulting in overcharging the award by $14,704. • The Organization serves as an employer of record for organizations that need assistance in providing benefits, payroll, and human resources to employees. A fixed rate is applied to total payroll wages and charged as additional payroll costs to cover administrative time incurred. In addition to the amount charged above, the Organization charged $49,049 to the federal program under this methodology resulting in an overcharge to the award. Cause: The Organization was not aware that the indirect cost rate should be applied pro rata to the underlying direct costs. In addition, the Organization believed this employer of record rate could be charged on grant wages incurred under the federal program. Effect: The Organization’s controls did not detect or correct the errors identified, which resulting in disallowed costs being charged to the federal award. Questioned Costs: Total questioned costs are $63,753. Context: For the Twenty First Century Community Learning Centers Program, a non-statistical sample of 60 direct expenditures were selected for testing, including 41 payroll transactions and 19 nonpayroll transactions. The 41 payroll transactions accounted for $20,888 of $358,025 total payroll costs charged to the federal award. The 19 nonpayroll transactions accounted for $10,368 of $168,717 total nonpayroll costs charged to the federal award. Additionally, all indirect costs charged to the federal awards were selected for testing, accounting for $105,893. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: We recommend management review procedures over the allocation of indirect costs to ensure indirect amounts charged to the program are based on actual underlying direct costs and that the total indirect allocation of general administration costs does not exceed the rate allowed by the federal program. Views of Responsible Officials: Management is in agreement.
Department of Education and Passed through State of Iowa Department of Education Federal Financial Assistance Listing #84.287, C14-SHIP, C15-SHIP, C16-SHIP, C17-SHIP, 7/1/2022 – 6/30/2023 Twenty-First Century Community Learning Centers Program Cash Management Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. In addition, 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6) establishes that the financial management system of the entity must provide written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 Payment. Condition: No support could be provided for the third quarter draw requests to substantiate a secondary level of review was completed prior to submission of the draws. Cause: Documentation to support the review of draw requests prior to submission was not retained during the transition period in the Finance Director role. Effect: Without retaining supporting documentation to substantiate the review of draw requests, demonstrating that the program complies with laws, regulations, and other compliance requirements is difficult. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context: A non-statistical sample of 2 of 4 quarters were selected for testing. All draws submitted within the selected quarters were tested. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: We acknowledge the review process lapsed during a time of employee transition, however, we recommend that management retain documentation to support the review of grant draws is performed for all grant draw requests. Views of Responsible Officials: Management is in agreement.
Department of Education and Passed through State of Iowa Department of Education Federal Financial Assistance Listing #84.287, C14-SHIP, C15-SHIP, C16-SHIP, C17-SHIP, 7/1/2022 – 6/30/2023 Twenty-First Century Community Learning Centers Program Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Material Noncompliance Criteria: The Organization is required to have procedures in place to ensure that federal awards are expended only for allowable costs in accordance with Subpart E – Cost Principles of the Uniform Guidance. Allowable costs are supported by appropriate documentation and correctly charged as to account, amount, and period. 2 CFR 200.303(a) establishes that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The Iowa Department of Education Guide to Program Budgets and Accounting for the 21st Century Community Learning Centers program provides that an organization participating in the program may expend no more than 8 percent of annual funding on general administration and indirect costs. Further, indirect costs are to be recovered only to the extent of direct costs incurred. Condition: Through review of indirect costs charged to the federal awards, we noted the following: • The Organization charged an 8% administrative indirect cost rate to the federal awards, however, calculated the 8% on the budgeted grant award rather than on the actual direct costs incurred under the federal award, resulting in overcharging the award by $14,704. • The Organization serves as an employer of record for organizations that need assistance in providing benefits, payroll, and human resources to employees. A fixed rate is applied to total payroll wages and charged as additional payroll costs to cover administrative time incurred. In addition to the amount charged above, the Organization charged $49,049 to the federal program under this methodology resulting in an overcharge to the award. Cause: The Organization was not aware that the indirect cost rate should be applied pro rata to the underlying direct costs. In addition, the Organization believed this employer of record rate could be charged on grant wages incurred under the federal program. Effect: The Organization’s controls did not detect or correct the errors identified, which resulting in disallowed costs being charged to the federal award. Questioned Costs: Total questioned costs are $63,753. Context: For the Twenty First Century Community Learning Centers Program, a non-statistical sample of 60 direct expenditures were selected for testing, including 41 payroll transactions and 19 nonpayroll transactions. The 41 payroll transactions accounted for $20,888 of $358,025 total payroll costs charged to the federal award. The 19 nonpayroll transactions accounted for $10,368 of $168,717 total nonpayroll costs charged to the federal award. Additionally, all indirect costs charged to the federal awards were selected for testing, accounting for $105,893. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: We recommend management review procedures over the allocation of indirect costs to ensure indirect amounts charged to the program are based on actual underlying direct costs and that the total indirect allocation of general administration costs does not exceed the rate allowed by the federal program. Views of Responsible Officials: Management is in agreement.
Department of Education and Passed through State of Iowa Department of Education Federal Financial Assistance Listing #84.287, C14-SHIP, C15-SHIP, C16-SHIP, C17-SHIP, 7/1/2022 – 6/30/2023 Twenty-First Century Community Learning Centers Program Cash Management Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: 2 CFR 200.303(a) states that the auditee must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides assurance that the entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. In addition, 2 CFR 200.302(b)(6) establishes that the financial management system of the entity must provide written procedures to implement the requirements of 2 CFR 200.305 Payment. Condition: No support could be provided for the third quarter draw requests to substantiate a secondary level of review was completed prior to submission of the draws. Cause: Documentation to support the review of draw requests prior to submission was not retained during the transition period in the Finance Director role. Effect: Without retaining supporting documentation to substantiate the review of draw requests, demonstrating that the program complies with laws, regulations, and other compliance requirements is difficult. Questioned Costs: None reported. Context: A non-statistical sample of 2 of 4 quarters were selected for testing. All draws submitted within the selected quarters were tested. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: We acknowledge the review process lapsed during a time of employee transition, however, we recommend that management retain documentation to support the review of grant draws is performed for all grant draw requests. Views of Responsible Officials: Management is in agreement.