Audit 300097

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$16.86M
Findings
2
Programs
16
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-03-28
Auditor: Eide Bailly LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
388300 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - B
964742 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - B

Contacts

Name Title Type
Y9KAMYJ8Z6C5 Rudy Hill Auditee
8057304242 Brandon Harrison Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of the District under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2023. The information is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the District, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position, or cash flows of the District. Expenditures reported in the Schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting, except for subrecipient expenditures, which are reported on the cash basis. When applicable, such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. The District has not elected to use the 10% de minimis cost rate. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee uses a negotiated indirect cost rate

Finding Details

Allowable Costs & Activities Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Agency: U.S. Department ofthe Treasury Pass-Through Entity: California Community Colleges Chancellor's Office Criteria or Specific Requirements The Uniform Guidance Cost Principals described in 31 CFR Part 35, Subpart A, established the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) to support governments in their response to and recovery from the COVID-19 public health emergency. As outlined in the Final Rule set forth by the U.S. Department of the Treasury, to identify eligible uses of funds, recipients should (1) identify a COVID-19 public health or economic impact on an individual or class (i.e., a group) and (2) design a program that responds to that impact. As a recipient of CSLFRF funding, the California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office (CCCCO) utilized the funding to provide emergency financial assistance grants to low-income students, enrolled at the California community colleges, who had been disproportionally impacted by the COVID-19 public health emergency. The CCCCO established the following eligibility criteria for students to receive CSLFRF grants: • U.S. citizen or eligible non-citizen • Current enrollment in credit or noncredit courses at a California community college • Demonstrate an emergency financial aid need • Qualify as low-income by meeting the requirements to receive a California College Promise Grant (CCPG} or is projected to receive a CCPG for the upcoming term Condition Significant Deficiency – The District disbursed CSLFRF grants to 2 ineligible students out of the 23 students tested. Questioned Costs During our testing, we identified that the District disbursed $6,000 in CSLFRF to 2 ineligible students out of the 23 students tested. Context The District disbursed CSLFRF grants to 115 students during the fiscal year totaling $336,724 in aid. Effect Without proper monitoring of the eligibility requirements set forth by the pass-through entity, the District is at risk of noncompliance with the above referenced criteria. Cause The District did not comply with the most up-to-date student eligibility requirements set forth by the California Community College Chancellor’s Office. Recommendation It is recommended that District establish effective controls and procedures to ensure that funds are only being distributed to those who are eligible to receive CSFRF student aid.
Allowable Costs & Activities Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Agency: U.S. Department ofthe Treasury Pass-Through Entity: California Community Colleges Chancellor's Office Criteria or Specific Requirements The Uniform Guidance Cost Principals described in 31 CFR Part 35, Subpart A, established the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (CSLFRF) to support governments in their response to and recovery from the COVID-19 public health emergency. As outlined in the Final Rule set forth by the U.S. Department of the Treasury, to identify eligible uses of funds, recipients should (1) identify a COVID-19 public health or economic impact on an individual or class (i.e., a group) and (2) design a program that responds to that impact. As a recipient of CSLFRF funding, the California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office (CCCCO) utilized the funding to provide emergency financial assistance grants to low-income students, enrolled at the California community colleges, who had been disproportionally impacted by the COVID-19 public health emergency. The CCCCO established the following eligibility criteria for students to receive CSLFRF grants: • U.S. citizen or eligible non-citizen • Current enrollment in credit or noncredit courses at a California community college • Demonstrate an emergency financial aid need • Qualify as low-income by meeting the requirements to receive a California College Promise Grant (CCPG} or is projected to receive a CCPG for the upcoming term Condition Significant Deficiency – The District disbursed CSLFRF grants to 2 ineligible students out of the 23 students tested. Questioned Costs During our testing, we identified that the District disbursed $6,000 in CSLFRF to 2 ineligible students out of the 23 students tested. Context The District disbursed CSLFRF grants to 115 students during the fiscal year totaling $336,724 in aid. Effect Without proper monitoring of the eligibility requirements set forth by the pass-through entity, the District is at risk of noncompliance with the above referenced criteria. Cause The District did not comply with the most up-to-date student eligibility requirements set forth by the California Community College Chancellor’s Office. Recommendation It is recommended that District establish effective controls and procedures to ensure that funds are only being distributed to those who are eligible to receive CSFRF student aid.