Audit 299531

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$1.13M
Findings
12
Programs
16
Organization: Edgewater Board of Education (NJ)
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-03-28

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Contacts

Name Title Type
U9A3MMJQZ3A6 Wally Lindsley Auditee
2019464106 Jeffrey Bliss Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: NOTE 8 DE MINIMIS INDIRECT COST RATE Accounting Policies: The schedules are prepared and presented using the budgetary basis of accounting with the exception of programs recorded in the food service fund, which are presented using the accrual basis of accounting. The information in these schedules is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (U.S. Uniform Guidance). De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The auditee did not use the de minimis cost rate. The District has not elected to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

Our audit of salaries charged to the ESSER grant programs revealed the following: • Employees and the funding percentages of their respective salaries charged to the program were not approved in the Board minutes. • Time and effort activity reports were not completed for employees whose salaries were charged to the grant program. • Salaries were charged by disbursement adjustment and not by each pay period throughout the year.
Our audit of salaries charged to the ESSER grant programs revealed the following: • Employees and the funding percentages of their respective salaries charged to the program were not approved in the Board minutes. • Time and effort activity reports were not completed for employees whose salaries were charged to the grant program. • Salaries were charged by disbursement adjustment and not by each pay period throughout the year.
Our audit of salaries charged to the ESSER grant programs revealed the following: • Employees and the funding percentages of their respective salaries charged to the program were not approved in the Board minutes. • Time and effort activity reports were not completed for employees whose salaries were charged to the grant program. • Salaries were charged by disbursement adjustment and not by each pay period throughout the year.
Our audit of salaries charged to the ESSER grant programs revealed the following: • Employees and the funding percentages of their respective salaries charged to the program were not approved in the Board minutes. • Time and effort activity reports were not completed for employees whose salaries were charged to the grant program. • Salaries were charged by disbursement adjustment and not by each pay period throughout the year.
Our audit of salaries charged to the ESSER grant programs revealed the following: • Employees and the funding percentages of their respective salaries charged to the program were not approved in the Board minutes. • Time and effort activity reports were not completed for employees whose salaries were charged to the grant program. • Salaries were charged by disbursement adjustment and not by each pay period throughout the year.
Our audit of salaries charged to the ESSER grant programs revealed the following: • Employees and the funding percentages of their respective salaries charged to the program were not approved in the Board minutes. • Time and effort activity reports were not completed for employees whose salaries were charged to the grant program. • Salaries were charged by disbursement adjustment and not by each pay period throughout the year.
Our audit of salaries charged to the ESSER grant programs revealed the following: • Employees and the funding percentages of their respective salaries charged to the program were not approved in the Board minutes. • Time and effort activity reports were not completed for employees whose salaries were charged to the grant program. • Salaries were charged by disbursement adjustment and not by each pay period throughout the year.
Our audit of salaries charged to the ESSER grant programs revealed the following: • Employees and the funding percentages of their respective salaries charged to the program were not approved in the Board minutes. • Time and effort activity reports were not completed for employees whose salaries were charged to the grant program. • Salaries were charged by disbursement adjustment and not by each pay period throughout the year.
Our audit of salaries charged to the ESSER grant programs revealed the following: • Employees and the funding percentages of their respective salaries charged to the program were not approved in the Board minutes. • Time and effort activity reports were not completed for employees whose salaries were charged to the grant program. • Salaries were charged by disbursement adjustment and not by each pay period throughout the year.
Our audit of salaries charged to the ESSER grant programs revealed the following: • Employees and the funding percentages of their respective salaries charged to the program were not approved in the Board minutes. • Time and effort activity reports were not completed for employees whose salaries were charged to the grant program. • Salaries were charged by disbursement adjustment and not by each pay period throughout the year.
Our audit of salaries charged to the ESSER grant programs revealed the following: • Employees and the funding percentages of their respective salaries charged to the program were not approved in the Board minutes. • Time and effort activity reports were not completed for employees whose salaries were charged to the grant program. • Salaries were charged by disbursement adjustment and not by each pay period throughout the year.
Our audit of salaries charged to the ESSER grant programs revealed the following: • Employees and the funding percentages of their respective salaries charged to the program were not approved in the Board minutes. • Time and effort activity reports were not completed for employees whose salaries were charged to the grant program. • Salaries were charged by disbursement adjustment and not by each pay period throughout the year.