Audit 298659

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$982,977
Findings
12
Programs
5
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-03-27

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
386233 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - I
386234 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - I
386235 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - I
386236 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - I
386237 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - I
386238 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - I
962675 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - I
962676 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - I
962677 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - I
962678 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - I
962679 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - I
962680 2023-001 Significant Deficiency - I

Programs

Contacts

Name Title Type
DBRGTD7EY3M1 Elizabeth Biggs Auditee
2028338773 Ricardo Trujillo Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Note 1. Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. The Society has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) includes the Federal award activity of the Society under programs of the Federal Government for the year ended June 30, 2023. Information in the Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). The Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the Society; accordingly, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net assets or cash flows of the Society.
Title: Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. The Society has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance. Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles in Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the Schedule represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years. The Society has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

Finding Details

Finding 2023-001: Suspension and Debarment Information on Federal Program: 47.074 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Recipients of Federal funding must adhere to specific requirements on screening of all potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, subrecipients, fellows, etc. to ensure the recipient is not conducting business with excluded parties (as defined by the United States Government). This screening process must also be documented in writing. Condition: The Society did not consistently perform the screening process for its potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, subrecipients, etc. that were paid with Federal funds. Context: Payments were made during the fiscal year without performing the proper screening process. Our audit work in this area consisted of internal control testwork over a random sample of expenditures, as well as substantive testwork over transactions above a defined threshold from select expense accounts that were charged to the Federal program. The issue is deemed to be systemic. Cause: The Society did not have a formal policy in place with regard to suspension and debarment screenings, although they did occasionally perform screening of potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, and subrecipients. Effect or Potential Effect: Failure to screen potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, subrecipients, employees, fellows, etc. increases the potential that Federal funds be inadvertently provided to parties deemed to be suspended or disbarred by the United States Government. Questioned Costs: None Identification of Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that the Society establish policies and ensure that all types of parties (as noted above) are included, and educate its employees on the procedures necessary to ensure full compliance with this requirement. We also recommend that the Society document each of these screenings and retain them in the respective files, which should be completed prior to engaging in relationships with these parties. For ongoing relationships, the Society should consider performing screenings on an annual basis (and documenting them) to ensure continuous compliance in the event the suspension and debarment status of any of these parties changes. Lastly, we recommend the Society perform retrospective screenings on these parties to which it made payments during the fiscal year.
Finding 2023-001: Suspension and Debarment Information on Federal Program: 47.074 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Recipients of Federal funding must adhere to specific requirements on screening of all potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, subrecipients, fellows, etc. to ensure the recipient is not conducting business with excluded parties (as defined by the United States Government). This screening process must also be documented in writing. Condition: The Society did not consistently perform the screening process for its potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, subrecipients, etc. that were paid with Federal funds. Context: Payments were made during the fiscal year without performing the proper screening process. Our audit work in this area consisted of internal control testwork over a random sample of expenditures, as well as substantive testwork over transactions above a defined threshold from select expense accounts that were charged to the Federal program. The issue is deemed to be systemic. Cause: The Society did not have a formal policy in place with regard to suspension and debarment screenings, although they did occasionally perform screening of potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, and subrecipients. Effect or Potential Effect: Failure to screen potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, subrecipients, employees, fellows, etc. increases the potential that Federal funds be inadvertently provided to parties deemed to be suspended or disbarred by the United States Government. Questioned Costs: None Identification of Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that the Society establish policies and ensure that all types of parties (as noted above) are included, and educate its employees on the procedures necessary to ensure full compliance with this requirement. We also recommend that the Society document each of these screenings and retain them in the respective files, which should be completed prior to engaging in relationships with these parties. For ongoing relationships, the Society should consider performing screenings on an annual basis (and documenting them) to ensure continuous compliance in the event the suspension and debarment status of any of these parties changes. Lastly, we recommend the Society perform retrospective screenings on these parties to which it made payments during the fiscal year.
Finding 2023-001: Suspension and Debarment Information on Federal Program: 47.074 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Recipients of Federal funding must adhere to specific requirements on screening of all potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, subrecipients, fellows, etc. to ensure the recipient is not conducting business with excluded parties (as defined by the United States Government). This screening process must also be documented in writing. Condition: The Society did not consistently perform the screening process for its potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, subrecipients, etc. that were paid with Federal funds. Context: Payments were made during the fiscal year without performing the proper screening process. Our audit work in this area consisted of internal control testwork over a random sample of expenditures, as well as substantive testwork over transactions above a defined threshold from select expense accounts that were charged to the Federal program. The issue is deemed to be systemic. Cause: The Society did not have a formal policy in place with regard to suspension and debarment screenings, although they did occasionally perform screening of potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, and subrecipients. Effect or Potential Effect: Failure to screen potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, subrecipients, employees, fellows, etc. increases the potential that Federal funds be inadvertently provided to parties deemed to be suspended or disbarred by the United States Government. Questioned Costs: None Identification of Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that the Society establish policies and ensure that all types of parties (as noted above) are included, and educate its employees on the procedures necessary to ensure full compliance with this requirement. We also recommend that the Society document each of these screenings and retain them in the respective files, which should be completed prior to engaging in relationships with these parties. For ongoing relationships, the Society should consider performing screenings on an annual basis (and documenting them) to ensure continuous compliance in the event the suspension and debarment status of any of these parties changes. Lastly, we recommend the Society perform retrospective screenings on these parties to which it made payments during the fiscal year.
Finding 2023-001: Suspension and Debarment Information on Federal Program: 47.074 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Recipients of Federal funding must adhere to specific requirements on screening of all potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, subrecipients, fellows, etc. to ensure the recipient is not conducting business with excluded parties (as defined by the United States Government). This screening process must also be documented in writing. Condition: The Society did not consistently perform the screening process for its potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, subrecipients, etc. that were paid with Federal funds. Context: Payments were made during the fiscal year without performing the proper screening process. Our audit work in this area consisted of internal control testwork over a random sample of expenditures, as well as substantive testwork over transactions above a defined threshold from select expense accounts that were charged to the Federal program. The issue is deemed to be systemic. Cause: The Society did not have a formal policy in place with regard to suspension and debarment screenings, although they did occasionally perform screening of potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, and subrecipients. Effect or Potential Effect: Failure to screen potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, subrecipients, employees, fellows, etc. increases the potential that Federal funds be inadvertently provided to parties deemed to be suspended or disbarred by the United States Government. Questioned Costs: None Identification of Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that the Society establish policies and ensure that all types of parties (as noted above) are included, and educate its employees on the procedures necessary to ensure full compliance with this requirement. We also recommend that the Society document each of these screenings and retain them in the respective files, which should be completed prior to engaging in relationships with these parties. For ongoing relationships, the Society should consider performing screenings on an annual basis (and documenting them) to ensure continuous compliance in the event the suspension and debarment status of any of these parties changes. Lastly, we recommend the Society perform retrospective screenings on these parties to which it made payments during the fiscal year.
Finding 2023-001: Suspension and Debarment Information on Federal Program: 47.074 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Recipients of Federal funding must adhere to specific requirements on screening of all potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, subrecipients, fellows, etc. to ensure the recipient is not conducting business with excluded parties (as defined by the United States Government). This screening process must also be documented in writing. Condition: The Society did not consistently perform the screening process for its potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, subrecipients, etc. that were paid with Federal funds. Context: Payments were made during the fiscal year without performing the proper screening process. Our audit work in this area consisted of internal control testwork over a random sample of expenditures, as well as substantive testwork over transactions above a defined threshold from select expense accounts that were charged to the Federal program. The issue is deemed to be systemic. Cause: The Society did not have a formal policy in place with regard to suspension and debarment screenings, although they did occasionally perform screening of potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, and subrecipients. Effect or Potential Effect: Failure to screen potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, subrecipients, employees, fellows, etc. increases the potential that Federal funds be inadvertently provided to parties deemed to be suspended or disbarred by the United States Government. Questioned Costs: None Identification of Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that the Society establish policies and ensure that all types of parties (as noted above) are included, and educate its employees on the procedures necessary to ensure full compliance with this requirement. We also recommend that the Society document each of these screenings and retain them in the respective files, which should be completed prior to engaging in relationships with these parties. For ongoing relationships, the Society should consider performing screenings on an annual basis (and documenting them) to ensure continuous compliance in the event the suspension and debarment status of any of these parties changes. Lastly, we recommend the Society perform retrospective screenings on these parties to which it made payments during the fiscal year.
Finding 2023-001: Suspension and Debarment Information on Federal Program: 47.074 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Recipients of Federal funding must adhere to specific requirements on screening of all potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, subrecipients, fellows, etc. to ensure the recipient is not conducting business with excluded parties (as defined by the United States Government). This screening process must also be documented in writing. Condition: The Society did not consistently perform the screening process for its potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, subrecipients, etc. that were paid with Federal funds. Context: Payments were made during the fiscal year without performing the proper screening process. Our audit work in this area consisted of internal control testwork over a random sample of expenditures, as well as substantive testwork over transactions above a defined threshold from select expense accounts that were charged to the Federal program. The issue is deemed to be systemic. Cause: The Society did not have a formal policy in place with regard to suspension and debarment screenings, although they did occasionally perform screening of potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, and subrecipients. Effect or Potential Effect: Failure to screen potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, subrecipients, employees, fellows, etc. increases the potential that Federal funds be inadvertently provided to parties deemed to be suspended or disbarred by the United States Government. Questioned Costs: None Identification of Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that the Society establish policies and ensure that all types of parties (as noted above) are included, and educate its employees on the procedures necessary to ensure full compliance with this requirement. We also recommend that the Society document each of these screenings and retain them in the respective files, which should be completed prior to engaging in relationships with these parties. For ongoing relationships, the Society should consider performing screenings on an annual basis (and documenting them) to ensure continuous compliance in the event the suspension and debarment status of any of these parties changes. Lastly, we recommend the Society perform retrospective screenings on these parties to which it made payments during the fiscal year.
Finding 2023-001: Suspension and Debarment Information on Federal Program: 47.074 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Recipients of Federal funding must adhere to specific requirements on screening of all potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, subrecipients, fellows, etc. to ensure the recipient is not conducting business with excluded parties (as defined by the United States Government). This screening process must also be documented in writing. Condition: The Society did not consistently perform the screening process for its potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, subrecipients, etc. that were paid with Federal funds. Context: Payments were made during the fiscal year without performing the proper screening process. Our audit work in this area consisted of internal control testwork over a random sample of expenditures, as well as substantive testwork over transactions above a defined threshold from select expense accounts that were charged to the Federal program. The issue is deemed to be systemic. Cause: The Society did not have a formal policy in place with regard to suspension and debarment screenings, although they did occasionally perform screening of potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, and subrecipients. Effect or Potential Effect: Failure to screen potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, subrecipients, employees, fellows, etc. increases the potential that Federal funds be inadvertently provided to parties deemed to be suspended or disbarred by the United States Government. Questioned Costs: None Identification of Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that the Society establish policies and ensure that all types of parties (as noted above) are included, and educate its employees on the procedures necessary to ensure full compliance with this requirement. We also recommend that the Society document each of these screenings and retain them in the respective files, which should be completed prior to engaging in relationships with these parties. For ongoing relationships, the Society should consider performing screenings on an annual basis (and documenting them) to ensure continuous compliance in the event the suspension and debarment status of any of these parties changes. Lastly, we recommend the Society perform retrospective screenings on these parties to which it made payments during the fiscal year.
Finding 2023-001: Suspension and Debarment Information on Federal Program: 47.074 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Recipients of Federal funding must adhere to specific requirements on screening of all potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, subrecipients, fellows, etc. to ensure the recipient is not conducting business with excluded parties (as defined by the United States Government). This screening process must also be documented in writing. Condition: The Society did not consistently perform the screening process for its potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, subrecipients, etc. that were paid with Federal funds. Context: Payments were made during the fiscal year without performing the proper screening process. Our audit work in this area consisted of internal control testwork over a random sample of expenditures, as well as substantive testwork over transactions above a defined threshold from select expense accounts that were charged to the Federal program. The issue is deemed to be systemic. Cause: The Society did not have a formal policy in place with regard to suspension and debarment screenings, although they did occasionally perform screening of potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, and subrecipients. Effect or Potential Effect: Failure to screen potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, subrecipients, employees, fellows, etc. increases the potential that Federal funds be inadvertently provided to parties deemed to be suspended or disbarred by the United States Government. Questioned Costs: None Identification of Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that the Society establish policies and ensure that all types of parties (as noted above) are included, and educate its employees on the procedures necessary to ensure full compliance with this requirement. We also recommend that the Society document each of these screenings and retain them in the respective files, which should be completed prior to engaging in relationships with these parties. For ongoing relationships, the Society should consider performing screenings on an annual basis (and documenting them) to ensure continuous compliance in the event the suspension and debarment status of any of these parties changes. Lastly, we recommend the Society perform retrospective screenings on these parties to which it made payments during the fiscal year.
Finding 2023-001: Suspension and Debarment Information on Federal Program: 47.074 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Recipients of Federal funding must adhere to specific requirements on screening of all potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, subrecipients, fellows, etc. to ensure the recipient is not conducting business with excluded parties (as defined by the United States Government). This screening process must also be documented in writing. Condition: The Society did not consistently perform the screening process for its potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, subrecipients, etc. that were paid with Federal funds. Context: Payments were made during the fiscal year without performing the proper screening process. Our audit work in this area consisted of internal control testwork over a random sample of expenditures, as well as substantive testwork over transactions above a defined threshold from select expense accounts that were charged to the Federal program. The issue is deemed to be systemic. Cause: The Society did not have a formal policy in place with regard to suspension and debarment screenings, although they did occasionally perform screening of potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, and subrecipients. Effect or Potential Effect: Failure to screen potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, subrecipients, employees, fellows, etc. increases the potential that Federal funds be inadvertently provided to parties deemed to be suspended or disbarred by the United States Government. Questioned Costs: None Identification of Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that the Society establish policies and ensure that all types of parties (as noted above) are included, and educate its employees on the procedures necessary to ensure full compliance with this requirement. We also recommend that the Society document each of these screenings and retain them in the respective files, which should be completed prior to engaging in relationships with these parties. For ongoing relationships, the Society should consider performing screenings on an annual basis (and documenting them) to ensure continuous compliance in the event the suspension and debarment status of any of these parties changes. Lastly, we recommend the Society perform retrospective screenings on these parties to which it made payments during the fiscal year.
Finding 2023-001: Suspension and Debarment Information on Federal Program: 47.074 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Recipients of Federal funding must adhere to specific requirements on screening of all potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, subrecipients, fellows, etc. to ensure the recipient is not conducting business with excluded parties (as defined by the United States Government). This screening process must also be documented in writing. Condition: The Society did not consistently perform the screening process for its potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, subrecipients, etc. that were paid with Federal funds. Context: Payments were made during the fiscal year without performing the proper screening process. Our audit work in this area consisted of internal control testwork over a random sample of expenditures, as well as substantive testwork over transactions above a defined threshold from select expense accounts that were charged to the Federal program. The issue is deemed to be systemic. Cause: The Society did not have a formal policy in place with regard to suspension and debarment screenings, although they did occasionally perform screening of potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, and subrecipients. Effect or Potential Effect: Failure to screen potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, subrecipients, employees, fellows, etc. increases the potential that Federal funds be inadvertently provided to parties deemed to be suspended or disbarred by the United States Government. Questioned Costs: None Identification of Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that the Society establish policies and ensure that all types of parties (as noted above) are included, and educate its employees on the procedures necessary to ensure full compliance with this requirement. We also recommend that the Society document each of these screenings and retain them in the respective files, which should be completed prior to engaging in relationships with these parties. For ongoing relationships, the Society should consider performing screenings on an annual basis (and documenting them) to ensure continuous compliance in the event the suspension and debarment status of any of these parties changes. Lastly, we recommend the Society perform retrospective screenings on these parties to which it made payments during the fiscal year.
Finding 2023-001: Suspension and Debarment Information on Federal Program: 47.074 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Recipients of Federal funding must adhere to specific requirements on screening of all potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, subrecipients, fellows, etc. to ensure the recipient is not conducting business with excluded parties (as defined by the United States Government). This screening process must also be documented in writing. Condition: The Society did not consistently perform the screening process for its potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, subrecipients, etc. that were paid with Federal funds. Context: Payments were made during the fiscal year without performing the proper screening process. Our audit work in this area consisted of internal control testwork over a random sample of expenditures, as well as substantive testwork over transactions above a defined threshold from select expense accounts that were charged to the Federal program. The issue is deemed to be systemic. Cause: The Society did not have a formal policy in place with regard to suspension and debarment screenings, although they did occasionally perform screening of potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, and subrecipients. Effect or Potential Effect: Failure to screen potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, subrecipients, employees, fellows, etc. increases the potential that Federal funds be inadvertently provided to parties deemed to be suspended or disbarred by the United States Government. Questioned Costs: None Identification of Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that the Society establish policies and ensure that all types of parties (as noted above) are included, and educate its employees on the procedures necessary to ensure full compliance with this requirement. We also recommend that the Society document each of these screenings and retain them in the respective files, which should be completed prior to engaging in relationships with these parties. For ongoing relationships, the Society should consider performing screenings on an annual basis (and documenting them) to ensure continuous compliance in the event the suspension and debarment status of any of these parties changes. Lastly, we recommend the Society perform retrospective screenings on these parties to which it made payments during the fiscal year.
Finding 2023-001: Suspension and Debarment Information on Federal Program: 47.074 Criteria or Specific Requirement: Recipients of Federal funding must adhere to specific requirements on screening of all potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, subrecipients, fellows, etc. to ensure the recipient is not conducting business with excluded parties (as defined by the United States Government). This screening process must also be documented in writing. Condition: The Society did not consistently perform the screening process for its potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, subrecipients, etc. that were paid with Federal funds. Context: Payments were made during the fiscal year without performing the proper screening process. Our audit work in this area consisted of internal control testwork over a random sample of expenditures, as well as substantive testwork over transactions above a defined threshold from select expense accounts that were charged to the Federal program. The issue is deemed to be systemic. Cause: The Society did not have a formal policy in place with regard to suspension and debarment screenings, although they did occasionally perform screening of potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, and subrecipients. Effect or Potential Effect: Failure to screen potential and current vendors, suppliers, contractors, subrecipients, employees, fellows, etc. increases the potential that Federal funds be inadvertently provided to parties deemed to be suspended or disbarred by the United States Government. Questioned Costs: None Identification of Repeat Finding: N/A Recommendation: We recommend that the Society establish policies and ensure that all types of parties (as noted above) are included, and educate its employees on the procedures necessary to ensure full compliance with this requirement. We also recommend that the Society document each of these screenings and retain them in the respective files, which should be completed prior to engaging in relationships with these parties. For ongoing relationships, the Society should consider performing screenings on an annual basis (and documenting them) to ensure continuous compliance in the event the suspension and debarment status of any of these parties changes. Lastly, we recommend the Society perform retrospective screenings on these parties to which it made payments during the fiscal year.