Audit 297658

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$2.53M
Findings
12
Programs
9
Organization: Metro Technology Center (OK)
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-03-26
Auditor: Eide Bailly LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
384579 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - L
384580 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - L
384581 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - L
384582 2023-003 Material Weakness - LN
384583 2023-003 Material Weakness - LN
384584 2023-003 Material Weakness - LN
961021 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - L
961022 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - L
961023 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - L
961024 2023-003 Material Weakness - LN
961025 2023-003 Material Weakness - LN
961026 2023-003 Material Weakness - LN

Contacts

Name Title Type
HS9JDWEFEMW8 Ronald Grant Auditee
4055954427 Vanessa Dutton Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Note 1 ‐ Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on using the cash basis of accounting. Some amounts presented in the schedule may differ from amounts presented in or used in the preparation of the basic financial statements. When applicable, such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The District has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards (the Schedule) includes the federal award activity of Metro Technology Centers School District (the District) under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2023. The information in this Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 220, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of Metro Technology Center, District No. 22 it is not intended to and does not present financial position or changes in financial position.
Title: Note 4 ‐ Subrecipients Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on using the cash basis of accounting. Some amounts presented in the schedule may differ from amounts presented in or used in the preparation of the basic financial statements. When applicable, such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The District has elected not to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance. The District did not have any awards that have been passed through to subrecipients.

Finding Details

2023‐002 U.S. Department of Education Student Financial Aid Cluster Reporting – Common Origination and Disbursement (COD) System Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: Institutions submit Direct Loan, Pell Grant, TEACH Grant, and IASG origination records and disbursement records to the COD system. Origination records can be sent well in advance of any disbursements, as early as the institution chooses to submit them for any student the institution reasonably believes will be eligible for a payment. The acknowledgments identify the processing status of each record: Rejected, Accepted with Corrections, or Accepted. In testing the origination and disbursement data, the auditor should be most concerned with the data ED has categorized as accepted or accepted with corrections. Institutions must report student disbursement data within 15 calendar days after the institution makes a disbursement or becomes aware of the need to make an adjustment to previously reported student disbursement data or expected student disbursement data. Institutions may do this by reporting once every 15 calendar days, bi‐weekly or weekly, or may set up their own system to ensure that changes are reported in a timely manner. Condition: The disbursement date recorded by the COD for financial aid and the disbursement to student by the District was greater than the allowable period of 15 calendar days for one item. Questioned Costs: None Effect: Untimely reporting of student enrollment status does not allow the Department of Education to properly track and monitor students, including initiation of the loan repayment process. Cause: The delay in actual disbursement is believed to be contributed to the District reviewing the costs of the Aviation Program before the disbursements was made. However, the person over the department when this disbursement was made is currently no longer employed by the District and the reason for the delayed disbursement cannot be clarified and records do not appear to be retained for this item. Repeat finding From Prior Year: No Context: Out of the 40 sample of students tested for COD reporting, 1 student was beyond the required 15 calendar days. Non‐statistical sampling was used. Recommendation: We recommend that management update their control processes to ensure that the proper COD reporting and proper retention of files in the event of subsequent updates from the original transfer date. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding.
2023‐002 U.S. Department of Education Student Financial Aid Cluster Reporting – Common Origination and Disbursement (COD) System Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: Institutions submit Direct Loan, Pell Grant, TEACH Grant, and IASG origination records and disbursement records to the COD system. Origination records can be sent well in advance of any disbursements, as early as the institution chooses to submit them for any student the institution reasonably believes will be eligible for a payment. The acknowledgments identify the processing status of each record: Rejected, Accepted with Corrections, or Accepted. In testing the origination and disbursement data, the auditor should be most concerned with the data ED has categorized as accepted or accepted with corrections. Institutions must report student disbursement data within 15 calendar days after the institution makes a disbursement or becomes aware of the need to make an adjustment to previously reported student disbursement data or expected student disbursement data. Institutions may do this by reporting once every 15 calendar days, bi‐weekly or weekly, or may set up their own system to ensure that changes are reported in a timely manner. Condition: The disbursement date recorded by the COD for financial aid and the disbursement to student by the District was greater than the allowable period of 15 calendar days for one item. Questioned Costs: None Effect: Untimely reporting of student enrollment status does not allow the Department of Education to properly track and monitor students, including initiation of the loan repayment process. Cause: The delay in actual disbursement is believed to be contributed to the District reviewing the costs of the Aviation Program before the disbursements was made. However, the person over the department when this disbursement was made is currently no longer employed by the District and the reason for the delayed disbursement cannot be clarified and records do not appear to be retained for this item. Repeat finding From Prior Year: No Context: Out of the 40 sample of students tested for COD reporting, 1 student was beyond the required 15 calendar days. Non‐statistical sampling was used. Recommendation: We recommend that management update their control processes to ensure that the proper COD reporting and proper retention of files in the event of subsequent updates from the original transfer date. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding.
2023‐002 U.S. Department of Education Student Financial Aid Cluster Reporting – Common Origination and Disbursement (COD) System Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: Institutions submit Direct Loan, Pell Grant, TEACH Grant, and IASG origination records and disbursement records to the COD system. Origination records can be sent well in advance of any disbursements, as early as the institution chooses to submit them for any student the institution reasonably believes will be eligible for a payment. The acknowledgments identify the processing status of each record: Rejected, Accepted with Corrections, or Accepted. In testing the origination and disbursement data, the auditor should be most concerned with the data ED has categorized as accepted or accepted with corrections. Institutions must report student disbursement data within 15 calendar days after the institution makes a disbursement or becomes aware of the need to make an adjustment to previously reported student disbursement data or expected student disbursement data. Institutions may do this by reporting once every 15 calendar days, bi‐weekly or weekly, or may set up their own system to ensure that changes are reported in a timely manner. Condition: The disbursement date recorded by the COD for financial aid and the disbursement to student by the District was greater than the allowable period of 15 calendar days for one item. Questioned Costs: None Effect: Untimely reporting of student enrollment status does not allow the Department of Education to properly track and monitor students, including initiation of the loan repayment process. Cause: The delay in actual disbursement is believed to be contributed to the District reviewing the costs of the Aviation Program before the disbursements was made. However, the person over the department when this disbursement was made is currently no longer employed by the District and the reason for the delayed disbursement cannot be clarified and records do not appear to be retained for this item. Repeat finding From Prior Year: No Context: Out of the 40 sample of students tested for COD reporting, 1 student was beyond the required 15 calendar days. Non‐statistical sampling was used. Recommendation: We recommend that management update their control processes to ensure that the proper COD reporting and proper retention of files in the event of subsequent updates from the original transfer date. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding.
2023‐003 U.S. Department of Education Student Financial Aid Cluster (FAL # 84.268, 84.063) Special Test: Enrollment Reporting Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: The National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) is the national database of information about loans and grants awarded to students. Institutions are required to report enrollment information under the Pell grant and the Direct and FFEL loan programs via the NSLDS (OMB No. 1845‐0035), although FFEL loans are no longer made or a part of the SFA Cluster, a student may have a FFEL loan from previous years that would require enrollment reporting for that student (Pell, 34 CFR 690.83(b)(2); FFEL, 34 CFR 682.610; Direct Loan, 34 CFR 685.309; Perkins 34 CFR 674.19(f)). The administration of the Title IV programs depends heavily on the accuracy and timeliness of the enrollment information reported by institutions. Institutions must review, update, and certify student enrollment statuses, program information, and effective dates that appear on the Enrollment Reporting Roster file or on the Enrollment Maintenance page of the NSLDS Professional Access (NSLDSFAP) website which the financial aid administrator can access for the auditor. Institutions are also responsible for accurately reporting all Campus‐Level Record data elements including OPEID number, enrollment effective data, enrollment status, and certification date. Institutions are responsible for accurately reporting all Program‐Level record data including CIP year, credential level, published program length measurement, published program length, program begin date, program enrollment status, and program enrollment effective date. Condition: Various discrepancies were noted between the District and NSLDS for both the Campus‐Level and Program‐Level requirements. Further some of the data provided was provided later than the required timelines established. Questioned Costs: None Effect: Untimely and inaccurate reporting of student enrollment status does not allow the Department of Education to properly track and monitor students, including initiation of the loan repayment process. Cause: Internal controls do not appear to be in place to accurately and timely identify the relevant dates for reporting to NSLDS. Repeat finding From Prior Year: No Context: Out of the 36 sample of students tested, 23 students had at least one incorrect reporting of Campus‐Level and Program‐Level requirements and/or considered to be reported late. Nonstatistical sampling was used. Recommendation: We recommend that management update their control processes to ensure that the proper status date changes are being reported to NSLDS. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding.
2023‐003 U.S. Department of Education Student Financial Aid Cluster (FAL # 84.268, 84.063) Special Test: Enrollment Reporting Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: The National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) is the national database of information about loans and grants awarded to students. Institutions are required to report enrollment information under the Pell grant and the Direct and FFEL loan programs via the NSLDS (OMB No. 1845‐0035), although FFEL loans are no longer made or a part of the SFA Cluster, a student may have a FFEL loan from previous years that would require enrollment reporting for that student (Pell, 34 CFR 690.83(b)(2); FFEL, 34 CFR 682.610; Direct Loan, 34 CFR 685.309; Perkins 34 CFR 674.19(f)). The administration of the Title IV programs depends heavily on the accuracy and timeliness of the enrollment information reported by institutions. Institutions must review, update, and certify student enrollment statuses, program information, and effective dates that appear on the Enrollment Reporting Roster file or on the Enrollment Maintenance page of the NSLDS Professional Access (NSLDSFAP) website which the financial aid administrator can access for the auditor. Institutions are also responsible for accurately reporting all Campus‐Level Record data elements including OPEID number, enrollment effective data, enrollment status, and certification date. Institutions are responsible for accurately reporting all Program‐Level record data including CIP year, credential level, published program length measurement, published program length, program begin date, program enrollment status, and program enrollment effective date. Condition: Various discrepancies were noted between the District and NSLDS for both the Campus‐Level and Program‐Level requirements. Further some of the data provided was provided later than the required timelines established. Questioned Costs: None Effect: Untimely and inaccurate reporting of student enrollment status does not allow the Department of Education to properly track and monitor students, including initiation of the loan repayment process. Cause: Internal controls do not appear to be in place to accurately and timely identify the relevant dates for reporting to NSLDS. Repeat finding From Prior Year: No Context: Out of the 36 sample of students tested, 23 students had at least one incorrect reporting of Campus‐Level and Program‐Level requirements and/or considered to be reported late. Nonstatistical sampling was used. Recommendation: We recommend that management update their control processes to ensure that the proper status date changes are being reported to NSLDS. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding.
2023‐003 U.S. Department of Education Student Financial Aid Cluster (FAL # 84.268, 84.063) Special Test: Enrollment Reporting Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: The National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) is the national database of information about loans and grants awarded to students. Institutions are required to report enrollment information under the Pell grant and the Direct and FFEL loan programs via the NSLDS (OMB No. 1845‐0035), although FFEL loans are no longer made or a part of the SFA Cluster, a student may have a FFEL loan from previous years that would require enrollment reporting for that student (Pell, 34 CFR 690.83(b)(2); FFEL, 34 CFR 682.610; Direct Loan, 34 CFR 685.309; Perkins 34 CFR 674.19(f)). The administration of the Title IV programs depends heavily on the accuracy and timeliness of the enrollment information reported by institutions. Institutions must review, update, and certify student enrollment statuses, program information, and effective dates that appear on the Enrollment Reporting Roster file or on the Enrollment Maintenance page of the NSLDS Professional Access (NSLDSFAP) website which the financial aid administrator can access for the auditor. Institutions are also responsible for accurately reporting all Campus‐Level Record data elements including OPEID number, enrollment effective data, enrollment status, and certification date. Institutions are responsible for accurately reporting all Program‐Level record data including CIP year, credential level, published program length measurement, published program length, program begin date, program enrollment status, and program enrollment effective date. Condition: Various discrepancies were noted between the District and NSLDS for both the Campus‐Level and Program‐Level requirements. Further some of the data provided was provided later than the required timelines established. Questioned Costs: None Effect: Untimely and inaccurate reporting of student enrollment status does not allow the Department of Education to properly track and monitor students, including initiation of the loan repayment process. Cause: Internal controls do not appear to be in place to accurately and timely identify the relevant dates for reporting to NSLDS. Repeat finding From Prior Year: No Context: Out of the 36 sample of students tested, 23 students had at least one incorrect reporting of Campus‐Level and Program‐Level requirements and/or considered to be reported late. Nonstatistical sampling was used. Recommendation: We recommend that management update their control processes to ensure that the proper status date changes are being reported to NSLDS. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding.
2023‐002 U.S. Department of Education Student Financial Aid Cluster Reporting – Common Origination and Disbursement (COD) System Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: Institutions submit Direct Loan, Pell Grant, TEACH Grant, and IASG origination records and disbursement records to the COD system. Origination records can be sent well in advance of any disbursements, as early as the institution chooses to submit them for any student the institution reasonably believes will be eligible for a payment. The acknowledgments identify the processing status of each record: Rejected, Accepted with Corrections, or Accepted. In testing the origination and disbursement data, the auditor should be most concerned with the data ED has categorized as accepted or accepted with corrections. Institutions must report student disbursement data within 15 calendar days after the institution makes a disbursement or becomes aware of the need to make an adjustment to previously reported student disbursement data or expected student disbursement data. Institutions may do this by reporting once every 15 calendar days, bi‐weekly or weekly, or may set up their own system to ensure that changes are reported in a timely manner. Condition: The disbursement date recorded by the COD for financial aid and the disbursement to student by the District was greater than the allowable period of 15 calendar days for one item. Questioned Costs: None Effect: Untimely reporting of student enrollment status does not allow the Department of Education to properly track and monitor students, including initiation of the loan repayment process. Cause: The delay in actual disbursement is believed to be contributed to the District reviewing the costs of the Aviation Program before the disbursements was made. However, the person over the department when this disbursement was made is currently no longer employed by the District and the reason for the delayed disbursement cannot be clarified and records do not appear to be retained for this item. Repeat finding From Prior Year: No Context: Out of the 40 sample of students tested for COD reporting, 1 student was beyond the required 15 calendar days. Non‐statistical sampling was used. Recommendation: We recommend that management update their control processes to ensure that the proper COD reporting and proper retention of files in the event of subsequent updates from the original transfer date. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding.
2023‐002 U.S. Department of Education Student Financial Aid Cluster Reporting – Common Origination and Disbursement (COD) System Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: Institutions submit Direct Loan, Pell Grant, TEACH Grant, and IASG origination records and disbursement records to the COD system. Origination records can be sent well in advance of any disbursements, as early as the institution chooses to submit them for any student the institution reasonably believes will be eligible for a payment. The acknowledgments identify the processing status of each record: Rejected, Accepted with Corrections, or Accepted. In testing the origination and disbursement data, the auditor should be most concerned with the data ED has categorized as accepted or accepted with corrections. Institutions must report student disbursement data within 15 calendar days after the institution makes a disbursement or becomes aware of the need to make an adjustment to previously reported student disbursement data or expected student disbursement data. Institutions may do this by reporting once every 15 calendar days, bi‐weekly or weekly, or may set up their own system to ensure that changes are reported in a timely manner. Condition: The disbursement date recorded by the COD for financial aid and the disbursement to student by the District was greater than the allowable period of 15 calendar days for one item. Questioned Costs: None Effect: Untimely reporting of student enrollment status does not allow the Department of Education to properly track and monitor students, including initiation of the loan repayment process. Cause: The delay in actual disbursement is believed to be contributed to the District reviewing the costs of the Aviation Program before the disbursements was made. However, the person over the department when this disbursement was made is currently no longer employed by the District and the reason for the delayed disbursement cannot be clarified and records do not appear to be retained for this item. Repeat finding From Prior Year: No Context: Out of the 40 sample of students tested for COD reporting, 1 student was beyond the required 15 calendar days. Non‐statistical sampling was used. Recommendation: We recommend that management update their control processes to ensure that the proper COD reporting and proper retention of files in the event of subsequent updates from the original transfer date. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding.
2023‐002 U.S. Department of Education Student Financial Aid Cluster Reporting – Common Origination and Disbursement (COD) System Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: Institutions submit Direct Loan, Pell Grant, TEACH Grant, and IASG origination records and disbursement records to the COD system. Origination records can be sent well in advance of any disbursements, as early as the institution chooses to submit them for any student the institution reasonably believes will be eligible for a payment. The acknowledgments identify the processing status of each record: Rejected, Accepted with Corrections, or Accepted. In testing the origination and disbursement data, the auditor should be most concerned with the data ED has categorized as accepted or accepted with corrections. Institutions must report student disbursement data within 15 calendar days after the institution makes a disbursement or becomes aware of the need to make an adjustment to previously reported student disbursement data or expected student disbursement data. Institutions may do this by reporting once every 15 calendar days, bi‐weekly or weekly, or may set up their own system to ensure that changes are reported in a timely manner. Condition: The disbursement date recorded by the COD for financial aid and the disbursement to student by the District was greater than the allowable period of 15 calendar days for one item. Questioned Costs: None Effect: Untimely reporting of student enrollment status does not allow the Department of Education to properly track and monitor students, including initiation of the loan repayment process. Cause: The delay in actual disbursement is believed to be contributed to the District reviewing the costs of the Aviation Program before the disbursements was made. However, the person over the department when this disbursement was made is currently no longer employed by the District and the reason for the delayed disbursement cannot be clarified and records do not appear to be retained for this item. Repeat finding From Prior Year: No Context: Out of the 40 sample of students tested for COD reporting, 1 student was beyond the required 15 calendar days. Non‐statistical sampling was used. Recommendation: We recommend that management update their control processes to ensure that the proper COD reporting and proper retention of files in the event of subsequent updates from the original transfer date. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding.
2023‐003 U.S. Department of Education Student Financial Aid Cluster (FAL # 84.268, 84.063) Special Test: Enrollment Reporting Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: The National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) is the national database of information about loans and grants awarded to students. Institutions are required to report enrollment information under the Pell grant and the Direct and FFEL loan programs via the NSLDS (OMB No. 1845‐0035), although FFEL loans are no longer made or a part of the SFA Cluster, a student may have a FFEL loan from previous years that would require enrollment reporting for that student (Pell, 34 CFR 690.83(b)(2); FFEL, 34 CFR 682.610; Direct Loan, 34 CFR 685.309; Perkins 34 CFR 674.19(f)). The administration of the Title IV programs depends heavily on the accuracy and timeliness of the enrollment information reported by institutions. Institutions must review, update, and certify student enrollment statuses, program information, and effective dates that appear on the Enrollment Reporting Roster file or on the Enrollment Maintenance page of the NSLDS Professional Access (NSLDSFAP) website which the financial aid administrator can access for the auditor. Institutions are also responsible for accurately reporting all Campus‐Level Record data elements including OPEID number, enrollment effective data, enrollment status, and certification date. Institutions are responsible for accurately reporting all Program‐Level record data including CIP year, credential level, published program length measurement, published program length, program begin date, program enrollment status, and program enrollment effective date. Condition: Various discrepancies were noted between the District and NSLDS for both the Campus‐Level and Program‐Level requirements. Further some of the data provided was provided later than the required timelines established. Questioned Costs: None Effect: Untimely and inaccurate reporting of student enrollment status does not allow the Department of Education to properly track and monitor students, including initiation of the loan repayment process. Cause: Internal controls do not appear to be in place to accurately and timely identify the relevant dates for reporting to NSLDS. Repeat finding From Prior Year: No Context: Out of the 36 sample of students tested, 23 students had at least one incorrect reporting of Campus‐Level and Program‐Level requirements and/or considered to be reported late. Nonstatistical sampling was used. Recommendation: We recommend that management update their control processes to ensure that the proper status date changes are being reported to NSLDS. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding.
2023‐003 U.S. Department of Education Student Financial Aid Cluster (FAL # 84.268, 84.063) Special Test: Enrollment Reporting Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: The National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) is the national database of information about loans and grants awarded to students. Institutions are required to report enrollment information under the Pell grant and the Direct and FFEL loan programs via the NSLDS (OMB No. 1845‐0035), although FFEL loans are no longer made or a part of the SFA Cluster, a student may have a FFEL loan from previous years that would require enrollment reporting for that student (Pell, 34 CFR 690.83(b)(2); FFEL, 34 CFR 682.610; Direct Loan, 34 CFR 685.309; Perkins 34 CFR 674.19(f)). The administration of the Title IV programs depends heavily on the accuracy and timeliness of the enrollment information reported by institutions. Institutions must review, update, and certify student enrollment statuses, program information, and effective dates that appear on the Enrollment Reporting Roster file or on the Enrollment Maintenance page of the NSLDS Professional Access (NSLDSFAP) website which the financial aid administrator can access for the auditor. Institutions are also responsible for accurately reporting all Campus‐Level Record data elements including OPEID number, enrollment effective data, enrollment status, and certification date. Institutions are responsible for accurately reporting all Program‐Level record data including CIP year, credential level, published program length measurement, published program length, program begin date, program enrollment status, and program enrollment effective date. Condition: Various discrepancies were noted between the District and NSLDS for both the Campus‐Level and Program‐Level requirements. Further some of the data provided was provided later than the required timelines established. Questioned Costs: None Effect: Untimely and inaccurate reporting of student enrollment status does not allow the Department of Education to properly track and monitor students, including initiation of the loan repayment process. Cause: Internal controls do not appear to be in place to accurately and timely identify the relevant dates for reporting to NSLDS. Repeat finding From Prior Year: No Context: Out of the 36 sample of students tested, 23 students had at least one incorrect reporting of Campus‐Level and Program‐Level requirements and/or considered to be reported late. Nonstatistical sampling was used. Recommendation: We recommend that management update their control processes to ensure that the proper status date changes are being reported to NSLDS. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding.
2023‐003 U.S. Department of Education Student Financial Aid Cluster (FAL # 84.268, 84.063) Special Test: Enrollment Reporting Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: The National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) is the national database of information about loans and grants awarded to students. Institutions are required to report enrollment information under the Pell grant and the Direct and FFEL loan programs via the NSLDS (OMB No. 1845‐0035), although FFEL loans are no longer made or a part of the SFA Cluster, a student may have a FFEL loan from previous years that would require enrollment reporting for that student (Pell, 34 CFR 690.83(b)(2); FFEL, 34 CFR 682.610; Direct Loan, 34 CFR 685.309; Perkins 34 CFR 674.19(f)). The administration of the Title IV programs depends heavily on the accuracy and timeliness of the enrollment information reported by institutions. Institutions must review, update, and certify student enrollment statuses, program information, and effective dates that appear on the Enrollment Reporting Roster file or on the Enrollment Maintenance page of the NSLDS Professional Access (NSLDSFAP) website which the financial aid administrator can access for the auditor. Institutions are also responsible for accurately reporting all Campus‐Level Record data elements including OPEID number, enrollment effective data, enrollment status, and certification date. Institutions are responsible for accurately reporting all Program‐Level record data including CIP year, credential level, published program length measurement, published program length, program begin date, program enrollment status, and program enrollment effective date. Condition: Various discrepancies were noted between the District and NSLDS for both the Campus‐Level and Program‐Level requirements. Further some of the data provided was provided later than the required timelines established. Questioned Costs: None Effect: Untimely and inaccurate reporting of student enrollment status does not allow the Department of Education to properly track and monitor students, including initiation of the loan repayment process. Cause: Internal controls do not appear to be in place to accurately and timely identify the relevant dates for reporting to NSLDS. Repeat finding From Prior Year: No Context: Out of the 36 sample of students tested, 23 students had at least one incorrect reporting of Campus‐Level and Program‐Level requirements and/or considered to be reported late. Nonstatistical sampling was used. Recommendation: We recommend that management update their control processes to ensure that the proper status date changes are being reported to NSLDS. Views of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding.