Audit 29685

FY End
2022-06-30
Total Expended
$14.11M
Findings
8
Programs
22
Organization: Bethel School District No. 52 (OR)
Year: 2022 Accepted: 2023-01-29

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
29144 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - E
29145 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - E
29146 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - E
29147 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - E
605586 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - E
605587 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - E
605588 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - E
605589 2022-001 Significant Deficiency - E

Contacts

Name Title Type
WBR6S78L81L6 Andrea Belz Auditee
5416071406 Larry Grant Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported on the Schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The District has not elected to use the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate as allowed under Uniform Guidance due to the District having a negotiated indirect cost rate with Oregon Department of Education and thus is not allowed to use the de minimis rate.

Finding Details

Finding 2022-001 Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance - Inadequate documentation of eligibility calculation. Title I Grants to Local Education Agencies Assistance Listing No. 84.010 Grant Period: Year Ended June 30, 2022 Criteria and Condition: Grantees are required to document that their schools meet the eligibility requirements for Title I support including the percentage of students from low-income families. The District does not have documentation supporting the calculations and associated percentages claimed. Context: As part of our audit procedures, we reviewed the targeting report submitted to the State and compared it to the Community Eligibility Provision (CEP) Identified Percentages report. The numbers did not match. Inquired with the client and noted that the grant manager who created the targeting figures was no longer employed by the District and they had no backup to support the figures. An alternative method to calculate the percentage of students from low-income families is to use the CEP poverty figures multiplied by 1.6. This also did not match the targeting information submitted to the State however all the percentages reported were less than the allowable 1.6 multiplier and therefore there are no questioned costs due to the control deficiency over compliance. Effect or Potential Effect: Without sufficient supporting documentation, the calculation of the poverty percentages for the targeting submission to the State could be incorrect. Incorrect poverty figures could result in the misappropriation of grant funds and unallowed expenditures. Cause: The District?s grant manager failed to maintain adequate records supporting the calculation of the poverty percentages. Recommendation: Management should strengthen the controls over the calculation of eligibility requirements and proper record keeping to ensure all necessary information is created, reviewed, and maintained per the grant requirements. Views of Responsible Official(s) and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has reviewed record keeping requirements with the new Grants Manager to ensure that appropriate supporting documentation is maintained per the grant agreement.
Finding 2022-001 Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance - Inadequate documentation of eligibility calculation. Title I Grants to Local Education Agencies Assistance Listing No. 84.010 Grant Period: Year Ended June 30, 2022 Criteria and Condition: Grantees are required to document that their schools meet the eligibility requirements for Title I support including the percentage of students from low-income families. The District does not have documentation supporting the calculations and associated percentages claimed. Context: As part of our audit procedures, we reviewed the targeting report submitted to the State and compared it to the Community Eligibility Provision (CEP) Identified Percentages report. The numbers did not match. Inquired with the client and noted that the grant manager who created the targeting figures was no longer employed by the District and they had no backup to support the figures. An alternative method to calculate the percentage of students from low-income families is to use the CEP poverty figures multiplied by 1.6. This also did not match the targeting information submitted to the State however all the percentages reported were less than the allowable 1.6 multiplier and therefore there are no questioned costs due to the control deficiency over compliance. Effect or Potential Effect: Without sufficient supporting documentation, the calculation of the poverty percentages for the targeting submission to the State could be incorrect. Incorrect poverty figures could result in the misappropriation of grant funds and unallowed expenditures. Cause: The District?s grant manager failed to maintain adequate records supporting the calculation of the poverty percentages. Recommendation: Management should strengthen the controls over the calculation of eligibility requirements and proper record keeping to ensure all necessary information is created, reviewed, and maintained per the grant requirements. Views of Responsible Official(s) and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has reviewed record keeping requirements with the new Grants Manager to ensure that appropriate supporting documentation is maintained per the grant agreement.
Finding 2022-001 Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance - Inadequate documentation of eligibility calculation. Title I Grants to Local Education Agencies Assistance Listing No. 84.010 Grant Period: Year Ended June 30, 2022 Criteria and Condition: Grantees are required to document that their schools meet the eligibility requirements for Title I support including the percentage of students from low-income families. The District does not have documentation supporting the calculations and associated percentages claimed. Context: As part of our audit procedures, we reviewed the targeting report submitted to the State and compared it to the Community Eligibility Provision (CEP) Identified Percentages report. The numbers did not match. Inquired with the client and noted that the grant manager who created the targeting figures was no longer employed by the District and they had no backup to support the figures. An alternative method to calculate the percentage of students from low-income families is to use the CEP poverty figures multiplied by 1.6. This also did not match the targeting information submitted to the State however all the percentages reported were less than the allowable 1.6 multiplier and therefore there are no questioned costs due to the control deficiency over compliance. Effect or Potential Effect: Without sufficient supporting documentation, the calculation of the poverty percentages for the targeting submission to the State could be incorrect. Incorrect poverty figures could result in the misappropriation of grant funds and unallowed expenditures. Cause: The District?s grant manager failed to maintain adequate records supporting the calculation of the poverty percentages. Recommendation: Management should strengthen the controls over the calculation of eligibility requirements and proper record keeping to ensure all necessary information is created, reviewed, and maintained per the grant requirements. Views of Responsible Official(s) and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has reviewed record keeping requirements with the new Grants Manager to ensure that appropriate supporting documentation is maintained per the grant agreement.
Finding 2022-001 Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance - Inadequate documentation of eligibility calculation. Title I Grants to Local Education Agencies Assistance Listing No. 84.010 Grant Period: Year Ended June 30, 2022 Criteria and Condition: Grantees are required to document that their schools meet the eligibility requirements for Title I support including the percentage of students from low-income families. The District does not have documentation supporting the calculations and associated percentages claimed. Context: As part of our audit procedures, we reviewed the targeting report submitted to the State and compared it to the Community Eligibility Provision (CEP) Identified Percentages report. The numbers did not match. Inquired with the client and noted that the grant manager who created the targeting figures was no longer employed by the District and they had no backup to support the figures. An alternative method to calculate the percentage of students from low-income families is to use the CEP poverty figures multiplied by 1.6. This also did not match the targeting information submitted to the State however all the percentages reported were less than the allowable 1.6 multiplier and therefore there are no questioned costs due to the control deficiency over compliance. Effect or Potential Effect: Without sufficient supporting documentation, the calculation of the poverty percentages for the targeting submission to the State could be incorrect. Incorrect poverty figures could result in the misappropriation of grant funds and unallowed expenditures. Cause: The District?s grant manager failed to maintain adequate records supporting the calculation of the poverty percentages. Recommendation: Management should strengthen the controls over the calculation of eligibility requirements and proper record keeping to ensure all necessary information is created, reviewed, and maintained per the grant requirements. Views of Responsible Official(s) and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has reviewed record keeping requirements with the new Grants Manager to ensure that appropriate supporting documentation is maintained per the grant agreement.
Finding 2022-001 Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance - Inadequate documentation of eligibility calculation. Title I Grants to Local Education Agencies Assistance Listing No. 84.010 Grant Period: Year Ended June 30, 2022 Criteria and Condition: Grantees are required to document that their schools meet the eligibility requirements for Title I support including the percentage of students from low-income families. The District does not have documentation supporting the calculations and associated percentages claimed. Context: As part of our audit procedures, we reviewed the targeting report submitted to the State and compared it to the Community Eligibility Provision (CEP) Identified Percentages report. The numbers did not match. Inquired with the client and noted that the grant manager who created the targeting figures was no longer employed by the District and they had no backup to support the figures. An alternative method to calculate the percentage of students from low-income families is to use the CEP poverty figures multiplied by 1.6. This also did not match the targeting information submitted to the State however all the percentages reported were less than the allowable 1.6 multiplier and therefore there are no questioned costs due to the control deficiency over compliance. Effect or Potential Effect: Without sufficient supporting documentation, the calculation of the poverty percentages for the targeting submission to the State could be incorrect. Incorrect poverty figures could result in the misappropriation of grant funds and unallowed expenditures. Cause: The District?s grant manager failed to maintain adequate records supporting the calculation of the poverty percentages. Recommendation: Management should strengthen the controls over the calculation of eligibility requirements and proper record keeping to ensure all necessary information is created, reviewed, and maintained per the grant requirements. Views of Responsible Official(s) and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has reviewed record keeping requirements with the new Grants Manager to ensure that appropriate supporting documentation is maintained per the grant agreement.
Finding 2022-001 Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance - Inadequate documentation of eligibility calculation. Title I Grants to Local Education Agencies Assistance Listing No. 84.010 Grant Period: Year Ended June 30, 2022 Criteria and Condition: Grantees are required to document that their schools meet the eligibility requirements for Title I support including the percentage of students from low-income families. The District does not have documentation supporting the calculations and associated percentages claimed. Context: As part of our audit procedures, we reviewed the targeting report submitted to the State and compared it to the Community Eligibility Provision (CEP) Identified Percentages report. The numbers did not match. Inquired with the client and noted that the grant manager who created the targeting figures was no longer employed by the District and they had no backup to support the figures. An alternative method to calculate the percentage of students from low-income families is to use the CEP poverty figures multiplied by 1.6. This also did not match the targeting information submitted to the State however all the percentages reported were less than the allowable 1.6 multiplier and therefore there are no questioned costs due to the control deficiency over compliance. Effect or Potential Effect: Without sufficient supporting documentation, the calculation of the poverty percentages for the targeting submission to the State could be incorrect. Incorrect poverty figures could result in the misappropriation of grant funds and unallowed expenditures. Cause: The District?s grant manager failed to maintain adequate records supporting the calculation of the poverty percentages. Recommendation: Management should strengthen the controls over the calculation of eligibility requirements and proper record keeping to ensure all necessary information is created, reviewed, and maintained per the grant requirements. Views of Responsible Official(s) and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has reviewed record keeping requirements with the new Grants Manager to ensure that appropriate supporting documentation is maintained per the grant agreement.
Finding 2022-001 Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance - Inadequate documentation of eligibility calculation. Title I Grants to Local Education Agencies Assistance Listing No. 84.010 Grant Period: Year Ended June 30, 2022 Criteria and Condition: Grantees are required to document that their schools meet the eligibility requirements for Title I support including the percentage of students from low-income families. The District does not have documentation supporting the calculations and associated percentages claimed. Context: As part of our audit procedures, we reviewed the targeting report submitted to the State and compared it to the Community Eligibility Provision (CEP) Identified Percentages report. The numbers did not match. Inquired with the client and noted that the grant manager who created the targeting figures was no longer employed by the District and they had no backup to support the figures. An alternative method to calculate the percentage of students from low-income families is to use the CEP poverty figures multiplied by 1.6. This also did not match the targeting information submitted to the State however all the percentages reported were less than the allowable 1.6 multiplier and therefore there are no questioned costs due to the control deficiency over compliance. Effect or Potential Effect: Without sufficient supporting documentation, the calculation of the poverty percentages for the targeting submission to the State could be incorrect. Incorrect poverty figures could result in the misappropriation of grant funds and unallowed expenditures. Cause: The District?s grant manager failed to maintain adequate records supporting the calculation of the poverty percentages. Recommendation: Management should strengthen the controls over the calculation of eligibility requirements and proper record keeping to ensure all necessary information is created, reviewed, and maintained per the grant requirements. Views of Responsible Official(s) and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has reviewed record keeping requirements with the new Grants Manager to ensure that appropriate supporting documentation is maintained per the grant agreement.
Finding 2022-001 Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance - Inadequate documentation of eligibility calculation. Title I Grants to Local Education Agencies Assistance Listing No. 84.010 Grant Period: Year Ended June 30, 2022 Criteria and Condition: Grantees are required to document that their schools meet the eligibility requirements for Title I support including the percentage of students from low-income families. The District does not have documentation supporting the calculations and associated percentages claimed. Context: As part of our audit procedures, we reviewed the targeting report submitted to the State and compared it to the Community Eligibility Provision (CEP) Identified Percentages report. The numbers did not match. Inquired with the client and noted that the grant manager who created the targeting figures was no longer employed by the District and they had no backup to support the figures. An alternative method to calculate the percentage of students from low-income families is to use the CEP poverty figures multiplied by 1.6. This also did not match the targeting information submitted to the State however all the percentages reported were less than the allowable 1.6 multiplier and therefore there are no questioned costs due to the control deficiency over compliance. Effect or Potential Effect: Without sufficient supporting documentation, the calculation of the poverty percentages for the targeting submission to the State could be incorrect. Incorrect poverty figures could result in the misappropriation of grant funds and unallowed expenditures. Cause: The District?s grant manager failed to maintain adequate records supporting the calculation of the poverty percentages. Recommendation: Management should strengthen the controls over the calculation of eligibility requirements and proper record keeping to ensure all necessary information is created, reviewed, and maintained per the grant requirements. Views of Responsible Official(s) and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and has reviewed record keeping requirements with the new Grants Manager to ensure that appropriate supporting documentation is maintained per the grant agreement.