2023-001 Eligibility – Tenant Files
Section 8 Housing Voucher Cluster (Section 8):
14.871 Section 8 – Housing Choice Vouchers
14.879 Mainstream Vouchers
Significant Deficiency in Internal Control and Other Matter to be Reported Under the Uniform Guidance
Repeat finding from June 30, 2022 as Finding 2022-002 (initially reported June 30, 2010)
Condition: Out of a total tenant population of approximately 2,179 tenants, 25 files were selected for testing. Exceptions were noted as follows:
• 1 error where the signed lease agreement in the file had the wrong rent amount, however HAP and tenant rent payments being made were correct.
• 1 error where file had wrong date of birth for a family member, however this had no effect on HAP rent.
• 1 error where lease agreement in file did not state the monthly rent amount, however HAP and tenant rent payments being made were correct.
• 1 error where a disability and dependent allowance that family qualified for was not deducted from their income. This increased HAP rent by $21.
• 1 error where the utility allowance was calculated using the prior year schedule. This increased HAP rent by $18.
• 1 file where data entry error on the 50058 caused wage income to be reported incorrectly. This decreased HAP rent by $10.
• 1 error where the HAP contract in the file had the wrong rent amount, however the correct rent was reported on 50058.
• 1 error where the utility allowance was calculated using 3 bedrooms when it should have been 2 bedrooms. This had no effect on HAP rent.
• 1 file with math errors on calculating both wage and child support income. This increased HAP rent by $28.
• 2 files with math errors on calculating child support income. This had no effect on HAP rent for one file and decreased HAP rent by $8 on the other.
• 1 error where EIV report did not include one member of the household, however file did contain the member of the household’s social security card and birth certificate.
• 1 file where Authority did not properly verify reported change in income from loss of job for one member of the household. As a result, tenant’s income was not calculated correctly, however the impact on HAP rent is undeterminable. 2023-001 Eligibility – Tenant Files (Continued)
In addition to the above, we noted the following during our new admissions testing (19 new admissions tested out of population of 190 new admissions):
• 1 error where the 214 affidavit was not properly checked to indicate member of household was an eligible citizen.
Criteria: 24 CFR 982.516 requires internal controls to be in place to ensure compliance with HUD requirements, as well as maintain complete and accurate tenant files. In addition, the Authority’s administrative plan also requires following proper procedures for determination of HAP and documentation in the tenant files.
Questioned Costs: None.
Effect: The Authority is not in compliance with all of the HUD requirements regarding eligibility and tenant recertifications, which could result in incorrect total tenant payments for rent and HAP payments to landlords.
Cause: Procedures to ensure compliance with all of the HUD requirements were not being fully implemented.
Recommendation: The Authority should correct the deficiencies noted in the tested files and utilize an ongoing quality control review process on the entire tenant population to ensure proper compliance with the requirements related to tenant eligibility. Ongoing staff training and timely management reviews should be utilized to ensure staff is aware of acceptable procedures. In addition, the Authority should review staffing levels, skill sets and case load.
Views of Responsible Officials of the Auditee: The Authority concurs with this finding and will implement review procedures and provide ongoing training to staff.
2023-001 Eligibility – Tenant Files
Section 8 Housing Voucher Cluster (Section 8):
14.871 Section 8 – Housing Choice Vouchers
14.879 Mainstream Vouchers
Significant Deficiency in Internal Control and Other Matter to be Reported Under the Uniform Guidance
Repeat finding from June 30, 2022 as Finding 2022-002 (initially reported June 30, 2010)
Condition: Out of a total tenant population of approximately 2,179 tenants, 25 files were selected for testing. Exceptions were noted as follows:
• 1 error where the signed lease agreement in the file had the wrong rent amount, however HAP and tenant rent payments being made were correct.
• 1 error where file had wrong date of birth for a family member, however this had no effect on HAP rent.
• 1 error where lease agreement in file did not state the monthly rent amount, however HAP and tenant rent payments being made were correct.
• 1 error where a disability and dependent allowance that family qualified for was not deducted from their income. This increased HAP rent by $21.
• 1 error where the utility allowance was calculated using the prior year schedule. This increased HAP rent by $18.
• 1 file where data entry error on the 50058 caused wage income to be reported incorrectly. This decreased HAP rent by $10.
• 1 error where the HAP contract in the file had the wrong rent amount, however the correct rent was reported on 50058.
• 1 error where the utility allowance was calculated using 3 bedrooms when it should have been 2 bedrooms. This had no effect on HAP rent.
• 1 file with math errors on calculating both wage and child support income. This increased HAP rent by $28.
• 2 files with math errors on calculating child support income. This had no effect on HAP rent for one file and decreased HAP rent by $8 on the other.
• 1 error where EIV report did not include one member of the household, however file did contain the member of the household’s social security card and birth certificate.
• 1 file where Authority did not properly verify reported change in income from loss of job for one member of the household. As a result, tenant’s income was not calculated correctly, however the impact on HAP rent is undeterminable. 2023-001 Eligibility – Tenant Files (Continued)
In addition to the above, we noted the following during our new admissions testing (19 new admissions tested out of population of 190 new admissions):
• 1 error where the 214 affidavit was not properly checked to indicate member of household was an eligible citizen.
Criteria: 24 CFR 982.516 requires internal controls to be in place to ensure compliance with HUD requirements, as well as maintain complete and accurate tenant files. In addition, the Authority’s administrative plan also requires following proper procedures for determination of HAP and documentation in the tenant files.
Questioned Costs: None.
Effect: The Authority is not in compliance with all of the HUD requirements regarding eligibility and tenant recertifications, which could result in incorrect total tenant payments for rent and HAP payments to landlords.
Cause: Procedures to ensure compliance with all of the HUD requirements were not being fully implemented.
Recommendation: The Authority should correct the deficiencies noted in the tested files and utilize an ongoing quality control review process on the entire tenant population to ensure proper compliance with the requirements related to tenant eligibility. Ongoing staff training and timely management reviews should be utilized to ensure staff is aware of acceptable procedures. In addition, the Authority should review staffing levels, skill sets and case load.
Views of Responsible Officials of the Auditee: The Authority concurs with this finding and will implement review procedures and provide ongoing training to staff.
2023-001 Eligibility – Tenant Files
Section 8 Housing Voucher Cluster (Section 8):
14.871 Section 8 – Housing Choice Vouchers
14.879 Mainstream Vouchers
Significant Deficiency in Internal Control and Other Matter to be Reported Under the Uniform Guidance
Repeat finding from June 30, 2022 as Finding 2022-002 (initially reported June 30, 2010)
Condition: Out of a total tenant population of approximately 2,179 tenants, 25 files were selected for testing. Exceptions were noted as follows:
• 1 error where the signed lease agreement in the file had the wrong rent amount, however HAP and tenant rent payments being made were correct.
• 1 error where file had wrong date of birth for a family member, however this had no effect on HAP rent.
• 1 error where lease agreement in file did not state the monthly rent amount, however HAP and tenant rent payments being made were correct.
• 1 error where a disability and dependent allowance that family qualified for was not deducted from their income. This increased HAP rent by $21.
• 1 error where the utility allowance was calculated using the prior year schedule. This increased HAP rent by $18.
• 1 file where data entry error on the 50058 caused wage income to be reported incorrectly. This decreased HAP rent by $10.
• 1 error where the HAP contract in the file had the wrong rent amount, however the correct rent was reported on 50058.
• 1 error where the utility allowance was calculated using 3 bedrooms when it should have been 2 bedrooms. This had no effect on HAP rent.
• 1 file with math errors on calculating both wage and child support income. This increased HAP rent by $28.
• 2 files with math errors on calculating child support income. This had no effect on HAP rent for one file and decreased HAP rent by $8 on the other.
• 1 error where EIV report did not include one member of the household, however file did contain the member of the household’s social security card and birth certificate.
• 1 file where Authority did not properly verify reported change in income from loss of job for one member of the household. As a result, tenant’s income was not calculated correctly, however the impact on HAP rent is undeterminable. 2023-001 Eligibility – Tenant Files (Continued)
In addition to the above, we noted the following during our new admissions testing (19 new admissions tested out of population of 190 new admissions):
• 1 error where the 214 affidavit was not properly checked to indicate member of household was an eligible citizen.
Criteria: 24 CFR 982.516 requires internal controls to be in place to ensure compliance with HUD requirements, as well as maintain complete and accurate tenant files. In addition, the Authority’s administrative plan also requires following proper procedures for determination of HAP and documentation in the tenant files.
Questioned Costs: None.
Effect: The Authority is not in compliance with all of the HUD requirements regarding eligibility and tenant recertifications, which could result in incorrect total tenant payments for rent and HAP payments to landlords.
Cause: Procedures to ensure compliance with all of the HUD requirements were not being fully implemented.
Recommendation: The Authority should correct the deficiencies noted in the tested files and utilize an ongoing quality control review process on the entire tenant population to ensure proper compliance with the requirements related to tenant eligibility. Ongoing staff training and timely management reviews should be utilized to ensure staff is aware of acceptable procedures. In addition, the Authority should review staffing levels, skill sets and case load.
Views of Responsible Officials of the Auditee: The Authority concurs with this finding and will implement review procedures and provide ongoing training to staff.
2023-001 Eligibility – Tenant Files
Section 8 Housing Voucher Cluster (Section 8):
14.871 Section 8 – Housing Choice Vouchers
14.879 Mainstream Vouchers
Significant Deficiency in Internal Control and Other Matter to be Reported Under the Uniform Guidance
Repeat finding from June 30, 2022 as Finding 2022-002 (initially reported June 30, 2010)
Condition: Out of a total tenant population of approximately 2,179 tenants, 25 files were selected for testing. Exceptions were noted as follows:
• 1 error where the signed lease agreement in the file had the wrong rent amount, however HAP and tenant rent payments being made were correct.
• 1 error where file had wrong date of birth for a family member, however this had no effect on HAP rent.
• 1 error where lease agreement in file did not state the monthly rent amount, however HAP and tenant rent payments being made were correct.
• 1 error where a disability and dependent allowance that family qualified for was not deducted from their income. This increased HAP rent by $21.
• 1 error where the utility allowance was calculated using the prior year schedule. This increased HAP rent by $18.
• 1 file where data entry error on the 50058 caused wage income to be reported incorrectly. This decreased HAP rent by $10.
• 1 error where the HAP contract in the file had the wrong rent amount, however the correct rent was reported on 50058.
• 1 error where the utility allowance was calculated using 3 bedrooms when it should have been 2 bedrooms. This had no effect on HAP rent.
• 1 file with math errors on calculating both wage and child support income. This increased HAP rent by $28.
• 2 files with math errors on calculating child support income. This had no effect on HAP rent for one file and decreased HAP rent by $8 on the other.
• 1 error where EIV report did not include one member of the household, however file did contain the member of the household’s social security card and birth certificate.
• 1 file where Authority did not properly verify reported change in income from loss of job for one member of the household. As a result, tenant’s income was not calculated correctly, however the impact on HAP rent is undeterminable. 2023-001 Eligibility – Tenant Files (Continued)
In addition to the above, we noted the following during our new admissions testing (19 new admissions tested out of population of 190 new admissions):
• 1 error where the 214 affidavit was not properly checked to indicate member of household was an eligible citizen.
Criteria: 24 CFR 982.516 requires internal controls to be in place to ensure compliance with HUD requirements, as well as maintain complete and accurate tenant files. In addition, the Authority’s administrative plan also requires following proper procedures for determination of HAP and documentation in the tenant files.
Questioned Costs: None.
Effect: The Authority is not in compliance with all of the HUD requirements regarding eligibility and tenant recertifications, which could result in incorrect total tenant payments for rent and HAP payments to landlords.
Cause: Procedures to ensure compliance with all of the HUD requirements were not being fully implemented.
Recommendation: The Authority should correct the deficiencies noted in the tested files and utilize an ongoing quality control review process on the entire tenant population to ensure proper compliance with the requirements related to tenant eligibility. Ongoing staff training and timely management reviews should be utilized to ensure staff is aware of acceptable procedures. In addition, the Authority should review staffing levels, skill sets and case load.
Views of Responsible Officials of the Auditee: The Authority concurs with this finding and will implement review procedures and provide ongoing training to staff.
2023-001 Eligibility – Tenant Files
Section 8 Housing Voucher Cluster (Section 8):
14.871 Section 8 – Housing Choice Vouchers
14.879 Mainstream Vouchers
Significant Deficiency in Internal Control and Other Matter to be Reported Under the Uniform Guidance
Repeat finding from June 30, 2022 as Finding 2022-002 (initially reported June 30, 2010)
Condition: Out of a total tenant population of approximately 2,179 tenants, 25 files were selected for testing. Exceptions were noted as follows:
• 1 error where the signed lease agreement in the file had the wrong rent amount, however HAP and tenant rent payments being made were correct.
• 1 error where file had wrong date of birth for a family member, however this had no effect on HAP rent.
• 1 error where lease agreement in file did not state the monthly rent amount, however HAP and tenant rent payments being made were correct.
• 1 error where a disability and dependent allowance that family qualified for was not deducted from their income. This increased HAP rent by $21.
• 1 error where the utility allowance was calculated using the prior year schedule. This increased HAP rent by $18.
• 1 file where data entry error on the 50058 caused wage income to be reported incorrectly. This decreased HAP rent by $10.
• 1 error where the HAP contract in the file had the wrong rent amount, however the correct rent was reported on 50058.
• 1 error where the utility allowance was calculated using 3 bedrooms when it should have been 2 bedrooms. This had no effect on HAP rent.
• 1 file with math errors on calculating both wage and child support income. This increased HAP rent by $28.
• 2 files with math errors on calculating child support income. This had no effect on HAP rent for one file and decreased HAP rent by $8 on the other.
• 1 error where EIV report did not include one member of the household, however file did contain the member of the household’s social security card and birth certificate.
• 1 file where Authority did not properly verify reported change in income from loss of job for one member of the household. As a result, tenant’s income was not calculated correctly, however the impact on HAP rent is undeterminable. 2023-001 Eligibility – Tenant Files (Continued)
In addition to the above, we noted the following during our new admissions testing (19 new admissions tested out of population of 190 new admissions):
• 1 error where the 214 affidavit was not properly checked to indicate member of household was an eligible citizen.
Criteria: 24 CFR 982.516 requires internal controls to be in place to ensure compliance with HUD requirements, as well as maintain complete and accurate tenant files. In addition, the Authority’s administrative plan also requires following proper procedures for determination of HAP and documentation in the tenant files.
Questioned Costs: None.
Effect: The Authority is not in compliance with all of the HUD requirements regarding eligibility and tenant recertifications, which could result in incorrect total tenant payments for rent and HAP payments to landlords.
Cause: Procedures to ensure compliance with all of the HUD requirements were not being fully implemented.
Recommendation: The Authority should correct the deficiencies noted in the tested files and utilize an ongoing quality control review process on the entire tenant population to ensure proper compliance with the requirements related to tenant eligibility. Ongoing staff training and timely management reviews should be utilized to ensure staff is aware of acceptable procedures. In addition, the Authority should review staffing levels, skill sets and case load.
Views of Responsible Officials of the Auditee: The Authority concurs with this finding and will implement review procedures and provide ongoing training to staff.
2023-001 Eligibility – Tenant Files
Section 8 Housing Voucher Cluster (Section 8):
14.871 Section 8 – Housing Choice Vouchers
14.879 Mainstream Vouchers
Significant Deficiency in Internal Control and Other Matter to be Reported Under the Uniform Guidance
Repeat finding from June 30, 2022 as Finding 2022-002 (initially reported June 30, 2010)
Condition: Out of a total tenant population of approximately 2,179 tenants, 25 files were selected for testing. Exceptions were noted as follows:
• 1 error where the signed lease agreement in the file had the wrong rent amount, however HAP and tenant rent payments being made were correct.
• 1 error where file had wrong date of birth for a family member, however this had no effect on HAP rent.
• 1 error where lease agreement in file did not state the monthly rent amount, however HAP and tenant rent payments being made were correct.
• 1 error where a disability and dependent allowance that family qualified for was not deducted from their income. This increased HAP rent by $21.
• 1 error where the utility allowance was calculated using the prior year schedule. This increased HAP rent by $18.
• 1 file where data entry error on the 50058 caused wage income to be reported incorrectly. This decreased HAP rent by $10.
• 1 error where the HAP contract in the file had the wrong rent amount, however the correct rent was reported on 50058.
• 1 error where the utility allowance was calculated using 3 bedrooms when it should have been 2 bedrooms. This had no effect on HAP rent.
• 1 file with math errors on calculating both wage and child support income. This increased HAP rent by $28.
• 2 files with math errors on calculating child support income. This had no effect on HAP rent for one file and decreased HAP rent by $8 on the other.
• 1 error where EIV report did not include one member of the household, however file did contain the member of the household’s social security card and birth certificate.
• 1 file where Authority did not properly verify reported change in income from loss of job for one member of the household. As a result, tenant’s income was not calculated correctly, however the impact on HAP rent is undeterminable. 2023-001 Eligibility – Tenant Files (Continued)
In addition to the above, we noted the following during our new admissions testing (19 new admissions tested out of population of 190 new admissions):
• 1 error where the 214 affidavit was not properly checked to indicate member of household was an eligible citizen.
Criteria: 24 CFR 982.516 requires internal controls to be in place to ensure compliance with HUD requirements, as well as maintain complete and accurate tenant files. In addition, the Authority’s administrative plan also requires following proper procedures for determination of HAP and documentation in the tenant files.
Questioned Costs: None.
Effect: The Authority is not in compliance with all of the HUD requirements regarding eligibility and tenant recertifications, which could result in incorrect total tenant payments for rent and HAP payments to landlords.
Cause: Procedures to ensure compliance with all of the HUD requirements were not being fully implemented.
Recommendation: The Authority should correct the deficiencies noted in the tested files and utilize an ongoing quality control review process on the entire tenant population to ensure proper compliance with the requirements related to tenant eligibility. Ongoing staff training and timely management reviews should be utilized to ensure staff is aware of acceptable procedures. In addition, the Authority should review staffing levels, skill sets and case load.
Views of Responsible Officials of the Auditee: The Authority concurs with this finding and will implement review procedures and provide ongoing training to staff.