Audit 296464

FY End
2023-06-30
Total Expended
$71.87M
Findings
24
Programs
16
Year: 2023 Accepted: 2024-03-21
Auditor: Eide Bailly LLP

Organization Exclusion Status:

Checking exclusion status...

Findings

ID Ref Severity Repeat Requirement
382890 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - N
382891 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - N
382892 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - N
382893 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - N
382894 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - N
382895 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - N
382896 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - AB
382897 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - AB
382898 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - AB
382899 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - AB
382900 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - AB
382901 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - AB
959332 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - N
959333 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - N
959334 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - N
959335 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - N
959336 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - N
959337 2023-002 Significant Deficiency - N
959338 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - AB
959339 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - AB
959340 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - AB
959341 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - AB
959342 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - AB
959343 2023-003 Significant Deficiency - AB

Contacts

Name Title Type
SELPYEM5SQ21 Melissa Elwood Auditee
9517365025 Bobby J. Patel Auditor
No contacts on file

Notes to SEFA

Title: Basis of Presentation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported in the schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. When applicable, such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. No federal financial assistance has been provided to a subrecipient. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The District has not elected to use the ten percent de minimis cost rate. The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the schedule) includes the federal award activity of the Corona-Norco Unified School District (the District) under programs of the federal government for the year ended June 30, 2023. The information is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the District, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position, fund balance, or cash flows of the District.
Title: Food Donation Accounting Policies: Expenditures reported in the schedule are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting. When applicable, such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. No federal financial assistance has been provided to a subrecipient. De Minimis Rate Used: N Rate Explanation: The District has not elected to use the ten percent de minimis cost rate. Nonmonetary assistance is reported in this schedule at the fair market value of the commodities received and disbursed. At June 30, 2023, the District did not have any food commodities reported as inventory.

Finding Details

Federal Program Affected Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555 Compliance Requirement: N (Special Tests and Provisions – Verification of Free and Reduced- Price Applications) Criteria or Specific Requirements Per Title 7, U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 245.6a. The local education agency must verify the current free and reduced-price eligibility of households selected from a sample of applications that it has approved for free and reduced-price meals, by November 15 of each school year. The verification sample size is based on the total number of approved applications on file October 1. Condition The District did not appropriately calculate the number of applications required to be sampled for the verification process by November 15th of the school year. As a result, the District selected fewer applications for verification than was required to meet the three percent requirement. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs associated with the identified condition. Context The condition was identified through inquiry with District personnel and through review of available supporting documentation. The District was required to select 50 applications for verification. However, due to the calculation error, only 24 applications were selected for verification. Effect The District does not appear to be in compliance with Special Test and Provision requirements for the Child Nutrition Cluster. Cause The cause appears to have been triggered by the change to universal meals, coupled with the increase in qualified CEP sites. Repeat Finding No. Recommendation The District should establish procedures to ensure the verification process is completed timely and the appropriate eligibility changes are made.
Federal Program Affected Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555 Compliance Requirement: N (Special Tests and Provisions – Verification of Free and Reduced- Price Applications) Criteria or Specific Requirements Per Title 7, U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 245.6a. The local education agency must verify the current free and reduced-price eligibility of households selected from a sample of applications that it has approved for free and reduced-price meals, by November 15 of each school year. The verification sample size is based on the total number of approved applications on file October 1. Condition The District did not appropriately calculate the number of applications required to be sampled for the verification process by November 15th of the school year. As a result, the District selected fewer applications for verification than was required to meet the three percent requirement. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs associated with the identified condition. Context The condition was identified through inquiry with District personnel and through review of available supporting documentation. The District was required to select 50 applications for verification. However, due to the calculation error, only 24 applications were selected for verification. Effect The District does not appear to be in compliance with Special Test and Provision requirements for the Child Nutrition Cluster. Cause The cause appears to have been triggered by the change to universal meals, coupled with the increase in qualified CEP sites. Repeat Finding No. Recommendation The District should establish procedures to ensure the verification process is completed timely and the appropriate eligibility changes are made.
Federal Program Affected Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555 Compliance Requirement: N (Special Tests and Provisions – Verification of Free and Reduced- Price Applications) Criteria or Specific Requirements Per Title 7, U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 245.6a. The local education agency must verify the current free and reduced-price eligibility of households selected from a sample of applications that it has approved for free and reduced-price meals, by November 15 of each school year. The verification sample size is based on the total number of approved applications on file October 1. Condition The District did not appropriately calculate the number of applications required to be sampled for the verification process by November 15th of the school year. As a result, the District selected fewer applications for verification than was required to meet the three percent requirement. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs associated with the identified condition. Context The condition was identified through inquiry with District personnel and through review of available supporting documentation. The District was required to select 50 applications for verification. However, due to the calculation error, only 24 applications were selected for verification. Effect The District does not appear to be in compliance with Special Test and Provision requirements for the Child Nutrition Cluster. Cause The cause appears to have been triggered by the change to universal meals, coupled with the increase in qualified CEP sites. Repeat Finding No. Recommendation The District should establish procedures to ensure the verification process is completed timely and the appropriate eligibility changes are made.
Federal Program Affected Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555 Compliance Requirement: N (Special Tests and Provisions – Verification of Free and Reduced- Price Applications) Criteria or Specific Requirements Per Title 7, U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 245.6a. The local education agency must verify the current free and reduced-price eligibility of households selected from a sample of applications that it has approved for free and reduced-price meals, by November 15 of each school year. The verification sample size is based on the total number of approved applications on file October 1. Condition The District did not appropriately calculate the number of applications required to be sampled for the verification process by November 15th of the school year. As a result, the District selected fewer applications for verification than was required to meet the three percent requirement. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs associated with the identified condition. Context The condition was identified through inquiry with District personnel and through review of available supporting documentation. The District was required to select 50 applications for verification. However, due to the calculation error, only 24 applications were selected for verification. Effect The District does not appear to be in compliance with Special Test and Provision requirements for the Child Nutrition Cluster. Cause The cause appears to have been triggered by the change to universal meals, coupled with the increase in qualified CEP sites. Repeat Finding No. Recommendation The District should establish procedures to ensure the verification process is completed timely and the appropriate eligibility changes are made.
Federal Program Affected Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555 Compliance Requirement: N (Special Tests and Provisions – Verification of Free and Reduced- Price Applications) Criteria or Specific Requirements Per Title 7, U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 245.6a. The local education agency must verify the current free and reduced-price eligibility of households selected from a sample of applications that it has approved for free and reduced-price meals, by November 15 of each school year. The verification sample size is based on the total number of approved applications on file October 1. Condition The District did not appropriately calculate the number of applications required to be sampled for the verification process by November 15th of the school year. As a result, the District selected fewer applications for verification than was required to meet the three percent requirement. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs associated with the identified condition. Context The condition was identified through inquiry with District personnel and through review of available supporting documentation. The District was required to select 50 applications for verification. However, due to the calculation error, only 24 applications were selected for verification. Effect The District does not appear to be in compliance with Special Test and Provision requirements for the Child Nutrition Cluster. Cause The cause appears to have been triggered by the change to universal meals, coupled with the increase in qualified CEP sites. Repeat Finding No. Recommendation The District should establish procedures to ensure the verification process is completed timely and the appropriate eligibility changes are made.
Federal Program Affected Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555 Compliance Requirement: N (Special Tests and Provisions – Verification of Free and Reduced- Price Applications) Criteria or Specific Requirements Per Title 7, U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 245.6a. The local education agency must verify the current free and reduced-price eligibility of households selected from a sample of applications that it has approved for free and reduced-price meals, by November 15 of each school year. The verification sample size is based on the total number of approved applications on file October 1. Condition The District did not appropriately calculate the number of applications required to be sampled for the verification process by November 15th of the school year. As a result, the District selected fewer applications for verification than was required to meet the three percent requirement. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs associated with the identified condition. Context The condition was identified through inquiry with District personnel and through review of available supporting documentation. The District was required to select 50 applications for verification. However, due to the calculation error, only 24 applications were selected for verification. Effect The District does not appear to be in compliance with Special Test and Provision requirements for the Child Nutrition Cluster. Cause The cause appears to have been triggered by the change to universal meals, coupled with the increase in qualified CEP sites. Repeat Finding No. Recommendation The District should establish procedures to ensure the verification process is completed timely and the appropriate eligibility changes are made.
Federal Program Affected Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555 Compliance Requirement: A/B (Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles) Criteria or Specific Requirements The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to establish indirect cost rates for California local education agencies (LEAs). The CDE has been delegated authority to calculate and approve indirect cost rates annually for LEAs. For the Child Nutrition Cluster in fiscal year 2022-2023, California Education Code Section 38101(c) limits school district indirect costs to the lesser of the District’s individual CDE approved indirect cost rate or the statewide average indirect rate. Condition The District charged unallowable indirect costs totaling $60,501 to the Child Nutrition Cluster. Questioned Costs The condition identified above resulted in $60,501 of questioned costs for unallowable indirect costs charged to the grant funds. Context The condition was identified through recalculation of the indirect costs charged to the federal programs. Effect The District has charged unallowable expenditures to the federal programs. Cause The condition identified appears to be due to the District not being familiar with the indirect cost requirements for each of the federal programs. Repeat Finding No. Recommendation It is recommended that the District implements a review process for indirect costs, which should include review of relevant grant agreements and relevant federal guidance.
Federal Program Affected Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555 Compliance Requirement: A/B (Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles) Criteria or Specific Requirements The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to establish indirect cost rates for California local education agencies (LEAs). The CDE has been delegated authority to calculate and approve indirect cost rates annually for LEAs. For the Child Nutrition Cluster in fiscal year 2022-2023, California Education Code Section 38101(c) limits school district indirect costs to the lesser of the District’s individual CDE approved indirect cost rate or the statewide average indirect rate. Condition The District charged unallowable indirect costs totaling $60,501 to the Child Nutrition Cluster. Questioned Costs The condition identified above resulted in $60,501 of questioned costs for unallowable indirect costs charged to the grant funds. Context The condition was identified through recalculation of the indirect costs charged to the federal programs. Effect The District has charged unallowable expenditures to the federal programs. Cause The condition identified appears to be due to the District not being familiar with the indirect cost requirements for each of the federal programs. Repeat Finding No. Recommendation It is recommended that the District implements a review process for indirect costs, which should include review of relevant grant agreements and relevant federal guidance.
Federal Program Affected Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555 Compliance Requirement: A/B (Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles) Criteria or Specific Requirements The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to establish indirect cost rates for California local education agencies (LEAs). The CDE has been delegated authority to calculate and approve indirect cost rates annually for LEAs. For the Child Nutrition Cluster in fiscal year 2022-2023, California Education Code Section 38101(c) limits school district indirect costs to the lesser of the District’s individual CDE approved indirect cost rate or the statewide average indirect rate. Condition The District charged unallowable indirect costs totaling $60,501 to the Child Nutrition Cluster. Questioned Costs The condition identified above resulted in $60,501 of questioned costs for unallowable indirect costs charged to the grant funds. Context The condition was identified through recalculation of the indirect costs charged to the federal programs. Effect The District has charged unallowable expenditures to the federal programs. Cause The condition identified appears to be due to the District not being familiar with the indirect cost requirements for each of the federal programs. Repeat Finding No. Recommendation It is recommended that the District implements a review process for indirect costs, which should include review of relevant grant agreements and relevant federal guidance.
Federal Program Affected Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555 Compliance Requirement: A/B (Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles) Criteria or Specific Requirements The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to establish indirect cost rates for California local education agencies (LEAs). The CDE has been delegated authority to calculate and approve indirect cost rates annually for LEAs. For the Child Nutrition Cluster in fiscal year 2022-2023, California Education Code Section 38101(c) limits school district indirect costs to the lesser of the District’s individual CDE approved indirect cost rate or the statewide average indirect rate. Condition The District charged unallowable indirect costs totaling $60,501 to the Child Nutrition Cluster. Questioned Costs The condition identified above resulted in $60,501 of questioned costs for unallowable indirect costs charged to the grant funds. Context The condition was identified through recalculation of the indirect costs charged to the federal programs. Effect The District has charged unallowable expenditures to the federal programs. Cause The condition identified appears to be due to the District not being familiar with the indirect cost requirements for each of the federal programs. Repeat Finding No. Recommendation It is recommended that the District implements a review process for indirect costs, which should include review of relevant grant agreements and relevant federal guidance.
Federal Program Affected Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555 Compliance Requirement: A/B (Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles) Criteria or Specific Requirements The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to establish indirect cost rates for California local education agencies (LEAs). The CDE has been delegated authority to calculate and approve indirect cost rates annually for LEAs. For the Child Nutrition Cluster in fiscal year 2022-2023, California Education Code Section 38101(c) limits school district indirect costs to the lesser of the District’s individual CDE approved indirect cost rate or the statewide average indirect rate. Condition The District charged unallowable indirect costs totaling $60,501 to the Child Nutrition Cluster. Questioned Costs The condition identified above resulted in $60,501 of questioned costs for unallowable indirect costs charged to the grant funds. Context The condition was identified through recalculation of the indirect costs charged to the federal programs. Effect The District has charged unallowable expenditures to the federal programs. Cause The condition identified appears to be due to the District not being familiar with the indirect cost requirements for each of the federal programs. Repeat Finding No. Recommendation It is recommended that the District implements a review process for indirect costs, which should include review of relevant grant agreements and relevant federal guidance.
Federal Program Affected Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555 Compliance Requirement: A/B (Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles) Criteria or Specific Requirements The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to establish indirect cost rates for California local education agencies (LEAs). The CDE has been delegated authority to calculate and approve indirect cost rates annually for LEAs. For the Child Nutrition Cluster in fiscal year 2022-2023, California Education Code Section 38101(c) limits school district indirect costs to the lesser of the District’s individual CDE approved indirect cost rate or the statewide average indirect rate. Condition The District charged unallowable indirect costs totaling $60,501 to the Child Nutrition Cluster. Questioned Costs The condition identified above resulted in $60,501 of questioned costs for unallowable indirect costs charged to the grant funds. Context The condition was identified through recalculation of the indirect costs charged to the federal programs. Effect The District has charged unallowable expenditures to the federal programs. Cause The condition identified appears to be due to the District not being familiar with the indirect cost requirements for each of the federal programs. Repeat Finding No. Recommendation It is recommended that the District implements a review process for indirect costs, which should include review of relevant grant agreements and relevant federal guidance.
Federal Program Affected Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555 Compliance Requirement: N (Special Tests and Provisions – Verification of Free and Reduced- Price Applications) Criteria or Specific Requirements Per Title 7, U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 245.6a. The local education agency must verify the current free and reduced-price eligibility of households selected from a sample of applications that it has approved for free and reduced-price meals, by November 15 of each school year. The verification sample size is based on the total number of approved applications on file October 1. Condition The District did not appropriately calculate the number of applications required to be sampled for the verification process by November 15th of the school year. As a result, the District selected fewer applications for verification than was required to meet the three percent requirement. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs associated with the identified condition. Context The condition was identified through inquiry with District personnel and through review of available supporting documentation. The District was required to select 50 applications for verification. However, due to the calculation error, only 24 applications were selected for verification. Effect The District does not appear to be in compliance with Special Test and Provision requirements for the Child Nutrition Cluster. Cause The cause appears to have been triggered by the change to universal meals, coupled with the increase in qualified CEP sites. Repeat Finding No. Recommendation The District should establish procedures to ensure the verification process is completed timely and the appropriate eligibility changes are made.
Federal Program Affected Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555 Compliance Requirement: N (Special Tests and Provisions – Verification of Free and Reduced- Price Applications) Criteria or Specific Requirements Per Title 7, U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 245.6a. The local education agency must verify the current free and reduced-price eligibility of households selected from a sample of applications that it has approved for free and reduced-price meals, by November 15 of each school year. The verification sample size is based on the total number of approved applications on file October 1. Condition The District did not appropriately calculate the number of applications required to be sampled for the verification process by November 15th of the school year. As a result, the District selected fewer applications for verification than was required to meet the three percent requirement. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs associated with the identified condition. Context The condition was identified through inquiry with District personnel and through review of available supporting documentation. The District was required to select 50 applications for verification. However, due to the calculation error, only 24 applications were selected for verification. Effect The District does not appear to be in compliance with Special Test and Provision requirements for the Child Nutrition Cluster. Cause The cause appears to have been triggered by the change to universal meals, coupled with the increase in qualified CEP sites. Repeat Finding No. Recommendation The District should establish procedures to ensure the verification process is completed timely and the appropriate eligibility changes are made.
Federal Program Affected Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555 Compliance Requirement: N (Special Tests and Provisions – Verification of Free and Reduced- Price Applications) Criteria or Specific Requirements Per Title 7, U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 245.6a. The local education agency must verify the current free and reduced-price eligibility of households selected from a sample of applications that it has approved for free and reduced-price meals, by November 15 of each school year. The verification sample size is based on the total number of approved applications on file October 1. Condition The District did not appropriately calculate the number of applications required to be sampled for the verification process by November 15th of the school year. As a result, the District selected fewer applications for verification than was required to meet the three percent requirement. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs associated with the identified condition. Context The condition was identified through inquiry with District personnel and through review of available supporting documentation. The District was required to select 50 applications for verification. However, due to the calculation error, only 24 applications were selected for verification. Effect The District does not appear to be in compliance with Special Test and Provision requirements for the Child Nutrition Cluster. Cause The cause appears to have been triggered by the change to universal meals, coupled with the increase in qualified CEP sites. Repeat Finding No. Recommendation The District should establish procedures to ensure the verification process is completed timely and the appropriate eligibility changes are made.
Federal Program Affected Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555 Compliance Requirement: N (Special Tests and Provisions – Verification of Free and Reduced- Price Applications) Criteria or Specific Requirements Per Title 7, U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 245.6a. The local education agency must verify the current free and reduced-price eligibility of households selected from a sample of applications that it has approved for free and reduced-price meals, by November 15 of each school year. The verification sample size is based on the total number of approved applications on file October 1. Condition The District did not appropriately calculate the number of applications required to be sampled for the verification process by November 15th of the school year. As a result, the District selected fewer applications for verification than was required to meet the three percent requirement. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs associated with the identified condition. Context The condition was identified through inquiry with District personnel and through review of available supporting documentation. The District was required to select 50 applications for verification. However, due to the calculation error, only 24 applications were selected for verification. Effect The District does not appear to be in compliance with Special Test and Provision requirements for the Child Nutrition Cluster. Cause The cause appears to have been triggered by the change to universal meals, coupled with the increase in qualified CEP sites. Repeat Finding No. Recommendation The District should establish procedures to ensure the verification process is completed timely and the appropriate eligibility changes are made.
Federal Program Affected Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555 Compliance Requirement: N (Special Tests and Provisions – Verification of Free and Reduced- Price Applications) Criteria or Specific Requirements Per Title 7, U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 245.6a. The local education agency must verify the current free and reduced-price eligibility of households selected from a sample of applications that it has approved for free and reduced-price meals, by November 15 of each school year. The verification sample size is based on the total number of approved applications on file October 1. Condition The District did not appropriately calculate the number of applications required to be sampled for the verification process by November 15th of the school year. As a result, the District selected fewer applications for verification than was required to meet the three percent requirement. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs associated with the identified condition. Context The condition was identified through inquiry with District personnel and through review of available supporting documentation. The District was required to select 50 applications for verification. However, due to the calculation error, only 24 applications were selected for verification. Effect The District does not appear to be in compliance with Special Test and Provision requirements for the Child Nutrition Cluster. Cause The cause appears to have been triggered by the change to universal meals, coupled with the increase in qualified CEP sites. Repeat Finding No. Recommendation The District should establish procedures to ensure the verification process is completed timely and the appropriate eligibility changes are made.
Federal Program Affected Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555 Compliance Requirement: N (Special Tests and Provisions – Verification of Free and Reduced- Price Applications) Criteria or Specific Requirements Per Title 7, U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Subchapter A, Parts 245.6a. The local education agency must verify the current free and reduced-price eligibility of households selected from a sample of applications that it has approved for free and reduced-price meals, by November 15 of each school year. The verification sample size is based on the total number of approved applications on file October 1. Condition The District did not appropriately calculate the number of applications required to be sampled for the verification process by November 15th of the school year. As a result, the District selected fewer applications for verification than was required to meet the three percent requirement. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs associated with the identified condition. Context The condition was identified through inquiry with District personnel and through review of available supporting documentation. The District was required to select 50 applications for verification. However, due to the calculation error, only 24 applications were selected for verification. Effect The District does not appear to be in compliance with Special Test and Provision requirements for the Child Nutrition Cluster. Cause The cause appears to have been triggered by the change to universal meals, coupled with the increase in qualified CEP sites. Repeat Finding No. Recommendation The District should establish procedures to ensure the verification process is completed timely and the appropriate eligibility changes are made.
Federal Program Affected Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555 Compliance Requirement: A/B (Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles) Criteria or Specific Requirements The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to establish indirect cost rates for California local education agencies (LEAs). The CDE has been delegated authority to calculate and approve indirect cost rates annually for LEAs. For the Child Nutrition Cluster in fiscal year 2022-2023, California Education Code Section 38101(c) limits school district indirect costs to the lesser of the District’s individual CDE approved indirect cost rate or the statewide average indirect rate. Condition The District charged unallowable indirect costs totaling $60,501 to the Child Nutrition Cluster. Questioned Costs The condition identified above resulted in $60,501 of questioned costs for unallowable indirect costs charged to the grant funds. Context The condition was identified through recalculation of the indirect costs charged to the federal programs. Effect The District has charged unallowable expenditures to the federal programs. Cause The condition identified appears to be due to the District not being familiar with the indirect cost requirements for each of the federal programs. Repeat Finding No. Recommendation It is recommended that the District implements a review process for indirect costs, which should include review of relevant grant agreements and relevant federal guidance.
Federal Program Affected Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555 Compliance Requirement: A/B (Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles) Criteria or Specific Requirements The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to establish indirect cost rates for California local education agencies (LEAs). The CDE has been delegated authority to calculate and approve indirect cost rates annually for LEAs. For the Child Nutrition Cluster in fiscal year 2022-2023, California Education Code Section 38101(c) limits school district indirect costs to the lesser of the District’s individual CDE approved indirect cost rate or the statewide average indirect rate. Condition The District charged unallowable indirect costs totaling $60,501 to the Child Nutrition Cluster. Questioned Costs The condition identified above resulted in $60,501 of questioned costs for unallowable indirect costs charged to the grant funds. Context The condition was identified through recalculation of the indirect costs charged to the federal programs. Effect The District has charged unallowable expenditures to the federal programs. Cause The condition identified appears to be due to the District not being familiar with the indirect cost requirements for each of the federal programs. Repeat Finding No. Recommendation It is recommended that the District implements a review process for indirect costs, which should include review of relevant grant agreements and relevant federal guidance.
Federal Program Affected Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555 Compliance Requirement: A/B (Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles) Criteria or Specific Requirements The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to establish indirect cost rates for California local education agencies (LEAs). The CDE has been delegated authority to calculate and approve indirect cost rates annually for LEAs. For the Child Nutrition Cluster in fiscal year 2022-2023, California Education Code Section 38101(c) limits school district indirect costs to the lesser of the District’s individual CDE approved indirect cost rate or the statewide average indirect rate. Condition The District charged unallowable indirect costs totaling $60,501 to the Child Nutrition Cluster. Questioned Costs The condition identified above resulted in $60,501 of questioned costs for unallowable indirect costs charged to the grant funds. Context The condition was identified through recalculation of the indirect costs charged to the federal programs. Effect The District has charged unallowable expenditures to the federal programs. Cause The condition identified appears to be due to the District not being familiar with the indirect cost requirements for each of the federal programs. Repeat Finding No. Recommendation It is recommended that the District implements a review process for indirect costs, which should include review of relevant grant agreements and relevant federal guidance.
Federal Program Affected Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555 Compliance Requirement: A/B (Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles) Criteria or Specific Requirements The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to establish indirect cost rates for California local education agencies (LEAs). The CDE has been delegated authority to calculate and approve indirect cost rates annually for LEAs. For the Child Nutrition Cluster in fiscal year 2022-2023, California Education Code Section 38101(c) limits school district indirect costs to the lesser of the District’s individual CDE approved indirect cost rate or the statewide average indirect rate. Condition The District charged unallowable indirect costs totaling $60,501 to the Child Nutrition Cluster. Questioned Costs The condition identified above resulted in $60,501 of questioned costs for unallowable indirect costs charged to the grant funds. Context The condition was identified through recalculation of the indirect costs charged to the federal programs. Effect The District has charged unallowable expenditures to the federal programs. Cause The condition identified appears to be due to the District not being familiar with the indirect cost requirements for each of the federal programs. Repeat Finding No. Recommendation It is recommended that the District implements a review process for indirect costs, which should include review of relevant grant agreements and relevant federal guidance.
Federal Program Affected Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555 Compliance Requirement: A/B (Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles) Criteria or Specific Requirements The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to establish indirect cost rates for California local education agencies (LEAs). The CDE has been delegated authority to calculate and approve indirect cost rates annually for LEAs. For the Child Nutrition Cluster in fiscal year 2022-2023, California Education Code Section 38101(c) limits school district indirect costs to the lesser of the District’s individual CDE approved indirect cost rate or the statewide average indirect rate. Condition The District charged unallowable indirect costs totaling $60,501 to the Child Nutrition Cluster. Questioned Costs The condition identified above resulted in $60,501 of questioned costs for unallowable indirect costs charged to the grant funds. Context The condition was identified through recalculation of the indirect costs charged to the federal programs. Effect The District has charged unallowable expenditures to the federal programs. Cause The condition identified appears to be due to the District not being familiar with the indirect cost requirements for each of the federal programs. Repeat Finding No. Recommendation It is recommended that the District implements a review process for indirect costs, which should include review of relevant grant agreements and relevant federal guidance.
Federal Program Affected Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Pass-Through Entity: California Department of Education (CDE) Program Name: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555 Compliance Requirement: A/B (Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles) Criteria or Specific Requirements The United States Department of Education has approved a delegation agreement with the California Department of Education (CDE) that authorizes the CDE to establish indirect cost rates for California local education agencies (LEAs). The CDE has been delegated authority to calculate and approve indirect cost rates annually for LEAs. For the Child Nutrition Cluster in fiscal year 2022-2023, California Education Code Section 38101(c) limits school district indirect costs to the lesser of the District’s individual CDE approved indirect cost rate or the statewide average indirect rate. Condition The District charged unallowable indirect costs totaling $60,501 to the Child Nutrition Cluster. Questioned Costs The condition identified above resulted in $60,501 of questioned costs for unallowable indirect costs charged to the grant funds. Context The condition was identified through recalculation of the indirect costs charged to the federal programs. Effect The District has charged unallowable expenditures to the federal programs. Cause The condition identified appears to be due to the District not being familiar with the indirect cost requirements for each of the federal programs. Repeat Finding No. Recommendation It is recommended that the District implements a review process for indirect costs, which should include review of relevant grant agreements and relevant federal guidance.